Iran admits US strikes badly damaged N-sites days after saying no contamination
Days after Iran said there were no signs of radioactive contamination following the US's strikes on its nuclear installations, Tehran on Wednesday admitted that its nuclear sites were "badly damaged" and demanded compensation from Washington.On June 21, the US joined Israel in its attacks on Iran during the 12-day conflict and bombed the Islamic Republic's key nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.advertisementIran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghei said the US strikes on his country's nuclear installations caused significant damage.
"Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure," Baghaei was quoted by Al Jazeera as saying.
Iran's Natanz nuclear facility damaged following US strikes. (Photo: Maxar)
In an interview with a Lebanese news agency, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh demanded compensation from the US for the damages caused to Iran's nuclear facilities and threatened to file a complaint with the UN."Washington must pay compensation for the damages caused to Iran's facilities or else Tehran will file a complaint with the United Nations on this matter," he said.advertisementSatellite images released by US-based Maxar Technologies showed noticeable damage to Iran's nuclear facilities in Natanz and Isfahan.
Iran's Isfahan nuclear facility damaged in US strikes. (Photo: Maxar)
Another satellite image showed Tehran's Mehrabad airport following Israeli strikes.
Tehran's Mehrabad airport damaged following Israeli attacks. (Photo: Maxar)
Khatibzadeh said, "We had no written agreement with the Zionist regime (Israel) that included any binding clauses. What happened was simply the halt of aggression by the Israelis."TRUMP SAYS CEASEFIRE ACHIEVED AMID TENSIONSOn Tuesday, US President Donald Trump claimed he brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Iran and urged the long-time rivals not to violate the agreement. However, hours later, Israel fired missiles on Iran, which then ordered retaliatory strikes.A frustrated Trump then said that Israel and Iran had violated the ceasefire but insisted that the truce was on. He also said that he urged Israel not to bomb Iran again and that all Israeli planes were returning home.advertisementTrump asserted that Israel "unloaded" right after agreeing to the deal. He also said he was not happy with either country, especially Israel."I am going to see if I can stop it (the fighting). I have to get Israel to calm down. We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing," he said.The surprise declaration of ceasefire by Trump came just 48 hours after he ordered strikes on Iran's underground nuclear facilities.In response, Iran retaliated by launching missiles towards the Al Udeid air base, a US military base in Qatar, as part of a campaign against what Tehran called "blatant military aggression" by Washington. Rockets were also fired at the Ain Al Asad base housing US troops in Iraq.This marked a major escalation in the Israel-Iran conflict, leading to the shutting of airspaces by the Gulf countries and affecting the movement of international flights. It also came as the Middle East remained under strife in 20 months following Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza and its conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon.On June 12, Israel launched aerial attacks on Iran under Operation Rising Lion, asserting that Tehran was on the verge of developing a nuclear weapon. Iran, which has insisted that its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes, fired a volley of missiles and drones, causing massive infrastructural damage and civilian casualties on both sides.- EndsTune InMust Watch
IN THIS STORY#Iran#Israel#Middle East#Donald Trump#United States of America
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
33 minutes ago
- First Post
Supreme Court ruling sparks confusion over US birthright citizenship
On Friday, the court's conservative majority approved President Donald Trump's request to limit the authority of federal judges but did not rule on the legality of his attempt to restrict birthright citizenship read more The U.S. Supreme Court's decision related to birthright citizenship led to confusion and calls to attorneys as individuals potentially impacted worked to understand a complex legal ruling with significant humanitarian consequences. On Friday, the court's conservative majority approved President Donald Trump's request to limit the authority of federal judges but did not rule on the legality of his attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. This outcome has created more uncertainty than clarity around a right long interpreted as protected by the U.S. Constitution: that anyone born in the United States is a citizen at birth, regardless of their parents' citizenship or immigration status. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lorena, a 24-year-old Colombian asylum seeker who lives in Houston and is due to give birth in September, pored over media reports on Friday morning. She was looking for details about how her baby might be affected, but said she was left confused and worried. 'There are not many specifics,' said Lorena, who like others interviewed by Reuters asked to be identified by her first name out of fear for her safety. 'I don't understand it well.' She is concerned that her baby could end up with no nationality. 'I don't know if I can give her mine,' she said. 'I also don't know how it would work, if I can add her to my asylum case. I don't want her to be adrift with no nationality.' Trump, a Republican, issued an order after taking office in January that directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of children born in the U.S. who do not have at least one parent who is an American citizen or lawful permanent resident. The order was blocked by three separate U.S. district court judges, sending the case on a path to the Supreme Court. The resulting decision said Trump's policy could go into effect in 30 days but appeared to leave open the possibility of further proceedings in the lower courts that could keep the policy blocked. On Friday afternoon, plaintiffs filed an amended lawsuit in federal court in Maryland seeking to establish a nationwide class of people whose children could be denied citizenship. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD If they are not blocked nationwide, the restrictions could be applied in the 28 states that did not contest them in court, creating 'an extremely confusing patchwork' across the country, according to Kathleen Bush-Joseph, a policy analyst for the non-partisan Migration Policy Institute. 'Would individual doctors, individual hospitals be having to try to figure out how to determine the citizenship of babies and their parents?' she said. The drive to restrict birthright citizenship is part of Trump's broader immigration crackdown, and he has framed automatic citizenship as a magnet for people to come to give birth. 'Hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into our country under birthright citizenship, and it wasn't meant for that reason,' he said during a White House press briefing on Friday. Worried calls Immigration advocates and lawyers in some Republican-led states said they received calls from a wide range of pregnant immigrants and their partners following the ruling. They were grappling with how to explain it to clients who could be dramatically affected, given all the unknowns of how future litigation would play out or how the executive order would be implemented state by state. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Lynn Tramonte, director of the Ohio Immigrant Alliance said she got a call on Friday from an East Asian temporary visa holder with a pregnant wife. He was anxious because Ohio is not one of the plaintiff states and wanted to know how he could protect his child's rights. 'He kept stressing that he was very interested in the rights included in the Constitution,' she said. Advocates underscored the gravity of Trump's restrictions, which would block an estimated 150,000 children born in the U.S. annually from receiving automatic citizenship. 'It really creates different classes of people in the country with different types of rights,' said Juliana Macedo do Nascimento, a spokesperson for the immigrant rights organization United We Dream. 'That is really chaotic.' Adding uncertainty, the Supreme Court ruled that members of two plaintiff groups in the litigation - CASA, an immigrant advocacy service in Maryland, and the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project - would still be covered by lower court blocks on the policy. Whether someone in a state where Trump's policy could go into effect could join one of the organizations to avoid the restrictions or how state or federal officials would check for membership remained unclear. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Betsy, a U.S. citizen who recently graduated from high school in Virginia and a CASA member, said both of her parents came to the U.S. from El Salvador two decades ago and lacked legal status when she was born. 'I feel like it targets these innocent kids who haven't even been born,' she said, declining to give her last name for concerns over her family's safety. Nivida, a Honduran asylum seeker in Louisiana, is a member of the Asylum Seeker Advocacy Project and recently gave birth. She heard on Friday from a friend without legal status who is pregnant and wonders about the situation under Louisiana's Republican governor, since the state is not one of those fighting Trump's order. 'She called me very worried and asked what's going to happen,' she said. 'If her child is born in Louisiana … is the baby going to be a citizen?'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Iran Denies Any Ceasefire Deal; Says Enemy ‘Pleaded' to End War
/ Jun 28, 2025, 04:40PM IST Iran has claimed that it never agreed to any ceasefire with Israel and that the truce was unilaterally announced by its enemies. A top Iranian cleric and former judicial official alleges that Israel and the U.S. "begged" for the halt after suffering major losses. Tehran says no deal was made, and that surrender was never an option. Meanwhile, mass funeral processions were held for 60 people, including top IRGC commanders killed in Israeli strikes. Watch
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Good luck with that': Trump's border czar hits back at Mamdani's anti-ICE plan for NYC
US President Donald Trump's immigration chief Tom Homan has issued a fiery challenge to Zohran Mamdani, the newly victorious NYC mayoral primary candidate, after Mamdani vowed to 'kick the fascist ICE out of New York City.' Responding on Fox Business' Kudlow a day after Mamdani's win, Homan scoffed, 'Good luck with that,' before adding: 'Federal law trumps him every day, every hour of every minute.' 'We're going to be in New York City, matter of fact, because it's a sanctuary city and President Trump made it clear a week and a half ago, we're going to double down and triple down on sanctuary cities.' he said. Homan, tapped by Trump to spearhead his border crackdown, said agents would focus on areas 'releasing public safety threats and national security threats back to the street.' Trump's border czar asserted that if immigration enforcement officials can't arrest people in jail, they would 'find them' in neighbourhoods or work sites, adding, 'so game on, we're coming.' New: 🚨 Border Czar Tom Homan on Zohran Mamdani for wanting to protect illegal aliens who are p*dos and r*pists. 'Good luck. Federal law trumps him every day, hour, and minute. We're going to be tripling down in NYC.' 👊🏻 — Jay 🇺🇸 Rapid Response Guy (@RapidResponseXY) June 25, 2025 The warning comes amid rising tensions over immigration enforcement in the Big Apple. Mamdani, a Democratic socialist and Queens assemblyman, declared victory in the June 24 Democratic primary with a pledge to 'Trump-proof' the city. His campaign criticised Trump's use of ICE to target immigrant families, and he pledged sweeping changes to protect undocumented New Yorkers. But Homan made clear the administration has other plans: 'Not only are we going to send more agents to the neighborhood, we are going to increase worksite enforcement tenfold.' In contrast, Homan praised current Mayor Eric Adams for cooperating with ICE on 'significant public safety threats' and helping trace the 300,000 missing children trafficked across the US. He described Adams as a law-and-order mayor whose 'hands are tied in many ways.' Mamdani has clashed with Homan before. In March, he confronted him at the New York state Capitol and posted video of the encounter during his campaign. The Astoria politician was protesting ICE's arrest of anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil, detained for allegedly lying on his visa application. Today I confronted 'border czar' Tom Homan who came to Albany to do Trump's bidding — push for mass deportations, carry out the assault on working class New Yorkers, and justify the unjustifiable detention of legal permanent resident and father-to-be, Mahmoud Khalil. — Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) March 12, 2025 Now, Homan says, the fight over immigration enforcement in New York City is far from over: 'We don't have this problem in Florida… so we're going to double up and triple up on New York.' Meanwhile, Trump posted to Truth Social on Wednesday: 'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line. Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous.' Trump continued: 'He looks TERRIBLE, his voice is grating, he's not very smart, he's got AOC+3, Dummies ALL, backing him, and even our Great Palestinian Senator, Cryin' Chuck Schumer, is groveling over him. Yes, this is a big moment in the History of our Country!'
