Ocean Acidity Has Reached Critical Levels, And We're All Under Threat
A team of scientists from the US and UK looked at what's known as the planetary boundary for ocean acidification, defined as a 20 percent drop in average surface aragonite saturation – that's the calcium carbonate material that many marine organisms use for shells and skeletons.
Combining computer models with the latest field measurements, the researchers found that globally, the oceans were either very close to or beyond the boundary. Around 60 percent of deeper waters have gone beyond it, and 40 percent of surface waters.
Given the damage already recorded, the team suggests the boundary should actually be set at a 10 percent drop in aragonite saturation – a level the ocean as a whole went past at the turn of the millennium.
"Looking across different areas of the world, the polar regions show the biggest changes in ocean acidification at the surface," says biological oceanographer Helen Findlay from Plymouth Marine Laboratory (PML) in the UK.
"Meanwhile, in deeper waters, the largest changes are happening in areas just outside the poles and in the upwelling regions along the west coast of North America and near the equator."
While ocean acidification is not something you'll immediately notice as you gaze out across the sea from the shoreline, it has a profound effect. It damages coral reefs, makes waters inhospitable for shell-building creatures, and kills off or weakens other marine life. That then has a knock-on effect on the rest of the ecosystem.
This acidification happens when carbon dioxide is absorbed by the ocean and reacts with water, and so the more greenhouse gases saturate the atmosphere, the more acidic the world's waters are going to become.
"Most ocean life doesn't just live at the surface – the waters below are home to many more different types of plants and animals," says Findlay. "Since these deeper waters are changing so much, the impacts of ocean acidification could be far worse than we thought.
"This has huge implications for important underwater ecosystems like tropical and even deep-sea coral reefs that provide essential habitats and nursing refuge for many species."
Scientists have agreed on eight other planetary boundaries besides ocean acidification, and we've already crossed six of them. Ocean acidification would be the seventh, and shows the dire straits that Earth is now in.
The researchers behind this latest study want to see a rapid response to the dangers, with targeted action taken in the areas most vulnerable to acidification – as well as protective measures for those areas that haven't been as badly affected so far.
"Ocean acidification isn't just an environmental crisis – it's a ticking time bomb for marine ecosystems and coastal economies," says Steve Widdicombe from PML, who wasn't directly involved in the study.
"From the coral reefs that support tourism to the shellfish industries that sustain coastal communities, we're gambling with both biodiversity and billions in economic value every day that action is delayed."
The research has been published in Global Change Biology.
Emperor Penguins Disappearing Faster Than Worst Estimates, Study Finds
World Oceans Day: Scientists Freeze Coral to Save The Great Barrier Reef
Volcanic Eruptions Can Create Ice in The Sky, And We Finally Know How
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
HRT ‘can raise breast cancer risk' in younger women
Hormone replacement therapy can raise the risk of breast cancer in some younger women, a Lancet study suggests. An international team of researchers found the treatment was not linked to young onset breast cancer overall. But oestrogen plus progestin therapy appears to increase breast cancer risk by 10 per cent. Meanwhile, oestrogen hormone therapy use appeared to decrease breast cancer risk by 14 per cent. Hormone replacement therapy is a treatment used to help menopause symptoms. There are different types of HRT, which is used to treat menopause symptoms, available. They contain different hormones: some are oestrogen products; others contain progestogen and other types have both. These medicines can be taken or used in different ways and work by replacing the hormones oestrogen and progesterone, which can fall to lower levels as women approach the menopause. Most studies examining links between hormone therapy and breast cancer risk have been explored in older women. Previous work, which has focused on women who have already been through the menopause, suggest that oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy is a risk factor for breast cancer. The researchers, led by academics from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in the US, wanted to explore the risks among younger women on hormone therapy – who may take these drugs after gynaecological surgery or during perimenopause. The new meta-analysis published in the journal, Lancet Oncology, examined data drawn from previous studies of 459,476 women aged 16 to 54 years old. Some two per cent of this group (8,455) developed young-onset breast cancer, which means the disease was diagnosed before they were 55 years old. And 15 per cent of women involved in the study reported using hormone therapy, with oestrogen plus progestin hormone therapy and oestrogen being the most common types. 'Although the strength of these associations might vary by age at first use, duration of use, gynaecological surgery status, and other factors, unopposed oestrogen hormone therapy use appears to decrease breast cancer risk and oestrogen plus progestin therapy appears to increase breast cancer risk,' the authors wrote. 'The findings can be used to augment clinical recommendations for hormone therapy use in young women, for whom guidance was previously scarce.' Dr Kotryna Temcinaite, the head of research communications at Breast Cancer Now, said: 'These results are largely in line with what we already know about taking HRT for menopausal symptoms and its effects on breast cancer risk – for most people, the risk of developing breast cancer because of taking HRT is small and is outweighed by the benefits. 'Taking HRT is a very personal decision and, as such, it's vital that everyone has the information they need on the benefits and risks, discusses them with their GP or specialist team and is supported to make the choice that's right for them.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Are Trying to Rebuild Humanity From Raw Genetic Code
