GOP's Ron Johnson brings his conspiratorial focus to the Jeffrey Epstein files
The senator has seemed a little too eager to prove his critics right, peddling bizarre and easily discredited nonsense about Covid-19. And the Jan. 6 attack. And vaccines. And climate change. And the 2020 presidential election. And the 2024 presidential election.
A few months ago, the Wisconsin Republican even began peddling 9/11 truther claims more commonly found on the radical fringes of the internet than on Capitol Hill.
So it probably didn't surprise anyone when Johnson sat down with CNN's Jake Tapper and brought a conspiratorial focus to the Jeffrey Epstein files.
'I don't know what's in the Epstein files,' Johnson said, before quickly adding, 'You know, I do know that the Epstein files are in the custody of the Biden administration. You know, I don't know to what extent they've added or deleted things.'
The senator went on to express concern about the 'chain of custody' with the files.
This didn't stand out for me because the GOP lawmaker is looking at the Epstein story through a conspiratorial lens — for all intents and purposes, Johnson looks at every story through a conspiratorial lens — but rather because his take has come up quite a bit in recent days, especially among Republicans aligned with the White House.
Indeed, the morning after the senator's on-air comments, the president himself emphasized the fact that Democrats 'controlled the 'files' for four years.'
As best as I can tell, the argument is that the Epstein files should be seen as inherently suspect because of possible mischief and political manipulation. It was the Trump administration that investigated, arrested and charged Epstein, who died while in custody in 2019, but the Republican president left office after his 2020 defeat, at which point rascally Democrats could have, as Johnson put it, 'added or deleted things.'
For now, let's put aside the obvious fact that there's literally no evidence of the Biden administration altering or manipulating any Justice Department files for any reason. Let's instead consider the underlying logic.
Why, exactly, would Democratic officials, working in secret, fabricate incriminating evidence in a sex trafficking case — and then do nothing with the fruits of their illicit labor? Or put another way, if nefarious Democrats had manipulated the Epstein files, wouldn't they have leaked them, rather than leaving them on Attorney General Pam Bondi's desk?
Why would any conspirators go to the trouble of concocting bogus evidence against political rivals, only then to sit on that evidence until their rivals are in power?
The problem with Johnson's theory isn't just that it's wrong, it's also bizarre.
This post updates our related earlier coverage.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Education Department pauses student loan forgiveness under IBR plan
The Education Department has paused student loan forgiveness under the Income-Based Repayment (IBR) plan without a clear timeline of when it might resume. The department argues any IBR forbearances were impacted by ongoing court action. 'The Department has temporarily paused discharges for IBR borrowers in order to comply with ongoing court injunctions regarding the Biden Administration's illegal attempts at student loan forgiveness. The Department's SAVE rule provided the authority to count forbearances in IBR toward loan forgiveness, but that rule has been enjoined,' said Ellen Keast, deputy press secretary for the department. 'Legal IBR discharges will resume as soon as the Department is able to establish the correct payment count. For any borrower that makes a payment after the date of borrower eligibility, the Department will refund overpayments when the discharges resume,' she added. The Department of Education is working through a court's injunction after the Biden administration's Saving on Valuable Education (SAVE) plan was ruled illegal. The agency argues that while the case did not impact forgiveness under IBR, what type of forbearances would count for loan discharges were. IBR allows individuals to make payments based on income and family size, receiving forgiveness after 20 to 25 years of consecutive payments. The department has encouraged individuals to join this plan as it shuts down the SAVE option. Those on SAVE will see interest accrual restart at the beginning of August and be kicked off the plan entirely in the following year.
CNET
12 minutes ago
- CNET
What Are 'Trump Accounts'? Breaking Down the Big Beautiful Bill's Newborn Savings Accounts
These new investment savings account will be started for every newborn automatically over the next few years. Getty Images Amid the divisiveness surrounding the passage of President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful" spending bill, one portion of the legislation seems like it would be agreeable to pretty much everyone: a new type of investment savings account for newborns, which the federal government will seed with money upfront. That sounds like a win for most folks, but are these accounts all they're cracked up to be? And how will they actually work? Most of the conversations and conflicts surrounding the Big Beautiful Bill, which Trump signed into law on July 4, largely ignored these accounts, focusing on the potential damages from sweeping Medicaid cuts and the bolstering of immigration enforcement funding. As polarizing as those elements of the bill were, these new savings accounts, which congressional Republicans attempted to brand as "Trump accounts," had bipartisan support. In the past, prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Sen. Cory Booker have suggested similar ideas to help parents begin building up savings for their children. These aren't going to be free money that new parents can use right away, as there are a number of rules about what can be done with the money. Additionally, the policy will only be in place for a few years unless extended. With all that in mind, keep reading for all the details you'll need to know about the so-called "Trump accounts" and what they mean for your family. For more, find out what recent political moves might mean for your student loan payments. Who's eligible for these new accounts? You can open one of these accounts in your child's name as soon as they're born, and so long as you, your spouse and the child have valid Social Security numbers. If the child's parents aren't married, only the parent opening the account and the child need Social Security numbers. As the policy currently stands, these accounts can only be opened for children born between Jan. 1, 2025, and Dec. 31, 2028. It's another example of a common theme highlighted by critics of the Big Beautiful Bill: benefits set to end around the time Trump will leave the White House and drawbacks kicking in once someone new is in office. Whatever