
Octopus Energy issues urgent warning to households which will see meters deactivated this month
Octopus Energy has warned customers with an outdated radio teleswitch (RTS) to get a smart meter before the old ones stop working at the end of this month.
The major energy supplier explained RTS meters, which were first introduced in the 1980s, use longwave radio signals from the BBC's RTS meters to switch meters between peak and off-peak rates.
However, the equipment which broadcasts the signal will be switched off on 30 June – which will affect more than 600,000 customers.
Jan Shortt, the general secretary of the National Pensioners Convention, said many of those living in homes affected by the RTS meters switch-off will be older people.
'A good proportion may not even be aware they have such a meter, or if they do, won't know they are about to be switched off,' she said.
The energy supplier explained that if you have a large black box next to your meter, you may have an RTS meter.
Octopus Energy is now deploying additional engineers to ensure all properties with outdated meters can switch to smart meters before the deadline, in hopes of minimising disruptions.
It has also fast-tracked the switch for its customers, covering nearly a quarter of affected households.
John Szymik, CEO of Octopus Energy Services, said: "Octopus has boosted its service capability to offer fast-tracked assistance and ensure that no one is left without heating.
'We urge all affected customers, of any supplier, to book their meter exchange now to ensure a smooth transition."
Those who do not make the switch in time may be overcharged for electricity or see their hot water and heating cut off.
Explaining the switch off in a YouTube video, Greg Jackson, CEO of Octopus Energy, said: 'This isn't one of those usual messages where energy companies are trying to get you to use a smart meter, this is specifically for the 2.5 per cent of customers which have these RTS meters that are going to stop working later this year.
'It's really important to make the switch as soon as possible because as we are changing these meters so resources will be tight, and we can't leave it all to the last minute.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
37 minutes ago
- BBC News
Post Office scandal couple say it was 'impossible' to prove loss
A couple who were wrongly convicted of stealing money from their Post Office have said it was "almost impossible" to prove the financial damage they Barber and her husband Norman lost their home and business over a £5,600 deficit caused by the Horizon accounting system at their Thelwall Post Office in Warrington. They received 12-month community orders, but said that even though their convictions were quashed they could not have their claim for compensation looked at individually because they were asked to provide evidence going back 15 couple said they had to accept a set £600,000 pay-out as a result. More than 900 people were prosecuted and 236 were sent to prison as a reult of financial losses caused by the faulty Horizon computer system. Mrs Barber said: "We were being asked to produce evidence we simply couldn't get our hands on with regards to our losses as we are talking going back 15 years."We found it almost impossible to provide the details needed to go down the route of having our case individually assessed."It just didn't seem worth it."The 55-year-old added: "It got to the stage where, when the £600,000 was offered, it seemed the best way to bring years of torture to an end."She said that the couple had spent about £200,000 trying to balance the books during their time using the Horizon system. One of the final reports into the Horizon scandal is due to be published on one law firm involved in representing people affected by it said it still had more than 700 compensation cases that needed to be resolved. Solicitor Neil Hudgell said his firm had agreed damages for more than 300 people, totalling £170 million, but said the process had "far too much red tape to get through".He said: "It has been retraumatising for many, and increasing numbers are sadly passing away without seeing redress."In a statement, the Department for Business and Trade said: "We are grateful for the inquiry's work, which has revealed the immeasurable suffering that victims of the scandal have endured."This government has quadrupled the total amount paid to affected postmasters to provide them with full and fair redress, with more than £1 billion having now been paid to over 7,300 claimants." Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now Starmer faces Labour revolt over desperate efforts to curb spiralling £11bn special needs education spending
Keir Starmer is facing another huge Labour revolt as the government struggles to get a grip on special needs funding. MPs and campaigners are gearing up for a confrontation with ministers on a new front after Keir Starmer was forced into an humiliating climbdown on welfare reforms last week. Battle lines emerged when Bridget Phillipson refused to commit to keeping Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs) in an interview yesterday. Holding an EHCP gives a child the legal right to a specific package of support, including one-to-one assistance, specialist equipment and dedicated speech and language therapy. However, there has been an alarming increase in the number of children with a care plan from 240,000 a decade ago to 638,000. There were almost 98,000 new EHCPs issued in 2024, a 16 per cent rise on the previous year's