logo
The Enduring Fantasy of Porn's Harmlessness

The Enduring Fantasy of Porn's Harmlessness

New York Times19-05-2025
These days, virality is difficult to achieve. But the British OnlyFans creator Lily Phillips managed it this winter, when she appeared in a documentary titled 'I Slept With 100 Men in One Day.'
The film (available on YouTube in an edited form and unexpurgated on OnlyFans) followed Ms. Phillips as she planned for and executed the titular stunt, capturing everything from the shuffling feet of the men waiting outside her rented Airbnb to her shaken visage in the aftermath of the deed. ('It's not for the weak girls,' she tells the filmmaker Josh Pieters, with tears in her eyes. 'I don't know if I'd recommend it.')
Excessive? Certainly. Off-putting? To some. But perhaps not unexpected, if one considers how inured American society has become to women's sexualization and objectification — so much so that extremism seems like one of the few ways for an ambitious young sex worker to stand out.
Pornography floods the internet. A 2023 report from Brigham Young University estimated that pornography could be found on 12 percent of websites. Porn bots regularly surface on X, on Instagram, in comment sections and in unsolicited direct messages. Defenders of pornography tend to cite the existence of ethical porn, but that isn't what a majority of users are watching. 'The porn children view today makes Playboy look like an American Girl doll catalog,' one teenager wrote in 2023 in The Free Press, and it often has a focus on violence and dehumanization of women. And the sites that supply it aren't concerned with ethics, either. In a column last week, Nick Kristof exposed how Pornhub and its related sites profit off videos of child rape.
There are consequences for members of Gen Z, in particular, the first to grow up alongside unlimited and always accessible porn and have their first experiences of sex shaped and mediated by it. It's hard not to see a connection between porn-trained behaviors — the choking, slapping and spitting that have become the norm even in early sexual encounters — and young women's distrust in young men. And in the future, porn will become only more addictive and effective as a teacher, as virtual reality makes it more immersive and artificial intelligence allows it to be customizable. (For a foretaste of where this might end up, you can read a recent essay by Aella, a researcher and sex worker, on Substack defending A.I. child porn.)
In her new book 'Girl on Girl: How Pop Culture Turned a Generation of Women Against Themselves,' Sophie Gilbert critiques the mass culture of the 1990s and 2000s, noting how it was built on female objectification and hyperexposure. A generation of women, she explains, were persuaded by the ideas that bodies were commodities to be molded, surveilled, fetishized or made the butt of the joke, that sexual power, which might give some fleeting leverage, was the only power worth having. This lie curdled the emerging promise of 20th-century feminism, and as our ambitions shrank, the potential for exploitation grew.
Ms. Gilbert has a talent for pinpointing moments that, in hindsight, signal a change: when the 'ferocious activist energy' of the Riot Grrrl movement was supplanted by the Spice Girls' sexy, consumerist pop; when grown-up, self-assured supermodels are pushed off magazine covers in favor of easily manipulated waifs; when reality television and paparazzi hounds made self-exposure (willing or unwilling) the norm.
And she's clear about the thread that runs through it all: the rise of easy-to-access hard-core pornography, which 'trained a good amount of our popular culture,' she writes, 'to see women as objects — as things to silence, restrain, fetishize or brutalize. And it's helped train women, too.'
But while Ms. Gilbert is unsparing in her descriptions of pornography's warping effect on culture and its consumers, she's curiously reluctant to acknowledge what seems obvious: Porn hasn't been good for us. While her descriptions of the cultural landscape imply that the mainstreaming of hard-core porn has been a bad thing, she pulls her punches.
'I'm not interested in kink-shaming,' she writes, 'and I'm not remotely opposed to porn' — immediately after describing a 2019 study that found that 38 percent of British women under 40 reported having experienced unwanted slapping, choking, gagging or spitting during sex. That data point comes at the tail end of a chapter that draws a disturbing and convincing line from the emergence and popularization of violent, extreme pornography in the late 1990s to the photos that emerged from Abu Ghraib in 2004 of prisoners being sexually humiliated.
But in its reluctance to acknowledge what the evidence suggests, 'Girl on Girl' is not unusual. Despite significant evidence that a deluge of pornography has had a negative impact on modern society, there is a curious refusal, especially in progressive circles, to publicly admit disapproval of porn.
Criticizing porn goes against the norm of nonjudgmentalism for people who like to consider themselves forward-thinking, thoughtful and open-minded. There's a dread of seeming prudish, boring, uncool — perhaps a hangover from the cultural takeover that Ms. Gilbert so thoroughly details. More generously, there's a desire not to indict the choices of individuals (women or men) who create sexual content out of need or personal desire or allow legislation to harm those who depend on it to survive.
But a lack of judgment sometimes comes at the expense of discernment. As a society, we are allowing our desires to continue to be molded in experimental ways, for profit, by an industry that does not have our best interests at heart. We want to prove that we're chill and modern, skip the inevitable haggling over boundaries and regulation and avoid potentially placing limits on our behavior. But we aren't paying attention to how we're making things worse for ourselves. Ms. Phillips's case is one example of how normalization of pornographic extremes has made even lurid acts de rigueur; it's not hard to imagine a future that asks (and offers) more than we can imagine today.
Most recently, the only people who seem willing to openly criticize the widespread availability of pornography tend to be right-leaning or religious and so are instantly discounted — often by being disparaged as such. But cracks are beginning to appear in the wall, as shown by sources as varied as the recent, if quiet, revival of the anti-porn feminist Andrea Dworkin (Picador books rereleased a trio of her most famous works this winter) and the heartfelt podcasts of Theo Von, who frequently discusses his decision to stop watching porn.
And members of Gen Z seem more willing to openly criticize it than their careful elders. The Oxford philosopher Amia Srinivasan, whom Ms. Gilbert quotes in the introduction to 'Girl on Girl,' notes this in her 2021 essay 'Talking to My Students About Porn': 'Does porn bear responsibility for the objectification of women, for the marginalization of women, for sexual violence against women? Yes, they said, yes to all of it.' In my own experience speaking to college students and young adults, they're dismayed and discouraged by the role pornography has played in their sexual formation. In their eyes, it colors everything.
'I wanted to understand how a generation of young women came to believe that sex was our currency, our objectification was empowering,' Ms. Gilbert writes. 'Why were we so easily persuaded of our own inadequacy? Who was setting the agenda?'
The thing is, we all know. Perhaps we should be so gauche — or brave — as to simply admit it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jennifer Lopez suffers wardrobe malfunction during concert
Jennifer Lopez suffers wardrobe malfunction during concert

