
New rules see province screening sex education resources before they hit classrooms
Alberta school leaders and groups that deliver school sex education presentations are preparing for new rules taking effect this fall that require the government to first vet all information.
The changes stem from a bill passed last year that the government describes as giving parents and guardians more control and information about what students are learning in school.
New guides and forms posted last month on the provincial government's website show that groups that offer presentations to students primarily and explicitly on human sexuality, sexual orientation or gender identity (SOGI) must have both their organization and their presentations first vetted and approved by Alberta Education.
Schools must also submit any related resource, such as literature, videos or digital tools, to the government for approval before teachers can use them in classrooms.
Exempt from the process is any sexual health information, or resource dealing primarily with SOGI, that is destined for a religion class.
In a statement last week, Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides said those classes are exempt because Albertans have a constitutionally protected right to religious education.
Advocates for 2SLGBTQ+ people say the province shouldn't be scrutinizing and gatekeeping information about sexual orientation and gender identity.
"It's textbook discrimination," said Bennett Jensen, director of legal for Egale, an organization that plans to challenge the legislation in court. "[The bill] sends the message to the population that the government thinks that there's something wrong with queer and trans people."
Presenter groups will also need to re-apply for approval every three years. Schools must submit a resource for re-approval every time a new version is released, according to the minister.
The minister says the government is screening to ensure resources and presenters align with the curriculum and are age-appropriate.
Nicolaides said he knows that getting groups and resources approved in a timely manner is important for educators.
"Since it's the first time that we're doing it at the beginning there, it will be a little bit more busy and hectic, but then it'll slow down as we get into the next few months," Nicolaides said of the review process in an interview last month.
The documents say the province will aim to review applications and make a decision within 90 days and starting in August, the government will post a list of approved presenter groups and resources online.
Last year's Education Amendment Act will also require parents and guardians to opt students into any sexual health education or lessons discussing SOGI issues. The change from the previous opt-out system will make Alberta the first province where students won't participate in sex ed unless parents want them to.
The guidance documents say schools must give parents at least 30 calendar days' notice of the lessons in question and "must provide parents with the option of full or partial consent."
Presenters and resources to be used by extracurricular school clubs, including gay-straight alliances, will also need government vetting. However, students don't need parents to opt them into participation in those clubs, Nicolaides's statement said.
Uncertainty for presenting groups
Calgary Communities Against Sexual Abuse has offered sexual violence education presentations in schools for more than 40 years. Last year, their educators gave 502 presentations to about 6,700 people.
CEO Danielle Aubry says depending on age, presentations cover personal space, listening to gut feelings, telling adults about inappropriate touching, and sexual assault. She said it should not be considered sex ed.
The minister said in a statement that sexual assault centres and their material will need government vetting.
Aubry worries the province will prevent educators from using accurate names for body parts — which police have urged them to teach to help catch perpetrators.
She said the opt-in choice could also mean predators can keep their children out of the education sessions.
On the plus side, presenters won't need to be vetted by multiple school jurisdictions, president and CEO at the Centre for Sexuality in Calgary Pam Krause said in an interview.
The organization has been offering sexual health education in classrooms for 50 years that aligns with provincial health curriculum and is age-appropriate, Krause said.
"We don't have any concerns about showing people what we do," Krause said.
Krause welcomes any steps that would make sexual health education more consistent across Alberta — which she sees as lacking. She is concerned about the timeliness of approvals from a bureaucratic process, though.
Tracking which student is allowed to learn what topics is going to be extra work for for schools, she said and it "defies logic" that students would be allowed to learn part, but not all of the curriculum.
"I'm just really hopeful that through this process we can actually enhance education, not really take away what has been working for years and years," Krause said.
Parental controls
The Alberta Parents' Union has previously run a campaign advocating for parents to have access to more information about what children learn in schools.
"We felt that parents were too in the dark," founder and executive director Jeff Park said in an interview last week.
Park said it was too difficult for families to get information not only about lessons about sexual health and SOGI issues, but how teachers or presenters were addressing racial identity, religion, ethical values or the oil and gas industry.
His members support opt-in sex ed and requiring schools to disclose in advance what will be taught.
Although he's happy there will be a central list of approved materials to consult, parents' union members never wanted the government to be the resource gatekeeper, he said.
"We would prefer a lot more detail there and a lot less bureaucratic nightmare on the approval side," he said.
