Supreme Court Keeps Affordable Care Act Coverage For Preventive Services—At Least For Now
A demonstrator holds up a pro-Affordable Care Act sign outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 10, ... More 2020. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images
This story is breaking and will be updated.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
30 minutes ago
- Forbes
Can Primary Care Survive Burnout, Bureaucracy, And A Broken System?
The fading art of the family doctor—will tradition survive the future of healthcare? Remember the primary care physician of yore? The doctor out of a Norman Rockwell illustration who knew you, your parents, your children, who was your trusted confidant, who you turned to for every sore throat and annual physical. Today, that relationship feels like a quaint relic, replaced by rushed visits, rotating clinicians, and an endless amount of paperwork. Today, this backbone of healthcare is facing a hard reboot. Burnout, bureaucratic bloat, and disruptive market forces are testing its resilience. But is this the end of the family doctor — or the birth of a reimagined model? The Perfect Storm: A Specialty Under Siege The numbers paint a dire picture. The shortage of physicians is being driven by an aging population and by aging physicians themselves — over a third of PCPs are over 55 — while fewer than 30% of residents plan to enter traditional primary care, with most opting for better-paying specialty roles. A new AAMC study projects a shortfall of 37,800 to 124,000 physicians by 2034, with primary care physicians (PCPs) bearing the brunt. Compounding the crisis: only 85 PCPs exist per 100,000 Americans, a ratio woefully inadequate for an aging, chronically ill population. What's more, if you are one of the 50 million Americans who reside in rural areas, only 9% of the nation's physicians practice in these communities. The culprit? There are a few. A system that puts paperwork over patients. PCPs spend two hours on paperwork for each hour of direct patient time. This includes time treadmilling on administrative tasks and EHR (Electronic Health Records) event logs and prior authorizations. Add stagnant reimbursements and median student debt exceeding $200,000, and the primary care exodus becomes both understandable and inevitable. The Reinvention Game Plan Fortunately, necessity is the mother of invention. Across the country, new thinking is rewriting the rules: Technology at the Bedside New tools promise to offload burdens and personalize care. Under recent Medicare rule changes, physicians can bill for remote patient monitoring and virtual check-ins, opening revenue streams and supporting proactive outreach. Why Retail Clinics Can't Fill the Gap Big players like CVS and Walmart promised disruption and primary care for everyone with much-touted retail clinics, but many have closed amid disappointing patient engagement. Consumers consider retail health as transactional — a quick fix for a sore throat, perhaps not as long of a wait as urgent care, but not for managing chronic disease or complex care plans. Without the deep, long-term relationships that PCPs cultivate, outcomes suffer, and trust Can Patients Do About All This? While the system evolves, patients also play a crucial role in preserving and improving primary care. The stakes are high: studies show that patients with a consistent primary care relationship have better health outcomes, lower costs, and fewer hospitalizations. 'As a family physician, I've seen firsthand how having a trusted primary care doctor can truly change the course of someone's life,' says Sarah C. Nosal, MD, FAAFP, President-Elect of the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). 'When patients have a usual source of care—someone who knows their health history, understands their goals, and can guide their health journey—they're more likely to stay on top of preventive care, manage chronic conditions, and avoid unnecessary hospital visits. Family medicine is about connection, continuity, and ultimately, better health and longer lives.' Here's how you can advocate for your health and your doctor: 6. Understand Your Insurance • Learn what preventive services (e.g., vaccines, screenings) are fully covered under your plan to avoid surprise bills. The future of family doctors hinges on both systemic reform and everyday choices. While clinicians and policymakers wrestle with large-scale solutions, patients wield surprising power—by demanding continuity, leveraging technology thoughtfully, and investing in relationships with their PCPs. These small acts compound into transformative change: preserving the human core of primary care while embracing innovation. The result? Better health outcomes today, and a blueprint for a system where the future of family doctors isn't just secure, but sustainable.
