South Korea, US prepare for summit with details of trade deal unresolved
SEOUL : As South Korea and the US prepare for a summit of their leaders, topics left unresolved by a recent trade deal provide scope for more disputes between the key allies and trade partners, six former negotiators and experts said.
President Donald Trump may use the summit with counterpart Lee Jae Myung to seek more concessions on defence costs and corporate investments, left out of the deal, while non-tariff barriers and currency could prove thorny issues, experts said.
No official summit date has been disclosed, though Trump last week gave a timeframe of two weeks.
The absence of a written agreement underpinning last week's talks could open the way for disputes, with some differences already emerging in the two sides' accounts of the deal.
Key among these was yesterday's denial by a South Korean presidential adviser of US claims that it would take 90% of the profit from project investments of US$350 billion by South Korea, which also agreed to open up its domestic rice market.
'Even a binding deal like the FTA has been efficiently scrapped,' warned Choi Seok-young, a former chief negotiator for the Korea-US free trade deal, signed in 2007. 'And this is just promise,' said Choi.
Last week's pact was scaled down from South Korea's previous plans for a package deal on trade, security and investment envisioned in the run-up to the summit between Trump and the newly-elected Lee.
However, Japan struck a deal with the US sooner than expected, spurring South Korea into a scramble for a trade-focused pact, leaving issues of security and investment for the coming summit, presidential adviser Kim Yong-beom said.
Uncertainty clouds plans for US$350 billion in funds Trump has said South Korea would invest in the US in projects 'owned and controlled by the US' and selected by him, though he gave few details of the plan's structure or timing.
The allies face challenges in ironing out details of the fund at upcoming working-level talks, South Korean Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol told reporters on Friday.
'People say the devil is in the details,' he added.
In a social media post, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick gave an assurance of '90% of the profits going to the American people', while White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said part would go to the US government to help repay debt.
However, Kim, the presidential adviser, said the two sides did not discuss profit distribution during talks, and South Korea expected the profit to be 'reinvested' in the US.
'Political rhetoric'
The idea of the US potentially taking most of the profit is 'hard to understand in a civilised country', he added, while dismissing as 'political rhetoric' Washington's claim that it would make all decisions about the fund.
South Korea had added a safety mechanism to reduce financing risk, including US commitments to buy products from the projects, under an 'offtake' clause and invest in commercially feasible projects, he said.
Seoul officials have said US$150 billion would go to the shipbuilding industry, with the rest earmarked for areas such as chips, batteries, critical minerals, biotechnology, nuclear power and other strategic industries.
The specifics of the structure have not been determined, said Kim, adding that loans and guarantees make up a majority of the funds, with equity investments accounting for a small part.
Leavitt said South Korea would provide 'historic market access to American goods like autos and rice', echoing earlier comments by Trump.
However, South Korea said repeatedly there had been no agreement on the agriculture market, including beef and rice, despite strong pressure from Washington.
Trump expressed keen interest in Korea's quarantine process for fruits and vegetables, Seoul said, improvements to which will figure in planned technical talks on non-tariff barriers that will also cover vehicle safety rules, but gave no details.
Other non-tariff barriers such as regulation of Big Tech could be hurdles.
'We cannot be relieved because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again,' Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo said last week on returning from Washington.
Defence costs are expected to emerge as a key issue during the upcoming summit, with Trump having long said South Korea needed to pay more for the US troop presence there.
In addition to the US$350 billion, Trump said South Korea agreed to invest a large sum of money in the US, to be announced during the summit, which he said on July 30 would be held within two weeks.
