
Apologise: Supreme Court raps IPS officer after ex-husband jailed over false cases
The court noted that the woman had filed six separate criminal complaints, including charges under Sections 498A (domestic cruelty), 307 (attempt to murder), and 376 (rape) of the Indian Penal Code.Two other complaints pertained to criminal breach of trust (Section 406), along with three complaints under the Domestic Violence Act. She had also moved the family court seeking divorce and maintenance. The husband, who had also filed for divorce, was jailed for 109 days, while his father spent 103 days in custody."What they have suffered cannot be resituated or compensated in any manner," the bench observed, calling for a public apology as moral redress."S_ and her parents shall tender an unconditional apology to the husband and his Family members which shall be published in the national edition of the renowned one English and one Hindi newspaper. Such apology shall also be published and circulated on all social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram, YouTube and other similar platforms. The expression of apology herein shall not be construed as an admission of liability and shall have no bearing on the legal rights, obligations, or consequences arising under law. The apology shall be published within 3 days from the date of this Order," the court stated.The court also specified the wording of the apology, which was to include expressions of regret and a wish for closure. It was to acknowledge the hurt caused to the husband's family and include lines such as: "I sincerely hope that this apology can be a step towards finding some peace and closure for all of us."The officer was also directed to express that her daughter - born out of wedlock - is at "no fault whatsoever" and that the husband's family is "most welcome to meet and get to know" her.Importantly, the court barred the officer from misusing her power as a government servant: "The wife shall not use her position and power as an IPS officer or any other position that she may hold in future, position and power of her colleagues/superiors or other acquaintances anywhere in the country, against the husband, his Family Members and Relatives by way of initiating any proceedings before any Authority or Forum through any third party/official or causing any bodily or mental injury to the husband and his family, in any manner whatsoever."advertisementAt the same time, the bench warned the husband and his family not to use the apology against the officer in any legal, administrative, or regulatory setting. "Otherwise it will be treated as contempt of court," the judgment said.The Supreme Court dissolved the marriage by invoking its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution. It noted that the couple had been living separately since October 2018 and that reconciliation was no longer possible due to bitterness caused by the legal battles.It ordered that all civil and criminal proceedings between the parties be quashed or withdrawn. Custody of the daughter was granted to the mother, with visitation rights to the father and his family.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Blake Lively drops YouTuber subpoenas while Justin Baldoni case escalates
In a surprise plot twist worthy of a Netflix thriller, Blake Lively has officially called off her subpoena storm against three YouTubers who found themselves tangled in her explosive legal drama with It Ends With Us director and co-star Justin Baldoni. Yep, the Gossip Girl star has hit pause on what many called a digital witch hunt. Blake Lively's YouTube subpoena saga just got a plot twist According to court documents revealed on 26 July, Lively's team informed the judge they would no longer pursue subpoenas against YouTube creators Kassidy O'Connell, McKenzie Folks, and Lauren Neidigh. The original subpoenas had demanded juicy details like bank account and credit card info, a legal move that sent shockwaves through the creator community. No further info needed, for now In a formal letter to the judge, Lively's legal squad stated that based on what these creators had already shared publicly and during legal exchanges, there was no need to push further. Translation? These three YouTubers are off the subpoena hook, at least for now. Her team stressed that the subpoenas were part of a standard evidence-gathering process. They were trying to trace whether Baldoni's camp orchestrated an 'untraceable' smear campaign using online platforms like YouTube and X (formerly Twitter). Creators clapped back, loud and clear Before the withdrawal, O'Connell and Neidigh had both fired back with fierce letters to the court, accusing Lively's legal team of harassment and intimidation. O'Connell claimed there was zero legal basis for the subpoena and said Lively was stretching discovery with no real evidence. Neidigh slammed it as burdensome and invasive. Even though these three creators are out of the crosshairs, Lively's team is still digging deep into other digital corners. They are determined to connect the dots between Baldoni's PR strategy and a potential smear campaign allegedly designed to silence her. Lively vs Baldoni: The showdown continues Lively's lawsuit alleges sexual harassment and retaliation by Baldoni during the making of It Ends With Us. Baldoni has denied all claims, reportedly hiring a crisis PR team to handle the fallout. While the subpoena drama cools down for some, the main event is heating up, Blake and Justin are set to face off in court on 9 March 2026. So, while this chapter closes, the battle is far from over. Grab popcorn, Gen Z, because this legal drama is far from its season finale.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Julian Brown's mother provides major update on ‘missing' son: ‘He is safe, but…'
