
Urgent need to fill gaps in care for those with psychosis, survey finds
Psychosis affects how the brain processes information, so a person may find it difficult to distinguish between what is real and what is not.
The Psychosis Survey 2024, published on Wednesday, is based on feedback from almost 400 people with this condition and others.
Shine CEO Nicola Byrne said investment in early intervention services is growing, but concerns remain.
She highlighted a 'postcode lottery' that has left gaps in many areas.
Some 42.3% of those who responded said expanding numbers of psychosis teams is their top priority.
More funding including money for staffing was also called for by respondents.
The report quotes one parent saying: 'When my son was involved in X mental health services, I received a lot of support from local mental health services. They were always helpful and there for me and his family.
'My son then moved to a different mental health service, and I feel this service is totally unsupportive to family members.'
Ms Byrne said in regions offering early intervention: 'People have a much better experience, they are much happier and much clearer, they have more understanding of what supports they can get.'
The survey found only 14.4% of people using general mental health services had 'easy access to support' compared to 42.9% of people using early intervention in psychosis services.
In addition over 70% found media portrayals of psychosis 'inaccurate', and 54% experienced workplace stigma.
One person said: 'Almost all forms of media highlight only negative outcomes of those living with psychosis or having violent psychotic episodes which end in harm to others.
The mental illness is incredibly stigmatised and rarely are the lack of supports for patients and friends/family highlighted.
Shine says public education campaigns including schools are needed. This was ranked as the third most important priority by those answering the survey.
'I think we need to be looking at having better conversations about understanding what mental illness is,' Ms Byrne said.
'Until we have that understanding we will never have parity with physical illness.'
Many people said charities help fill the gaps in State services. One person said:
"If it wasn't for the support of Shine, I probably would not have been able to cope having a family member with severe psychosis who still after years has not been treated."
Minister of State for mental health Mary Butler welcomed improvements seen by people using the early intervention services.
'My department allocated funding in Budget 2025 to set up two new early intervention teams in Dublin and Limerick. A further 24 roles are being funded across the two new teams at a cost of €2.8m,' she said.
There are now seven teams.
The survey was carried out by Shine, Mental Health Reform, and the HSE National Clinical Programme for Early Intervention in Psychosis.
It can be read online from Wednesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
15-07-2025
- Irish Examiner
Advocates call for 'key changes' to Mental Health Bill to protect the 'rights and dignity' of patients
It is not too late to make changes to the Mental Health Bill and offer better dignity to people with mental illnesses, advocates and legal experts have urged. The bill has now concluded final stages in the Dáil and goes before the Seanad in the autumn. Minister of state for mental health Mary Butler described the bill as the 'most comprehensive overhaul of mental health laws in 20 years'. She said it provided for the regulation of community mental health services — including Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services — by the Mental Health Commission among other reforms. Human rights lawyer and lecturer in international disability law at the Centre for Disability Law and Policy in Galway, Janos Fiala-Butora, is one of many raising concerns. A key issue is the criteria for involuntary admission to psychiatric units, he said. 'Psychiatric patients differ from other patients in one important way. If other patients reject the treatment offered, doctors cannot enforce it on them against their will. They have to offer alternatives and make an effort to convince them,' he said. They do not have to do that in the field of mental health, because involuntary treatment is readily available. That is a huge power, which must be wielded responsibly. He described the debate on the bill in recent months as 'quite disappointing' in an article for the online journal Mad in Ireland. Having represented dozens of patients and interviewed hundreds, he said abolishing involuntary treatment was preferable, but acknowledged the lack of alternatives for patients in crisis. He argued it was 'unfair to doctors' to expect them to police this approach. 'Pretending that all psychiatric patients who are rejecting treatment are doing so because they lack capacity will not get us closer to discussing what the proper contours of that power should be,' he cautioned. Social Democrat TD and psychologist Liam Quaide raised concerns about how the bill was rushed through the Dáil, with many last-minute amendments. He warned rejection of amendments on a right to an independent advocate or an independent complaints mechanism was worrying for patients. An amendment to bring in a reference to chemical restraints was also rejected. 'This is a deeply troubling omission as the practice of administering powerful, temporarily disabling sedatives is common in psychiatric settings [and] has serious implications for bodily autonomy and personal liberty,' he said. He also highlighted 'significant changes' to provisions around involuntary treatment. Many of these concerns were echoed by Mental Health Reform, which set out recommendations on seven issues. It also noted limited Dáil scrutiny with concern. It warned of 'particularly troubling' consequences from changes, including widened criteria for involuntary treatment and allowing for involuntary treatment to begin without a capacity assessment. A doubling of time allowed for involuntary treatment from 21 to 42 days was introduced, it said, 'at a late stage'. Independent advocacy and complaints are 'essential to uphold the rights and dignity' of people in vulnerable situations and should be included, it said. It welcomed a reduction in time to review the bill from 10 to five years. Overall, however, it urged that "there is still an opportunity to introduce key changes that would significantly strengthen the bill".


Irish Independent
10-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Mental health group says plan to extend duration of involuntary psychiatric treatment is ‘troubling'
Proposed changes to new legislation on mental health are troubling, according to a submission from Mental Health Reform (MHR). The organisation which is a coalition on mental health is calling on the Government to urgently address a number of amendments to the Mental Health Bill 2024 which it said 'risk undermining the rights of people experiencing mental health difficulties'.


Irish Independent
10-07-2025
- Irish Independent
Mental health groups says plan to extend duration of involuntary psychiatric treatment is ‘troubling'
Proposed changes to new legislation on mental health are troubling, according to a submission from Mental Health Reform (MHR). The organisation which is a coalition on mental health is calling on the Government to urgently address a number of amendments to the Mental Health Bill 2024 which it said 'risk undermining the rights of people experiencing mental health difficulties'.