The allies are holding working level-talks on currency policy, put on the agenda at April's opening round of trade talks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Tesla's brand loyalty collapsed after Musk backed Trump
TESLA for years had more repeat US customers than any other major automotive brand but its loyalty has plunged since CEO Elon Musk endorsed President Donald Trump last summer, according to data from research firm S&P Global Mobility. The data, which has not been previously reported, shows Tesla's customer loyalty peaked in June 2024, when 73 per cent of Tesla-owning households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla, according to an S&P analysis of vehicle-registration data in all 50 states. That industry-leading brand loyalty rate started to nosedive in July, that data showed, when Musk endorsed Trump following an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania on the Republican nominee. The rate bottomed out at 49.9 per cent last March, just below the industry average, after Musk launched Trump's budget-slashing Department of Government Efficiency in January and started firing thousands of government workers. S&P analyst Tom Libby called it "unprecedented" to see the runaway leader in customer loyalty fall so quickly to industry-average levels. "I've never seen this rapid of a decline in such a short period of time," he said. The timing of Tesla's plunging brand loyalty suggests the CEO's involvement in politics turned off customers in the EV pioneer's eco-conscious customer base, some analysts said. "If they have Democratic leanings, then perhaps they consider other brands in addition to Tesla," said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at Morningstar. Tesla's ageing model lineup also faces stiffer competition from an array of EVs from legacy automakers including General Motors, Hyundai and BMW. The only new model Tesla has released since 2020, its triangular Cybertruck, has proved a flop despite Musk's prediction of hundreds of thousands of annual sales. On an April earnings call, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja singled out "the negative impact of vandalism and unwarranted hostility towards our brand and people," but also said there were "several weeks of lost production" when the company retooled factories to produce a refreshed version of its top-selling Model Y. Musk on the April call said that "absent macro issues, we don't see any reduction in demand." Tesla vehicle sales overall are falling globally and have declined eight per cent in the United States the first five months of 2025, according to S&P. Sales fell 33 per cent over the first six months of the year in Europe, where public backlash to Musk's politicking has been particularly fierce. Musk's increased political activism was "very bad timing" for Tesla, said Garrett Nelson, an analyst who tracks the EV maker at CFRA Research, because it came exactly as the company faced heightened competition from Chinese EV makers and other traditional automakers. He said his top concerns for Tesla are its loss of market share and "what can be done to repair the brand damage." Tesla remains the US electric-vehicle sales leader but has seen its dominance erode as Musk last year delved into politics and focused Tesla more on developing self-driving technology than on new affordable models for human drivers. Customer loyalty is a closely watched auto-industry metric because it is "much more expensive" to take new customers from competitors than to retain existing ones, said S&P's Libby. S&P offers some of the most detailed industry data on automotive purchases because it analyses vehicle registration data from all 50 states on a household-by-household basis. Unlike survey data, it follows actual vehicle transactions to track how consumers migrate among brands and models. From the fourth quarter of 2021 through the third quarter of last year, more than 60 per cent of Tesla-owning households bought another one for their next car purchase, the data show. Only one other brand – Ford – posted a quarterly loyalty rate exceeding 60 per cent during the period, and only once. Tesla's average inflow of customers started to decline in July 2024 along with its loyalty rate. Since February, Tesla has been gaining fewer than two households for every one it loses to the rest of the industry, its lowest level ever, according to the data. "The data shows clearly that the net migration to Tesla is slowing," Libby said. Brands that now attract more Tesla customers than they lose to Tesla include Rivian, Polestar, Porsche and Cadillac, the data show.
