Striking Vancouver Island transit workers to vote on mediator recommendations this weekend
The strike, which began on Feb. 8 and is the longest transit contract dispute in the province's history, affects about 50 regular and HandyDART bus drivers, maintenance workers and cleaners in the region north of Victoria.
Unifor, the union representing the workers, said the mediator delivered his report on Monday, and the workers were offered a copy on Tuesday.
"They're disappointed," Unifor national representative Gavin Davies told CBC News.
"They don't feel that the recommendations went far enough."
Weeks to get rolling
Davies said the workers' primary issues are wages, breaks, and bathroom access for drivers. But he emphasized that the vote will be the real test of how workers feel about the recommendations.
If the workers ratify the recommendations, Davies said, it could still take two or three weeks before buses get rolling because they would need to be recertified as commercial vehicles.
If the workers vote against the recommendations, Davies said, the workers could go to binding arbitration or be mandated to return to work by the province.
The employer and transit operator Transdev, a private company contracted by B.C. Transit, told CBC News in a written statement that it "remains committed to reaching a sustainable resolution and resuming reliable service for our riders and the Cowichan Valley community."
45 kilometres of coverage
The strike has created challenges for many people in the region of about 90,000 residents. The Cowichan Valley transit system covers more than 45 kilometres, north to south.
Service providers and elected officials have said it's the community's most vulnerable who are bearing the brunt of the strike.
Negotiators for Unifor locals 114 and 333 reached a deal with Transdev in April, but it was voted down by members.
In May, the mayor of North Cowichan said it was time for the province to step up and help end the transit strike in his region.
On June 10, B.C. Labour Minister Jennifer Whiteside appointed a mediator, Dave Schaub, and called on both sides to work with him.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Alberta gov't fell short of its affordable housing goal last year: annual report
The provincial government completed fewer new or refurbished affordable housing units last year than the previous three years, according to figures in the Seniors, Community and Social Services Ministry's annual report. Provincial funding contributed to the creation of 388 new units in fiscal 2024, while another 410 households received rent supplements — payments that help people pay rent in market-housing units, the annual report says. But the combined number of 798 units and subsidies fell short of the ministry's target of 1,500 for the year, the report says "The provincial government has been failing at creating more affordable housing, particularly for low-income people," said Carolyn Whitzman, a senior housing researcher at the University of Toronto's School of Cities. Last year, the Alberta government created 641 affordable housing units — through new builds and refurbishments — and allocated 1,661 rent supplements. In the 2021 Stronger Foundations report, the province's 10-year strategy for affordable housing, the government set a goal to expand the capacity of its affordable housing system, so it could support 25,000 more households by 2032. That figure combines new builds, renovations to existing units and rent subsidies. During a media availability Friday, Assisted Living and Social Services Minister Jason Nixon told reporters that the provincial government is on track to reach its goal. He said providing rent supplements for existing market housing is part of the plan. "Rent supplement units are new units," Nixon said. "Taking a unit on, that would be in the open market, and creating a rent supplement for that unit creates an affordable unit that would not have been affordable before this." The annual report said an additional 1,626 units were under construction as of March 31. Nixon's press secretary, Amber Edgerton, said in a written statement that the figure in the annual report shows the projects completed within a fiscal year, and that most affordable housing projects are currently being built. "Construction of affordable housing doesn't happen in a fiscal year — these are long-term projects that will benefit Albertans for decades to come," she wrote. On Friday, Nixon and Eleanor Olszewski, the federal minister of emergency management and community resilience and MP for Edmonton Centre, announced that the federal and provincial governments will spend $203 million combined to build 2,300 affordable housing units across Alberta. The provincial government has spent $386 million through its Affordable Housing Partnership Program since 2022, and plans to spend another $655 million over the next three years. Provinces could do better Whitzman, the U of T researcher, sees problems with Alberta's use of subsidies to help make market housing more affordable. The