logo
Editorial: For the love of Leo, hold your horses on seizing the pope's boyhood home, Dolton

Editorial: For the love of Leo, hold your horses on seizing the pope's boyhood home, Dolton

Yahoo23-05-2025
Boy, did Dolton need that white smoke rising from the Vatican.
The south suburb just outside Chicago has taken blow after blow in recent years.
Former Mayor Tiffany Henyard's antics led to an FBI investigation and a separate investigation by former Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot, who was appointed by village board members to look into allegations that Henyard had misused and mismanaged village funds. Tack on brawls in public meetings, and Dolton became a laughingstock, synonymous with dysfunction and corruption.
But then came an unexpected win. Robert Prevost, a hometown boy, came seemingly out of nowhere to succeed Pope Francis as the next pontiff. That's right: Dolton nurtured the Holy Father, now one of the most famous and powerful leaders in the world.
It's brought us all great pride. And now we must urge you, Dolton: Take the win. Take it, celebrate it, be proud of it.
Don't let bad ideas muck it up.
We were surprised and concerned by the news that Dolton plans to acquire Pope Leo XIV's childhood home either through direct purchase or by seizing it through eminent domain.
The house on 141st Place in Dolton had been on the market since January. Once Leo was named pope, owner and Homer Glen-based rehabber Pawel Radzik planned to auction the home in mid-June, with a minimum asking price of $250,000. Radzik paid $66,000 for Prevost's old house and then overhauled it, saying that '80% of it is new — new flooring, new cabinets, new plumbing, new electrical, new kitchen.'
Turns out, Radzik has a very determined would-be owner.
'Dolton is going to be the ultimate buyer,' village attorney Burt Odelson told Crain's Chicago Business earlier this week. It's unclear how the village would use the property, though the idea of turning it into a museum has been floated. The modest three-bedroom house is just a little over 1,000 square feet, and while it would suit a family fine, it's hard to imagine people crowding in for a guided tour.
We much prefer recently sworn-in Mayor Jason House's other ideas to celebrate the village's connection to the Holy Father, which include granting landmark status to the home. We thought it made sense that the village board earlier this week approved naming the stretch of 141st Place that's home to Leo's former residence 'Pope Leo XIV Place.' And we certainly would support any and all protections to make sure nobody demolishes the childhood home of a pope.
But we think it's a bad idea for the village to acquire the house. There's going to be plenty of demand — why not let someone buy it on the open market?
We're particularly skeptical of the idea of using eminent domain to seize the property. The village would have to pay a fair market value if it does, but what's fair? A price tag of $250,000 seems awfully low for a home that suddenly holds so much cultural significance. Eminent domain is meant to serve the greater public good — building schools, roads or infrastructure. Using it to secure a modest home for an uncertain purpose risks setting a troubling precedent, and could expose the village to legal blowback.
Not to mention another important question: Does it make financial sense for Dolton to do this? Lightfoot's investigation revealed that the village's general fund dropped to $3.65 million in debt, a sharp decline from the $5.6 million surplus it held when Henyard took office.
There's a lot Dolton could do to infuse their papal ties into the village's culture that doesn't involve taking on debt and seizing private property.
Hold your horses, Dolton. Celebrate your papal legacy — but do it wisely, transparently, and without burdening taxpayers or overstepping your authority.
Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@chicagotribune.com.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Massie, Khanna hammer Republican leadership for thwarting Epstein transparency push
Massie, Khanna hammer Republican leadership for thwarting Epstein transparency push

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

Massie, Khanna hammer Republican leadership for thwarting Epstein transparency push

The pair took particular issue with the Justice Department's statements that it was focusing on the needs of victims by declining to release more of the files. 'No one has asked the victims what they want,' Khanna said. 'They do want these files released for closure and for healing.' The GOP has been embroiled in controversy since the Justice Department in early July announced that a DOJ and FBI review had uncovered no evidence of an incriminating client list or history of blackmail from the disgraced financier, who authorities say died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019. President Donald Trump's reported connections to Epstein, and the president's strategy of deeming the episode a 'hoax' perpetrated by 'Radical Left Democrats,' have only further inflamed a core constituency of Republican voters. 'You can't do anything constructive with government if you don't have trust in government,' Khanna told Welker. 'This is about trust in government. When John F. Kennedy was president, trust in government was 60 percent. Today it's in the teens.' With Republicans facing an onslaught of Epstein votes last week— and a brewing rebellion from inside the caucus — Johnson sent the House home for its August recess early. 'If the pain he's talking about is that the legislators, when they vote, have to pick between protecting the embarrassment of the rich and powerful versus getting justice for victims, I don't really understand what he means by that,' Massie said. 'Why is it painful for Mike Johnson to call a vote on this? The American people deserve this, regardless of what the political ramifications are for the speaker.'

