
$1 Towards A Girl's Education = $3 For The Global Economy: That's How Development Works
Thursday, 26 June 2025, 6:33 am
Every dollar invested in girls' education yields an average return of $2.80 – translating into billions in additional GDP. Similarly, each dollar spent on water and sanitation saves $4.30 in healthcare costs.
Simple math, not miracles
These aren't miracles – they're measurable outcomes. Maths doesn't recognize gender or infrastructure; it simply reflects the truth in numbers. And those numbers make a compelling case: helping countries with the least resources benefits everyone, including those with the most.
Even a single dollar, strategically invested, can make a profound difference.
For example, allocating just $1 per person annually to combat non-communicable diseases could prevent nearly seven million deaths by 2030. Likewise, every dollar spent on disaster risk reduction can save up to $15 in recovery costs.
Yet despite such compelling evidence, development aid is often misunderstood – seen by some as mere charity, and by others as a vehicle for profiteering.
Equity, not charity
The latest UN Development Programme report on Afghan women entrepreneurs challenges the skeptics.
It highlights that these women are not seeking charity – they're asking for a fair chance to succeed. Earning their own income gives them a measure of independence, which in turn strengthens the communities they live in.
Against all odds, they are generating income, creating jobs, and building fuller, more enriching lives.
Expanding access to public and private financing, guaranteeing loans, offering preferential terms in international markets, and reinforcing support networks can fuel business growth and foster a more prosperous future – whether in Afghanistan or Ecuador, or anywhere in between.
FFD4 faces strong headwinds
These examples – from education and health to entrepreneurship and disaster resilience – paint a clear, data-driven narrative: smart investments in development pay dividends for everyone.
That message should be front and center at the upcoming Fourth UN Conference on Financing for Development which will be held in the Spanish city of Sevilla, from 30 June to 3 July. But the summit, known by its clunky acronym FFD4, faces stiff headwinds.
Even as countries negotiating at UN Headquarters in New York agreed a week ago on a sweeping outcome document – set to be adopted at the close of the conference and intended to guide the future of global development aid – some nations are pulling back.
Notably, the United States has announced it will not send a delegation to Sevilla at all.
And even though there are some notable exceptions, including Spain, which has increased its development financing budget allocations by 12 per cent, the uncertain landscape ahead has led UN Secretary-General Antono Guterres to lament that 'global collaboration is being actively questioned.'
This questioning is reflected in the $4 trillion annual deficit in development financing, as well as the abandonment of earlier commitments and delivery of aid by donors at what the Secretary-General has called 'a historic speed and scale.'
Moreover, the Sustainable Development Goals, signed by all world leaders just 10 years ago, are a long way off track.
What is at stake in Seville?
Success in Sevilla 'will require other countries to fill the global leadership vacuum and demonstrate credible commitment to multilateral cooperation, which is essential for our survival,' states Jayati Ghosh, professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Meaningful steps forward must include deep reforms of the international financial system. As it stands, it fails to meet the needs of developing countries while steadfastly protecting the interests of wealthier nations.
Consider this: developing countries face interest rates at least twice as high as those paid by developed nations. And today, the average rates charged by private creditors to these countries have reached their highest levels in 15 years.
What aid gives, debt takes away
Developing countries spent a record $1.4 trillion on external debt service in 2023, the highest in 20 years.
Meanwhile, in 2024, more than 1.1 billion people live in developing countries where external debt servicing accounts for more than 20 per cent of government revenue, and nearly 2.2 billion live in developing countries where the percentage is higher than 10 per cent.
Interest payment on this debt hinders development by preventing investment in health infrastructure and education services, to cite just two examples.
Debt restructuring is therefore essential, because much of the hope for development is lost in the give and take of aid and debt.
Promoting investment in what works
Eradicating hunger, advancing gender equality, protecting the environment, confronting climate change, and saving our oceans are not radical ideas.
Despite claims from some highly ideological viewpoints that the Sustainable Development Goals represent an extremist agenda, they are, in fact, a shared baseline – an urgent set of priorities that humanity demands and that the leaders of 193 countries committed to in 2015.
Despite the noise made by those who oppose development aid and multilateralism, they are a minority, says Spain's Secretary of State for International Cooperation.
Ana Granados Galindo sees Seville as 'a beacon of global solidarity.'
