Parliament panel flags poor resolution rate in digital consumer complaint system
Only 23% of the total complaints filed through the platform have been resolved so far, with no dedicated system in place to track performance or enforce legal timelines, the Standing Committee on Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution said. The committee expressed disappointment with the Ministry of Consumer Affairs for failing to act on previous recommendations for institutional reforms, and called again for urgent corrective steps.
'The Committee remains concerned about the persistently low resolution rate of 23%... it (ministry) does not provide substantive information on steps being taken to address the backlog or accelerate case resolution,' the report noted.
The e-daakhil portal was launched in September 2020 by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) to offer a cost-effective, paperless mechanism for consumers to file complaints, track progress, and make payments online. As of 27 November 2024, more than 198,000 complaints had been filed through the portal, of which 38,453 had been resolved, according to data from the consumer affairs ministry.
The 23% resolution rate reflects cumulative performance since the portal's launch, but the Department has not published a clear baseline resolution rate from the period before 2020.
Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, complaints that do not require product testing or expert analysis must be resolved within three months from the date the notice is received by the opposite party. If testing or expert input is required, the Act provides for a maximum resolution timeline of five months.
Queries sent to the spokesperson of the Ministry of Consumer Affairs remained unanswered till press time.
Experts say the portal's limited impact stems not from its design but from the absence of institutional follow-through.
'If there's no mechanism to measure what happens after a complaint is filed, then the platform becomes just a filing cabinet,' said Ashim Sanyal, chief executive, Consumer Voice, a non-government consumer advocacy organization.
The report also raised concerns over delays in implementing basic infrastructure under CONFONET, the government's IT backbone for consumer courts. Of the 45 video-conferencing systems scheduled to be installed by March 2024, only six were in place—all at the NCDRC—as of the deadline, the panel said.
The delays not only added to the backlog but also left more than ₹ 30 crore in FY24 funds unspent, the panel, chaired by Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, said.
'We have asked for very basic measures from the Department, which is the custodian of consumer rights. Putting in place a monitoring mechanism for grievance redressal would bring greater transparency and significantly speed up complaint resolution,' Ranjeet Ranjan, Rajya Sabha MP and member of the Committee, told Mint.
The ministry attributed the spending shortfall to procedural restrictions under the Government e-Marketplace (GeM), which allows payments only after full delivery. But the committee found that explanation inadequate and reiterated its call for the creation of a dedicated project management unit to monitor implementation timelines.
In a written response dated 14 May 2025, the Department of Consumer Affairs said the implementing agency, the National Informatics Centre (NIC), had completed installation at only six benches of the NCDRC by the 15 March deadline. 'As per the terms and conditions of GeM, payment can only be released after 100% delivery. Therefore, the funds could not be released in 2023–24,' the ministry said.
The panel said it was particularly concerned by the ministry's failure to establish a dedicated monitoring cell, a step it had recommended earlier to track key performance indicators and ensure legal compliance under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Digitization, the committee noted, had made filing easier but would remain ineffective without administrative reforms to reduce pendency.
