logo
Man jailed for running 'unspeakable' child sex abuse website

Man jailed for running 'unspeakable' child sex abuse website

A man has been jailed for helping run a website that hosted computer-generated child sex abuse material so graphic and 'unspeakable' a district court judge has suppressed the details of it.
Donald James Sarratt was charged in 2023 as part of Operation Dark Orchid, a joint operation between New Zealand police and US authorities.
That investigation centred on a website containing more than 85,000 computer-generated images, 30,000 being realistic images depicting the graphic sexual abuse and torture of children as young as infants.
A forensic examination of Sarratt's electronic devices also identified child sexual abuse material involving real children.
The Wellington District Court heard as one of the website's facilitators, the 35-year-old was involved in the website's upkeep, as well as assisting the almost 200,000 members with their log-ons and password issues.
He was also involved in the banning and unbanning of members. He held the role for nine years.
It was also revealed that Sarratt, who has no previous convictions, believed that by providing the computer-generated images it would stop people from offending in person.
In May 2023, a sample of images was taken to illustrate the website's content. These weren't available to the public but could be viewed by the site's members.
At yesterday's sentencing, Judge Noel Sainsbury suppressed the name of the website, which is part of an ongoing investigation.
He also suppressed the descriptions of the material that had been seized, saying there was no public interest in releasing details of the images.
But the judge broadly categorised the images as ranging from images of nude children, through to images of bestiality and sadism.
The judge noted the children in these images ranged in age from 3 to 13 years and 'involved the grossest depravity, representing sadism and torture for sexual gratification'.
'It is difficult to imagine images that would be worse,' the judge said.
As the website's facilitator, Judge Sainsbury noted Sarratt's role wasn't merely functionary but placed him at the highest level of the organisation. His actions had allowed the website to continue, he said.
Judge Sainsbury ruled that a person who was involved in distributing objectionable material containing real children generally faced a higher level of culpability than someone who was distributing objectionable material that had been computer-generated.
On that basis he reduced the starting point of 12 years, which the Crown had suggested, to nine years' jail.
But because some of the computer-generated images investigators had found were the worst of their kind, and went beyond what was usually possible, he added a year to the starting point.
Sarratt's lawyer Gretel Fairbrother submitted a psychiatric report suggesting Sarratt exhibited traits of autism spectrum disorder.
But Crown prosecutor Wilber Tupua said there was no nexus between Sarratt's undiagnosed personality issues and the offending, so he shouldn't receive any credit for it. Judge Sainsbury agreed.
The judge did agree with Fairbrother that Sarratt's guilty pleas and cooperation with the police, whose investigation is ongoing, warranted a discount. Sarratt's family 'bewildered'
Judge Sainsbury also referred to letters he'd received from Sarratt's family.
'It is clear that they are as bewildered as anyone that he is before the court. They speak to someone who, in their experience, is gentle, loyal, and caring towards family. They find it simply bewildering that he would be involved in anything involving harm to a child,' the judge said.
Judge Sainsbury said notwithstanding the offending, it was clear his family saw Sarratt's 'good aspects' and remained supportive of him.
'You are lucky to have that support,' the judge said.
Judge Sainsbury said while it was clear Sarratt held a genuine, but misguided belief, that by providing computer-generated images he was assisting those with a predilection for child sexual abuse material not to offend in person, that required more evidence than a statement at sentencing to carry any weight.
On charges of possessing and distributing objectionable child sexual abuse material, Sarratt was jailed for five years and six months. Police say images depict 'unspeakable' child abuse
Following Sarratt's sentencing police released a statement. The officer in charge of Operation Dark Orchid, Detective Sergeant Daniel Wright, said the sentence was a testament to the thorough investigation conducted by New Zealand Police and US law enforcement.
'This investigation, involving our law enforcement colleagues from the US, demonstrates our commitment to keeping our communities safe, and that we will use all resources available to us to hold to account those who prey on the vulnerability of children both in New Zealand and abroad,' he said.
Travis Pickard from the Department of Homeland Security Investigations said they worked with law enforcement partners from across the globe to stop those who produce and distribute child sexual abuse materials.
'The vast number of images uncovered in this joint investigation - many featuring disturbingly realistic computer-generated representations of unspeakable child sexual abuse - is unacceptable in any part of contemporary society.
'This sentence reinforces our dedication to protecting the innocence of our most vulnerable populations from such abhorrent child exploitation,' he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Napier trials night CCTV to tackle rising crime
Napier trials night CCTV to tackle rising crime