Meanwhile, as the world gears up for FFD4, mathematics, statistics, and Afghan women continue to work their common sense 'development magic'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
UNFCCC Parties Must Help Protect Civic Space In Climate Talks, Says Civil Society
Bonn, 24 June 2025 - Civil society constituencies participating in the UNFCCC climate negotiations have today shared an open letter with all Parties to the Convention, raising urgent concerns over the UNFCCC Secretariat's arbitrary and escalating censorship of peaceful expressions of solidarity with the Palestinian people. The letter - signed by the Women and Gender Constituency, YOUNGO, and Environmental Non-Governmental Organisations - the Global Campaign to Demand Climate Justice (DCJ) and Climate Action Network (CAN), calls attention to the Secretariat's recent decision to prohibit the use of the phrase 'End the Siege' during a planned action at SB62 in Bonn, despite allowing language such as 'end the genocide.' The UNFCCC Secretariat cited the need to 'maintain a neutral and constructive environment,' but civil society actors reject the idea that silence in the face of a humanitarian catastrophe constitutes neutrality. Tasneem Essop, Executive Director, Climate Action Network International, said: 'Let's be clear: the UNFCCC Secretariat is not neutral - it's policing civil society while the rest of the UN system, including the Secretary-General and the High Commissioner for Human Rights, openly call for an end to the siege of Gaza. When our banners are censored for using the same language as UN leaders, it's not about rules - it's about politics. The UNFCCC is embarrassingly out of step with the rest of the UN and with fundamental human rights. We refuse to be complicit in this erasure of the truth.' The letter states,'Silence is not neutrality. To censor calls to 'End the Siege' is to condone it. The climate crisis cannot be addressed in isolation from broader struggles for justice and human rights.' Read the letter: To: All Parties to the UNFCCC Cc: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Secretariat Bonn, 20th June 2025 Subject: Civil Society Protest Against UNFCCC's Arbitrary Censorship of Solidarity with Palestine Your Excellencies, We write to you today with grave concern and indignation. As civil society, we have been a part of the UNFCCC for close to three decades. Our engagement has included advocating for and bringing voices of peoples and communities on the frontlines through actions and press conferences inside the UNFCCC amongst others. For the last two years in the UNFCCC sessions, COP's and SB's, we have faced an escalating pattern of arbitrary censorship from the UNFCCC Secretariat - specifically targeting expressions of solidarity with the Palestinian peoples. Despite our repeated efforts to navigate and comply with an increasingly ambiguous and inconsistent set of restrictions, the Secretariat has continued to impose arbitrary limits on our collective rights. Legitimate, peaceful expressions of solidarity - statements, words, signs, and slogans that align with international human rights and international humanitarian law - have been censored or blocked. This situation has reached a new and deeply troubling low. The UNFCCC Secretariat, in a response to an application for a Palestine solidarity action in the venue of SB62, communicated that they could not authorise the use of the phrase 'End the Siege' in the banners and any accompanying text. As they did not object to the other phrases we use, including 'end the genocide', their focus on the siege wording is unusual and perplexing. This further demonstrates the arbitrariness of their decision-making. The reason provided by the UNFCCC Secretariat was their need to 'maintain a neutral and constructive environment that supports open dialogue among Parties', and authorisation must be assessed in light of the current context. We struggle to understand how a clamp down on the calling out of an ongoing and well-documented humanitarian catastrophe can be considered neutral, particularly when the UN Secretary General, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and representatives of other UN bodies have called for the same thing using the same language. In addition, a majority of states who are also Parties to the UNFCCC process have voted for a resolution in the UN General Assembly demanding an immediate and lasting ceasefire and an end to the blockade in Gaza. To silence the call to 'End the Siege' is to condone it. This is no longer a question of procedure or neutrality. It is picking a side, and in this case, a side that does not align with the UN's own values and international humanitarian law. Civil society has decided to end our negotiations on Palestinian Solidarity actions with the Secretariat that compromises our rights to civic space and freedom of expression within this space. We refuse to accept a decision that directly contradicts the rights and freedoms that the UN was founded to protect. We have therefore decided to make our grievances public in the hope that all people of conscience will support basic human rights and bring it to the attention of Parties because the UNFCCC Secretariat's attempts at silencing us is done in the name of Parties. . The climate crisis is inseparable from questions of justice and human rights. The Paris Agreement itself is emphatic that 'Parties should, when taking action to address climate change, respect, promote and consider their respective obligations on human rights [...]' The Secretariat's refusal to acknowledge an unfolding crime against humanity, together with its active suppression of calls to end the genocide and siege, and doing so in the name of Parties in the UNFCCC, has deeply shaken our confidence in this body's ability to safeguard humanity's future. This is a sentiment that echoes far beyond these walls, and risks making multilateralism irrelevant to humanity. The UNFCCC Secretariat's narrow understanding of climate, ignoring its intersections with civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, not only is contrary to the Convention and the Paris Agreement but will lead to a failure in finding systematic and sustained solutions to the climate crisis. We appeal to Parties to reaffirm the rights of civil society, particularly our freedom of expression in calling out a genocide and the vested interests that uphold this as well as the climate crisis. Silence is not neutrality. Sincerely,


Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
BRIEFING NOTES: Israel-OPT
Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights: Thameen Al-Kheetan Location: Geneva Date: Subject: Israel-OPT Desperate, hungry people in Gaza continue to face the inhumane choice of either starving to death or risk being killed while trying to get food. Since the 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' started operating on 27 May, the Israeli military has shelled and shot Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points, leading to many fatalities. Reportedly, over 410 Palestinians have been killed as a result. At least 93 others have also been reportedly killed by the Israeli army while attempting to approach the very few aid convoys of the UN and other humanitarian organisations. At least 3,000 Palestinians have been injured in these incidents. Each of these killings must be promptly and impartially investigated, and those responsible must be held to account. The killing and wounding of civilians resulting from the unlawful use of firearms constitute a grave breach of international law, and a war crime. Palestinians across Gaza are suffering from hunger and the lack of other lifesaving necessities. The Gaza Strip remains on the verge of famine as a result of Israel's closure and blockade, as well as ongoing unlawful restrictions on the entry and distribution of humanitarian assistance. This adds to Israel's systematic destruction of local food production and the economy, as well as the repeated forced mass displacements over the past 20 months. Israel also continues to impose severe restrictions on the work of the UN and other humanitarian organisations, preventing them from bringing and distributing food, fuel and lifesaving assistance into Gaza. Only a very few trucks have been allowed in since 2 March 2025. We are seeing scenes of chaos around the food distribution points of the 'Gaza Humanitarian Foundation' and the few UN humanitarian convoys. Women, children, older and disabled people in particular are facing multiple challenges at these points, and are potentially at risk of aggravated forms of exploitation and abuse. Israel's militarised humanitarian assistance mechanism is in contradiction with international standards on aid distribution. It endangers civilians, and contributes to the catastrophic humanitarian situation in Gaza. The weaponisation of food for civilians, in addition to restricting or preventing their access to life-sustaining services, constitutes a war crime and, under certain circumstances, may constitute elements of other crimes under international law. The Israeli military must stop shooting at people trying to get food. Israel must also allow the entry of food and other humanitarian assistance needed to sustain the lives of Palestinians in Gaza in accordance with international law and humanitarian principles. It must immediately lift its unlawful restrictions on the work of UN and other humanitarian actors. Third States have the obligation to take concrete steps to ensure that Israel, the occupying power in Gaza, complies with its duty to ensure that sufficient food and lifesaving necessities are provided to the population.


Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Climate Groups Call For Accountability And Ambition From COP30 Presidency
23 June 2025 Bonn, Germany – In a press conference held today, leading voices from the climate justice movement responded to the COP30 Presidency's plenary session at the UN climate talks in Bonn. Activists and climate groups are urging a stronger, more accountable path forward, gathering earlier in the day holding banners calling for the tripling of renewable energy, a full and fair phase-out of fossil fuels, and the inclusion of Indigenous and traditional leaders at the heart of COP30 decision-making. At the press conference, speakers from across the Global South emphasized that the world cannot afford another summit of empty promises. They called on the COP Presidency to deliver the tripling renewable energy capacity and phase out fossil fuels in the negotiated outcome, and for Indigenous and traditional people to meaningfully participate in the leaders segment and official agenda. Today's messages were clear: 1.5°C is a lifeline, not a target to be negotiated. The Global North must deliver new, additional public finance to meet its climate debt, and frontline communities must be empowered as leaders in global climate governance. Only through ambition grounded in justice can COP30 deliver the outcomes the world urgently needs. Alia Kajee, Global Campaign Project Manager, says: 'At home in South Africa, 88 people died in flooding just this month. Droughts, storms, and heatwaves are intensifying. Food and energy costs are rising while a handful of billionaires profit and prop up the industries that pollute our lands, air and waters while the vulnerable carry the burden of climate impacts and the cost of life. We ask the COP30 Presidency: Will you match our courage, or will you let history remember you as the government that wrote sophisticated letters, but failed to walk the talk?' Claudio Angelo, Head of International Policy, Observatório de Clima, says: 'Brazil is the best presidency you could get for a climate conference, given the context we have today with wars and the expansion of fossil fuels everywhere. The issue is more that there is a lot on their plate right now. They do have a plan, and they are trying to innovate in a COP format, but the issue is that simply the context is not favoring much ambition right now. But it's not game over yet. If one country can do it, at a climate conference, especially looking at the last three presidencies, Brazil can deliver – but it can't do it alone.' Cacique (chief) Ninawá Inu Huni Kui, says: 'We are here to reaffirm that we are not invited to simply occupy seats at global decision-making tables; we are holders of ancestral knowledge and guardians of the territories that guarantee life on the planet. Indigenous peoples and local communities are not spectators in the climate debate: we are protagonists and have the right and commitment to guide paths towards fair and sustainable change. This is not an option. It is a vital necessity for each and every one of us. Let's transform this global battle into a joint and equal action, so that all voices are heard and all strategies are strengthened by the Indigenous and traditional presence.' Dr Sindra Sharma, International Policy Lead, Pacific Islands Climate Action Network, says: 'I am born of and a product of the Pacific, a region that did not cause this crisis, but is paying for it every day. It's been 10 years since the Paris Agreement, and what do we have to show for it? In every country, planetary boundaries are being crossed, emissions keep rising, and fossil fuel subsidies are not falling. The problem is not a lack of science, it's a failure of political will. For us, the 1.5C limit is a red line. As we move toward COP30 we hope this is the moment we can reclaim 1.5C, as our time is running out. We'll continue to defend 1.5C and the science. But know this, our resilience is not your excuse to not act. We must maintain the required ambition.'