The Sun
2 minutes ago
- The Sun
Brazil opts for local relief over retaliation for US tariffs
BRASILIA: Brazil's government has set aside for now plans for direct retaliation against steep U.S. tariffs taking effect this week, focusing instead on a relief package for industries hit hardest by the levies, sources familiar with the strategy said. Wide-ranging exemptions granted in U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order last week spared some of the most vulnerable sectors of Latin America's largest economy, to the relief of many investors and business leaders. That has left Brasilia cautious about responding to Trump with reciprocal tariffs or other retaliation that could escalate tensions, said government officials, who requested anonymity to discuss confidential deliberations. Talks with Washington are likely to be slow and complex, said one of the sources, so Brazil's government is prioritizing immediate relief for exporters, such as through public credit lines and other support for export finance. Another official said the government is studying potential responses to the tariffs that would affect U.S. companies, but sees them as a last resort if negotiations fail. Those potential countermeasures, now under review, could include suspension of royalty payments for pharmaceutical patents and media copyrights, two sources said. The government had also signaled last year that it was preparing a new tax that could affect big U.S. tech companies, but shelved the plan this year to avoid antagonizing Trump ahead of his April tariff announcement. At the time, Brazil was saddled with a 10% tariff, among the lowest in the world, which many credited to a longstanding U.S. trade surplus with Brazil. Trump then tied a steeper 50% tariff in July to what he called a political 'witch hunt' against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a right-wing ally on trial for an alleged coup plot to overturn his 2022 election loss. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva initially said he would respond under the country's Economic Reciprocity Law, passed by Congress to provide legal grounds for countermeasures against trade sanctions, fueling speculation about retaliation. Talk of reciprocal action has since faded, even as Lula criticizes Trump's rationale for the tariff hike, defending the independence of Brazil's judiciary and insisting any negotiations should remain strictly focused on trade. U.S. tariff exemptions granted last week for Brazil's aviation, energy and mining industries were taken in Brasilia as evidence that patient diplomacy and lobbying by affected U.S. companies seeking relief was the best way to get results in Washington. Brazil also said it plans to file a formal complaint at the World Trade Organization over the tariffs, even though that dispute settlement system has been stalled since the first Trump administration. 'You still need to go through the available channels,' one Brazilian official said, while acknowledging that a resolution is unlikely under the current state of the WTO. More immediately, the government is fine-tuning measures to shield sectors most hurt by the U.S. tariffs set to take effect on Wednesday, extending financial relief to companies already facing canceled contracts. Officials have said the package will likely include credit lines and possible tweaks to the export credit insurance and export financing mechanisms, according to one of the sources. Finance Minister Fernando Haddad, who said relief measures could begin rolling out this week, on Friday said the government was never committed to retaliating against Washington. 'We never used that verb to characterize the actions the Brazilian government will take,' he said. 'These are actions to protect sovereignty, to protect our industry, our agribusiness, our agriculture,' he told reporters. 'That word (retaliation) was not present in the president's speech, nor in any minister's.' - Reuters
Free Malaysia Today
5 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
India slams ‘unjustified' action by US, EU over its Russian oil purchases
US President Donald Trump vowed to raise tariffs on India, accusing it of buying Russian oil and reselling it for profit. (Gazprom pic) NEW DELHI : India's foreign ministry said Monday that the United States and European Union were 'targeting' it due to its buying of Russian oil, adding that the moves were 'unjustified' and that it would protect its interests. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' India foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal said in a statement, after US President Donald Trump vowed to raise tariffs on the country over its oil purchases from Russia. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' It did not provide further details on the measures. India became a major buyer of Russian oil, providing a much-needed export market for Moscow after it was cut off from traditional buyers in Europe because of the Ukraine war. New Delhi saved itself billions of dollars while bolstering Moscow's coffers. But India on Monday argued it 'began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict'. It also noted that Washington at that time had 'actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability.' It pointed to what it suggested were double standards of EU and US trade with Moscow. 'It is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia,' Jaiswal added. 'Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion.' Jaiswal singled out examples of where deals were being done with Moscow. 'Europe-Russia trade includes not just energy, but also fertilisers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel and machinery and transport equipment,' the statement added. 'Where the US is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers as well as chemicals.' India, the world's most populous country, was one of the first major economies to engage the Trump administration in broader trade talks. The United States is India's largest trading partner, with New Delhi shipping goods worth US$87.4 billion in 2024. India's protectionist trade policies, however, saw it run up a surplus of nearly US$46 billion the same year. On Monday, Trump said in a post to his Truth Social platform that India was 'buying massive amounts of Russian Oil' and selling it for 'big profits.' 'Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,' he wrote. But he did not provide details on what tariff level he had in mind. For now, an existing 10% US tariff on Indian products is expected to rise to 25% come Thursday. Last month, the EU and Britain sought to ramp up economic pressure on Russia to halt the war in Ukraine by slashing a price cap meant to choke off revenues from key oil exports.