figure. The most common type of need for those with a plan is autistic spectrum disorder. A report by the National Audit Office last year warned that the system was 'financially unsustainable' and risked forcing councils into bankruptcy. A 'statutory override' that effectively allows local authorities to ignore funding shortfalls is due to expire next March. The IFS think-tank highlighted in December that central government funding for high needs had reached £11billion a year, up 59 per cent in real terms since 2015–16. That accounted for half of the total real-terms rise in school funding over the same period. Just over £1.5billion was earmarked for transporting SEN pupils aged up to 16 in 2024-25. That was up from £1.2billion the previous year - and around three times the level from 2017-18. The overall schools budget in England was around £64billion last year. Ms Phillipson yesterday said that a review due in the autumn would ensure children would get the 'support maintained that they need'. But she repeatedly dodged on whether they would retain the legal right to extra help guaranteed by the EHCP system. She told the BBC the situation was 'tough' and suggested that more children may have to have their needs met through mainstream education. She said the current system was 'too adversarial, it takes too long, it's too bureaucratic'. 'I do think we need to just take a step back and think about how do we build a better system that is more timely, more effective and actually maximises support including for children with complex needs,' Ms Phillipson said. Options thought to be under consideration including phasing out EHCPs or restricting them to children with the most profound needs. However, one Labour MP told the Guardian: 'This could be a massive problem. We are hoping there will be proper engagement around it, but we are worried about some of the signals we are picking up.' Another said: 'People are really, really worried about this. It is one of the things that is going to make people feel very, very uncomfortable.' A letter to the paper signed by dozens of campaigners - including Jane Asher, the actor and president of the National Autistic Society - said EHCPs must be kept to avoid thousands of children being 'denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether'. The most common type of need for those with an EHC plan is autistic spectrum disorder, DfE said


Daily Mail
40 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Government-backed motability scheme that could get you a free car
By Taxpayers are funding cars for people with conditions including 'constipation', 'tennis elbow' and 'anxiety'. New figures reveal the government-backed Motability scheme is also being used to provide vehicles for drivers who have abused alcohol or drugs. Motability was set up to help those with serious physical disabilities get around. But the bloated scheme is now being used by people with a wide variety of ailments. A table shows they include over 32,000 new motors for people suffering anxiety or other depressive disorders, while 40 cars went to people with 'tennis elbow', a condition which the NHS advises 'usually goes away with rest'. A further 20 people suffering from constipation made use of Motability, along with 190 who had 'social phobia', the official figures show. Ten people struggling with a 'failure to thrive' got a taxpayer-funded car, and so did another 20 with a 'food intolerance'. A full breakdown of the figures was released in response to a Parliamentary Question and published by the Guido Fawkes website which said some £600million was funnelled from the Department for Work and Pensions into the scheme in 2024, and, as of April, some 589,000 benefits claimants in England and Wales have the publicly-subsidised cars. The way the scheme works, eligible benefit claimants – meaning those who receive an enhanced rate for qualifying mobility difficulties - can choose to swap a portion of their payments for a new car, scooter or powered wheelchair. The figures show that 800 cars have gone to people with obesity and 230 to those with Tourette's syndrome. Some 770 people with 'alcohol misuse' conditions and another 220 with drug misuse issues lease cars from Motability. The campaign group Crush Crime claims it is 'easier for a drunk-driver to get a free car than a lifetime driving ban', adding: 'Yes, they can get a car BECAUSE they have an alcohol problem.' Motability stressed that 'anyone with an unspent drink-driving conviction cannot drive our vehicles'. Motability came under fire recently as it emerged people online boasted of gaming the system to get new cars 'basically free'. Incredibly, the publicly-funded private company is now so big it buys one in five new cars sold in Britain – and friends or relatives of Motability customers can drive them too. The boss earns £750,000 and – as the Mail revealed earlier this year – Motability is sitting on a £4billion stockpile. Meanwhile TikTok 'influencers' are fuelling the Motability scandal by encouraging Britons to cash in on brand new cars. A non-refundable advance payment based on the value of the vehicle due at the outset is required, but at a significantly lower cost. The scheme has been coming under fire for months amid fears the system is being abused. The boom in claimants, who must be in receipt of benefits in the form of the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) or the Disability Living Allowance (DLA), has proved lucrative for Motability, whose turnover soared to £7billion last