payments, she said, don't always make up the difference between the rent charged for a unit and what a lower-income tenant can afford. Rent subsidies also keep tenants in the private market, which may not provide the same kind of rent stability as a unit in a community-housing or non-market unit., she said. Nixon rejects calls for Alberta to implement rent control while the province builds out its affordable housing supply. He argues rent caps provide a disincentive to developers who build new apartment and homes. Whitzman said that isn't the case in jurisdictions like Quebec, which has rent control. No provincial government is doing a great job building affordable housing, Whitzman said, but Alberta is failing on several fronts. She said Alberta has a growing rate of evictions, and that the government needs to improve benefits so people can afford to live. The Alberta government can also change the building code and provide guidance to municipalities on how they can change zoning bylaws to allow more apartment buildings, she said. Calgary, and particularly Edmonton, are doing well with zoning changes, but only because they did so on their own, Whitzman added. Opposition NDP housing critic Janis Irwin, the MLA for Edmonton-Highlands-Norwood, said she isn't surprised the government fell short of its affordable-housing goals. Nixon often cites increases in market housing starts as proof Alberta is building more housing, which in turn will make more apartments available as tenants move into new homes. But Irwin argues the UCP government needs to spend more on new non-market housing, and reiterated a call to institute a rent cap. She said Nixon could spend more on new affordable housing builds, noting the government ended the 2024-25 year with a $8.2 billion surplus. "They could be using that money to invest in new affordable housing. They could be upgrading the affordable housing that we know is in disrepair," Irwin said. "We know that investments in housing will will pay dividends down the road. These should be viewed as investments and not expenses."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How to fix Canadians' unfairly high tax burdens under progressive rates
If you think tax rates are too high, now is your chance to share your views with the government as it prepares its 2025 fall federal budget. This week, Minister of Finance and National Revenue, François-Philippe Champagne, launched the government's annual pre-budget consultations, giving Canadians until Aug. 28 to share their thoughts on a variety of key issues directly with the government online, via email or through written submissions. In a media release, the government noted that part of the consultations will focus on bringing down costs for Canadians, building on its recent 'middle-class tax cut,' which saw the lowest federal tax bracket drop to 14.5 per cent (from 15 per cent) as of July 1, with a further cut to 14 per cent scheduled for Jan. 1, 2026. While Canadians of all income levels will benefit from the rate cut to the lowest bracket, such a cut further magnifies the extreme progressivity inherent in our tax rate structure. Let's take a closer look at tax progressivity and what steps the government might consider to reduce the impact of such progressivity on certain taxpayers. As a refresher, we have five federal tax brackets in 2025: zero to $57,375 of income (14.5 per cent); above $57,375 to $114,750 (20.5 per cent); above $114,750 to $177,882 (26 per cent); above $177,882 to $253,414 (29 per cent), with anything above that taxed at 33 per cent. Each province and territory also has its own set of provincial tax brackets and rates. For example, an Ontario taxpayer currently pays a zero rate of tax on any income up to the basic exemption of $16,129. For income above that, the combined federal and Ontario marginal rate rises through over a dozen successive income brackets (including two levels of Ontario provincial surtax) until it reaches a top marginal rate of 53.53 per cent with income over $253,414. If we go back 15 years, Ontario's top marginal tax rate was a mere 46.41 per cent, meaning both the degree of progressivity as well as the top marginal rates have since increased sharply. And, this is not just an Ontario problem, as eight out of 10 provinces now have top marginal tax rates over 50 per cent. The other problem with our top rate is that it kicks in way too soon at $253,414. Contrast that with the top federal rate in the United States of 37 per cent, which was just made permanent (rather than reverting back to the 39.6 per cent rate for 2026) by the recent passage of President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), and only starts to apply with income over US$626,350 — equivalent to about $860,000 in Canadian dollars. While there are many arguments for progressivity in the tax system, such as the more you make, the greater your ability to pay, having a tax rate so high can be a disincentive to earn more money since in most of Canada, you can't even keep half of it for