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
The Bulletin June 21, 2025
The rundown: The issue of animal testing is something most Americans agree on: it needs to change and gradually be stopped. Since President Donald Trump began his second term, his administration has been making moves to transform and reduce animal testing in country. Find out what steps are being taken. Why it matters: In April, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said that its animal testing requirement will be "reduced, refined, or potentially replaced" with a range of approaches, including artificial intelligence-based models, known as New Approach Methodologies or NAMs data. The Trump administration's efforts to tackle the issue of animal testing appear to be a step in the right direction, according to experts who spoke with Newsweek. Read more in-depth coverage: Over 300 Animals Removed From US Safari After Decade of Red Flags TL/DR: Millions of animals each year are killed in U.S. laboratories as part of medical training and chemical, food, drug and cosmetic testing. What happens now? A Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) official told Newsweek: "The agency is paving the way for faster, safer, and more cost-effective treatments for American patients.' Deeper reading How Animal Testing in US Could Be Transformed Under Trump
Vox
2 hours ago
- Vox
Ultra-processed foods: A patriotic American tradition!
covers health for Vox, guiding readers through the emerging opportunities and challenges in improving our health. He has reported on health policy for more than 10 years, writing for Governing magazine, Talking Points Memo, and STAT before joining Vox in 2017. Eating a hot dog on July Fourth isn't just traditional. It's patriotic. From iconic red, white, and blue rocket pops (hello, Red Dye 40!) to nitrate-loaded hot dogs and the all-day parade of sugary drinks and alcohol, this quintessential American holiday is a celebration of freedom — and, often, dietary chaos. And yet these days, many of us seem to be having second thoughts about the American diet. Our food is too processed, too loaded with dyes and preservatives. The country's obesity and diabetes epidemics, which have led to an explosion in the diagnoses of related chronic health conditions, have put the issue front and center, with much of the blame being placed on what we eat and all of the additives and preservatives it contains. About half of US adults believe food additives and chemicals are a large or moderate risk to their health — higher than the perceived risks of infectious disease outbreaks or climate change, according to a recent poll from Ipsos, a global market research firm. We all worry about microplastics, nitrates, food dyes, and ultra-processed foods. And US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made improving Americans' diets and our food supply a top priority. It's a policy emphasis that's popular with the public: Two-thirds of US adults believe artificial dyes and pesticides make our foods unsafe to eat — and these are opinions that transcend political leanings, according to Ipsos. Related 40 maps that explain food in America And regardless of our entrenched food system, people are trying to make healthier decisions in their daily lives: 64 percent of US adults say they pay more attention to food labels than they did five years ago, according to the public health nonprofit NSF International. But we are frustrated: Only 16 percent of Americans say they find claims on food labels trustworthy. It may sound unbelievable on a holiday when Americans will gladly stuff their faces with ultra-processed junk while wearing flag-laden paraphernalia, but these days, many of us actually wish the products in our grocery stores looked a little more like the ones across the Atlantic. Just 37 percent of American adults said in the NSF International survey that our food labeling was better than in other countries. Most Americans say they want changes to how foods at our grocery stores are labeled. American food really is different from what can be found in Europe, both in its substance and in its packaging. But while we're probably not doing any favors to our health by consuming ultraprocessed foods loaded with artificial ingredients that are banned elsewhere, the biggest source of our health woes isn't necessarily these artificial dyes and preservatives. It's the cholesterol and saturated fat in that hot dog, the sugar in that lemonade, and those ultra-processed potato chips. Americans consume about twice as much sugar as other rich countries do on average, eat more ultra-processed foods, and consume more trans and saturated fats than Europeans. We also eat enormous portions, and calories, no matter where they come from, are a big part of the problem. Americans are generally in poorer health than our peers in Europe, and US life expectancy continues to trail behind other wealthy countries. Rich Americans actually fare worse than poor Europeans, according to one study. A new era of American greatness starts at the picnic table this July Fourth. Yes, we ostensibly rebelled against an English monarchy in order to be able to do whatever we want, even eat whatever we want. But if we want to catch up to our European rivals again in how healthy we feel, how productive we are, and how long we live — we need to take a closer look at the stuff we're putting in our bodies. American food really does have different stuff in it Doctors widely agree that ultra-processed foods and food additives are bad for children's health. Yet they have become more and more readily available over the decades: One 2023 study found 60 percent of the food that Americans buy has additives, a 10 percent increase since 2001. Kennedy, the head of the Department of Health and Human Services, the country's top health agency, has made overhauling US food production a top priority. His department's recent MAHA report highlights steps taken by other countries, including France and the Nordic countries, to discourage people through their dietary guidelines from eating ultra-processed foods. The