Dalai Lama says he hopes to live for another 40 years
The spiritual leader Dalai Lama was speaking during a ceremony organised by his followers to offer prayers for his long life, ahead of his 90th birthday on Sunday (July 6, 2025). The Dalai Lama previously told Reuters in December he might live to 110.
'I still hope to live for over 130 years,' the Dalai Lama told hundreds followers from around the world who gathered in the northern Indian hill town of Dharamshala, where he has lived after fleeing Tibet in 1959 in the wake of a failed uprising against Chinese rule.
'We have lost our country and we live in exile in India, but I have been able to benefit beings quite a lot. So, living here in Dharamshala, I intend to serve beings and the dharma as much as I can,' he said, referring to the teachings of the Buddha, according to a translation of his speech.
Beijing views the Dalai Lama as a separatist and has insisted that its leaders would have to approve his successor as a legacy from imperial times.
The Dalai Lama has previously said that he would reincarnate in the 'free world' and this week told his followers that the sole authority to recognise his reincarnation rests solely with his non-profit institution, the Gaden Phodrang Trust.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
39 minutes ago
- Mint
China warns US of retaliation if tariffs return, as Trump targets 14 nations with new duties: ‘Will respond resolutely'
China warned the Trump administration on Tuesday (July 8) against reigniting trade tensions by reinstating tariffs on Chinese goods starting next month. The warning came in response to President Donald Trump's move to notify trade partners of sharply higher tariffs set to begin August 1, unless new agreements are reached. In a strongly worded commentary published by the People's Daily, the ruling Communist Party's official mouthpiece, Beijing said, 'One conclusion is abundantly clear: dialogue and cooperation are the only correct path.' The article was signed under the pseudonym 'Zhong Sheng', a term used by the publication to signal official views on foreign policy. Trump's plan to restore tariffs—initially delayed in April—could unravel the fragile truce both sides reached in June. China now has until August 12 to strike a deal with the US to avoid the reimposition of duties that were paused following earlier tit-for-tat exchanges. The People's Daily commentary dismissed the looming tariff deadline as a 'so-called 'final deadline'', and hinted at renewed retaliation if Washington moves forward unilaterally. According to the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the current average US tariff on Chinese goods stands at 51.1%, while China imposes an average 32.6% duty on US products—both sides now covering the entirety of bilateral trade. China continues to reject Washington's approach, reiterating its stance that the tariffs amount to economic coercion. The People's Daily stated: 'Practice has proven that only by firmly upholding principled positions can one truly safeguard one's legitimate rights and interests.' The editorial also criticised regional economies—without naming specific countries—for considering deals with the US that reroute supply chains away from China. The move was seen as a threat to Beijing's central role in global trade networks. In a veiled reference to Vietnam, which recently secured a tariff reduction on US exports, the paper warned: 'China firmly opposes any side striking a deal that sacrifices Chinese interests in exchange for tariff concessions.' 'If such a situation arises, China will not accept it and will respond resolutely to protect its legitimate interests.' Vietnam reportedly agreed to a tariff cut from 46% to 20%, with goods transshipped from China to be levied at 40%, prompting strong objections from Beijing. US President Donald Trump on Monday (July 7) sent formal letters to 14 countries, including Japan and South Korea, announcing new tariffs ranging from 25% to 40% on imports, effective August 1. The move marks a renewed push to force new trade deals before an earlier-imposed July 9 deadline. The letters cited 'significant trade deficits' and warned of penalties for any retaliatory tariff hikes, stating such moves would be matched 'on top of the 25%' rate. However, the letters also left room for negotiation, with Trump saying the US would 'perhaps consider an adjustment' if trade barriers are removed. Trump offered these countries a chance to avoid tariffs if their firms build or manufacture products in the US. And, if these nations impose retaliatory tariffs, the US would add that amount to the declared base tariff. Goods transshipped to evade tariffs will be subject to the higher rate. The United States has extended the suspension of its reciprocal tariffs, initially announced on April 2, until August 1, offering temporary relief to Indian exporters and allowing more time for trade negotiations between New Delhi and Washington. The suspension, which was set to expire on July 9, has been extended through an executive order issued by the White House. The order cited 'additional information and recommendations from senior officials,' including updates on the progress of discussions with trading partners, as the basis for the extension. 'In light of this information, it is necessary and appropriate to extend the suspension effectuated by Executive Order 14266 until 12:01 a.m. EDT on August 1, 2025,' the White House said. On April 2, President Trump had announced reciprocal tariffs on several countries, including a 26% duty on Indian goods, but implementation was paused for 90 days to give partners time to negotiate trade deals with the US.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-US mini trade deal: Will the mega problem remain?
