North Korea says US should abandon denuclearisation push
US President Donald Trump, who began his second term in January, is interested in resuming talks with North Korea on denuclearisation.
During his first term in the years of 2018 and 2019, Trump met with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un three times in Singapore, Vietnam and at the demilitarised zone (DMZ) that separates the two Koreas.
Although the Trump administration wanted North Korea to give up its nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief, no deal was struck between the two sides and Pyongyang continues to advance its nuclear aspirations.
Trump-Kim relationship 'not bad'
Kim's powerful sister, Kim Yo Jong, said Trump's personal relationship with the North Korean leader is 'not bad'.
However, she said if the US administration were to use the Trump-Kim relationship to push for North Korean denuclearisation, Pyongyang would consider it 'nothing but a mockery'.
'If the US fails to accept the changed reality and persists in the failed past, the DPRK-US meeting will remains as a 'hope' of the US side,' Kim Yo Jong said, using the acronym for North Korea's formal name, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.
Kim Yo Jong's remarks suggest that North Korea is ruling out complete denuclearisation as an option if talks are relaunched with the US.
Trump seeking same objectives
A White House official told Reuters news agency that Trump is still seeking the same objectives in regards to North Korea as he did in the first term.
'The president retains those objectives and remains open to engaging with Leader Kim to achieve a fully denuclearised North Korea,' the unnamed US official told Reuters.
During Trump's first term, the president had sometimes an unusually friendly relationship with Kim after a tense start, with Trump saying the two leaders 'fell in love'.
After nuclear negotiations broke down in October 2019, the two leaders began exchanging insults, with North Korea in December of that year threatening to call him a 'dotard'.
How the ties evolved?
Since Trump's first term from 2017 to 2021, US and North Korea ties have grown more fraught.
Trump's successor, Joe Biden, did not continue the flashy diplomatic engagements with Kim that were a feature of Trump's first administration. Instead, the Biden administration chose to deepen ties with South Korea and Japan in a bid to further isolate Pyongyang.
North Korea, meanwhile, has been growing closer with Russia since it launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. North Korea has sent weapons and troops to assist Russia's assault, with Moscow in turn backing North Korea's nuclear programme.
The US firmly opposed the invasion of Ukraine during Biden's term, with Trump in his second term also pushing Russia to commit to a ceasefire and end the conflict.
DW
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
4 hours ago
- Observer
The US-India relationship is changing again
India's relationship with the United States has long been a careful balancing act between shared democratic values and sometimes diverging national interests. But recent diplomatic tremors have unsettled India, prompting it to question whether the partnership has reached a turning point. In what Indian officials view as an unsettling display of geopolitical grandstanding, US President Donald Trump has taken credit for halting recent hostilities between India and Pakistan by threatening to disrupt trade ties. India has bristled at Trump's claims, not only because it is fiercely protective of its sovereignty, but also because they lack merit. As Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar have noted, Trump did not even call them during the conflict. Bilateral trade was not mentioned by any US official while the fighting was under way. Trump may well have pressed Pakistan to end the violence, but India did not need persuading. As a status-quo power focused on its own economic development, the last thing India wanted was a protracted conflict. So, after terrorists slaughtered Indian civilians in Pahalgam in April, India devised a sharp, swift and measured response. It was always clear that 'Operation Sindoor' — which featured strikes on nine known terrorist basecamps and other facilities in Pakistani territory — was retribution against the terrorists who had targeted Indian tourists, not the opening salvo in a war against Pakistan. When Pakistan retaliated with indiscriminate attacks, India initiated another decisive but carefully calibrated strike — this time, on 11 air bases. It was this manoeuver — possibly coupled with US pressure on Pakistan's government — that prompted Pakistan to seek a cessation of hostilities. Trump hardly deserves credit for this outcome and yet, true to form, he has sought to claim it. But Indian officials have unequivocally rejected Trump's narrative. India is proud of its independence and it will not tolerate the implication that it succumbed to Trumpian threats or blandishments. This is not Trump's only action that is giving India pause. In June, he hosted Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir. Pakistan's civilian leadership was not at the table. Trump's unpredictability vis-à-vis China is similarly troubling. Whereas he took a reliably hardline approach to the country during his first presidency, Trump 2.0 blows hot and cold. One minute, he is imposing extreme tariffs against China; the next, he is seeking to negotiate a trade truce and saying that he might visit Beijing at Chinese President Xi Jinping's invitation. Where India fits into these calculations — if it factors into them at all — is a mystery. During Trump's first term — as well as during Joe Biden's presidency — the US regarded India as a vital partner in the Indo-Pacific. While India upheld its foreign-policy doctrine of strategic autonomy and avoided committing to any confrontation with China, it welcomed US engagement in the