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story: For decades, scientists have been building synthetic versions of viruses, bacteria, and yeast, but now U.K. scientists are setting their sights on the human genome. Building a synthetic genome would be much different than gene editing, which contains smaller edits to one's own genome. While a synthetic human genome could dramatically improve our ability to manage our health, it could also be a deadly weapon if used for nefarious purposes. The ethical duality of scientific discovery is nothing new. The most dramatic example is, of course, splitting the atom, which delivered a promising new energy source as well as weapons of mass destruction. A more recent example—the internet—was an unprecedented way to access the sum total of human knowledge, and it also became an insidious vector of mass misinformation. Now scientists are embarking on a new scientific journey, one that could bring unimaginable benefits for human health while also providing the tools for immense destruction. We're going to synthesize the human genome. Over the next five years, the Synthetic Human Genome Project (SynHG), funded by the world's largest medical charity Wellcome Trust (which was also a partner of the Human Genome Project completed in 2003), will work with scientists from Cambridge, Kent, Manchester, Oxford, and Imperial College London to build the foundational tools necessary to rebuild the human genome from scratch. This is different than gene editing, which typically involves much smaller changes to an organism's original DNA. 'With recent technological advances, the SynHG project is at the forefront of one of the most exciting areas of scientific research,' Wellcome's Michael Dunn said in a press statement. 'Through creating the necessary tools and methods to synthesize a human genome, we will answer questions about our health and disease that we cannot even anticipate yet, in turn transforming our understanding of life and wellbeing.' In an interview with the BBC, Julian Sale, a member of the Molecular Biology in Cambridge who is part of the study, said that a synthetic human genome could improve the lives of humans as they age. This focus on healthspan—improving the quality of life for the years we do have—over lifespan is something medical professionals have been urging for years, and a synthetic human genome could address a wide variety of maladies that impact our quality of life in old age. And then, there's the other side of the scientific coin. While a synthetic genome could help generate disease-resistant cells or repair damaged organs or the immune system in general, the technology could also be used as a highly efficient biological weapon if it fell into the wrong hands. That's why SynHG will also develop social science programs that will examine the technology's ethical, legal, and social implications. 'The genie is out of the bottle,' Edinburgh University genetic scientist Bill Earnshaw told BBC News. 'We could have a set of restrictions now, but if an organization who has access to appropriate machinery decided to start synthesising anything, I don't think we could stop them.' When it comes to synthetic biology, the genie has actually been out of that proverbial bottle for a while now. In 2002, scientists in the U.S. first synthesized a viral genome, and since then, scientists have increased genomic complexity by synthesizing a bacterium in 2008 and a yeast organism in 2017. Of course, the human genome is leagues beyond these simple synthetic reconstructions, which is why the project scientists estimate that it could take decades to complete. Hopefully that provides enough time for humanity to fully grapple with the implications of such a breakthrough and ensure that we don't accidentally create yet another weapon of mass destruction. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dino disco: 100-million-year-old giant courtship arena discovered in Colorado
At Dinosaur Ridge, researchers uncovered a remarkable and unusual site where dinosaurs gathered and performed mating dances over 100 million years ago—and it might be the largest 'lekking' area ever found. A team of paleontologists recently published their groundbreaking discovery of possibly one of the most significant mating sites from the dinosaur age. 'Lekking' refers to the elaborate mating dances that male dinosaurs would present to females. Today, some modern birds carry on this ancient tradition as descendants of the dinosaurs. In these displays, males engaged in energetic movements while females observed and selected a partner based on the performance. Researchers had previously noted the existence of five fossilized scrape marks at Dinosaur Ridge. After a closer investigation, however, they discovered much more than a few traces of this ritual. Aerial images revealed 35 marks made by different dinosaurs, making this former wetland home to one of the largest mating destinations in the ancient world. Once upon a time, 100 million years ago, many species walked through this former wetland, such as duck-billed hadrosaurs and ostrich-like herbivores. They left track marks in the soft Earth. Nearby, researchers discovered that they marked solid rock on a slope with a more dynamic set of traces, suggesting they began their mating rituals here. Paleontologists gathered aerial images of the site, which is, in a humorous twist of fate, closed to foot traffic to preserve and protect the track marks. They did not expect to uncover what appeared to be a space more like a dance club where dinosaurs would gather and dance, hoping to secure a mate. Dr. Caldwell Buntin of Old Dominion University, the study's lead author, told IFLScience that Martin Lockley, who first identified the trace fossils, determined they were likely related to mating displays after ruling out other possibilities such as nesting, foraging, territorial marking, or water-seeking behavior. Buntin and his team wanted to evaluate the validity of Lockley's findings that these were, in fact, traces of a mating dance using a data-driven approach. High-resolution drone imagery revealed 35 Ostendichnus, the scientific name for this specific type of claw marks associated with the dance of sex, according to the study. Buntin told Science that he believed Ornithomimids, or ostrichlike herbivores, and Acrocanthosaurus, which looks like a both used this sacred ground to populate their species. These markings—bowl-shaped and long and thin as if the dinosaurs kicked back their feet—were clustered together at different layers of the rock. Researchers understood that the element of time was present. These dinosaurs returned to this site over generations to put themselves out there—to attract a female. 'These traces were generated by backward kicking movements repeated by both the left and right foot,' Buntin said. In interpreting the choreography, researchers understood that the dinosaurs turned clockwise and scraped their claws through the sand. The circular markings suggest that, later, they might have nested here. Scientists have only found three lekking sites worldwide. Already a rare discovery, the site at Dinosaur Ridge might be 'the clearest case yet of a dinosaur display arena,' according to Amy Atwater, the site's director of paleontology. Buntin told Science that future work might require the state of Colorado to allow researchers to visit it, so they can study the traces of mating up close, as they still cannot make any definitive statements as to who these markings belong to. Nonetheless, some of it is open to the public, so dinosaur lovers can visit one of the world's only and most popular hiking sites. This site stands to contribute to the field and provide new insights into the ancient beasts that once ruled the Earth—the dinosaurs. The discovery of 35 scrape sites offers new insight into dinosaur courtship, showing they likely performed display behaviors to attract mates. The study was published in the journal Cretaceous Research.
