
‘Before whom did India surrender?': Gaurav Gogoi leads Opposition charge
Starting the debate on the Opposition's behalf, Congress Deputy Leader in the Lok Sabha Gaurav Gogoi said the Centre had withheld critical details, and asked how the terrorists had managed to carry out the killings on April 22.
'This is a war of information,' Gogoi said. '(Defence Minister) Rajnath Singh gave a lot of details, but couldn't say how five terrorists reached Pahalgam. Twenty-six innocent people were killed and we still don't know who helped the terrorists or how they fled… You have Pegasus, satellites, CRPF, BSF, CISF, and yet no answers after 100 days?'
Union Home Minister Amit Shah should take 'moral responsibility' for the killings, Gogoi said. 'You can't hide behind the L-G (J&K Lieutenant Governor). And this government, rather than accepting lapses, blamed tour operators!'
He also criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi for not visiting Pahalgam after cutting short his visit to Saudi Arabia and flying back, contrasting it with Rahul Gandhi. 'Our leader went there. He is demanding martyr status for those killed,' the Congress MP said.
Questioning the government's claim of having 'dismantled the terror infrastructure' inside Pakistan, Gogoi said it did so after every terror attack, be it the 2016 Uri killings or the 2019 Pulwama attack, or now. 'If Operation Sindoor is not complete (as the government has said), how can you call it a success?'
The Congress leader said the government decision's to announce a ceasefire on May 10 had squandered an opportunity India had for territorial gains. 'You say war, territorial gain were not your intention. Why not? When will we take POK (Pakistan Occupied Kashmir)?… Why did you stop if Pakistan was ready to get on its knees? Before whom did you surrender?'
Quoting Deputy Chief of Army Staff Lt Gen Rahul R Singh's remarks, Gogoi said China had supported Pakistan during the conflict. 'Why didn't Rajnath Singh even mention China?' He also claimed that the government cut back on the decision to strike 21 targets, and alleged political constraints. 'Why were only nine targets chosen out of 21?'
If India had lost Rafale aircraft, Gogoi said, 'it's a serious issue'. 'Trump has claimed that five or six jets fell. How many did we lose?'
Samajwadi Party Ramashankar Rajbhar accused the government of failure in border management, saying: 'Aakash bandho, paatal bandhi, lekin apni taati to baandho (Control the skies and the ground, but first secure your belongings). If the boundary was sealed, terrorists wouldn't have entered.'
Rajbhar said the government failed to give an adequate response. 'The country wanted Operation Tandoor (the destruction of terror bases) within three days (of the attack), not Operation Sindoor after 17 days.'
Raising Trump's claims, he said: 'We felt proud that our PM is Vishwaguru. But we found that Vishwaguru is sitting in America.'
Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee said: 'No one can take credit for Operation Sindoor except our soldiers. It is surprising how four terrorists came and killed 26 people. What were the BSF and CISF doing? What was the Home Minister doing?'
Questioning Modi's 'silence' on Trump's claims, Banerjee said: 'Why are you so afraid of the American President?'
He also sought to know from the government 'when it was going to take POK'.
Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Arvind Sawant sought a probe into the security lapse leading to the Pahalgam terror attack, and referred to then J&K Governor Satypal Malik's claim that his request that flights be provided for movement of soldiers had been ignored, resulting in the death of 40 CRPF personnel in an attack on a convoy in Pulwama in 2019.
Sawant also questioned why the PM was yet to visit Pahalgam since the incident, comparing it to his 'absence' from Manipur since the crisis began there in 2023.
Sawant asked why 'no country was standing with India' despite Pakistan's role in Pahalgam being clear. 'We kept telling the IMF not to give money to Pakistan as it would use it for terror. Yet it got the funds?' the Sena (UBT) MP said, adding that any cricket matches with Pakistan should be cancelled.
Congress MP Deepender Singh Hooda focused on the timing and rationale of the ceasefire. 'If Pakistan was on its knees, why stop? Who brokered the ceasefire and on what terms?' he asked.
He also questioned the government's strategy in declaring that only terror camps were hit and not military targets. 'That was a strategic mistake. You ended up giving the Pakistan Army a clean chit,' Hooda said, going on to ask why the government felt the need to send all-party delegations across countries in a bid for support in the wake of the attack, if our foreign policy was as robust as claimed.
Congress MP Praniti Sushilkumar Shinde sought to draw a link between terror attacks and polls. Referring to Rome's Colosseum which, she said, was built to keep the public involved in sports and entertainment, and divert their attention from core issues, Shinde alleged the government appeared to be doing the same.
'Just before an important election, a terrorist attack takes place, followed by a retaliatory action by the government. The government has no idea where the terrorists came from or where they went. But we want to attack a neighbouring country and use that as a basis to gather votes,' she said.
In her speech, the NCP (SP)'s Supriya Sule said, 'Justice will not be done till you don't nab the terrorists. We cannot celebrate.' She also said that Amit Shah is seen as an 'assertive' Home Minister and hence people have expectations with him.
Sule suggested that just as the Atal Bihari Vajpayee government had set up a committee after Kargil War, the Modi government should seek a report on Operation Sindoor and table it on the floor of Parliament.