yourself. And, while there's a common misperception in Canada that top income earners do not pay their share of taxes, a new report out this week by the Fraser Institute entitled Measuring progressivity in Canada's tax system, 2025, finds that high-income families already pay a disproportionately large share of all Canadian taxes, with the top 20 per cent of income earning families paying nearly two-thirds (64.5 per cent) of the country's personal income taxes. While it seems unlikely our current government will proactively lower the top bracket any time soon, perhaps the government could instead focus on a couple of targeted measures in the area of tax policy that would help reduce the sting of this sharp progressivity. A recent article by Geoffrey Turner, a law professor and tax lawyer with Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP in Toronto, entitled Mitigating the inequities of high progressivity: Income averaging and spousal unit taxation, puts forth those two ideas for consideration. Turner maintains that tax reform should focus on alleviating the unfairly high tax burdens that our current progressive rate structure imposes on two specific categories of taxpayers: individuals whose income is irregular over time and families in which spouses or partners earn dissimilar incomes and therefore fall into different tax brackets. Of course, these ideas are not new as they were originally contained in the 1966 Carter Royal Commission Report on Taxation which recognized these inequities and proposed solutions, which were never permanently adopted. But, given the progressivity inherent in today's rates, Turner argues that the time has come to introduce these measures into our tax system. Let's start with income averaging. Under our personal income tax system we measure income annually and report it based on the calendar year. As a result of this 'convenient but arbitrary time frame,' taxable income is measured discretely each year, without reference to taxable income in prior or subsequent years. This means taxpayers with 'lumpy' income, who experience high income in one year but low income the following year, end up paying unfair amounts of tax in those high-income years relative to their actual ability, over time, to pay. The Carter commission recommended addressing this problem by allowing income averaging, which we did have in some form or other in Canada until 1988. The other recommendation proposed by Turner was to change the taxing unit from the individual to the couple. The Carter commission concluded that a better measure of ability to pay is the consolidated income of families because they constitute the basic economic grouping in Canadian society. Although the family unit was never adopted as part of the 1972 tax reform, family income is used today to income-test various social programs and credits, including the Canada child benefit, the Canada workers benefit, and the GST/HST credit. But notwithstanding this, the individual, rather than the family, remains the basic taxing unit in Canada, despite the fact that family income may better gauge one's ability to pay. Our current system is particularly unfair for families in which one spouse earns most of the income, as that family's tax burden is significantly higher under our progressive rate structure than if that income were evenly divided between each individual in a couple. Rather than force couples to be taxed together, however, Turner is in favour of allowing couples to elect to be taxed as a spousal unit. This would be similar to the elective 'married filing jointly' option available to couples in the U.S. As an added bonus, it would also 'help simplify the complex income-splitting rules, which might be rendered redundant by such a measure,' writes Turner. Jamie Golombek, FCPA, FCA, CFP, CLU, TEP, is the managing director, Tax & Estate Planning with CIBC Private Wealth in Toronto. If you liked this story, in the FP Investor newsletter. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
3 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Canada Is the Best Friend America's Got
When President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the Trans-Pacific Partnership in 2017, I was profoundly disappointed. In 2015, as Canada's minister of international trade, I helped negotiate the ambitious agreement that set high standards for the global economy and countered China's influence in the Asia-Pacific region. It was more than a trade deal—it was a strategic blueprint for shared prosperity and security among like-minded nations. That withdrawal signaled a larger shift. The Trump administration over its two terms has steadily retreated from the multilateral, rules-based order the U.S. had built since World War II. It has refused to appoint judges to the World Trade Organization's appellate body, effectively paralyzing the system that enforces global trade rules. It has turned to tariffs as a blunt instrument of coercion, wielding them against strategic competitors like China and longtime partners such as Canada.