the political machinations behind the timeline might be, just keep them in mind if you have a kid later than the start of 2029, since the policy might not be extended. What do the "Trump accounts" do? These accounts allow parents to contribute up to $5,000 a year towards a fund their child will have access to later in life. As investment accounts -- think a 401(k) for your new baby as opposed to a standard savings account -- they have the potential to accrue a lot more value over the years through capital gains and dividends, but they could also lose value depending on how markets move. Other entities, such as the parents' employers, can also contribute to these accounts, up to $2,500 a year. One of the most publicized and desirable aspects of these accounts is that, once one is opened for a new child, the federal government will seed it with $1,000 to get things rolling. This is why the savings accounts have gotten a thumbs-up from some experts, even if parents never add anything else to the account. "Someone is giving me $1,000 for my kid? That's a no-brainer. Who turns away free money?" Jaime Eckels of Plante Moran Financial Advisors said in an interview with CNBC. "From there, you'll have to decide what additional savings you'll have for your child." It's unlikely, however, that a significant number of Americans will be able to use these accounts to their fullest, since, as the Urban Institute noted, one-third don't currently have over $2,000 in savings or have surplus income high enough to make stock investments. Still though, you'll probably be happier to have that $1,000 from the government even if you aren't able to save much on your own. The Milken Institute estimated that the minimum seed from the government could grow to as much as $8,000 for your child over the course of 20 years. How can I open one of these accounts? You should be able to open one at any bank or participating financial institution. If no one gets around to it, the government will open one for the child automatically the first time you file a tax return with the new baby claimed as a dependent. When can money be withdrawn from one of these accounts? The holder of the account (that is, your child) can't withdraw any funds from them until they are at least 18 years old. Funds withdrawn from the account will be subject to the standard capital gains tax, and an additional 10% penalty until they're 59 and a half or older, similar to withdrawals from a 401(k) account. However, there are a number of notable life expenses that the money can be used for penalty-free, including higher-education costs and expenses incurred due to things like disability, domestic violence or natural disasters. Up to $10,000 can be withdrawn penalty-free to be put towards the purchase of a home, and $5,000 can be withdrawn to cover the costs of having a baby. For more, keep an eye on inflation with CNET's daily tariff impact tracker.
Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Approval Rating on Epstein Probe Is Double Digits Underwater: Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's approval rating related to the investigation into the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is underwater by over 30 points as the backlash against the Trump administration continues. Newsweek reached out to the Department of Justice via online form for comment. Why It Matters Waning faith in the government's disclosures about the Epstein investigation underscored broader concerns around transparency and accountability in the current administration. In a memo earlier this month, the DOJ and FBI stated that there is no evidence of a "client list" or attempts by Epstein to blackmail public figures, and that Epstein's death by suicide was confirmed in government inquiries. Attorney General Pam Bondi, in a previous Fox News appearance, said she intended to review Epstein material, but later clarified that she was speaking generally about case documents on her desk. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on July 22, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on July 22, 2025. ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images What To Know According to a The Economist/YouGov poll released on Tuesday, Trump received a 22 percent approval rating on his handling of the investigation into Epstein. His disapproval rating is 56 percent. The survey was conducted from July 18 to July 21 among 1,729 U.S. adult citizens, with a 3.4 percent margin of error. Tuesday's poll also shows that 81 percent think the Trump administration should release all the documents related to the investigation, versus 5 percent who don't, and 14 percent who are unsure. According to the survey, 69 percent think the government is covering up evidence related to the case, while 9 percent don't and 23 percent are unsure. In a The Economist/YouGov poll conducted from July 11 to July 14, 67 percent thought the government was covering up evidence related to the case, and 79 percent believed all documents related to the investigation should be released, showing a 2 percentage point increase on both questions from the previous week. Amid the vocal criticism against the president and his administration from both Republican and Democratic parties, recent polling shows that Trump continues to coast with strong approval ratings among GOP voters. What People Are Saying President Donald Trump on Truth Social on Sunday: "My Poll Numbers within the Republican Party, and MAGA, have gone up, significantly, since the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax was exposed by the Radical Left Democrats and, just plain 'troublemakers.' They have hit 90%, 92%, 93%, and 95%, in various polls, and are all Republican Party records. The General Election numbers are my highest, EVER! People like Strong Borders, and all of the many other things I have done. GOD BLESS AMERICA. MAGA!" Democratic Representative Ro Khanna of California on X on Tuesday: ".@RepThomasMassie and I have the votes to easily pass the full release of the Epstein files. The Speaker is recessing Congress without giving us a vote. RT if you believe members of Congress should have to vote yes or no on the release before their summer vacation." Republican Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky on X on Monday: "If the executive branch won't release phase 2 of the Epstein files, we will. Americans deserve transparency and the victims deserve justice." What Happens Next The DOJ submitted a motion to unseal Epstein-related transcripts on July 18. Any release of grand jury or investigative records will require court rulings to balance public interest and the privacy of alleged victims or third parties, which could add weeks or months to the timeline. Meanwhile, political scrutiny of the administration's transparency may persist into the 2026 midterm election cycle.
