Nintendo launches legal war against Redditors over Switch piracy network
In its ongoing battle against Nintendo Switch piracy, the gaming giant has set its sights on Reddit users and moderators who are allegedly involved in promoting pirated games and tools.
In a recent legal filing, Nintendo claims that James 'Archbox' Williams, a prominent moderator of the subreddit r/SwitchPirates, operated a "vast network of pirate shops" dedicated to Nintendo Switch game piracy.
The legal action, filed in Federal Court under the case Nintendo of America Inc v. Williams, alleges that Williams was a key figure in the subreddit's piracy operations.
The filing states, "We… learned that Defendant was the primary moderator of the 'SwitchPirates' Reddit community and apparently was the owner of a GitHub account directly tied to these activities."
According to Nintendo, Williams ran accounts linked to distributing pirated Switch games and tools, operating under the name "Archbox" or a close variation of it. The company further claims that through diligent research, it was able to connect Williams to an address in the Phoenix, Arizona area.
As part of its legal strategy, Nintendo has requested the court to subpoena Reddit, GitHub, and Discord, seeking user records that could link Williams and other individuals to the piracy network.
If the request is granted, it could lead to legal action against Reddit users and developers involved in creating or distributing piracy tools for Nintendo systems.
While the risk of receiving a personal lawsuit for simply discussing or downloading pirated ROMs seems minimal, those who played a role in creating or distributing piracy tools may soon face legal pressure.
Nintendo's tactics are clear: target key figures in the piracy scene who lack the resources to fight back legally, using massive financial penalties to deter illegal activities.
This latest move comes as mainstream piracy on the Nintendo Switch appears to have dwindled, with tools like Yuzu and Ryujinx becoming less prominent.
Yet, Nintendo's legal team is showing no signs of letting up in its quest to rid the platform of illegal activity. It seems the battle is far from over, and those on the fringes of piracy may need to start watching their backs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Man arrested for stealing $10,000 in Nintendo Switch games from California libraries
Switch 2 comes equipped with 256 GB of internal storage—eight times the capacity of the original Switch—along with the ability to add more storage via microSD Express cards. PHOTO: YAHOO NEWS A man from Oakland, California, has been arrested for allegedly stealing nearly $10,000 worth of Nintendo Switch games from multiple public libraries in Marin County, according to a June 17 statement by the Marin County Sheriff's Office on Facebook. The thefts reportedly occurred across at least seven library branches between April and June 2025. Authorities believe the suspect intentionally targeted libraries for their video game collections, focusing on Nintendo Switch titles. He is now facing 12 felony charges, including several counts of burglary and committing a felony while already out on bail. Although libraries are not typically known for stocking popular video games, many have expanded their offerings to attract younger visitors. The continued success of the Nintendo Switch—and the recent release of the Switch 2—may have made these collections more appealing to potential thieves. It remains unclear if any of the stolen items included Switch 2 games. In a public statement, the Sheriff's Office emphasized the role of libraries in the community, writing, 'Our libraries are pillars of the community and must be safeguarded for everyone to enjoy.' The specific titles stolen have not been disclosed, but with individual games typically priced between $40 and $60, the estimated $10,000 value suggests that more than 150 games were taken. Authorities have not yet confirmed how the suspect intended to use or resell the games, and no information has been released on whether any of the stolen items have been recovered. As the investigation continues, the Sheriff's Office urges public support to help safeguard community resources like local libraries.
Express Tribune
17-06-2025
- Express Tribune
RaKai banned from Twitch after viral reckless driving livestream
Twitch streamer 2xRaKai, a known associate of Kai Cenat, has been banned from the platform following backlash over a viral video showing him texting while driving during a livestream. The clip, shared widely on June 15, 2025, shows the 16-year-old briefly removing his hands from the wheel, causing his vehicle to swerve—a moment that drew sharp criticism across social media. RaKai has been banned on Twitch after streaming himself recklessly driving. — FearBuck (@FearedBuck) June 16, 2025 Just a day later, on June 16, the automated account @StreamerBans confirmed RaKai's second suspension from the Amazon-owned platform. Attempts to access his channel now display a message citing violations of Twitch's Terms of Service or community guidelines. The circulating clip has intensified scrutiny over Twitch's enforcement of real-life conduct during streams. RaKai acknowledged the situation during a Just Chatting broadcast hours before the ban was made official. He explained he couldn't go live because Twitch had launched an investigation. In the clip, he remarked: 'I thought I was over… I wasn't able to stream yesterday because they needed to do an investigation or some bulls**t.' Public reaction on platforms like Reddit and X has been swift. One user on r/LivestreamFail questioned the platform's delay in taking action, while others criticized RaKai's behavior. Meanwhile, some speculated whether Kai Cenat might intervene on his friend's behalf. As of writing, RaKai has not issued a formal statement regarding his suspension. His Twitch channel remains suspended, and the platform has not commented on the duration of the ban.
Express Tribune
17-06-2025
- Express Tribune
Instagram users face sudden suspensions, AI under scrutiny
Listen to article Instagram users say they are being wrongly banned or suspended from the platform, with complaints growing across Reddit, X, and petition sites as Meta has yet to publicly acknowledge the issue. Photo: Screenshot from Reddit post Many users claim they have not breached any of Instagram's rules, yet find themselves locked out of their accounts without warning. In several cases, users said that when they appealed the decision or submitted identity documents, they received no response. 'I've already submitted multiple appeals, uploaded my ID, and tried reaching out to Meta through all the official channels, but I've been completely ignored,' one Reddit user wrote. 'It feels like I'm shouting into a void.' Critics suspect the bans may be the result of automated moderation errors, possibly involving artificial intelligence systems. However, no concrete evidence has been provided and Meta has not confirmed or denied the use of AI in this case. Meta did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Instagram's subreddit and reply threads on X have been dominated by users sharing similar experiences for several weeks. A petition on demanding Meta address the bans has drawn over 4,000 signatures. Some users say they have been banned for serious policy violations, including alleged involvement in child sexual exploitation (CSE). Several have denied the accusations and warned that such claims carry severe reputational damage. 'This is my livelihood,' wrote a user who runs a fitness business through Instagram. 'This ban has directly affected my business and all the hard work I've poured into it.' Meta offers a Verified subscription that provides priority customer service, but many affected users appear to be outside that tier. A similar episode earlier this year saw Pinterest users facing mass bans. The company later admitted an internal error, but said it was not caused by AI. It remains unclear whether Instagram is facing a higher-than-normal rate of false positives or if the issue stems from a broader moderation failure.
