New Chrome, Edge Deadline—Update And Restart All Browsers Now
Google made headlines this week, releasing an emergency Chrome update and confirming it had quietly stopped attacks by pushing out changes to all browsers. This is not just a Chrome issue. Microsoft has also updated Edge to mitigate the same threat.
With Chrome so dominant on Windows desktops, it's easy to overlook that Edge runs on the same Chromium platform and is often vulnerable to the same vulnerabilities. That's certainly the case here, and it means all users need to take note.
CISA has now mandated federal staff update os stop using all Chromium browsers by June 26. 'This vulnerability could affect multiple web browsers that utilize Chromium,' it says, 'including, but not limited to, Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Opera.' This is only mandatory for federal staff, but all users should do the same.
Microsoft warns Edge users that its latest update 'contains a fix for CVE-2025-5419 which has been reported by the Chromium team as having an exploit in the wild.' This echoes Google's initial warning from June 2, which with its own emergency update.
For its part, America's cyber defense agency warns this is a 'Chromium V8 contains an out-of-bounds read and write vulnerability that could allow a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page."
While browser vulnerabilities affect mobile platforms and Macs, the primary risk is with Windows PCs. Chrome dominates with a 65% market to Edge's 14%, albeit that is slowly growing. Other browsers remain also-rans outside Apple's ecosystem and Safari.
Given Google's and CISA's warnings, updating immediately is critical. As Qualys points out, 'currently, no publicly available information exists regarding exploiting this Google Chrome vulnerability by any specific threat actors. The absence of reports does not necessarily mean the vulnerability is not being exploited.'
As ever with such threats, the maximum risk is the period between public disclosure and the majority of users applying updates. Attackers know they're on the clock. That's why Google and others do not issue any further detail at this early stage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump slams Elon Musk as megabill drops AI protections and hits snags in Senate
President Trump slammed Elon Musk's subsidies, and Republican senators struck down a plan to shield artificial intelligence from state regulations. These two middle-of-the-night developments on Tuesday reinforced a growing schism between Trump and Silicon Valley supporters over his "big, beautiful bill." The first development came at 12:44 a.m. ET, when Trump responded to Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk's ongoing critiques of the package, focusing on the government grants that Musk's companies receive. "Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," wrote the president in a Truth Social post, adding, "perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this?" The president was referring to the government efficiency group that Musk ran until recently. The president's missive came after Trump's signature legislation underwent key changes in recent days that set off many in the tech industry, Musk most of all, with new measures to tax green energy companies and further support for fossil fuels, as well as a growing price tag. The divide between many in Silicon Valley and the "big, beautiful bill" has been evident for over a month. It appeared set to deepen further when, a few hours later, a closely watched artificial intelligence provision was stripped from the bill itself. This plan, which had many Silicon Valley supporters, was meant to shield the quickly growing AI industry from state and local regulations. But the idea now appears to be dead after Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee turned against a compromise plan Monday evening and stripped it from the bill. It wasn't close in the end, with the Senate voting 99-1 to adopt Blackburn's subsequent amendment in a count that wrapped up a little after 4:00 a.m. ET. Trump's overall package also appears to be teetering Tuesday morning after a series of overnight developments saw two key Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine — uncommitted to vote yes. Those two senators could join two Republicans already committed to voting no, which would be enough to sink the package. The drama between the president and the world's richest man has been up and down for weeks, but it escalated Monday afternoon when Musk offered new electoral threats against Republicans. Musk had already amplified Democrats' critiques and talked about the need for a new political party. He offered a striking promise Monday afternoon that lawmakers who vote for the bill "will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk, of course, was the biggest donor during the 2024 campaign, spending at least $288 million, most of which was offered in support of Trump. Trump reiterated his critiques of Musk Tuesday morning, speaking to reporters and saying of Musk's objection to losing EV subsidies, "Elon can lose a lot more than that." The president also called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) a "monster that might have to go back and eat Elon." And when asked by a reporter if he would consider deporting Musk, he demurred: "We'll have to take a look." What is unclear for the days ahead is how much the Trump-Musk fight will impact the actual chances of the bill's passage, with Senate amendment votes ongoing. Musk is clearly focused on a debate likely coming later this week, when the House is set to take up the amended measure if it passes. The House is where a vocal bloc of fiscal conservatives — who often vote as part of the "Freedom Caucus" — warily supported a previous version of the bill, saying a previous smaller price tag was too big. Musk even tagged some of these House Republican lawmakers in some of his latest posts, which continued throughout the night with dozens of messages. Musk also responded to Trump's comments about his subsidies by saying his companies like Tesla and SpaceX ( would be fine and that oil and gas subsidies should be removed as well. The back-and-forth over AI also came to a head overnight after the House passed a plan in May that included a complete ban on state regulations of AI for a decade. The little-noticed measure gained wider attention in the weeks that followed, with many of Trump's most loyal supporters opposing it. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene even admitted that she hadn't been aware of the provision when she voted yes. The Georgia lawmaker then announced her opposition and plans to vote no if this "violation of state rights" stayed in the bill. Trump himself doesn't appear to have taken a position on the measure, but it had the backing of his Silicon Valley-aligned aides, most notably the vocal support of AI and crypto czar (and longtime venture capitalist) David Sacks. But Republican opposition grew, and Sen. Blackburn of Tennessee became a leading voice of opposition in the Senate. She entered into negotiations over the issue and appeared to have found a compromise in recent days around the idea that instead of a decade-long ban, the provision would be amended to be a "temporary pause" of five years. States would be strongly discouraged from regulating AI, as lawmakers linked it to access to millions of dollars in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. But even that wasn't enough. Blackburn renounced the compromise, said a moratorium "could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives," and teamed with a top Democrat to strike the provision entirely. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (a former Trump press secretary) congratulated Blackburn on the move in a post the senator quickly reposted. "This is how you take on big tech!" Sanders wrote. This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why stablecoin issuer Circle wants to be a bank
