‘Best year ever': UniCredit delivers record earnings, raises 2025 outlook
The Milan-based lender posted a record net profit of €3.3 billion in the second quarter of 2025, lifting its first-half earnings to €6.1 billion.
Earnings per share surged to €2.16, up 34% year-on-year and well ahead of the €1.55 forecast.
Core revenue rose 1.3% annually to €5.9 billion in the quarter.
According to the bank, these results are transforming what was meant to be a "transitional year into the best year ever."
'UniCredit has achieved outstanding financial results, with a record-breaking Q2 contributing to the best H1 in the bank's history,' said Chief Executive Officer Andrea Orcel.
'We are protected for the future as our low cost of risk, strong asset quality and unmatched overlays safeguard against potential macroeconomic downturns,' he added.
Upgraded outlook and investor payouts
In a further sign of confidence, UniCredit raised its full-year 2025 net profit guidance to approximately €10.5 billion, up from a prior target of more than €9.3 billion. The bank also lifted its net revenue outlook to above €23.5 billion and upgraded its return on tangible equity (ROTE) forecast to around 20%, from previously over 17%.
Longer-term projections were also improved, with 2027 earnings now expected to reach at least €11 billion, up from circa €10 billion. The bank raised its distribution guidance to equal to or above €9.5 billion for 2025, including a cash dividend of at least €4.75 billion. An interim cash dividend of about €2.1 billion is envisaged, representing a 46% increase year-on-year, with the ex-dividend date set for 24 November.
In addition, a €3.6 billion share buy-back programme is slated to commence following the second-quarter results.
Goldman Sachs analyst Chris Hallam praised UniCredit's 'beat and raise' performance, highlighting the bank's continued earnings momentum and shareholder-friendly capital distribution.
Related
Asian markets rise, Toyota up by 14% after US tariff deal
Billion euro deal: Sanofi buys UK biotech company to expand respiratory vaccine portfolio
Balance sheet resilience and strategic clarity
UniCredit's gross non-performing exposure (NPE) ratio remained stable at 2.6%, while the cost of risk stayed at a low nine basis points in the first half—underscoring the group's asset quality and prudent provisioning.
Separately, UniCredit withdrew its offer for Banco BPM, citing unresolved conditions linked to Italy's golden power regulations.
Orcel noted that the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the authorisation process did not benefit shareholders or the bank, prompting the decision to pull the deal.
While progress had been made with the Italian Administrative Tribunal (TAR), the European Commission's Directorate-General for Competition and the Italian government, the bank concluded that the timeline for resolving the regulatory hurdle exceeded the offer window.
Market reaction and sector momentum
Investors responded positively to the results and upgraded guidance.
UniCredit shares rallied 2.6% in early Wednesday trading to €59.60, bringing year-to-date gains to 54%. The stock surged 56% in 2024 and 85% in 2023, making it one of Europe's best-performing financials.
The Euro STOXX Banks index advanced 1.4%, outperforming the broader Euro STOXX 600, which rose 0.9%.
Peers including Deutsche Bank, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya and Nordea Bank each gained 1.5%, while BNP Paribas rose 1.1% ahead of its second-quarter earnings release on Thursday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Colgate-Palmolive Second-Quarter Results Unexpectedly Rise; Maintains 2025 Outlook
Colgate-Palmolive's (CL) second-quarter results unexpectedly increased on an annual basis despite ch Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Johnson Matthey Plc's (LON:JMAT) institutional investors lost 4.3% over the past week but have profited from longer-term gains
Key Insights Significantly high institutional ownership implies Johnson Matthey's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership Insiders have been buying lately Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of Johnson Matthey Plc (LON:JMAT) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by UK£132m last week. However, the 16% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Johnson Matthey. View our latest analysis for Johnson Matthey What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Johnson Matthey? Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. Johnson Matthey already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Johnson Matthey's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Johnson Matthey is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is RWC Partners Limited, with ownership of 8.5%. Schroder Investment Management Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 6.6% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.6% of the company stock. After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. Insider Ownership Of Johnson Matthey While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Johnson Matthey Plc in their own names. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own UK£3.7m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. General Public Ownership The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. Next Steps: While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Johnson Matthey has 4 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Big Tech's AI investments set to spike to $364 billion in 2025 as bubble fears ease
