Judicial Service Commission to interview candidates for Deputy Chief Justice position
Image: Picture: Timothy Bernard/African News Agency
The process to choose the country's next deputy chief justice starts on Wednesday when the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) and leaders of political parties and others within the legal fraternity will interview three possible candidates.
But President Cyril Ramaphosa, as head of the National Executive, after consulting the JSC and the leaders of parties represented in the National Assembly, will have the final say over who will stand by the side of Chief Justice Mandisa Maya.
The position of deputy chief justice has been vacant since September 1, last year, when the then-Deputy Chief Justice Maya rose to the position of chief justice. The three candidates who will be interviewed are Gauteng Judge President Dunstan Mlambo, Free State Judge President Cagney Musi, and Northern Cape Judge President Pule Tlaletsi. A fourth nominee, Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) Justice Mahube Molemela, withdrew.
Online group Judges Matter, which advocates for transparency and accountability within the judiciary, looked at the chances of each of the judges to get the nod and said Judge Mlambo, 66, has impeccable credentials as a judicial leader. For the last 15 years, he has served as judge president of two of the busiest courts in the country – the Labour Court and then the Gauteng High Court. He is currently the most senior judge president in South Africa in terms of years of service.
According to Judges Matter, he is regarded by the legal profession as an innovative and savvy leader, and he spearheaded the rollout of the Court Online system in the Gauteng High Court in 2020, at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic.
As chair of the Judiciary's IT committee, he has overseen the further rollout of Court Online to seven of the nine provinces. Before moving into judicial leadership, he was a judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal and has served a brief stint as an acting justice of the Constitutional Court, and the Labour Appeal Court, which signals experience in working in teams of appellate judges.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
In looking at the chances of Judge Musi, 63, Judges Matter said he has the distinct advantage of having spent half his life as a judicial officer. He started as a district magistrate and worked his way up to be a regional magistrate, high court judge, deputy judge president and now judge president.
'This offers him a unique 'bottom-up' perspective on the judiciary. Should he be appointed as DCJ, this perspective would be an asset in helping implement CJ Maya's vision of a single, unified judiciary (with magistrates and judges under one roof),' Judges Matter said. Judge Musi, the youngest of the three candidates, would serve for nearly the duration of CJ Maya's tenure.
In looking at Judge Tlaletsi's chances, Judges Matter said the 65-year-old has 22 years of judicial experience under his belt, with 13 as deputy judge president of the Labour Court and then the Northern Cape High Court. Judge Tlaletsi is actively involved in the leadership roles in the judiciary. 'This experience will be particularly crucial in supporting CJ Maya's vision of a single, unified judiciary that governs its own affairs,' Judges Matter said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
21 hours ago
- IOL News
July 2021 Unrest: Did SA's Political Leadership Learn Any Lessons?
Residents of Soweto protest outside the Maponya Mall in Soweto, on July 14, 2021 against the wave of violence and looting that afflicted the Gauteng and KwaZulu Natal. Image: AFP Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu July 2025 marks the fourth anniversary of the July 2021 unrest. On the evening of July 9, 2021, riots broke out across KwaZulu-Natal. In the evening of July 11, 2021, these riots had spread to Gauteng. By the time this civil unrest ended, over 350 people had lost their lives. Some were injured while others lost their property, businesses and jobs. Racial tensions rose in KZN. This untenable situation aggravated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. By August 12, 2022, over 5,500 people had been arrested in connection with these riots – some cases are still active. But how did we get here? Could the riots have been prevented? Who should be held responsible for acting recklessly, thereby leading the country into this chaos? More importantly, did our political leadership learn anything from this incident to ensure that the country does not descend into chaos again in the future? If not, where is our country going? To answer some of these and other related questions, it is of cardinal importance to trace the origin of this incident, reflect on how it unfolded, and compare it with the current situation as a precaution on what could potentially happen if the political leadership turns a blind eye on the concerns raised by South Africans, which leave them frustrated. In a nutshell, the 2021 unrests were caused by factors which could have been easily avoided if the political leadership and the legal fraternity had demonstrated erudite leadership, objective reading of the situation and nonpartisan action. Firstly, the Zondo Commission misread the political mood in the country. It lacked objectivity in handling the witnesses who appeared before it. The great mistake was for this structure to behave like a court. In a court of law, there is a litigant and a defendant. By contrast, in the case of a commission, everyone who appears before it is a witness. Unlike a court of law, the job of the commission is to get facts right, compile a report, and make recommendations to be considered by the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) and relevant bodies. When former President Jacob Zuma appeared before the Zondo Commission, he received a hostile reception and was treated differently. When this issue was raised, some people outside of the Commission argued that such treatment was justified because Zuma was accused of wrongdoing. This was the first mistake. Given this hostile treatment, Zuma refused to return to the Commission. Justice Zondo approached the Constitutional Court and asked it to rule on Zuma's decision. He went further to prescribe a sentence of two years if the court found him guilty. This was bizarre. It is not common for a litigant to play the role of a judge. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ In its ruling, the court instructed Zuma to return to the Zondo Commission within a stipulated time. It went further to state that it was depriving him of his right to remain silent as had been the case, for example, with the late Dudu Myeni. This was also strange. When Zuma failed to appear before the Commission as instructed to do so, he was accused of contempt of court. Subsequently, Justice Sisi Khampepe read a ruling which was riddled with emotions, sending Zuma to jail for fifteen months with no option of a fine. Zuma was given until July 4 to hand himself in, failing which the police were instructed to arrest him on July 7. Khampepe defended her ruling by saying that Zuma was the one who appointed the Commission. As such, it did not make sense why he was frustrating its function. This statement was misplaced on many grounds. Firstly, Zuma did not voluntarily establish the Commission; he was forced by a court of law to do so as Sec 84(2)(f) of the Constitution states. Even then, his prerogative to appoint the person to chair the Commission was removed from him by Advocate Thuli Madonsela's report. Lastly, Sec 9(1) of the Constitution states that 'everyone is equal before the law.' Indeed, Zuma was sent to Estcourt prison. This happened although some South Africans had already raised concerns that the political leadership and the judiciary had colluded to crucify Zuma. Word spread that if Zuma were incarcerated, there would be riots. The political leadership ignored this warning. There was dereliction of duty on the side of the security cluster. When it became clear that the intelligence agency, the South African Police Service (SAPS) and the metro police were struggling to contain the situation, the South African Defence Force (SANDF) was deployed in Gauteng and KZN to suppress the riots as part of Operation Prosper. Eventually, the situation calmed down. On September 5, 2021, Arthur Fraser released Zuma on medical parole. Zuma served his parole period and was supposed to be a free man. Intriguingly, the court ruled that Fraser had erred in his decision to release him. The fact that Zuma had completed his parole period did not seem to matter. He was sent back to Estcourt Correctional Service. Eventually, President Ramaphosa released him together with other prisoners. By then, the damage had already been done. Now, the earlier question becomes relevant. What lessons did the political leadership (including the President) learn from this episode? Zuma's matter was a trigger. The real causes of these unrests included political, social and economic factors, which resulted in frustration. The Frustration-Aggression Theory states that when people are frustrated, they resort to unlawful behaviour and join non-governmental forces which resonate with their situation. Currently, South Africans are frustrated. Issues such as corruption, crime, poor standards of living, political appointments, factional politics, increases in petrol prices, and other issues lead to frustration. What is the political leadership doing to contain the situation? Should there be another spark to ignite the inferno, how prepared is the coalition government to deal with that situation? Looking at how things are happening in the country, there is no sign that lessons were learnt from the 2021 riots. * Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
SA's national security strategy is both funny and frightening
It's unacceptable to issue a report which hints of social collapse but offers a vague list of generic priorities. So, the Cabinet has approved a 47-page national security strategy that essentially warns of potholes ahead. You've got to love government reports. Forty-seven pages to give us the kinds of insightful goals like 'combat violent and syndicated crime' and 'create conditions for peaceful socio-economic development of South Africa and to ensure its military security'. You just know some management consultant had an absolute field day laughing as they drafted that while charging seven years' worth of steak and wine. The strategy gets great at Pillar 5: Cyber security, which concludes with the ingenious goal of 'address cyber-security challenges'. At least the person writing this nonsense is getting paid but who even reads this stuff? More importantly, why bother if the stuff, basic as it may be, never gets implemented and is more outdated than a Nokia 3310? Here's another insight from the report: 'Economic hardship or low economic growth which were further exacerbated by the impact of Covid-19 pandemic and the implications of the war in Ukraine.' Gosh. A whole state and we cannot plan around a pandemic of five years ago and a war that started in 2014 and geared up in 2022? That sounds like the ultimate doctor's note: 'Please excuse Timmy from doing his homework. He ate a dodgy Christmas pudding in the 2023 holidays.' ALSO READ: 'Where's the proof?': Calls for Ntshavheni to answer for coup claims Pandemics and wars from years ago should not be excuses not to get the job done. Just like we can't keep taking wins from the success of the 2010 World Cup, we can't throw our hands up and be like, oh let's maybe have some social collapse because we can't deliver to our people since there's this war on a different continent. We're still trading with both countries. It's not like any industry has been decimated by that war. But fear not, because our leadership has a plan. It involves creating a culture of preparedness. It comes in two layers but the first has to be a favourite. 