Circle (CRCL), the stablecoin issuer, has formally applied with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to get a national trust bank charter, it said in a press announcement late Monday. If the national bank regulator grants Circle approval, it plans to spin up a national trust bank called First National Digital Currency Bank, N.A. Such a charter would allow the crypto firm to custody and manage the reserve assets behind its own stablecoins and offer other fiduciary services. 'Establishing a national digital currency trust bank of this kind marks a significant milestone in our goal to build an internet financial system that is transparent, efficient and accessible,' Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said in a statement. Reuters was the first to report this development. The move would allow Circle, which has seen its stock soar after its recent IPO, to manage the reserve assets for the stablecoins it issues, thus strengthening the firm's competitive position. It would also check the box for a requirement all US stablecoin issuers are expected to meet under related legislation. Only one other crypto firm, Anchorage Digital, holds such a license. Currently, Circle's reserves are held in custody by the Bank of New York Mellon (BK) and managed by BlackRock (BLK). Circle's stock opened 2% lower on Tuesday. It's up 470% from its June 5 IPO price of $31. President Donald Trump has promised to make America the 'crypto capital of the world' and since he's taken office, the crypto world has seen a flood of doors open to mainstream finance. And no other corner of the industry so far has attracted so much attention from Wall Street as Circle's corner, the $253 billion stablecoin market. From Wall Street banks like JPMorgan Chase (JPM) and Bank of America (BAC) to credit card giants Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA), fintech firms, and even Big Tech companies, a swath of corporate America is gearing up their stablecoin strategies ahead of passage of the first-ever US stablecoin legislation later this year. Unlike other cryptocurrencies, the value of stablecoins isn't intended to fluctuate. Instead, they act as a safe haven for investors waiting out crypto's volatility and in that way are seen as a potential gamechanger in the world of cross-border payments. In practice, stablecoins are managed like money market funds, where for every dollar users put in, issuers must set aside assets in reserve. Known as the GENIUS Act, this stablecoin bill would set standards for how US banks and other financial companies can offer stablecoins and how they would need to manage their reserves in cash and US Treasuries. It would also call for issuers of a certain size to be overseen by the OCC, opening the stablecoin market to a far wider range of players. Another broader crypto market structure bill that is expected to take longer to pass, known as the Clarity Act, will open more doors. This bill includes tokenization, which would clear a path for US firms to begin offering blockchain versions of other assets, such as bank deposits, stocks, and bonds. As issuer of the world's second-largest stablecoin, USDC (USDC-USD), Circle is well positioned to benefit from so much new interest. While no one is quite sure how much stablecoins could change global payments, there's already a flurry of proponents predicting a lot of growth ahead. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers last month that passing stablecoin legislation could help push the US stablecoin market beyond $2 trillion by the end of 2028. "We view CRCL as an investor must-hold, to participate in the new internet-scale financial system built for the next decade," Bernstein analyst Gautam Chhugani, who initiated coverage of Circle on Monday, said in a note. Bernstein expects the global stablecoin market to grow to $4 trillion over the next decade. David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. His email is at Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNET
20 minutes ago
- CNET
Grammarly Adds Superhuman Email App to Expand Its AI Platform. Here's What That Could Mean for You
Show of hands: Who'd like to spend less time going through their email? That could be in the offing from Grammarly, which announced it's expanding its suite of workplace tools with the purchase of Superhuman, an email efficiency tool. Grammarly, the company behind the popular grammar enforcement app of the same name, has acquired the AI-powered Superhuman app as part of its push to build out its business productivity offerings, the company said in a press release today. "Email is the main communication tool for billions of people worldwide and the number-one use case for Grammarly customers," Rahul Vohra, CEO of Superhuman, said in a statement. "By joining forces with Grammarly, we will invest even more in the core Superhuman experience, as well as create a new way of working where AI agents collaborate across the communication tools that we all use every day." The news follows the grammarian's 2024 purchase of Coda, a productivity platform that offers a suite of products including document software and spreadsheets. Both acquisitions point to Grammarly's potential desire to break free of its grammatical roots and compete on a bigger stage with tech titans Google and Microsoft, which have launched their own AI tools (Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot) that operate across all their software products. Started in 2009, Grammarly is a Ukraine-founded cloud-based typing assistant. It uses AI to help correct basic writing errors, detects plagiarism and suggest edits for your writing across multiple platforms. It even assesses the tone of your writing, although Grammarly, the product, has told me many times that my writing is too sarcastic. Thanks for that brilliant insight, Grammarly. Oh wait, I see what you mean there. Superhuman's website boasts that its email productivity app can help you save four hours every week on email by organizing your inbox and drafting email messages. Here's what you need to know about Grammarly's expansion. Could Grammarly replace Google Suite? Grammarly's recent purchases raise a larger question about the grammar app. Reuters reports that the company is working on a name change that sells it as more than just a writing improvement tool. But could its collection of Coda and Superhuman really make it a viable competitor with the likes of Google Suite? "My sense is that Grammarly is trying to position itself as the company that sells the next layer on top of workplace software for companies," said Jon Reed, a CNET senior editor who covers AI. While versions of generative AI have been criticized for inaccuracies and hallucinations, tech giants continue to invest and expand the use of this technology across all platforms, including chatbots and image generators. To set itself apart from grammar-focused competitors like ProWritingAid and Wordtune, Grammarly may be feeling the heat as it anticipates increased AI adoption.
