Cape San Blas beach restoration project left out of Senate Bill
Two homes have already been condemned and 30 more are at imminent risk. If more homes are condemned, residents fear the state road could be next, which is the only way on and off the cape.
'The road is about to be washed out. These homes are falling in, and we don't even get a dime. And we just want answers. And we know, you know, we're calling people hundreds of people call and just nobody's communicating with us as to what happened,' Coastal Community Association Board Member Kelly Mills said.
Before this year's legislative session, residents met with their State Senator Corey Simon and State Representative Jason Shoaf. Both said they would submit appropriation requests for the last $10 million needed for the beach renourishment project.
Both kept their word. But as the 60-day session progressed, something happened to the requests.
'Well, as they bargained back and forth, Jason put in the $5 million, and we were told that was going to be accepted,' Mills said.
The news about the Senate's version of the budget is not as promising. Residents don't understand what happened with Senator Simon.
Callaway's renovated community center reopens for residents
'He allocated $0 to our beach renourishment. Whereas Jason Shoaf, who said the same, he allocated $5 million, and without Corey Simon's $5 million. I think it's my understanding I could be wrong, but it's my understanding that we won't get the funding,' Sunrise Sunset Townhomes HOA President Michelle Massingill said.
Both Senate and House members have been in conference committee this week, trying to agree on a single budget to send to the governor.
There's still a chance the project could receive some funding, but residents are now looking for other solutions.
'We have reached out to Neil Dunn's office, and he's been very helpful, but he's getting mixed communication with the county. And so he's just trying to. You know, they say they can't help us unless the county asks for help,' Mills said.
Gulf County is not eligible for federal funding due to the Coastal Barrier Resources Act. COBRA restricts funding in undeveloped coastal areas.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
PEPFAR survives rescissions
Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) and Office of Management and Budget Director Russ Vought told reporters that the White House agreed with a plan to change the rescissions package with a substitute amendment that would exempt the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) from being cut. 'It's substantially the same package and the Senate has to work its will and we've appreciated the work along the way to get to a place where they've got the votes,' Vought said. 'There is a substitute amendment that does not include the PEPFAR rescission and we're fine with that.' Trump had requested that $900 million be clawed back from PEPFAR. If the substitute amendment is adopted, the size of the initial $9.4 billion request would be narrowed to $9 billion, Vought said Tuesday. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) repeatedly stated her desire to remove PEPFAR from the package. Other GOP appropriators maintained their support for the program but didn't say whether it was a deal breaker. 'This is progress,' Collins told reporters about saving PEPFAR. But she added Vought did not give a clear enough explanation about what programs he wanted to 'save' and the specifics about what programs are being cut. 'It's unclear to me how you get to $9 billion,' Collins said. 'We still have the problem of not having detailed account information from OMB.' The amendment means the House will have to vote again on the legislation. House Republicans had pressed for the Senate not to change the bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R) told reporters Tuesday there had been 'a lot of interest' in preserving PEPFAR funding among his conference, adding that he hopes the House will accept 'that one small modification.'
Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
House votes canceled
Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will bring the first procedural vote to the floor Tuesday on the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in spending. It's not clear he has even the 51 votes necessary to start debate on the package. Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon. 'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.' The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program. It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.' Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP. Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act. 'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.' It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version. MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week. But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland. Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair. What else we're watching: — Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case. — Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess. — Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning. Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.
Miami Herald
36 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Salazar introduces ‘Dignity' bill in House to grant some migrants legal status
U.S. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar, a Miami Republican who has advocated for creating a legal pathway for immigrants who have been living and working in the U.S. for years without a criminal record, on Tuesday announced a renewed version of her 2023 Dignity Act, which would provide deportation protections to some migrants and allow them to work in the United States. Salazar, surrounded by both Republican and Democratic House members, said many migrants had been working in the shadows and are a key component of the U.S. economy. 'The truth is that we still have over 10 million people, or more, working in construction, hospitality, agriculture, dairy, fisheries, slaughterhouses, who are undocumented but who are not criminals. Human beings, invisible to the average American, but without them, we will not have food by this Friday,' Salazar said. The bipartisan bill, now called the Dignity Act 2025 and co-sponsored by U.S. Democratic Rep. Veronica Escobar of Texas and 20 other Democratic and Republican representatives, would allow undocumented immigrants who have been in the United States for more than five years, have no criminal record and have been paying taxes to apply for legal status. Migrants who get the status would pay a fine of $7,000 over several years and contribute one percent of their salary to the U.S. Treasury. 'You can come out of the shadows and apply,' Salazar said. The bill prevents migrants from being eligible for any social benefits, and they would need to purchase their own health insurance. They would be able to travel in and out of the United States without any barriers. Salazar said this would allow the undocumented the ability to lead 'a dignified life.' As the Trump administration increases its mass deportation targets, with ICE aiming for 3,000 detentions a day, employers in industries like construction and hospitality have voiced concerns about severe labor shortages. President Donald Trump, in an interview with Fox News earlier in June, mentioned that his administration was looking at temporary status solutions for farm workers. 'We're going to work it so that some kind of a temporary pass where people pay taxes, where the farmer can have a little control, as opposed to you walk in and take everybody away,' Trump said at the time. The administration had previously backtracked, saying it was barring ICE from conducting raids on farms. U.S. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins contradicted the president's statement in July when she said in a press conference there would be 'no amnesty' for agricultural workers and that all workers in the U.S. illegally would be deported. Salazar echoed the same amnesty sentiment in the press conference on Tuesday. 'Dignity is not amnesty. Dignity does not grant a path to citizenship to anybody. Dignity is the Solomonic way to fix a 40-year problem.' Salazar's office did not comment on whether the bill has a Senate companion or if she is currently in talks with any members of the U.S. Senate to sponsor a version of the bill in that chamber. Salazar urged the president to sign the bill if it passes the House and the Senate. 'You have been called to do this, to fix this 40-year-old mess with just one signature. Yours.'