Fox News

time8 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Jennifer Lopez suffers wardrobe malfunction during concert

Jennifer Lopez accidentally left her skirt on the floor Friday during a concert in Poland. Lopez, who performed in Warsaw on Friday for her 56th birthday, suffered a wardrobe malfunction during the middle of her celebration. The "Waiting for Tonight" singer was in the midst of receiving birthday wishes during her livestreamed concert when her gold sequined skirt fell to the ground. Lopez glittered in gold wearing a metallic bra with a matching fringed skirt for the show. As she walked across the stage, concert-goers caught a glimpse of her matching underwear when her sparkling skirt hit the stage. "Thank you, Warsaw," Lopez screamed to the crowd when suddenly her skirt broke. "Oh! I'm out here in my underwear." A backup dancer rushed to her side and attempted to cover up Lopez, only for the "Let's Get Loud" singer to throw the broken garment into the crowd. "I'm glad that they reinforced that costume, and I'm glad I had underwear on," she said. "I don't usually wear underwear." Representatives for Lopez did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment. JLo's set to perform once again this week in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. It's unclear if any additional precautions are being taken to prevent another on-stage incident. The tour, which began earlier this month, is her first tour in six years. Lopez was slated to embark on the "This is Me… Live" tour in the summer of 2024, but canceled the concerts to spend time with her family. Representatives for Live Nation explained JLo would be "taking time off to be with her children, family and close friends." "I am completely heartsick and devastated about letting you down," Lopez wrote in her newsletter. "Please know that I wouldn't do this if I didn't feel that it was absolutely necessary. I promise I will make it up to you and we will all be together again. I love you all so much. Until next time ... " Two months later, Lopez filed for divorce from her fourth husband, Ben Affleck. The Hollywood heavyweights finalized their divorce in January, with both parties waving spousal support, in addition to waiving further discovery proceedings. Affleck and Lopez were married for two years before she filed for divorce on Aug. 20 in Los Angeles County Superior Court. Her petition for the dissolution of their marriage was filed on the two-year anniversary of their Georgia wedding. CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER The former couple first said "I do" during a surprise Las Vegas wedding in 2022. One month later, the newlyweds hosted a backyard ceremony for friends and family at the $8 million Georgia mansion Affleck purchased when the couple first began dating 20 years ago. Affleck and Lopez first met while working on the set of "Gigli" and were engaged in 2002 with plans to marry in September 2003, but they postponed the wedding and ultimately called off their relationship at the beginning of 2004. "Bennifer" reunited once again before the summer of 2021, and Affleck proposed to Lopez in April while she was taking a bath.