Park said some parents had concerns about "social values" they didn't agree with being taught to children alongside sex education.
Critics say rules based on disinformation
Jamie Anderson, a University of Calgary PhD candidate who studies the experiences of trans and queer people in school systems, said misinformation and disinformation are fuelling some worries about what teachers teach, and how they teach it.
The guidelines requiring any mention of SOGI to be connected to at least one learning outcome in the curriculum concerns Anderson, as does parents' ability to opt children into lessons by topic.
The only overt mention of 2SLGBTQ+ people in the Alberta health curriculum is the expectation that Grade 3 students learn about different family structures, which could include two moms or two dads, he said.
"This paints a picture of a very explicit drive to erase queer and trans experiences and content from the classroom," he said.
Egale lawyer Jensen said adding administrative barriers for educators to use material mentioning SOGI identities will limit teachers' abilities to respond to the needs of the students before them.
"You're saying that there's something wrong with who they are, such that additional permission is required for their identities to even be discussed," he said.
In a statement, the minister denied the policies are intended to erase 2SLGBTQ+ people.
"These changes will give greater transparency in communication between school authorities and parents and result in greater consistency for students, parents and teachers," Nicolaides said in a statement this week.
The new rules are planned to take effect Sept. 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Raging Grannies protest at Montreal Tesla dealership on Musk's birthday
Ragging grannies take to Tesla to protest on Elon Musk's birthday A small but determined group rallied on Saturday outside of Tesla's Montreal showroom as part of a larger anti-Elon Musk movement on his 54th birthday. The 'Raging Grannies' wanted to protest Musk's ideas that they say puts Canada at risk. 'It's his birthday but we don't feel like celebrating,' said Marguerite 'Soleil' Bilodeau. Bilodeau said Musk is using his influence to destabilize democratic values. 'He uses his privilege and his money to make matters worse- and all for his own benefit,' she said. Raging Grannies protest in the rain Raging Grannies protest at Tesla dealership in Montreal on June 28, 2025. Dual Canadian-American citizen Randi Weitzner joined the grannies and said Musk has already done a lot of damage, including the recent slashing of federal jobs. 'When you see things going on that are anti-ethical to democracy, you have to get up, get out and do something about it,' said Weitzner. While Musk and Trump's relationship has been complicated, U.S. politics expert Graham Dodds said he's long had significant influence on politics. 'The fact of the matter is, especially in the U.S., having a lot of money makes your political opinions count for a lot more,' said Dodds. Musk's net worth is around $400 billion, heading, in addition to Tesla, SpaceX, and the social media company X. 'Which by most accounts was key to the rise of Trump in his first election, in his second election, and today,' said Dodds. Dodds said that disinformation flows freely on the X platform, fueling extremists. 'A lot of the actions that Musk has dreamt of is hurting people everywhere,' said Raging Granny Sheila Laursen. The Raging Grannies know they can't change the world alone, but Laursen said, they have a special strength. 'We have a power because we are old, we have lived a life, we have opinions and not always do we get them expressed, but we can when we're raging grannies,' she said.

CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Liberals taking 'fresh' look at online harms bill, says Justice Minister Sean Fraser
Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the federal government plans to take a "fresh" look at its online harms legislation over the summer but it's not clear yet exactly what the bill will look like when it is reintroduced. It would be the Liberals third attempt to pass legislation to address harmful behaviour online. Fraser told The Canadian Press in an interview that the government hasn't decided whether to rewrite or simply reintroduce the Online Harms Act, which was introduced in 2024 but did not pass. He said Canadians can expect measures addressing deepfakes and child exploitation "to be included in legislative reforms coming up in the near future." WATCH | A bill to protect people — especially children — from harmful content online: Federal government introduces online harms bill 1 year ago Duration 4:59 The Liberal government has tabled bill C-63, which aims to protect people — especially children — from harmful content online, including sexual exploitation and hate speech, through the creation of a new regulatory body called the Digital Safety Commission and changes to the Criminal Code. In their election platform, the Liberals promised to make the distribution of non-consensual sexual deepfakes a criminal offence. They also pledged to introduce a bill to protect children from online sexploitation and extortion, and to give law enforcement and prosecutors additional tools to pursue those crimes. Fraser said the growth of artificial intelligence is influencing the discussions. The spread of generative AI has changed both the online space and everyday life since the federal government first introduced the legislation. "We will have that in mind as we revisit the specifics of online harms legislation," he added. "The world changes and governments would be remiss if they didn't recognize that policy needs to shift." Fraser expects to work with other ministers Online harms legislation was first proposed by then-heritage minister Steven Guilbeault in 2021. After widespread criticism, the government pivoted and shifted the file to the justice minister. Guilbeault is now back in his old ministry, which has been renamed Canadian identity and culture. Prime Minister Mark Carney has also created an artificial intelligence ministry, headed up by rookie MP Evan Solomon. Fraser said he expects "significant engagement" with Guilbeault and Solomon but it will be determined later which minister will take the lead on it. The first version of the bill alarmed critics who warned that the provision requiring platforms to take down offending content within 24 hours would undermine free expression. When Fraser's predecessor, Arif Virani, introduced the Online Harms Act in 2024, the bill restricted that 24-hour takedown provision to content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor, or intimate content shared without consent, including deepfakes. It also required social media companies to explain how they plan to reduce the risks their platforms pose to users, and imposed on them a duty to protect children. But the government also included Criminal Code and Canadian Human Rights Act amendments targeting hate in the same legislation — which some said risked chilling free speech. In late 2024, Virani said he would split those controversial provisions off into a separate bill, but that didn't happen before this spring's federal election was called and the bill died on the order paper. Fraser said no decision has been made yet on whether to bring back online harms legislation in one bill or two. "That is precisely the kind of thing that I want to have an opportunity to discuss with stakeholders, to ensure we're moving forward in a way that will create a broad base of public support," he said. Fraser said the government could "modify existing versions that we may have on the shelf from the previous Parliament as may be needed, or to accept the form in which we had the legislation." He added he wants to have a "fresh consideration of the path forward, where I personally can benefit from the advice of those closest to the file who know best how to keep kids safe online." While the government hasn't set a date to introduce legislation, it could include some online harms measures in a crime bill Fraser plans to table in the fall. Fraser said online harms provisions that "touch more specifically on criminal activity" could be "included in one piece of legislation, with a broader set of reforms on online harms at a different time."


National Post
3 hours ago
- National Post
A Canadian helped design the 'two-state solution.' This Canadian says it remains the only answer in Israel
Former Canadian diplomat Norman Spector doesn't have a reputation for wishful thinking. So when he proposes we talk about how the issues around terrorism, atrocities and hostages are being framed in the aftermath of the October 7 attacks in Israel, I know I'm in for a stiff shot of realpolitik. Article content 'By chance, I had the good fortune of being Canada's first representative to the Palestinian Authority shortly after I landed in Israel as ambassador in 1992,' Norman says, setting the context for our virtual conversation. Article content Article content 'I have some fond as well as some scary memories of walking around Gaza back then,' he continues, 'but these days, I mostly wonder how Israeli-Palestinian relations would have unfolded in the wake of the Oslo accords had Yitzhak Rabin not been assassinated.' Article content Article content Appointed by then-prime minister Brian Mulroney as Canada's ambassador in 1992, the year before the Oslo accords were signed, Norman had the good fortune of living in the Middle East during a period of peace. Article content Reflecting back, Norman says he's not sure the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, envisioned in the Oslo accords, ever had a chance after the Rabin assassination. Rabin, the prime minister of Israel, was assassinated in 1995 by an Israeli extremist opposed to his peace efforts. Article content 'I think Rabin came to the conclusion that there was no alternative — and he had the credibility that allowed him to take a chance with Arafat whom Israelis did not trust,' Norman says. 'After October 7,' he muses, 'there is even less trust of Palestinians and there's no Rabin in sight.' Article content Article content There is a faint hint of wistfulness in Norman's tone; his assessment of the current situation is deeply unsettling. Article content Article content From October 7 on, we've seen growing division and polarization and hatred in our own country. Progressives have made Gaza their cause (no one more than Alberta's own NDP MP, Heather McPherson) and conservatives hold loyal to Israel. Media outlets pick a lane and stick with it. Article content Talking about Israel and the Palestinians has become so prickly, many refuse to wade into the conversation for fear of being attacked. The rhetoric is all part of the conflict, Norman accurately points out, 'Folks chanting or spray painting 'genocide' are generally not in favour of two states, one Jewish, one Palestinian, between the river and the sea.'