'The first principle of our culture of preparedness is a shared acknowledgement that creating a prepared nation will be an enduring challenge.' Sure, it reads like a statement preparing for failure before starting, but it should be praised for encouraging a long game strategy. Plus, it gives us more to work with than 'develop key scientific and technological competences'. Seriously, this report is a wonderful 'wtf do you mean?' kind of read. The report's hilarity aside, we have to engage with the idea of reports for their own sake. Ideally, whatever information one can elicit from this report that wasn't immediately obvious to anybody with functional capacity should be valuable. If it is valuable, then it should too, be implementable. If it is implementable then this report should be more than the minutes of the previous meeting when it comes to issuing the next report. It's not enough to simply set out goals, some having no real discernable meaning nor quantifiable outcome, and then say 'great, job done'. Because then you are putting up the pothole warning with no intention of ever fixing the potholes. That's just not good enough and it certainly isn't why we pay for a bloated government. ALSO READ: A coup? Here's what makes SA most vulnerable to attacks It's unacceptable to issue a report which hints of social collapse but offers a vague list of priorities; the same priorities that have been listed in reports since the '90s and as generic as ever. It covers everything from corruption, to substance abuse and even the 'mushrooming of charismatic churches'. We don't need reports to know what the problems are. We have several of those. We need strategies to address them and the right people to implement them. Curiously, in this report the only mention of capable human resources relates to foreign missions. Let's take a step back and before issuing a new report, let's start with what we've done to address the problems in the previous reports. Maybe then we'll prevent such gems as 'strengthen civil peace and harmony'. Until it actually has some discernable and actionable meaning, it is just a waste of ink.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
AV Mahomed resigns from KZN Inter-Religious Council over alleged silence on Palestine crisis
AV Mahomed Image: File Dr AV Mahomed, the chairperson of the Juma Musjid, announced his immediate resignation from the KwaZulu-Natal Inter-Religious Council over its alleged silence on the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Palestine. The council, of which Mahomed was a founding member, was launched in October 2007. It is a provincial body that brings together various faith groups to address social issues and promote interfaith dialogue. The council includes representatives from the Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, Bahai, African Traditional, and Nazareth Baptist faiths. Mahomed, who resigned on Sunday, said the alleged dormant state of the council during the past four to six years had been laid bare by its inaction and indifference, particularly regarding the atrocities in Gaza. 'It is shameful that an institution claiming to represent religious leadership can remain silent in the face of such blatant inhumanity. How can we purport to uphold divine values, while ignoring the suffering of our fellow human beings? This is not just a failure of leadership but a betrayal of faith itself. 'After 69 years of humanitarian work, I refuse to associate with an organisation that has shown such profound disregard for justice and compassion. The council's paralysis, whether due to fear, indifference, or complicity, has rendered it irrelevant in the fight for humanity. Despite raising this issue directly, the only response was a cordial, yet empty engagement by (members) Brother Ian Booth and Sister Ela Gandhi, with no meaningful acknowledgment,' he said. Next Stay Close ✕ Mahomed added that his resignation was not a statement of religious discord, but was instead a profound moral stance. 'I am known around the world as a humanitarian, so I cannot associate myself with people who are afraid to make comments on such urgent humanitarian issues. The narrative surrounding Palestine transcends religion and politics. It's fundamentally about human rights and the duty we have to condemn the starvation of fellow human beings.' In response to Mahomed's resignation, the council, in a statement to the POST, expressed 'deep regret and gratitude' for Mahomed's many years of tireless service. 'As a founding member, his contribution to interfaith dialogue and social cohesion in the province have been invaluable.' The statement said while the council recognised Mahomed's 'frustrations and concerns', it remained committed to its founding mandate of promoting peace, unity, and the well-being of all in KwaZulu-Natal through collaboration among diverse faith communities. 'While Covid-19 slowed down activities, the council has engaged in multiple online or in-person activities in response to the various crises faced by our communities, including social unrest, floods and Covid-19. The council continues to function as a voluntary body, currently engaged in initiatives such as the forthcoming provincial interfaith summit. 'We affirm our collective concern for global humanitarian crises, including the ongoing conflict in Gaza, and advocate for peace, the protection of human life, release of those held in captivity and the urgent delivery of humanitarian aid. Though our approaches may differ, our shared values compel us to stand for justice, compassion, and unity.' The council said it wished Mahomed well in his future endeavours. 'The council remains steadfast in its mission to build relationships, promote peace and serve our communities through interfaith cooperation and mutual respect.' THE POST
