No vote on removing books from schools as SC education board questions own rule
COLUMBIA — Amid state Board of Education members' misgivings about its own regulation banning 'sexual conduct' from K-12 public schools, the board held off on deciding Tuesday whether to remove 10 more books from school library shelves.
The state board unanimously approved the regulation last year, sending it to the state Legislature. Neither the House nor Senate took a vote on the regulation, which automatically went into effect last June through an apparent fluke that surprised even legislators.
Since the state board's first review in November, board members have agreed to remove 11 books from public school libraries and keep six others, one of which the board required parental permission to check out. Last month, a five-member committee unanimously recommended removing the 10 books up for consideration.
Books considered for removal Tuesday
'Collateral' by Ellen Hopkins
'Empire of Storms' by Sarah J. Maas
'Half of a Yellow Sun' by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
'Hopeless' by Colleen Hoover
'Identical' by Ellen Hopkins
'Kingdom of Ash' by Sarah J. Maas
'Last Night at the Telegraph Club' by Malinda Lo
'Living Dead Girl' by Elizabeth Scott
'Lucky' by Alice Sebold
'Tricks' by Ellen Hopkins
Source: Instructional Materials Review Committee
But ahead of taking a vote Tuesday, board members began to question their own regulation, including whether they had applied it correctly in the past. Many of their questions echoed concerns opponents of the complaint have raised.
'I'm not sure if we're shooting at the right target, or if we're shooting whether our range finder is accurate,' said board member David O'Shields, superintendent of Laurens County School District 56.
The first seven books considered didn't come from a parent challenging a local district's ruling but by board members working with state Department of Education staff. Board members wanted to consider some widely questioned books to set a precedent for future rulings and hopefully clear up confusion, members said at the time.
Since then, most of the books removed from school libraries, including the 10 up for consideration Tuesday, came to the state board through challenges from one Beaufort County parent. The same parent brought 96 books to the Beaufort County Board of Education for review last year.
The local school board, which considered all the books before the statewide regulation went into effect, declined to remove any of the books from shelves. The same parent could feasibly ask the state board to consider every one of those books under the regulation, said board member Ken Richardson, former chairman of the Horry Georgetown Technical College board.
'When does this thing stop?' Richardson, who represents Horry and Georgetown counties, asked repeatedly.
10 more books recommended for removal in SC from K-12 libraries
'I think that's the question of the day,' replied board Chairwoman Rita Allison, a former longtime legislator from Spartanburg County.
Board members raised concerns over a single parent being able to bring dozens of requests to the state board, requiring schools across the state to remove them from library shelves, whether or not local community members share the concerns about the books. O'Shields, Allison and Richardson said they had yet to hear complaints about any of the books they had considered in the districts they represented.
'I do not like to come up here every single meeting and vote on books nobody in my area is even talking about,' Richardson said.
Five of the 10 books up for consideration Tuesday are in school libraries in Laurens County School District 56, where O'Shields in superintendent, he said.
Libraries bought those books with the hopes that they would encourage more students to read, while 'understanding that children don't come from a cookie cutter world,' O'Shields said. He questioned whether the board should be considering books as a whole, instead of based on excerpts containing sexual conduct.
In some cases, the sexual conduct that leads the board to remove books from shelves amounts to as little as a few pages in several-hundred-page novels, he said.
'Again, I am not in favor of it,' O'Shields said. 'I personally find those pages repugnant.'
But those books can still be important for some students, he said. O'Shields held up a small, yellow tome entitled 'Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex* (*But Were Afraid to Ask),' which he deemed his own 'puberty book' — the book to which he turned to learn about the changes happening in his adolescence.
'However, this was all I had. You know what I'm saying?' he continued.
For children who have experienced abuse or other struggles, reading stories similar to their own might be especially important, said Tony Vincent, a minister in Seneca. While he wouldn't be comfortable with his preteen daughters reading some of the books up for review, he also understood that every child is different, he said.
The books 'could possibly save lives and help young people understand themselves and their experiences,' said Vincent, who represents Anderson and Oconee counties.
SC teachers say new 'age-appropriate' rule is causing confusion. They're seeking clear guidance.
'Looking at these books outside of the arc of their full stories is a mistake, in my view,' Vincent said.