year. Meanwhile Motability Operations, the company behind the Motability charity, is sitting on a surplus of £4billion - all of which is stemming from taxpayers' money. One TikTok 'influencer', masking his full face with a red balaclava, handed out tips to claim a £31,000 car for 'essentially free'. He tells his 25,000 followers the best way to obtain PIP and Motability, even advising people to take the Government to court if they are turned down. In one video, he reveals the best way to cash in on an Abarth 695 Sport, worth around £31,000, saying: 'To get this car, all you have to do is pay £599... but there's a catch. You have to be in the Motability scheme, meaning you have to be getting PIP, more specifically the Motability aspect of it. You need to get 12 points of that, however if you have a family member on PIP or if you are on PIP yourself you can exchange your allowance to get this car.' In other videos, first reported by The Sun, he advises his followers how to find out if they are eligible for the Motability scheme and reveals how he acquired his Seat Arona, worth up to £29,850, 'for free'. Filming a video while driving around in the car, he says: 'A question I get asked a lot is how did I get my car completely free? I've got this car completely free, so the way I got this car was through the Motability scheme. 'The way I got this car was going into a dealership, giving them the letter, them confirming the benefit and just getting the car ordered... it came within four days.' Another user shared a video boasting how her four-year-old autistic daughter can be 'driven around in style' after the family replaced their Vauxhall Zafira with a flash new Skoda Kodiaq. The vehicle is usually worth around £36,000 but can be leased for £3,299 on the Motability scheme. Motability claimants are supposed to prove they struggle to leave their home or cannot plan and follow a journey route without help to get the required '12 points'. John O'Connell, at the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'The Government must look at the criteria before this situation gets worse.' Motability Operations, which runs the Motability scheme, said: 'To use the Motability Scheme, you must receive a higher rate mobility allowance. Eligibility for the allowance is determined and awarded by the Government.' The Department for Work and Pensions, which makes the decisions on who is eligible for disability benefit claims, said: 'People in receipt of an eligible benefit can choose to join the Motability Scheme. Any misuse of the scheme is a matter for Motability and, where appropriate, the police.' One of the most notorious incidents involving a Motability recipient hit the headlines in May last year when a couple called Bernard (pictured) and Ann McDonagh were convicted of a string of 'dine and dash' offences. When the McDonaghs and their children went to the Bella Ciao restaurant in Swansea one day last April, they were clearly in the mood to splash out. Their main courses included the two most expensive items on the menu – T-bone and fillet steaks – and when it came to pudding they ordered 'double desserts'. 'They wanted two brownies on a plate,' the owner of the restaurant said later. But when the time came to settle the £329 bill for her party of five, Mrs McDonagh tried to pay with a savings account card. After this had been declined twice, she told the proprietor: 'I'm going to go to the car to get another card, I'll leave my son here as proof that you can trust me.' Unfortunately, for Bella Ciao's bottom line, McDonagh Jr made a run for it shortly afterwards and the family made their escape in a blue Ford Transit van. It later emerged that the McDonaghs had been given the brand-new vehicle by Motability on a three-year lease but, far from putting them on the road to productive employment, it became their getaway vehicle. Their choice of a Ford Transit is illustrative of the range of models that are available to Motability's clients, who are presented with an eye-catching catalogue of gleaming new vehicles. By handing over £60 of their weekly PIP mobility benefit, a claimant can find themselves driving away with an all-electric Dacia Spring – retail price £15,000 – for no upfront cost . In exchange for the full £75.75 weekly allowance, a claimant can 'purchase' a petrol Nissan Juke SUV – retail price £23,000. For people in dire need of assistance with transportation owing to a disability, these vehicles can be essential to their physical and mental wellbeing. But it becomes less clear as to the immediate benefits to the taxpayer when you look further down the list of vehicles purchased by Motability – which enjoys zero VAT on the hire and resale of its vehicles. For an upfront payment of £7,999, customers can walk away with a brand-new BMW i4 M Sport, which retails at £50,000 and accelerates from 0-60mph in five seconds, or, for the same upfront price, a Mercedes-Benz CLA Coupe. Once the lease on a vehicle is up, Motability sells it on the open market, with the profits going back into the company. Labour peer John Mann (pictured), who has previously raised concerns about the company, says: 'Motability is making too much money. It needs tighter criteria. There needs to be a return of some of this money they have accrued to the exchequer. I also question why it is necessary for its customers to change to a new vehicle so regularly. Cars last a long time and the whole point of Motability must be to help people live a normal life. Three years per car is too short a time-frame.'