Just before his July 9 deadline, US President Donald Trump sent letters slapping tariffs on several countries, excluding India, which haven't made trade deals with the US. Trump said the US is close to making a trade deal with India. Trade negotiators from Washington and New Delhi held long-drawn negotiations, but disagreements over dairy and agriculture sectors remained the sticking points. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has said India won't make any deal under pressure of a deadline. Yet, as per media reports, a mini trade deal between the US and India is imminent and might be announced tonight. This would mean India and the US have agreed to go ahead with sectors and products where agreement could be reached. But the mini trade deal will not mean India's Trump challenge will vanish. While it can offer India significant benefits, it will buy a fragile peace with Trump because the problematic issues will remain and have to be negotiated. On the surface, a mini trade deal may seem like a diplomatic breakthrough, but this reprieve might be temporary. The Trump doctrine of aggressive, transactional diplomacy means that India might continue to face erratic trade pressure from the US even after a short-term agreement is inked. Also Read: How India can play hardball with Trump and win Unresolved core disputes At the heart of the stalled trade talks are India's dairy and agriculture sectors, the areas that have remained politically sensitive and economically vital for the Indian government. The US has long demanded broader market access for its dairy and agricultural products, citing non-tariff barriers and regulatory restrictions as unfair protectionism. India, on the other hand, has made it clear that these sectors are non-negotiable. Indian dairy, for instance, is heavily reliant on small farmers, and allowing US dairy, especially from hormone-treated and meat-fed cattle, into the Indian market could devastate domestic producers and will be culturally unacceptable. Similarly, agricultural subsidies and minimum support prices form the backbone of India's rural economy and food security strategy. These cannot be compromised without causing political and social unrest. Even if these issues are temporarily sidestepped in a mini trade deal, they remain ticking time bombs for future negotiations. Live Events Trump's tariff diplomacy as a pressure tactic Trump has turned tariffs into a geopolitical weapon. From China to the EU to even traditional allies like Canada and Mexico, Trump has shown that he's willing to use tariff threats not just for trade imbalances but also for diplomatic leverage. India is no exception. In fact, Trump has repeatedly claimed that he threatened India with tariffs to deter it from going to war with Pakistan, a highly questionable but revealing statement which has been vigorously refuted by India. This shows that trade under Trump is not just about economics, but about dominance and unpredictability. Even if a mini deal is signed now, it does not ensure lasting calm. Trump could very well return with fresh demands, unrelated to trade, and use tariff threats to enforce compliance, whether on strategic alignments, defense purchases, or even foreign policy decisions like India's stance on Russia. Perhaps the biggest challenge in dealing with Trump is the absence of predictability. His sudden moves or tweeting tariff threats at odd hours make it nearly impossible for long-term planning. For India, this means that even sectors that have not yet come under pressure could be dragged into future conflicts at any time. A mini deal might create short-term relief, but it is no shield against future policy reversals or impulsive trade actions. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has publicly stated that India will not work under any deadline pressure. This is a strong and principled stance. But deadlines aren't the only tools Trump uses. He is equally effective with ambiguity and sudden policy shifts. The absence of a formal deadline does not mean India will be free from coercive tactics. A tweet, a press conference or a sudden tariff hike can achieve what a deadline might fail to do. Moreover, India's relative dependence on the US for exports, especially in the services and pharmaceutical sectors, makes it vulnerable to punitive actions, even if not directly related to dairy or agriculture. India's foreign policy has historically emphasized strategic autonomy. But under Trump's transactional worldview, strategic autonomy can be seen as resistance. Whether it's India buying oil from Iran, procuring defense equipment from Russia or taking a neutral stance in US-China rivalry, Trump has often viewed such moves as acts of defiance. This will put India in a difficult position. Any attempt to assert its national interest in global affairs could be punished through tariffs or trade threats. A mini deal, therefore, does not offer protection from the possibility of Trump's coercive actions. "Trump's model isn't a free trade agreement, it's a YATRA - Yielding to American Tariff Retaliation Agreement," Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) Founder Ajay Srivastava has said. A mini trade deal between India and the US, if announced, will be a welcome development for India, but it may still have the big task of building long-term economic resilience and diversifying its trade partnerships. Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