‘A nightmare that no one wants': GOP fears Mastriano's down-ballot drag in Pennsylvania
‘A nightmare that no one wants': GOP fears Mastriano's down-ballot drag in Pennsylvania

Politico

time2 hours ago

  • Politico

‘A nightmare that no one wants': GOP fears Mastriano's down-ballot drag in Pennsylvania

A person close to Trump's political operation — one of the four aforementioned Republicans — described the president's team as 'very concerned' that a Mastriano campaign 'could jeopardize or add to the jeopardization of multiple down-ballot congressional races.' Pennsylvania Republicans went even further, saying a Mastriano candidacy would all but certainly unleash a bloodbath across the state next November. 'If he's our nominee, we lose four House seats,' Pennsylvania-based GOP consultant Josh Novotney said. 'He's a nightmare that no one wants.' Asked for comment, Mastriano said POLITICO is 'not letting facts getting [sic] in the way of a good story.' 'I can tell you that I have President Trump's direct line,' he said in a direct message on X. 'And he ain't saying this.' Despite perennially alarming Republican leaders, Mastriano, a state senator, still appears to have a grip on MAGA voters. A private Public Policy Polling survey conducted in May and obtained by POLITICO shows him leading state Treasurer Stacy Garrity, a likely candidate favored by much of the party establishment, by 21 points. His perceived strength is springing national and Pennsylvania Republicans into action. Some state GOP operatives said they hope Trump will back Garrity in a bid to block Mastriano. For now his plans for Pennsylvania's nascent gubernatorial primary are unclear, particularly since Shapiro is widely seen as the favorite in the general election. Even if Garrity wins the nomination, several state and national Republicans expressed pessimism that anyone can defeat the incumbent, though they believe Garrity would outperform Mastriano.

There's more to the anti-Trump Russiagate plot — and Tulsi Gabbard will unravel it
There's more to the anti-Trump Russiagate plot — and Tulsi Gabbard will unravel it

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

There's more to the anti-Trump Russiagate plot — and Tulsi Gabbard will unravel it

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard just released a trove of apparently once-classified documents — with promises of much more to follow. The new material describes the role of the Obama administration's intelligence and investigatory directors — purportedly along with former President Barack Obama himself — in undermining the 2016 Trump presidential campaign. In addition, their efforts extended to sabotaging the 2016-2017 presidential transition and, by extension, the first three years of the Trump presidency. Advertisement The released documents add some new details to what over the last decade has become accepted knowledge. Congressional committees, special prosecutors and the inspectors general had all previously issued reports that largely confirmed the general outlines of the skullduggery that began in 2015-16. Hillary Clinton's campaign, later aided by the top echelon of the FBI, CIA and the director of national intelligence, sought — falsely — to seed a narrative that Trump had colluded directly with Russia to win unfairly the 2016 election. Advertisement When that campaign gambit failed to alter the 2016 results, the Obama administration doubled down during the transition to undermine the incoming Trump presidency. Next, Special Counsel Robert Mueller's 'all-star' legal team found no evidence of direct Trump-Putin collusion to hijack the election. But his investigation did sabotage 22 months of Trump's first term, marked by constant leaks and hysterical rumors that Trump was soon to be convicted and jailed as a 'Russian asset.' By 2020, the frustrated intelligence agencies and former 'authorities' now absurdly further lied that Hunter Biden's incriminating laptop had 'all the earmarks' — once again — of Russian interference. Advertisement So, what could be new about Gabbard's latest release? One, after the 2016 election of Donald Trump but before his inauguration, Obama convened a strange meeting with his outgoing intelligence and investigatory heads — CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, National Security Advisor Susan Rice and a few others. Contrary to a four-year Democratic Party narrative that '18 intelligence agencies' had long claimed Russian collusion, the top directors apprised Obama that their expert colleagues had found no such evidence. Yet outgoing President Obama allegedly directed them to ignore such an assessment. Advertisement Instead, they began spreading narratives that President-elect Trump had been colluding with the Russians. Leaks followed. Media hysteria crested. And soon Mueller and his left-wing 'dream team' of lawyers targeted President Trump. Further new information may confirm that Brennan's CIA — and those he briefed in the Oval Office — had known for some time that the Russians themselves were confused about why they were falsely being accused of colluding with Trump to rig the election. Of course, Russian operatives, like their Chinese counterparts, often seek to cause havoc in American institutions, such as hacking emails or spreading online disinformation. But they may have been nevertheless curious why Hillary Clinton was making such false accusations that they were working directly with Trump, and why the Obama administration was acting upon them. Obama has now claimed these new charges are outrageous and beneath the dignity of the presidency. He did not, however, flatly contradict the new information. He should have issued an unambiguous denial that he had never ordered his intelligence chiefs in December 2016 to ignore their associates' assessments and instead to assume Trump's collusion with Putin. Advertisement These sustained efforts of the Clinton campaign, Obama appointees, and ex-intelligence chiefs and their media counterparts between 2015 and 2020 severely undermined the 2016 Trump campaign. They bushwhacked the 2017 presidential transition. They hamstrung the Trump presidency. And they may well have hurt Trump's 2020 election bid. Summed up, here is the damage caused by the Trump-Putin collusion lies: Advertisement They emboldened 'experts' in 2020 to again lie blatantly and shamelessly to the American people that the incriminating Hunter Biden laptop was yet another fake product of Russian interference to help reelect Trump. The media were equally guilty. Journalists partnered with current and ex-Obama appointees by disseminating fake documents like the Steele dossier and working with giants like Twitter and Facebook. During the 2020 campaign, the FBI and social media sought to censor accurate news stories that the laptop was indeed authentic and already verified as such by the FBI. These operations may have had serious consequences for US foreign policy. Dictatorial Russia is a US adversary. By needlessly and falsely claiming that Russia had intervened in two elections directly to partner with Trump, Obama-era officials and Clinton-campaign activists destroyed Trump's own credibility to sustain a workable relationship with a nuclear Russia. In addition, the lying and extra-legal operations of the FBI and CIA only further convinced the paranoid Russians that they could not trust the US government — given it had been engaging in the very conspiracy lies that were more akin to its own than America's. Advertisement Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey and others will likely never face legal consequences for the damage they've done to our institutions and foreign policy. But that does not mean they should be exempt from an ongoing and disinterested effort to find and finally expose the whole truth. Victor Davis Hanson is a distinguished fellow of the Center for American Greatness.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store