'The Committee, therefore, reiterate their original recommendation for a dedicated monitoring mechanism and urge the department to take urgent and concrete steps to improve the case resolution rate and reduce pendency,' the report said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Govt. to table private school fee Bill in Monsoon Session: CM
Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Saturday said the Delhi government will table a Bill to regulate fee hikes by private schools during the upcoming Monsoon Session of the Assembly, beginning August 4. Amid ongoing protests by parents, the Delhi government had earlier approved a draft of the Bill and proposed bringing an Ordinance, since the Assembly was not in session. Now, it has decided to table the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025. 'The Delhi government will table the Bill to regulate fee hikes by private schools in the Monsoon Session of Assembly beginning from August 4,' Ms. Gupta said while addressing the media. The parents' groups, while pointing out issues in the Bill, said that they will send their detailed suggestions to the government on Sunday. Three-level checks A three-level verification will be implemented to regulate fee hikes, according to the Bill seen by The Hindu. First, schools will form an 11-member committee comprising the school management – a management representative and principal – three teachers, five parents from the parent-teacher association, selected by a draw of lots, and a nominee of the Directorate of Education (DoE). A District Fee Appellate Committee will hear appeals against the decisions taken by school-level committees. A similar procedure will be followed with a State-level revision committee, which will be the highest appellate authority. An aggrieved parents' group, which the Bill describes as 15% of the total strength of parents in an affected school, may appeal to the District Fee Appellate Committee within 30 days from the time the fees are approved, against the decisions of school-level committees. The Bill also specifies that if a school is found levying a fee that is not determined in the provisions of the Act, the DoE will direct the school to roll back the fee and refund the excess amount to the parents. The penalty for violators can range between ₹1 lakh and ₹10 lakh. Meanwhile, a fine of ₹50,000 will be levied on schools for harassing students over delayed payment of fees. The Bill also mentions the 10 factors that will determine the fee structure, including the location of the school, infrastructure made available, the education standardof schools, and a reasonable revenue surplus as may be prescribed. Divya Mattey, a parent of a student who studies in Delhi Public School, Dwarka, said, 'It will be difficult to get a minimum of 15% of the parent body to raise a question.' Mr. Mattey said that parents have noted that the penalties might not affect bigger schools, for whom '₹50,000 might be a small amount'. AAP, BJP at odds Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) Delhi State president Saurabh Bharadwaj criticised the Bill, saying, 'Until now, even under the 1973 law, if a single parent felt that fees had been unfairly hiked, they could file a complaint with the DoE. Now, that has been scrapped. Under the new law, you'll need a minimum of 15% of parents to raise a complaint. In a school with 3,000 students, that means identifying 450 parents – a near-impossible task.' Delhi BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva said, 'It would have been better if Saurabh Bharadwaj had waited until the Bill was tabled in the upcoming session before commenting on it.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Camp court disposes of 139 appeals under ODA Act
Bhubaneswar: In a significant move towards expediting urban development-related appeals, a special camp court held at Unnati Bhawan here on Saturday disposed of 139 cases under the Orissa Development Authorities (ODA) Act, 1982. The session, presided over by principal secretary of housing and urban development, Usha Padhee, addressed appeals related to the Bhubaneswar Development Authority (BDA) and Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (BMC). This initiative comes following directives from chief minister Mohan Charan Majhi. "The camp court represents our commitment to transparent and accountable administration," said Padhee. The hearing tackled cases from a backlog of over 700 pending appeals filed by citizens against various administrative orders in the real estate and related sectors. In a recent administrative reform, the govt has designated additional senior officers, including the director of municipal administration and special secretaries, as appellate authorities in the govt. The decentralised approach aims to streamline the appeal process and reduce pending cases. The housing and urban development department plans to continue the camp courts in phases to address remaining cases. The initiative has received positive response from the public, marking a significant step towards efficient urban governance. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Fee committee fines four schools Rs 5 lakh each for unapproved pre-primary fees
Ahmedabad: The Ahmedabad zonal fee regulatory committee imposed a fine of Rs 5 lakh each on four private schools for collecting pre-primary fees without obtaining mandatory approval. The action was taken after the schools were found charging unapproved and excessive fees for their pre-primary sections. The penalised schools include James Genesis International School (Vaishnodevi Circle), Shiv Ashish Juniors (Bopal), New Tulip International School (Bopal), and Vedant International School (Isanpur). The committee earlier issued notices to these schools and called them for a personal hearing. Following the hearings, the committee concluded that all four schools violated the norms by not obtaining prior fee approval for their pre-primary sections, as required under the Gujarat Self-Financed School (Regulation of Fees) Act. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad James Genesis International submitted a proposal in 2017-18 and received fee approval but failed to seek renewal or submit any affidavit for the academic years 2020-21 to 2024-25. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How to Trade ETH/USD Without Holding Ether IC Markets Learn More Undo The committee therefore imposed a fine of Rs 5 lakh and instructed the school to deposit the amount within 15 days. Similarly, Shiv Ashish Juniors charged fees for several years without seeking approval for their pre-primary section. After being served a notice and appearing for the hearing, the school was also fined Rs 5 lakh. New Tulip International previously sought fee approval for its nursery section but did not submit any proposals for pre-primary classes thereafter. As a result, it too was penalised. Vedant International School received approval for the nursery section in 2018 but failed to apply for pre-primary fee approval in subsequent years. After appearing before the committee, the school was fined Rs 5 lakh. All four schools have been directed to pay the penalty within 15 days and submit proof of payment to the fee committee. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