The board originally approved the regulation in order to protect children from nefarious people looking to introduce them to sexual ideas with the intention of abusing them, said Richard Harrington, who represents Florence and Marion counties. He acknowledged that he didn't know whether that was actually happening in South Carolina schools, but out of an abundance of caution, the board should continue to remove books that include sexual conduct, he said.
'It would be ill-advised to have these books remain when they could be used for that purpose,' Harrington said.
O'Shields and Vincent asked whether the board could consider a middle ground between removing the books from shelves entirely and allowing any student to access them. The board has already done something similar once, by requiring parental permission to check out 'Crank' by Ellen Hopkins.
'I'm asking for something so it's not, 'goodnight, sweet prince,' for these books,' O'Shields said.
The board voted to postpone a decision on the 10 books up for consideration Tuesday until members can get more clarification on the regulation in hopes of assuaging some of their concerns or determining whether the regulation needs any changes.
The next time the board could take a vote would be at its May 6 meeting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hearing held, no recall election date of Jackson County Executive set
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A Jackson County judge wants to take the weekend to review testimony and other cases mentioned in arguments Friday, before coming to a decision, about a potential recall election date of Jackson County Executive Frank White Jr. Recently, two lawsuits seeking different outcomes were consolidated. One lawsuit demands the election be held at the end of this month, or as early as possible. The other, filed by two election offices, argues it's best to wait until November, such as November 4, since it's already a set election date. Kansas City air deemed 'unhealthy' as wildfire smoke casts haze across skies 'I think that all the parties agreed today, except for the County Executive. I don't think that he's going to agree with this, but I think one thing we all walked out knowing that there is going to be an election,' Attorney Phil LeVota shared with FOX4 Friday. Different perspectives and arguments surround when a recall election of Jackson County's Executive Frank White Jr. should take place if it were set to happen. 'My clients, the (Jackson County) citizens, are lock step with the Jackson County Legislature that it should be as soon as possible,' LeVota added. Friday, evidence was presented, and testimony was given. The election boards say they are committed to conducting a fair election and have no position on the recall, and add, in compliance with law, the next election date this could happen is November 4. They claim not enough time is given for alerting and securing polling locations, or finding an adequate number of polling judges, among other things. Council for County Executive Frank White Jr. says the process should be fair. White Jr. had no comment for FOX4 on Friday. 'My taxes went up 341%. I want the man gone. Gone from the county. Our people can't handle this. He has to go. The sooner, the better. People are being rooted out of their homes by Frank White,' Mark Anthony Jones, a Jackson County resident, said. Jones, a plaintiff, was unknowingly called to the stand on Friday. 'I am one of those 60,000 people who still haven't got our tax assessment figured out for 2023,' Jones added. OSHA investigating deadly collapse at Family Dollar in Kansas City One side argues the charter states it should take place within 60 days of receiving the signatures, or the next feasible date. Another says it's still an election and should fall on an already set election date, such as November 4. 'If that 10 weeks is an issue, that date could be September 30 or October 7. We don't believe we should fall back on, 'Well, there's one in November just waiting.' The people want a recall election. They want it expediently done. They want it quick,' LeVota shared. Others say there's harm in waiting and understand a recall election is rare. 'If they want to recall someone, they want to vote to take someone out of office. They don't want them to sit around for four more months still doing things that they don't think they should be doing,' LeVota added. A potential recall election date is anticipated for Monday or Tuesday of the coming week. LeVota is confident a date will likely be set soon. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Mass. Governor: All shelters are closed, state of emergency for shelter system is over
Advertisement 'We're saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars and putting families on a path to self-sustainability,' she said. In addition to the closure of hotel shelters, shelters located at the former Bay State Correctional Center and the Chelsea Rapid Shelter site have also closed. Three families were using the hotel shelter system, a Massachusetts experienced a surge of immigrants arriving here beginning in the At the same time, the Advertisement After Healey took office in January 2023, officials drastically expanded the emergency shelter system to house thousands of homeless and migrant families For decades, homeless families have been guaranteed a roof over their heads under to help families at hotels access medical care, find transportation, and enroll their children in school. With costs skyrocketing, Healey and legislators repeatedly sought to tighten eligibility, including by requiring homeless families to prove lawful