Trump's mass deportation plans for 520,000 Haitian migrants hit with major setback
A federal district court judge in Brooklyn rejected President Trump's plans to end temporary protection status (TPS) for 520,000 Haitian migrants living in the U.S.
The TPS designation was set to expire on August 3 and termination was meant to go into effect on September 2.
But U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan said that Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem went against the timeline set forth by Congress to reconsider the designation for migrants from the Caribbean island.
'Secretary Noem does not have statutory or inherent authority to partially vacate a country's TPS designation,' Cogan wrote in his Tuesday decision.
He said that her actions to end the status were 'unlawful.'
The federal government, however, can still freely enforce immigration laws and terminate TPS.
The ruling came down the same day that Trump and Noem were in the Florida Everglades with Gov. Ron DeSantis to visit the new immigration detention center dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.'
The facility is designed to hold up to 5,000 migrants and supports the administration's mass deportation agenda.
DHS said days before Cogan's ruling that the decision to end the TPS for Haitians ensures it is only a temporary status and not a tool used to circumvent the traditional route to gain citizenship or other documentation to live and work in the U.S.
They claim it restores integrity of the U.S. immigration system and legal pathways.
'The environmental situation in Haiti has improved enough that it is safe for Haitian citizens to return home,' a spokesperson said on Friday.
'We encourage these individuals to take advantage of the Department's resources in returning to Haiti, which can be arranged through the CBP Home app. Haitian nationals may pursue lawful status through other immigration benefit requests, if eligible.'
The Immigration Act of 1990 created TPS with the intention of allowing residents of foreign countries to seek refuge in the U.S. while their home nations were facing war, natural disasters, political uprisings or other unsafe conditions.
The program is able to be extended in 18-month increments.
Haitians were first granted TPS by the U.S. in 2011 after two hurricanes rocked the poor island nation.
In 2013 and 2015 the status was extended for 18-month periods each time. At the end of the 2015 decision to continue TPS, in 2017 it was extended for six more months with a termination of July 22, 2019. But that easy delayed by lawsuits.
In May 2021 the TPS status was redesignated for 18 months due to the ongoing political crisis in Haiti along with human rights abuses and economic challenges. On December 5, 2022 it was extended again.
The previous administration extended it on June 28, 2024 to expire on February 3, 2026 for any Haitians living in the U.S. as of June 3, 2024. But Noem amended this on February 20, 2025 an d set it to expire in August.
Cogan claims that she cannot redesignate the expiration outside the 18-month extension period laid out by Congress.
Cogan wrote in his decision that Haitians' interest in living and working in America 'far outweigh' potential harm to the U.S. government.
It's unclear whether that's a sound legal justification for ruling against the federal-level decision to end TPS for Haitians and remove migrants living in the U.S. without permanent status.
Noem originally decided to revoke TPS from these migrants after reviewing a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) report showing that Haiti no longer met the statutory requirements that grant foreign residents the ability to obtain this protection status.
Haitians living in the U.S. under TPS are encouraged by DHS to use the CBP Home app to secure a complimentary ticket for a departure flight home to their island along with a $1,000 exit bonus for those who voluntarily leave.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Footage shows aftermath of Israeli strike on Gaza school turned shelter
At least 17 people were killed in an Israeli strike on the Mustafa Hafez school, which shelters displaced Palestinians in Gaza City, and 20 others were wounded, according to health officials at al-Shifa hospital. Witnesses said women and children were among those killed who had been sheltering at the site. It came as Hamas said it was studying what Donald Trump called a 'final' ceasefire proposal for Gaza
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump has hung Ukraine out to dry
Volodymyr Zelensky thought he had done everything right. When Donald Trump demanded he sign away Ukraine's mineral rights in exchange for military aid, he did it. When the White House decided that offering Moscow an unconditional ceasefire was the only way to stop the war, Zelensky quickly acquiesced. When the US asked Ukraine to hold off using Nato military equipment against targets inside Russia, they agreed. In the end it didn't make any difference. This week Politico broke the news that the US Department of Defence had paused key weapons deliveries already agreed to and funded by Congress under the Biden administration; this leaves Ukrainian cities defenceless against Russian missile strikes and its troops dangerously low on ammunition. Trump has already clearly signalled his opposition to future arms shipments from the US. But cutting off arms already promised and paid for seems cruel and gratuitous. 'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a DOD review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' explained deputy White House press secretary Anna Kelly. 