Big Tech firms Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOGL, GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), and Meta (META) reported that they were set to spend as much as a cumulative $364 billion in their respective 2025 fiscal years, up from their prior estimates of around $325 billion. Investors appeared to shrug off the increase for the most part. Shares of three of the four tech giants spiked following their latest quarterly earnings reports over the past two weeks, which showed the companies broadly outperforming Wall Street's expectations and lifting their capital expenditure forecasts. Meta and Microsoft shares surged roughly 11% and 4%, respectively, in Thursday's trading session, following their quarterly results the prior afternoon. Microsoft's surge briefly pushed the firm's value north of $4 trillion for the first time. Alphabet stock also jumped following its report last week. Microsoft reported capital expenditures of $88.7 billion in its 2025 fiscal year, which ended June 30, higher than the $80 billion it projected earlier. The company said its spending will grow at a slower pace in its 2026 fiscal year. During the first quarter, it expects to spend $30 billion, a 50% increase from the prior year. "We will continue to invest against the expansive opportunity ahead across both capital expenditures and operating expenses given our leadership position in commercial cloud, strong demand signals for our cloud and AI offerings, and significant contracted backlog," Microsoft CFO Amy Hood said in an earnings call with analysts. Meta lifted the bottom of its range for projected capital expenditures, as the Facebook and Instagram parent company spends truckloads of money to build AI data centers and poach talent. The firm said Wednesday it expects spending to tally between $66 billion and $72 billion in its fiscal year 2025 versus its prior range of $64 billion to $72 billion given in May. The latter was already bigger than Meta's initial estimate in February that it would spend up to $65 billion in 2025. Meta CFO Susan Li said on a call with analysts Wednesday, "[W]e currently expect another year of similarly significant CapEx dollar growth in 2026 as we continue aggressively pursuing opportunities to bring additional capacity online to meet the needs of our AI efforts and business operations." Alphabet CFO Anat Ashkenazi said the tech giant would spend $85 billion in 2025 rather than its prior estimate of $75 billion, "given the strong demand for our cloud products and services." Using the top end of Meta's range, $72 billion, the higher forecasts would put Big Tech's spending at $364 billion, up from prior estimates of $325 billion in February. Wall Street analysts broadly lifted their price targets on the three stocks, saying the investments are justified as they see companies benefiting from the AI boom. Wedbush analyst Scott Devitt wrote in a note to clients Thursday that Meta's "infusion of AI capabilities across the company's ad stack and content recommendation engines are driving tangible results," raising his outlook on shares to $920 from $750. RBC Capital's Rishi Jaluria said in his own note that Microsoft's "AI footprint and cloud growth remain underappreciated," raising his price target on the stock to $640 from $525. Needham analyst Laura Martin said Google is "leading GenAI innovation," lifting her price outlook on Alphabet shares to $220 from $210 last week. Amazon was an exception to Wall Street's bullish reception of the capital expenditures changes. Shares fell 8% Friday after the company raised its capital expenditure forecast, but its guidance for operating income at its AWS cloud computing unit was lower than expected, raising questions about its AI plans. Amazon said its $31.4 billion in second quarter capital expenditures was "reasonably representative of our quarterly capital investment rate for the back half of this year," implying it would spend around $118.5 billion in the full fiscal year. Amazon aside, the overall excitement over Big Tech's AI spending is a reversal from investors' wariness over companies' torrid spending at the beginning of the year, when Chinese startup DeepSeek showed its AI models could produce similar results to OpenAI's and were trained at a fraction of the cost. The development raised concerns that tech firms had overspent on AI infrastructure as they were still working on monetizing the technology. Recently, top voices in the investment world, from legendary short seller Jim Chanos to Apollo senior economist Torsten Sløk, have sounded alarm bells that the stocks are in an AI bubble bigger than the dot-com era. "The difference between the IT bubble in the 1990s and the AI bubble today is that the top 10 companies in the S&P 500 today are more overvalued than they were in the 1990s," Apollo chief economist Torsten Sløk said in a July 16 blog post. (Disclosure: Yahoo Finance is owned by Apollo Global Management.) It's unclear exactly how much money companies are making on the technology since they don't break out their AI revenue. Google said AI helped drive the company's latest earnings beat, with AI Overviews achieving 2 billion monthly users, while Meta said AI helped drive its larger-than-expected ad revenue. Microsoft did not break out its Azure AI services revenue as it has in prior quarters, but said it "was generally in line with expectations." Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said, "Our AI business has a multibillion-dollar annual revenue run rate, continues to grow triple-digit year-over-year percentages and is still in its very early days." "They're not tight for cash. They're seeing some signs that these investments will bear fruit," Cornell University professor Karan Girotra said in an interview with Yahoo Finance on Thursday. DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria told Yahoo Finance, "The optimism has to do with returns that are coming 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 years out."Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