region and supported the revitalisation of the Quad, which includes Australia, Japan and the US, in 2017. After all, India has its own quarrels with China. Meanwhile, China's influence across South Asia is growing, extending from Bhutan and Nepal to Bangladesh and Sri Lanka. Indian officials and businesses see China as a threat. But it is difficult to know where the US stands, especially after Trump opted not to rebuke China publicly for offering intelligence assistance to Pakistan. When it comes to trade, moreover, Trump has often been tougher on partners than adversaries. On July 30, Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, effective August 1, together with an unspecified 'penalty' — probably an additional 10 per cent — for India's ongoing purchases of energy and military equipment from Russia. If trade can be weaponised, defence ties could be, too. Trump's capriciousness has heightened India's strategic anxieties. The US has proved to be an unreliable partner before. For example, during the 1999 Kargil conflict between India and Pakistan, the US denied India access to vital GPS data, leading the country to develop its own. Now, Indian decision-makers are split: Should India decouple from China, trusting the US to have its back, or pragmatically engage with it, for fear that the US will do the same? This raises an even more fundamental question: What is the value of a partnership that is subject to the whims of an outsize ego? India will not panic, but it might pivot. Given its lack of treaty obligations, it has greater leeway to act independently than formal US allies like Japan or South Korea. It might use this manoeuvering room to adjust its foreign-policy orientation. Jaishankar's July visit to Beijing pointed to a desire to broaden channels of communication with China. While India is not downgrading its ties with the US, it is emphasising self-reliance. This may lead to a more transactional bilateral relationship, shaped less by ideals than interests. @Project Syndicate, 2025
Observer
4 hours ago
- Observer
S Korea starts removing anti-North loudspeakers
SEOUL: South Korean authorities began removing on Monday loudspeakers blaring anti-North Korea broadcasts along the country's border, Seoul's defence ministry said, as the new government of President Lee Jae Myung seeks to ease tensions with Pyongyang. Shortly after he took office in June, Lee's administration switched off propaganda broadcasts criticising the North Korean regime as it looks to revive stalled dialogue with its neighbour. But North Korea recently rebuffed the overtures and said it had no interest in talking to South Korea. South Korea's dismantling of the loudspeakers from Monday is just a 'practical measure to help ease tensions between the South and the North,' the ministry said in a statement on Monday. Soldiers could be seen unplugging loudspeakers, mounted together like a wall, and taking them down, photographs provided by the defence ministry show. Propaganda broadcast through loudspeakers across the border has been used by both sides as relations between South and North Korea have ebbed and flowed over the years. Since Seoul suspended its own loudspeaker broadcasts in June, North Korea appears to have stopped its broadcasts, which had disturbed South Korean border residents for months, officials in the South say. — Reuters
Observer
4 hours ago
- Observer
Russia urges caution after Trump comments
Russia urged caution on Monday after US President Donald Trump said he would deploy two nuclear submarines following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. Trump said he had ordered the deployment in response to what he alleged were highly provocative comments by Medvedev, saying the submarines would be positioned in 'appropriate regions'. Trump did not say whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the locations, which are kept secret by the US military. 'Russia is very attentive to the topic of nuclear non-proliferation. And we believe that everyone should be very, very cautious with nuclear rhetoric,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Monday. The row between Medvedev and Trump erupted against the backdrop of the US leader's ultimatum for Russia to end its military offensive in Ukraine or face fresh economic sanctions, including on its remaining trading partners. Medvedev — one of Russia's most prominent anti-Western hawks — accused Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game' and said that Trump 'should remember' that Russia was a formidable force. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' he said. Medvedev is currently deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. He served one term as president between 2008-2012, effectively acting as a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power. The Kremlin said on Monday it was anticipating 'important' talks with Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, later this week, ahead of the US president's looming deadline to impose fresh sanctions on Moscow if it does not make progress towards a peace deal with Ukraine. Trump confirmed on Sunday that special envoy Steve Witkoff will visit Russia, likely on 'Wednesday or Thursday', where he is expected to meet President Vladimir Putin. The nuclear saber-rattling came against the backdrop of a deadline set by Trump at the end of next week for Russia to take steps towards ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions. The Republican leader said Witkoff would visit 'I think next week, Wednesday or Thursday'. Russian President Vladimir Putin has already met Witkoff multiple times in Moscow, before Trump's efforts to mend ties with the Kremlin came to a grinding halt. When reporters asked what Witkoff's message would be to Moscow, and if there was anything Russia could do to avoid the sanctions, Trump replied: 'Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed.' The Kremlin said another meeting with Putin was possible and that it considered talks with Witkoff to be 'important, substantial and helpful'. Trump has previously threatened that new measures could mean 'secondary tariffs' targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. This would further stifle Russia, but would risk significant international disruption. Despite the pressure from Washington, Russia has continued its onslaught against its pro-Western neighbour. Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half-year war were 'unchanged'. 'We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries,' Putin told reporters. But he added that 'the conditions (from the Russian side) certainly remain the same'. Russia has frequently called on Ukraine to effectively cede control of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, a demand Kyiv has called unacceptable. Putin also wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join Nato. Ukraine launched a drone attack on Sunday which sparked a fire at an oil depot in Sochi, the host city of the 2014 Winter Olympics. Kyiv has said it will intensify its air strikes against Russia in response to an increase in Russian attacks on its territory in recent weeks, which have killed dozens of civilians. Russia's Ministry of Defence said on Monday its air defences intercepted 61 Ukrainian drones overnight. One person was killed by Russian shelling in the southern Kherson region, Ukrainian military authorities said in a Telegram post early on Monday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also said that the two sides were preparing a prisoner exchange that would see 1,200 Ukrainian troops return home. — AFP Russia urged caution on Monday after US President Donald Trump said he would deploy two nuclear submarines following an online row with former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. Trump said he had ordered the deployment in response to what he alleged were highly provocative comments by Medvedev, saying the submarines would be positioned in 'appropriate regions'. Trump did not say whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the locations, which are kept secret by the US military. 'Russia is very attentive to the topic of nuclear non-proliferation. And we believe that everyone should be very, very cautious with nuclear rhetoric,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Monday. The row between Medvedev and Trump erupted against the backdrop of the US leader's ultimatum for Russia to end its military offensive in Ukraine or face fresh economic sanctions, including on its remaining trading partners. Medvedev — one of Russia's most prominent anti-Western hawks — accused Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game' and said that Trump 'should remember' that Russia was a formidable force. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' he said. Medvedev is currently deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. He served one term as president between 2008-2012, effectively acting as a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power. The Kremlin said on Monday it was anticipating 'important' talks with Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, later this week, ahead of the US president's looming deadline to impose fresh sanctions on Moscow if it does not make progress towards a peace deal with Ukraine. Trump confirmed on Sunday that special envoy Steve Witkoff will visit Russia, likely on 'Wednesday or Thursday', where he is expected to meet President Vladimir Putin. The nuclear saber-rattling came against the backdrop of a deadline set by Trump at the end of next week for Russia to take steps towards ending the Ukraine war or face unspecified new sanctions. The Republican leader said Witkoff would visit 'I think next week, Wednesday or Thursday'. Russian President Vladimir Putin has already met Witkoff multiple times in Moscow, before Trump's efforts to mend ties with the Kremlin came to a grinding halt. When reporters asked what Witkoff's message would be to Moscow, and if there was anything Russia could do to avoid the sanctions, Trump replied: 'Yeah, get a deal where people stop getting killed.' The Kremlin said another meeting with Putin was possible and that it considered talks with Witkoff to be 'important, substantial and helpful'. Trump has previously threatened that new measures could mean 'secondary tariffs' targeting Russia's remaining trade partners, such as China and India. This would further stifle Russia, but would risk significant international disruption. Despite the pressure from Washington, Russia has continued its onslaught against its pro-Western neighbour. Putin, who has consistently rejected calls for a ceasefire, said that he wants peace but that his demands for ending his nearly three-and-a-half-year war were 'unchanged'. 'We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries,' Putin told reporters. But he added that 'the conditions (from the Russian side) certainly remain the same'. Russia has frequently called on Ukraine to effectively cede control of four regions Moscow claims to have annexed, a demand Kyiv has called unacceptable. Putin also wants Ukraine to drop its ambitions to join Nato. Ukraine launched a drone attack on Sunday which sparked a fire at an oil depot in Sochi, the host city of the 2014 Winter Olympics. Kyiv has said it will intensify its air strikes against Russia in response to an increase in Russian attacks on its territory in recent weeks, which have killed dozens of civilians. Russia's Ministry of Defence said on Monday its air defences intercepted 61 Ukrainian drones overnight. One person was killed by Russian shelling in the southern Kherson region, Ukrainian military authorities said in a Telegram post early on Monday. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also said that the two sides were preparing a prisoner exchange that would see 1,200 Ukrainian troops return home. — AFP
