logo
Tasmanian Aboriginal resistance warriors battled against overwhelming power, but have no recognition

Tasmanian Aboriginal resistance warriors battled against overwhelming power, but have no recognition

It evokes one of the most powerful scenes in Tasmanian history.
On January 7, 1832, the last 16 Aboriginal warriors from the Oyster Bay-Big River resistance walked down Elizabeth Street in Hobart, spears in hand.
WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that this article contains images of a person who has died.
The warriors were on their way to meet governor George Arthur at Government House to finalise an armistice, bringing an end to the largest domestic military offensive in Australian history.
The Black Line.
The leader of the Aboriginal resistance to this show of force was Tongerlongeter, a man who paid the ultimate price for defending everything he ever knew against the overwhelming might of British colonial power.
"He'd lost nearly everyone he'd ever loved, his first wife had been abducted, never to be seen again," Dr Clements said.
"He'd lost his child. He'd lost his arm in battle.
Tongerlongeter — like others defending their lands against the world's most powerful empire — is not recognised in statues, memorials or plaques.
The scene could not have been more different than one from 60 years earlier, when European explorers first started landing in Van Diemen's Land.
Dr Clements describes these explorers as curious and generally well-intentioned towards Aboriginal people — compared with what was to come.
As colonial expansion rapidly increased by the 1820s, there was soon conflict.
The kidnap of women and girls by sealers and some settlers, and the competition for scarce resources, like kangaroos, saw the start of more organised Aboriginal resistance taking in multiple bands, led by men like Tongerlongeter.
"Tongerlongeter was defending his homeland, but there were more proximate causes. For example, the systematic abduction, rape, and murder of Aboriginal women and children," Dr Clements said.
Aboriginal people would attack solitary huts during the day, while Europeans would attack at night, Dr Clement said.
Then came the Black Line — the conscription of 2,200 soldiers, convicts and settlers to capture the remaining Aboriginal people.
While the campaign itself was largely unsuccessful, the show of force proved overwhelming to Tongerlongeter.
Historic records show he suffered a catastrophic injury to his arm, requiring amputation by his comrades without anaesthetic, the bone ground smooth with rock before the wound was cauterised.
The group agreed to an armistice, or truce, but in their ultimate meeting in Hobart, Dr Clements notes that governor Arthur did not keep records of what was discussed.
Tongerlongeter and the others were exiled to Flinders Island, losing his only child on the way.
But he continued to be a leader while in exile, before dying of illness in 1837, aged 47.
"We just need to get over this sense that this wasn't a legitimate war and that these people don't deserve the same sort of recognition as those who fought in our overseas conflicts," Dr Clements said.
"It should be a conversation for all Tasmanians so that we can all feel a part of this because, after all, someone like Tongerlongeter, we can all admire a man like that.
The idea of women and girls being kidnapped from their families to live with sealers on remote islands is something that Nala Mansell often reflects on.
It was the reality faced by Walyer — a young north-west Tasmanian Aboriginal in the 1820s.
"Her childhood would have included freedom, culture, being taught by her elders," Ms Mansell said.
"I can only imagine the terror that she would have felt … being captured and kidnapped and taken to a foreign island with white men that she'd never seen before.
Walyer was known for her determined attitude and cunning nature, likely driven by the trauma she had experienced. She observed the use of firearms by her captors, and was able to escape.
Walyer engaged in forms of violent resistance; Ms Mansell said she led others in helping to cause terror among white settlers in Tasmania's north.
She was again taken to remote islands, where her resistance continued to the end.
"I just think she embodies the Palawa spirit," Ms Mansell said.
Walyer — and the other women and girls kidnapped during the Tasmanian colonial period — are also not physically recognised in the state.
The Tasmanian government this week announced it was no longer pursuing a treaty with the state's Aboriginal people and would instead establish a truth-telling and healing commission.
There was previously a push, which included the RSL, to establish a memorial to the frontier conflict near the cenotaph in Hobart, but this ultimately did not go ahead.
Tasmania is also the only state that does not have an Aboriginal-run cultural centre, originally proposed for Macquarie Point, but now also cancelled.
Instead, plaques and monuments — such as one that celebrates Abel Tasmania for his "discovery" of Tasmania — have prominent positions, remaining a source of frustration for the Aboriginal community.
That plaque sits on the public-facing side of a government building in Launceston, used as offices for the Tasmanian premier.
Ms Mansell said stories of Aboriginal resistance are vital for Tasmanians to be aware of and to reflect on.
"It's up to the state government or the local councils who have the ability and the funds to be able to install some type of acknowledgement, but to work without the Aboriginal community so that we can find ways to honour and celebrate Aboriginal people," she said.
In a statement earlier this week, Aboriginal Affairs Minister Jacquie Petrusma said the truth-telling and healing commissioners would promote respect and self-determination.
"It is a critical and necessary step towards recognising past injustices, gaining a greater understanding of the contemporary challenges being faced by Tasmanian Aboriginal people, and making real progress in healing the wounds of the past," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hobart couple buy former student boarding house for older women at risk of homelessness
Hobart couple buy former student boarding house for older women at risk of homelessness