immigration status, show they have lived in Massachusetts for at least six months, and undergo The number of families in emergency shelter has fallen to Just last month, however, state officials had the cap set by the Legislature, the state still was not able to keep up with the demand. Healey officials say they issued the declaration specifically so they can continue to impose restrictions on shelters, such as limiting who gets priority for beds and how long they can stay. Advertisement Massachusetts Housing Secretary Ed Augustus wrote in The extended declaration is supposed to last until Nov. 9, which is required under rules set out by the Legislature in a 2023 spending bill. It can be extended again if Augustus determines it's necessary. Former MBTA executive Brian Shortsleeve, who is running in the GOP primary for governor, criticized Healey's comments Friday. He slammed the use of public dollars to fund the state's HomeBase program, which provides rental assistance for families transitioning into permanent housing and is credited with helping reduce the emergency shelter population. Shortsleeve said Healey's claim of saving taxpayer dollars has 'got to go done [sic] in the Guinness Book of Records as the biggest lie ever told by a politician,' 'As the next governor, I will stop the flow of our tax dollars to the migrants,' he said. Samantha J. Gross can be reached at
San Francisco Chronicle
10 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats cry foul as Republicans push to redraw Texas electoral maps to gain US House seats
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Democratic lawmakers tried to build a case Friday that Republicans in Texas have engineered a rushed and unfair process for redrawing the state's congressional districts in response to a push by President Donald Trump to win more GOP seats that Democrats fear will spread to other states. Democrats in the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature delayed the start of public testimony during a hearing of a state House Committee on Redistricting by peppering its chair with pointed questions about how quickly GOP lawmakers planned to move and whether the public is getting enough of an opportunity to weigh in. The Republican proposal would give the GOP five more winnable seats in next year's elections, which would make it easier for the party to keep its slim U.S. House majority. Chair Cody Vasut told the committee that he expected it to vote later Friday or Saturday on the bill, which Republicans unveiled Wednesday. He said he expected the full state House to debate the measure Tuesday. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called the Legislature into a 30-day special session and put congressional redistricting on the agenda after Trump called for Texas to redraw lines that Republicans approved in 2021. Republicans hold 25 of the state's seats, to 13 for Democrats, and the plan would create 30 districts that Trump would have carried by at least 10 percentage points had they been in place in 2024. Democratic state Rep. Jon Rosenthal called the public redistricting hearings 'a sham.' The committee quietly released the plan after several public hearings that drew hours of public testimony and scrutiny from residents concerned about new maps they hadn't seen. 'Does the leadership of the state truly think the people of Texas are that stupid?' Rosenthal asked, to which Vasut did not reply. Democrats appear to have few ways to stop the GOP's plans. Some have talked about boycotting the special session to prevent either chamber or both from having a quorum to take action until the special session ends. But Abbott could call another. Republican state Rep. Todd Hunter, the bill's author, dismissed concerns about how quickly lawmakers are moving. He said they've have been discussing the possibility for months. 'Don't be surprised,' he said. 'The topic has been there.' Hunter acknowledged that the lines were being redrawn 'for partisan purposes,' which he said is allowed by the U.S. Supreme Court. He said a law firm was consulted as the map was being drawn. 'I'm telling you,' he said. 'I'm not beating around the bush.' Democrats argue that if Republicans succeed in redrawing the districts in Texas, Trump will push other states to redraw theirs before they'd normally do so, which would be in 2031 or 2032, after the next nationwide census. States are required to adjust the lines at least once every 10 years to keep the districts as equal in population as possible after population shifts. That's led Democrats in California and New York to consider redrawing their states' lines to help Democrats, though each state has an independent commission for drawing the lines. Texas might have no competitive districts Under the exiting lines, which were in place for the 2022 and 2024 elections, Republicans won all of the seats in districts carried by Trump by at least 10 percentage points, and Democrats won all 11 districts carried by Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. In the other two districts, Trump won by less than 10 percentage points, but Democrats won the House seats. Under the new map, there would be no districts won by Trump by less than 10 points. In Austin, a liberal bastion, parts of two districts represented by Democrats would be combined into one that favored Democrats even more strongly. One of the three other districts would include a slice of the city and extend 340 miles (547 kilometers) to the west, to take in the oil city of Midland. 'Some people like it, and some people don't, and that's the nature of redistricting," Hunter said. ___ Hanna reported from Topeka, Kansas.