RJD MP Abhay Kumar Sinha raised questions over local law enforcement. 'Did the government probe why police security was not available when the incident happened at Pahalgam, and who was responsible for that?' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Sanjay Raut cites Kulbhushan Jadhav in Pakistan to counter Amit Shah's ‘Hindus can't be terrorists' remark
Shiv Sena (UBT ) Member of Parliament Sanjay Raut said on Thursday that a terrorist doesn't have a caste or a religion. Raut was responding to Union Home Minister Amit Shah's 'A Hindu cannot be a terrorist' statement in Rajya Sabha a day before. 'A terrorist does not have any caste or religion,' Raut told news agency ANI, invoking Kulbhushan Jadhav, an Indian national incarcerated in Pakistan since 2016. "The people of Pakistan call Kulbhushan Jadhav a terrorist, a Hindu terrorist. We are not ready to accept it. The government should tell Pakistan that he is our citizen and get him freed," Raut said. Pakistan alleges that Jadhav is a spy for the Research and Analysis Wing, India's intelligence agency, and was arrested in the Pakistani province of Balochistan. The Indian foreign ministry says that Yadav was kidnapped from Iran and illegally rendered to Pakistan Union Home Minister Amit Shah said, speaking in Rajya Sabha on July 30, that Hindus 'can never be terrorists'. The home minister criticised former Union minister and senior Congress leader P Chidambaram for his assessment that there was no solid proof linking Pakistan to the terrorists who attacked tourists at Pahalgam, the home minister said. The home minister also brought up Congress leader Digvijaya Singh's 2008 statement about the possibilities of an RSS link to the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. A terrorist does not have any caste or religion. "Aur Hindu terror ka shigoofa kisne chhoda? (Who gave the false theory of Hindu terror?) Today I proudly declare to the world and the people of the country that a Hindu can never be a terrorist. Hindus can never be terrorists," said Shah.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India has to now contend with CAP- China, America, Pak: Cong's dig at govt
After US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on India, the Congress on Thursday took a swipe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying that he once spoke of the TOP -- Tomato, Onion, Potato -- challenges in prices, but the country now has to contend with the political challenges arising out of CAP -China, America, Pakistan. The opposition party said that on the one hand President Trump criticises India strongly and imposes penalties on it for trading with Russia, while on the other hand, just before the Iranian President's visit to Pakistan, he announces a big partnership with Pakistan for hydrocarbon exploration and development, alongside a trade deal. Congress general secretary in-charge of communications Jairam Ramesh said that President Trump is "piling it on India". In an X post, Ramesh wrote, "Since May 10, he has claimed 30 times that he stopped Operation Sindoor. These claims were made in four different countries. On June 18, he hosted the Pakistan Army Chief and the orchestrator of the Pahalgam terror attacks for lunch at the White House." "On July 30, he imposed a 25% tariff on US imports from India plus a penalty on India's oil and defence purchases from Russia. In addition, sanctions on at least six Indian companies were imposed for engaging with Iran," he said. On July 30, Trump also announced that the US will help Pakistan explore and develop its oil and gas reserves, Ramesh said, adding this comes on top of his full-throated support to Pakistan receiving financial assistance from the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. "Prime Minister Modi once spoke of the TOP (Tomato, Onion, Potato) challenge in prices. Now India has to contend with the political challenge arising out of CAP (China, America, Pakistan)," Ramesh said. "He (Modi) invested very heavily in his personal friendship with President Trump, as he had done earlier with President Xi. Both have the full measure of the man now --? someone who can be managed easily by playing to his gigantic ego and self-obsession," the Congress leader said. In another post, Ramesh said, "President Trump criticises India imposes penalties on India for trading with Russia. He sanctions Indian companies for trading with Iran." But just before the Iranian President's visit to Pakistan, Trump announces a big partnership with Pakistan for hydrocarbon exploration and development - alongside a trade deal, he said. The remarks came a day after the US President announced the imposition of 25 per cent tariff on all goods coming from India starting August 1, plus an unspecified penalty on the country for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. The announcement is being seen as a pressure tactic to get New Delhi to agree to demands made by the US, which has, in recent days, got favourable trade deals with major partners like Japan, the UK and the European Union. In a social media post, Trump termed India's trade policies as "most strenuous and obnoxious". "All things not good! India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25 per cent, plus a penalty for the above, starting on August first," Trump wrote. The penalty was announced as India has made large purchases of oil and military equipment from Russia. India is the first country Trump has slapped a penalty over Russian imports. Earlier, he had imposed high tariffs on China but refrained from levying any penalty despite Beijing being Russia's largest oil importer. On Wednesday, the Opposition parties slammed the government for the US' imposition of the tariff and penalties on Indian imports, and said that Prime Minister Modi's friendship with the US president meant little. Ramesh had said that Modi should take inspiration from former prime minister Indira Gandhi and stand up to the president of the United States.


Deccan Herald
24 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
PM Modi lauds Shah's 'phenomenal' speech
A phenomenal speech by Home Minister Amit Shah Ji in the Rajya Sabha. He categorically expressed our Government's point of view on key aspects relating to national security, uprooting terror networks and the success of Operation Sindoor.