ABC News

time35 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Hobart couple buy former student boarding house for older women at risk of homelessness

It was while offering short-term stays to women in need that retirees Richard and Jan Gould heard first-hand of the depth of Tasmania's growing housing affordability issues. Moved by the stories they were confronted with, the Goulds resolved to try to make a difference in their community by offering their own low-cost housing solution. "So, we are consulting widely with charities to see if we've hit the mark on what the people who come to them would want." After moving to Hobart from Sydney three years ago, the couple had been providing accommodation to vulnerable women at a short-stay rental property they own. One by one, they met women from all walks of life, with the common thread being their visitors were unable to afford the increasing cost of private rentals. Some stayed at their place for just a week, others for closer to six months. Mr Gould said it opened their eyes to how big the housing crisis is, and how it was having a disproportionate impact on older women, who are often lower on the priority lists at social housing providers. This could make a great affordable housing property, and specifically for women. "It was a no-brainer." In June, they purchased a 10-bedroom, five-bathroom home in South Hobart — formerly used by The University of Tasmania's Jane Franklin Hall for student accommodation — with savings from their superannuation. The intention is to offer stable, low-cost housing for older women at risk of homelessness. Ms Gould said it was important to them the property felt like a home for the women, rather than an institution. Since named Blue Sky House, the home will offer private living spaces as well as communal areas for the women to come together to connect. The couple expect most residents would stay for the medium to long-term, but they also anticipate some short-term need. Mr Gould believes having the stability of a secure rental will help the women better recover from possible troubles and trauma and "to lift themselves up out of what is a very depressing situation to be in and often not by their own hand". "My wife likes to think it's going to become a sisterhood." Their goal is to have the property ready for residents by October. Charity organisation Hobart City Mission has praised the couple's philanthropy, but questions whether the provision of essential services typically offered by governments should fall to private citizens. The charity's program manager Ewan Higgs said that while he was full of admiration for the Goulds, he had to ask the question: "why are we having to rely on people putting their retirement savings into a venture that maybe shouldn't need to". He said said having a roof over their heads was also "only one part of the puzzle" in helping homeless people. "We know there are other things that come with that and other complex issues that have led someone to homelessness," Mr Higgs said. "So, it's ensuring that not only do we provide a roof, but provide some of the connections and support. "What we need is a whole-government response that not only pulls in housing but also looks to pull in criminal justice and health. The Goulds said they will continue working with experts in the social housing space to help them best deliver their dream. But first, they need to finish preparing the property and gain council approval for any use and structural changes. The Goulds have also started hunting for preloved items to furnish the property and are in discussions about potential sponsorships with local suppliers. Others in the local community's online Good Karma Network have also volunteered their services. "They're touched by what we're doing and following up with saying that they want to help," Mr Gould said of the architect, builder and gardener who had reached out. The Goulds, in turn, have been touched by the community's support. "It's very heartwarming," Mr Gould said. "We've got to take responsibility for what's happening in our community.

The exposed horror reality for tenants in NSW
The exposed horror reality for tenants in NSW