Police cordons remain in place as investigation into death continues
Police cordons remain in place as investigation into death continues

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Police cordons remain in place as investigation into death continues

A back street remains cordoned off as police continue their enquiries into the death of a man. The scene has been in place since Thursday evening, with a police having made an arrest. (Image: Phil Taylor) The investigation centres around Longden Street in Heaton, where another police scene is in place. READ MORE: Heaton: Murder investigation launched after man found dead Murder investigation launched in Heaton (Image: Phil Taylor) Emergency services were called just before 9pm on Thursday, and there has been a police presence there since, including today. The police told The Bolton News on Friday that they were called at 8.50pm on Thursday to reports of a concern for the welfare of a man on the street. A man in his 40s was found dead and a woman in her 40s had been arrested on suspicion of murder and as of yesterday was still in custody for questioning. Crime scene investigation were on scene on Friday.

A Woman's Son Died in the Air India Crash, and Now She Says She Was Given the Wrong Body: 'An Appalling Thing to Have Happened'
A Woman's Son Died in the Air India Crash, and Now She Says She Was Given the Wrong Body: 'An Appalling Thing to Have Happened'

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Woman's Son Died in the Air India Crash, and Now She Says She Was Given the Wrong Body: 'An Appalling Thing to Have Happened'

'We don't know what poor person is in that casket,' Amanda Donaghey said of the body she believed to be her son's After losing her son in the Air India plane crash, a grieving mother traveled to India to bring his body home. But the coffin she returned with, she claims, contained the remains of a different victim. On June 12, Air India Flight AI171, a London-bound Boeing 787-8 aircraft, crashed just after takeoff in India, resulting in the deaths of 241 people — everyone on board but one. Amanda Donaghey's son, Fiongal Greenlaw-Meek, 39, and his husband Jamie, 45, were on the flight, returning home to the United Kingdom after celebrating their wedding anniversary in India. Donaghey, who lives in France, traveled to the crash site to see where her son had spent his final moments, and to bring his body home — but the remains she brought back to London were not her son's, she claimed in a new The Sunday Times interview published on July 26. Donaghey, 66, first arrived in India five days after the crash, on June 17, and gave blood in order to find a DNA match among the remains of the 241 — 229 passengers and 12 crew members. On June 20, as she began to lose hope, someone informed her a 'match' had been found, she told The Sunday Times. Believing his body would now be able to join the body of his husband, which had already been properly identified and brought home, Donaghey arrived in London Gatwick Airport 'with the assurance that Fiongal was in the casket,' she told The Sunday Times. But she claimed she would soon make a 'heartbreaking' discovery that disrupted the family's plan to have the couple rest together. As Donaghey and her family planned Greenlaw-Meek and Jamie's funerals, police allegedly informed her that a coroner in the U.K. had determined that the remains she had brought home were not her son's. It happened in early July, when family liaison officers set up a meeting with Donaghey, along with Greenlaw-Meek's father, sister and brother, and allegedly told the family, 'We don't have Fiongal. We have carried out the DNA tests and we do not have Fiongal,' according to The Sunday Times. 'I had my doubts, but to be told that was heartbreaking,' the grieving mother recalled to the outlet of the revelation. 'We don't know what poor person is in that casket. This is an appalling thing to have happened,' Donaghey added to The Sunday Times. 'And we would now like the British government to do everything in its power to find out, and bring Fiongal home.' As Donaghey continues her effort to bring her son's body home, she fears, however, it may now be an impossible feat. 'We have spent every day since then on the phone to the Foreign Office, trying to get a response on where Fiongal is,' Donaghey told The Sunday Times. 'All the time, I feel like I'm just standing on the edge of a black hole thinking, 'Has he been disposed of?' ' Greenlaw-Meek's loved ones are not the only ones in this situation. James Healy-Pratt, an aviation lawyer who said he is representing multiple U.K. families in the wake of the crash, previously told CBS News and The Daily Mail that the remains of two British victims had been misidentified. Speaking with CBS News, he described it as 'a double psychological trauma.' In a statement shared on July 23, Indian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Shri Randhir Jaiswal said authorities 'have seen the report' about the mix-up and "have been working closely with the UK side from the moment these concerns and issues were brought to our attention.' "In the wake of the tragic crash, the concerned authorities had carried out identification of victims as per established protocols and technical requirements,' Jaiswal added. 'All mortal remains were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased. We are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue." In a statement to The Sunday Times, a U.K. government spokesperson said that "formal identification of bodies is a matter for the Indian authorities." 'We understand that this is an extremely distressing time for the families, and our thoughts remain with them," the spokesperson continued, in part. "We continue to liaise with the government of Gujarat and the government of India on behalf of the Inner West London senior coroner to support the coronial process.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. An official cause of the Air India Flight AI171 crash has not officially been released, but officials are currently investigating why the fuel to the engines was cut. The Ministry of Civil Aviation previously announced it was establishing a committee to investigate the incident, promising to assess "the root cause of the crash" and "contributing factors, including mechanical failure, human error, weather conditions, regulatory compliances and other reasons.' Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store