report lists several additives and artificial ingredients that are permitted in American food but are banned or heavily restricted across the pond. Kennedy suggests that the US should follow suit. So where might we begin? Let's start with Red Dye 40, the color additive found in foods such as Froot Loops and M&Ms that has been linked to hyperactivity in children and, according to some animal studies, has been shown to accelerate tumor growth in mice. The US has not placed any special requirements on Red Dye 40, aside from its listing alongside other ingredients. But the European Union has required a clear warning label on any food with the dye, and some countries (including Germany, France, and Denmark) have banned it outright. A similar warning could be adopted here. There are other additives casually lurking in American foods that have been restricted in other countries. Here are a few: Titanium dioxide: Another food coloring that can be added to candies like Skittles and coffee creamers for a bright white effect. The EU banned it in 2022 because of Another food coloring that can be added to candies like Skittles and coffee creamers for a bright white effect. The EU banned it in 2022 because of evidence it could affect the human body's genetic material, while the US continues to allow its use. Propyl paraben: This preservative is regarded as safe in the US, often This preservative is regarded as safe in the US, often added to mass-produced American baked goods such as Sara Lee cinnamon rolls or Weight Watchers lemon creme cake. But its use has been prohibited in the EU because of research indicating it could mess with hormone function. Butylated hydroxytoluene: Another preservative that's sometimes added to breakfast cereals and potato chips to extend their shelf life. It's generally regarded as safe for use in the United States despite evidence that it could compromise kidney and liver function and Another preservative that's sometimes added to breakfast cereals and potato chips to extend their shelf life. It's generally regarded as safe for use in the United States despite evidence that it could compromise kidney and liver function and concerns that it could cause cancer. In the EU, however, its use is subject to strict regulation. There are some artificial sweeteners, too — aspartame, sucralose, and saccharin — that are permitted in the US and the EU, but generally, Europe puts many more restrictions on unhealthy artificial ingredients than the US does. Kennedy is pledging he'll do something about it. His biggest win so far is securing voluntary commitments from food manufacturers to remove a variety of artificial dyes — yes, including Red Dye 40 — from their products before the end of 2026. If they fail to comply, he has suggested new regulations to put a limit on or outright prohibit certain substances of concern. But are these ingredients the most important problem with our July Fourth cookouts? They are part of the issue. But there's more to it. The real problem is the American diet, dyed or not Here's a revealing comparison: In 2018, the United States banned trans fats, an artificial ingredient derived from oils that has been linked to heart disease and diabetes — 15 years after Denmark did the same thing. For more than a decade, Americans kept eating a ton of trans fat — something that is so bad for you that it can simultaneously increase bad cholesterol while lowering good cholesterol. While that is probably not the entire reason that the US has double the obesity and diabetes rates as Denmark does, it is a telling example. A fatty and highly processed ingredient that is linked to two of the biggest health problems in the United States persisted for years in American food, long after the Europeans had wised up. It's a pattern that, across the decades, explains the enormous gulf between the typical American's diet and the Mediterranean diet that dominates much of Europe. During the 20th century, amid an explosion in market-driven consumerism, convenience became one of the most important factors for grocery shoppers. Americans wanted more meals that could be quickly prepared inside the microwave and dry goods that could last for weeks and months on a pantry shelf, and so these products gained more and more of a market share. But that meant that more American food products were laced with more of the preservatives and additives that are now drawing so much concern. Americans have also always eaten more meat, cheese, and butter, animal products high in saturated fats as opposed to the unsaturated fats that come from oils like olive oil and are more common in European diets, for years. Our meat obsession was turbocharged by a meat industry that tapped into patriotic sentiments about pioneering farms making their living off the frontier. Eating a diet with more animal products is associated with a long list of health problems, particularly the cardiovascular conditions that remain the biggest killers of Americans. Related What the MAHA movement gets wrong about meat We should push our policymakers to pass regulations that get rid of artificial additives, but that alone is insufficient. You can find too much fat and too much sugar around the picnic table. Some of it is unnatural, but plenty of it is. America has to figure out how to encourage people to eat low-fat, low-sugar, whole-food diets. That's the real path to better health. MAHA has some good ideas. Its emphasis on whole foods, not processed ones, is a step in the right direction. But Kennedy's prescriptions are contradictory: Kennedy wants to make it easier for people to find whole foods at their nearby store, while Republicans in Congress propose massive cuts to food stamps. Kennedy's MAHA report rails against the overuse of pesticides, but Trump's Environmental Protection Agency is rolling back restrictions on their use. Those contradictions are a reminder that, though Kennedy has shone a light on a worthwhile issue, we can't and we shouldn't expect the government to fix our food problems all on its own. This is America, after all, where we pride ourselves on individualism.