NZ Herald

time2 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Napier trials night CCTV to tackle rising crime

It will be funded through the Parking Reserve Account, using existing staff, with no impact on rates. Overnight monitoring will give police and the council real-time visibility of the city during hours when incidents are more likely to occur. Councillor Sally Crown said they have had a clear signal from the community and local retailers that safety and crime after dark was a major concern. In December 2024, Boy Taylor was found about 3.15am on Emerson St after being attacked. Attempts were made to resuscitate him, but he died at the scene. Four men aged 18, 19, 21 and 33 were later charged with murder. Emerson St retailers have been the target of multiple burglaries, including three this year at Life Pharmacy within 10 weeks. Thieves in two of the raids targeted men's fragrances. Council said the new monitoring hours aim to strengthen collaboration with police and provide better tools for responding to night-time crime, particularly retail break-ins and antisocial behaviour. Crown said it wasn't often that the council was able to be agile. 'There are lots of things that come at us from different angles where we want to be enabling, where we want to act. 'So I take my hat off to council officers for taking the approach that they have and looking to take a step in a different direction to test and see how effective it might be for our community,' Crown said. Wise says this is another step forward in evolving the service to meet community needs. 'Safety in our city doesn't stop when the sun goes down. This is about using the resources we already have in smarter ways, trialling what works best, and setting Napier up for long-term solutions that reflect the needs of our people and our place.' Napier Assist was launched in 2022 after a survey revealed 44% of the 597 people who took part felt the city was not a safe place to live. Despite the foot patrol, crime has continued to rise. The temporary change will involve the Napier Assist team adjusting their shifts to cover night-time monitoring, while continuing their daytime patrols in a reduced capacity. The trial will run until June 30, 2026. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

Man jailed for assaulting girl went on to abuse preschooler
Man jailed for assaulting girl went on to abuse preschooler

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Man jailed for assaulting girl went on to abuse preschooler

By Al Williams, Open Justice reporter Warning: This story contains details of sexual offending against a child and may be upsetting. A man who was jailed for three and a half years for indecently assaulting a 10-year-old girl went on to commit similar offences against a 4-year-old girl a decade later. The victim of Michael Brendon Buck's latest offending described the trauma as something she could not comprehend. 'I have lived with it for many years, I don't think I had ever had a reaction, not until the day I came forward to my family about what happened when I was 4 years old.' Her victim statement was read out in the Christchurch District Court by Crown prosecutor Jade Lancaster when Buck appeared for sentencing on multiple charges of sexual conduct with a child aged under 12. The victim said the hardest thing to do was telling her family about Buck's offending. 'I didn't really think anything of it, the damage it might cause, the guilt, talking about it, I still get a sore throat, my heart caves into the pit of my stomach. 'It is heartbreaking, gut-wrenching, it makes me sick now; I have stopped trying to understand why someone like that would take advantage of me, not realising that things like that shouldn't happen to you.' She wanted Buck to acknowledge what he had done. The court heard the victim was often in Buck's care, and that when she was 4 or 5 years old, he had committed an indecent act on her. When the victim was aged between 8 and 9 years old, he again committed an indecent act on her. He went on to deny the offending before saying he didn't have a direct recall of the events, but accepted the summary of facts if that was what the victim had recalled. While defence lawyer Rupert Ward said Buck had shown remorse and taken responsibility for the situation, Judge Gerard Lynch didn't accept his claim of remorse. 'Any remorse was about the fix you found yourself in rather than any heartfelt remorse for this child,' Judge Lynch told him. Judge Lynch said the thought of going back to jail had 'terrified' Buck. Lancaster submitted an uplift in the sentence for Buck's criminal history. 'Obviously this is offending of a type where prison is appropriate.' The Crown also sought to have Buck placed on the Child Sex Offender Register. Judge Lynch said Buck, now 65, had been sentenced to three and half years' jail in 1991 for indecent acts on a girl aged under 12. While there had been more than 30 years between the convictions, it was only 12 years between the offending, the judge said. 'That you have offended again like this is worrying. 'She was very young, you exploited her for your own gratification, it is plain the harm he caused, it will be with her for some time.' Judge Lynch told Buck he did not accept his claim of remorse after Buck had entered not guilty pleas and sought a sentencing indication. From a starting point of 24 months' jail, Judge Lynch sentenced him to 10 months and two weeks' home detention and placed Buck on the Child Sex Offender Register. 'This is the sort of case when an order is needed to protect any children or any other person, the risk is real and genuine.' SEXUAL HARM Where to get help: If it's an emergency and you feel that you or someone else is at risk, call 111. If you've ever experienced sexual assault or abuse and need to talk to someone, contact Safe to Talk confidentially, any time 24/7:• Call 0800 044 334• Text 4334 • Email support@ • For more info or to web chat visit Alternatively contact your local police station - click here for a list. If you have been sexually assaulted, remember it's not your fault.