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned – just ask Iran.' But drill down into the list of weapons withheld this week and the claim that the US is protecting its own dwindling supplies makes little sense. For a start, almost all the pledged weapons are located in American military stockpiles in Poland, not in the US. The Defence Department has blocked the transfer of 250 GMLRS missiles to Ukraine – yet Lockheed Martin makes 14,000 a year. Ukraine will receive 8,496 fewer rounds of 155 mm artillery shells – which is less than a week's production by US industry. And it's hard to see how holding back 25 Stinger missiles is going to help Make America Great Again. There is some debate over whether the delivery freeze comes on the orders of the White House, or whether it's a screw-up by the bean counters in America's defence department. Indeed, just last week Trump signalled that he was willing to find some more Patriot batteries for Kyiv – the holy grail of missile defence that Ukraine so desperately needs as Russia ramps up its missile attacks to unprecedented levels of intensity and frequency. But in the big picture it doesn't matter. Long-term, Trump has made it clear that the US is out of the Ukraine weapons supply game, and he believes that the war must end in diplomacy. Sending more weapons to Kyiv, Trump apparently believes, will only add fuel to the conflict. Trump is wrong, for one simple reason. Ukraine is currently fighting a defensive war on the ground, and slowly losing it in part because of a lack of firepower. Its only successful attacks are targeted at Russian airfields and military factories, and these strikes are undertaken using ingenious weapons of Ukraine's own devising and manufacture. And Kyiv has signalled that it's ready for an immediate ceasefire if Russia follows suit. Ukraine needs weapons to defend against continuous Russian attacks, not to prolong the war. Ukraine's biggest practical problem is that European promises to step into the breach and fill the gap left by the US have so far yielded little in the way of actual arms deliveries. European militaries have been hollowed out by years of budget cuts, and whatever meagre stockpiles existed three years ago have been quickly consumed in the killing fields of Donbas. Pledges to increase defence spending to five per cent of GDP agreed at the Nato summit earlier this month will boost Europe's military industrial complex – indeed the market capitalisation of Rheinmetall, the German tank manufacturer, have risen above Volkswagen's. But that extra investment will take years to make a difference. Europe's immediate answer has been to buy US arms and donate them to Ukraine. But if Washington is not able or willing to send crucial armaments to Kyiv, as this week's withheld shipments suggests, then Zelensky's situation is worse than his remaining allies feared.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Wife of illegal migrant who's a climate change rioter scolds lawmakers for deporting spouse to his native Pakistan
The wife of a Pakistani climate activist who was deported back to his homeland after his visa was revoked says she couldn't stay with him because his native country is, 'not a comfortable place for women'. Sophia Papp lasted just a month living in Pakistan with her husband Zain Haq and is begging authorities to allow him to return home. Haq had his student visa revoked in 2022, after it was found that he had stopped studying for his university degree in Canada. He had also been hit with mischief charges related to acts of 'civil disobedience' during climate protests at the time. He was granted a six-month extension to apply for a spousal sponsorship with his Canadian citizen wife, but he missed the deadline and his application for an extension was never received by officials, reports Vancouver Sun. Haq's deportation was not directly due to the mischief charges, but on a claim that he had violated his student visa by stopping his studies. He was subsequently deported in January of this year. Canadian immigration authorities did not immediately respond to a request for clarification over what happened in the years between Haq missing the deadline and his deportation. Papp said she initially joined her husband and his parents and sister in Pakistan, but struggled with the culture of the South Asian country. 'For security and safety reasons, I was not able to go by myself outside of the home. I was stuck inside most of the time,' she said. Papp said that she and her husband have been stuck in limbo since he was deported, claiming that they applied for their spousal sponsorship extension but it was never received by Canadian officials. 'I did not have due process to appeal,' Papp said. 'The explanation was that there was an active removal order in place, but the only reason there was an active removal order was that they lost the (extension). It was a Catch-22.' The couple's predicament has attracted scrutiny in Canada, with filmmaker Aaron Gunn taking to X this week to voice his opposition to allowing the climate activist back into the country. 'A very good way to not get yourself deported from Canada is not to come here under false pretenses and then proceed to very publicly break our laws and cost hard-working taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars,' he wrote. A very good way to not get yourself deported from Canada is not to come here under false pretenses and then proceed to very publicly break our laws and cost hard-working taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars. — Aaron Gunn (@AaronGunn) July 2, 2025 Papp said she struggled to adjust to the restrictions placed on women in Pakistan. Canada has an active travel warning for female travelers to the country which warns them of rampant gender-based oppression and harassment. In Pakistan, Haq has continued his climate activism, and writes for The Express Tribune about climate change issues including the destruction of habitat and farmland in the port of Keti Bandar, per the Vancouver Sun. 'Regions in Pakistan and India are already experiencing some of the worst effects of this climate crisis — drought, or floods that have displaced millions of people,' Papp said. Papp said she is now waiting for her husband to be allowed back into Canada, but the process for applying for spousal sponsorship from outside the country can take years. 'My home is in Canada,' she said. 'He should be here with me.'