43 minutes ago
- First Post
Japan and South Korea seek tariff relief in talks with US before August deadline
Trump escalated his trade battle on Monday, informing 14 countries that they will face duties ranging from 25% for Japan and South Korea to 40% for Laos and Myanmar read more Advertisement Employees work at Pyeongtaek port in Pyeongtaek, South Korea. Reuters Powerhouse Asian economies Japan and South Korea said on Tuesday that they will try to negotiate with the United States to mitigate the impact of much higher tariffs that President Donald Trump now expects to apply beginning in August. Trump escalated his trade battle on Monday, informing 14 countries that they will face duties ranging from 25% for Japan and South Korea to 40% for Laos and Myanmar. However, with the start date moved out to August 1, those nations were focussing on the new three-week timeframe to advocate for a smoother ride. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Japan's senior trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, stated on Tuesday that it seeks concessions for its big vehicle sector. Akazawa said he held a 40-minute phone call with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in which the two agreed to actively continue negotiations. However, he said he would not sacrifice Japan's agriculture sector - a powerful political lobby domestically - for the sake of an early deal. South Korea said it planned to intensify trade talks over the coming weeks 'to reach a mutually beneficial result.' Asked if the latest deadline was firm, Trump replied on Monday: 'I would say firm but not 100% firm. If they call up and they say we'd like to do something a different way, we're going to be open to that.' Global stocks were flat to marginally higher on Tuesday, as investors took in their stride the latest twist in the tariff saga, but the yen slid on the prospect of duties on Japanese goods. Economists warned that the long-running tariff disputes risked stunting growth and pushing up prices, causing headaches for policymakers. 'The ongoing threat of higher tariffs intensifies stagflationary risks in the U.S. and puts pressure on Europe to stimulate domestic demand further in order to offset headwinds in international trade,' said David Kohl, chief economist at Swiss-based bank Julius Baer. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD European Union eyes deal The European Union, which is the largest bilateral trade partner of the U.S., aims to strike a deal before August 1 with negotiations focused on 'rebalancing' and concessions for certain key export industries, a European source familiar with the negotiations said. However, German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil warned that the EU was prepared to retaliate if necessary. 'If we don't reach a fair trade deal with the U.S., the EU is ready to take counter measures,' Klingbeil said on Tuesday, speaking in the lower house of parliament. Some EU sources had said late on Monday that the bloc was close to an agreement with the Trump administration. This could involve limited concessions to U.S. baseline tariffs of 10% for aircraft and parts, some medical equipment and spirits. Only two deals have been struck so far, with Britain and Vietnam. Washington and Beijing agreed to a trade framework in June, but with many of the details still unclear, traders and investors are watching to see if it unravels before a separate, U.S.-imposed August 12 deadline or leads to a lasting detente. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Spreading the pain Trump said the United States would impose tariffs of 25% on goods from Tunisia, Malaysia and Kazakhstan, with levies of 30% on South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina, climbing to 32% on Indonesia, 35% on Serbia and Bangladesh, 36% on Cambodia and Thailand and 40% on Laos and Myanmar. Cambodia, hit hard by levies imposed in April, on Tuesday hailed as a big success a reduction in the tariff rate from 49% to 36% and said it was seeking to negotiate a further cut. The tariffs have been an issue for Cambodia's garments and footwear sector, a major employer and the biggest driver of its economy. The U.S. is also the main export market for Bangladesh's ready-made garments industry, which accounts for more than 80% of its export earnings and employs 4 million people. 'This is absolutely shocking news for us,' Mahmud Hasan Khan, president of Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association, told Reuters on Tuesday. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'We were really hoping the tariffs would be somewhere between 10-20%. This will hurt our industry badly.'