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

The exposed horror reality for tenants in NSW

A Sydney rental is getting attention for all the wrong reasons, with one disturbing feature leaving potential tenants in shock. A video tour of a Sydney home recently listed for rent has exposed the living conditions some tenants have been expected to endure, with the home alleged to have a trashed kitchen and leaking ceiling. Posted to Instagram by online content creator Jordan van den Lamb, who has garnered a large following from exposing less-than-desirable listings, the video casts the spotlight on a $550 a week listing in the inner west suburb of Burwood. Images reveal a deteriorating kitchen missing cupboards and drawers below the sink. Some of the last remaining doors appear to be hanging barely from hinges. 'So (the agents) describe this place as having a good condition kitchen and bathroom,' Mr Van den Lamb stated in the video. 'But this is the kitchen – if by good they mean, bad, then maybe.' Mr Van den Lamb, who often posts content under the tag 'Sh*t Rentals', revealed in the video that the images were taken from someone from the group's subreddit, who inspected the residence. 'This is a photo of the bedroom ceiling, which just reminds me of really bad psoriasis,' he said. 'So anyways, thanks for wasting this person's time.' The Burwood listing comes off the back of revelations of another Sydney rental in squalid condition, shared via TikTok video. The former tenant alleged that the Petersham rental included a bug infestation throughout the house, a window that could be opened from the outside as well as a random shipping container in the backyard. The creator said she spent $240 a week on rent which was the least out of the sharehouse's nine tenants, with some people paying $350 a week. These rentals have been listed as a prominent tenants' rights group warned recent regulation changes have given NSW tenants a raw deal. The June changes have made it easier for landlords to evict tenants and undermine earlier reforms which sought to make it illegal for tenants to be evicted without reason, according to the Tenants Union of NSW. The Tenants Union pointed to previous requirements for landlords wanting to evict tenants for major repairs or renovations to give a written statement, tradie quotes for required works or proof of development approval. This measure was intended to ensure landlord claims of renovations were genuine and significant enough to warrant eviction and not simply a tactic to unfairly evict tenants, the union said. It claims a move by the NSW government in June to quietly remove this key safeguard, which means landlords do not have to provide the same level of renovations evidence as before, has opened the way for unjust 'renovictions'. The NSW Tenants' Union said the changes open the door to non-genuine 'renovictions'.

Press Council Adjudication
Press Council Adjudication

Daily Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Press Council Adjudication

Don't miss out on the headlines from NSW. Followed categories will be added to My News. The Press Council considered whether its Standards of Practice were breached by an article published in print on 4 December 2024 in The Daily Telegraph headed 'To keep peace at home, Labor backs Hamas'. The article reported that Penny Wong, the Minister for Foreign Affairs 'is set to strengthen Australia's support for a two-state-solution in the Middle East by backing a United Nations vote calling for an 'irreversible pathway' to the measure after abstaining in recent years, in a move the Coalition claims will further open a rift with Israel'. The article attributed comments that the 'Albanese government voting for the measure in the UN after abstaining previously was a play for domestic votes', to the former ambassador to Israel Senator Dave Sharma. The article went on to quote Senator Sharma as saying: 'These potential changes in Australia's UN voting pattern are against our national interests. They will do nothing to advance the cause of peace in the Middle East' and 'All they do is reward Hamas for its terrorist acts. And they further damage Australia's relations with an important partner in the Middle East, Israel. Labor is seeking to placate domestic constituencies, rather than putting Australia's national interests first.' In response to a complaint received, the Council asked the publication to comment on whether the article complied with the Council's Standards of Practice, which require publications to take reasonable steps to ensure that factual material is accurate and not misleading (General Principle 1); to ensure that factual material is presented with reasonable fairness and balance and to ensure that writers' expressions of opinion are not based on significantly inaccurate factual material or omission of key facts (General Principle 3). The Council noted that the complaint raised concerns that the headline does not support the tenor of the article and that it is editorial opinion to state that 'Labor backs Hamas'. In response, the publication said that in the article, Senator Sharma criticised the Albanese government for backing a UN resolution that he claims rewards the terrorist organisation Hamas for its acts of terrorism. The publication said that in this context, the headline reflects the opinion of Senator Sharma and readers would view the headline as accurately reflecting the senator's view. The publication also said that readers can discern the difference between an opposition senators criticism of government decision-making, as opposed to the editorial direction of the publisher. Conclusion The Council recognises the limitations of headlines to reasonably reflect the tenor of an article. The Council also recognises that what constitutes reasonable steps to ensure factual material is accurate and not misleading may vary in the circumstances. In relation to this, the Council considers that publications need to take great care in order to satisfy the reasonable steps standard in the context of heightened community sensitivities around the Israel/Palestine conflict and on matters of significant public interest. In the absence of inverted commas to signify a paraphrase or a quote, the Council considers the headline is presented as statement of fact with the clear implication being that the Labor government is 'backing' Hamas. The Council considers that the headline goes beyond what was said by Senator Sharma in his criticisms of the government support for a two-state-solution in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Council concludes the publication failed to take reasonable steps to ensure factual material is accurate and not misleading in breach of General Principle 1. In noting the complaint is limited to the headline, the Council finds no breach of General Principle 3. For the full Adjudication, see:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store