Repeat sex offender Michael Buck receives home detention for child abuse
Repeat sex offender Michael Buck receives home detention for child abuse

NZ Herald

time4 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Repeat sex offender Michael Buck receives home detention for child abuse

Her victim statement was read out in the Christchurch District Court by Crown prosecutor Jade Lancaster when Buck appeared for sentencing on multiple charges of sexual conduct with a child aged under 12. The victim said the hardest thing to do was telling her family about Buck's offending. 'I didn't really think anything of it, the damage it might cause, the guilt, talking about it, I still get a sore throat, my heart caves into the pit of my stomach. 'It is heartbreaking, gut-wrenching, it makes me sick now; I have stopped trying to understand why someone like that would take advantage of me, not realising that things like that shouldn't happen to you.' She wanted Buck to acknowledge what he had done. The court heard the victim was often in Buck's care, and that when she was 4 or 5 years old, he had committed an indecent act on her. When the victim was aged between 8 and 9 years old, he again committed an indecent act on her. He went on to deny the offending before saying he didn't have a direct recall of the events, but accepted the summary of facts if that was what the victim had recalled. While defence lawyer Rupert Ward said Buck had shown remorse and taken responsibility for the situation, Judge Gerard Lynch didn't accept his claim of remorse. 'Any remorse was about the fix you found yourself in rather than any heartfelt remorse for this child,' Judge Lynch told him. Judge Lynch said the thought of going back to jail had 'terrified' Buck. Lancaster submitted an uplift in the sentence for Buck's criminal history. 'Obviously this is offending of a type where prison is appropriate.' The Crown also sought to have Buck placed on the Child Sex Offender Register. Judge Lynch said Buck, now 65, had been sentenced to three and half years' jail in 1991 for indecent acts on a girl aged under 12. While there had been more than 30 years between the convictions, it was only 12 years between the offending, the judge said. 'That you have offended again like this is worrying. 'She was very young, you exploited her for your own gratification, it is plain the harm he caused, it will be with her for some time.' Judge Lynch told Buck he did not accept his claim of remorse after Buck had entered not guilty pleas and sought a sentencing indication. From a starting point of 24 months' jail, Judge Lynch sentenced him to 10 months and two weeks' home detention and placed Buck on the Child Sex Offender Register. 'This is the sort of case when an order is needed to protect any children or any other person, the risk is real and genuine.' Al Williams is an Open Justice reporter for the New Zealand Herald, based in Christchurch. He has worked in daily and community titles in New Zealand and overseas for the last 16 years. Most recently he was editor of the Hauraki-Coromandel Post, based in Whangamatā. He was previously deputy editor of the Cook Islands News.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store