The mother of Julian Brown has provided new information about her 21-year-old son, whose alleged disappearance has sparked growing concern online. Brown, an Atlanta-based inventor and influencer with more than 1.7 million Instagram followers, has reportedly been missing for nearly three weeks following a series of alarming social media posts. Julian Brown has reportedly been missing for nearly three weeks. (Facebook/ Naturejab) In a statement to the Daily Mail, Brown's mother, Nia, clarified that her son is not missing. 'I can confirm Julian is safe but in the best interest of his security I'm not able to provide any more information,' she told the outlet. Also Read: Julian Brown disappearance: Missing metro Atlanta inventor said 'I'm certainly under attack' in shocking final post Who is Julian Brown? Julian Brown, known as @naturejab on Instagram, gained widespread online attention for his work in sustainable energy. He is the inventor of a product called Plastoline, which he claimed could recycle plastic waste and convert it into gasoline. In the weeks leading up to his disappearance, Brown posted a series of increasingly concerning messages on Instagram, suggesting he feared for his safety. In his final post on July 9, he shared a video with the caption, 'Something is happening, keep me in your prayers please. SCREEN RECORD THIS. I don't know.' In the video, he appeared visibly shaken, saying, 'I'm certainly under attack... I can't go into so much detail. Keep your eyes open.' One of his earlier posts claimed 'A SECRET Helicopter found circled me in the middle of NOWHERE… and it gets even scarier - Pray for me please.' Also Read: Where is Julian Brown? Metro Atlanta inventor who went viral for 'Plastoline' invention disappears after unsettling post These cryptic posts left many of his followers concerned. Some speculate that Brown may be in danger due to the nature of his invention.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Ramya to actor Darshan: Urge your fans not to behave cheaply
Bengaluru: Kannada movie actress and former MP Divya Spandana, popularly known as , on Monday lodged a complaint with the city police commissioner, Seemanth Kumar Singh, charging a few unscrupulous fans of actor Darshan with issuing her rape and death threats. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Ramya was being trolled after she hailed the , which reprimanded the Karnataka high court for the manner in which it granted bail to Darshan, who had been arrested on charges of murdering his fan Renukaswamy in June 2024. Ramya had posted: "Supreme Court is a ray of hope for the common people of India — justice for the family of Renukaswamy." This triggered terse reactions from Darshan's fans on social media platforms, so much so that a few of them wished her the worst. Karnataka State Women Commission chairperson Nagalakshmi Choudhary, who took cognisance of the comments, wrote to the city police commissioner seeking action against the miscreants posting abusive and filthy messages against Ramya. "It has been reported that derogatory and defamatory comments are made against actress and former MP Ramya. This is denigrating women. The comments against her should be examined and removed immediately, and legal action should be initiated against the miscreants," Nagalakshmi's letter to the senior officer read. Later in the evening, Ramya met the police commissioner and demanded action against the handlers of 43 social media accounts that posted vitriolic comments. "... Never in my life have I come across such nasty and abusive comments. The disgruntled fans of actor Darshan have sent scandalous, ghastly, and obnoxious messages to my Instagram handle through various accounts. The messages sent are so disgusting and misogynistic that I'm unable to even reproduce the same in the complaint," she told reporters, adding: "If a person like me is treated in this manner, what about common women? My fight is for all the women facing such situations. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now " Calling the trolls pathetic, Ramya said: "Darshan should now upload a video, directing his fans not to behave so cheaply and use filthy words against women. It is his responsibility to stop them and educate them. If he (Darshan) had done this earlier, Renukaswamy's murder would not have taken place." Meanwhile, the police commissioner said the complaint would be probed by the cybercrime unit.