Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
Supreme Court
Planned Parenthood
FacebookTweetLink
The Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb.
State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother 'intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child.'
It was in effect until 1973, when the US Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the US Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it.
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation.
Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist.
Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide – which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent – but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin.
Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban.
Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights.
Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
32 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
What to the Immigrant is the 4th of July?
On July 5, 1852, over a decade before Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, Frederick Douglass delivered a keynote address at an Independence Day event. 'What, to the American slave, is the Fourth of July?' Douglass asked. 'A day that reveals to him, more than all other days in the year, the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery.' Enslaved Americans and their descendants, of course, did not voluntarily come to America. It was a forced migration in shackles, one drenched in blood—a painful history that, nearly 250 years since the Declaration of Independence, has not been fully reconciled with. On this Independence Day holiday weekend, amid increasingly aggressive, reckless immigration raids; in the aftermath of the Supreme Court inviting chaos and confusion into settled constitutional birthright citizenship law, and the Senate voting to give ICE a budget larger than the Marines; as Florida constructs a massive 'Alligator Alcatraz' detention center and its governor talks of deputizing National Guardsmen as immigration judges; and as everyday Americans look at each other with doubt and wonder if their neighbors are truly 'American,' we must ask: What, to the immigrant—particularly to the undocumented immigrant—is our Fourth of July? In Southern California, ICE has been quietly tearing apart Asian immigrant communities, with detainments often happening out of public sight, and detainees not being told in their language what is happening to them or where they are. Cambodian, Laotian, and Vietnamese refugees whose deportation orders have been on indefinite hold for years are being detained after showing up for routine check-ins at ICE offices. Ethnic hubs like Little India are receiving noticeably less foot traffic as even legal residents avoid potential run-ins with federal agents. In Texas, Jermaine Thomas, a 38-year-old Black man born on an army base in Germany to a U.S. citizen father, was deported to his father's birth country of Jamaica, a place he'd never been. After propagating a dehumanizing lie that Haitian immigrants in Ohio eat pets, President Donald Trump terminated Temporary Protected Status for around half a million Haitian refugees, with no plan in place for their U.S. citizen children. Several predominantly Latino communities have canceled or postponed Independence Day events. Trump's efforts to 'Make America Great Again' have perversely scared Americans into not celebrating America's greatness at all. Unfortunately, the challenges facing immigrant communities are not new. Thirteen years ago, myself and several other undocumented immigrants spoke out about America's broken immigration system on the cover of TIME. 'The Republican Party can go one of two ways. It will either make room for its moderate voices to craft a compromise; after all, John McCain, to name just one, was a supporter of the Dream Act,' I wrote. 'Or the party will pursue a hard-line approach, further isolating not just Latinos, the largest minority group in the U.S., but also a growing multiethnic America that's adapting to the inevitable demographic and cultural shifts. In 21st century politics, diversity is destiny.' Now, the three branches of government are under Republican control, enabled and empowered by a fact-free MAGA narrative in which the rhetoric around immigration is synonymous with violent criminality. Messaging that undocumented immigrants are a massive criminal monolith helped fuel Trump to the American presidency—twice. But almost half of the people currently in ICE custody, data shows, have neither been convicted of nor charged with any crime. Despite the picture painted by the president, just 6% of known undocumented murderers and 11% of known undocumented sexual offenders have been detained. The most common categories of crimes committed by detainees are immigration and traffic offenses. The truth is that most undocumented immigrants want to make America great. We love America. We want to be here and follow the law. We want to work, and we find ways to do so, despite only 19 U.S. states allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver licenses. We are eager to contribute. In fact, we contribute nearly $100 billion each year in taxes—income, property, sales, etc. We subsidize social services like Social Security and Medicare without being able to benefit from them. Ironic from a country born out of revolting against taxation without representation. We strive to be proud of a country that is not proud of us. Not long after I discovered that I didn't have the proper documents to live in America, I was watching Rob Reiner's film The American President, and toward the end of the film, Michael Douglas, as the president, says: "America isn't easy. America is advanced citizenship. You gotta want it bad, 'cause it's gonna put up a fight." I was 17, lost and disoriented, and hearing those words helped me realize that I had to fight—that being an American had to be earned. When you are an undocumented immigrant, celebrating the Fourth of July is to resist being defined by fear and panic. What it means to be an American is less about who you are than what you are about—how you live your life, how you contribute to this country, how you pledge allegiance to a flag hoping and praying it will make room for you. It means insisting that we are more than our labor, and that our dignity lies in our agency—that the most American thing about us, in fact, is what connects us to every human being who's ever had to fight their way to be included in the American experiment. What it means to be an American is in the hearts of the people who, in their struggles and heartaches, in their joys and triumphs, fight for America and fight to be American every day. And it's in the hearts of local U.S. citizens who welcome us despite our status, who date us, hire us, and fight for our humanity. 'The visual echo between today's ICE raiders and yesterday's slave catchers is eerie: the ambushing, the snatching off the streets, the chasing through fields and forests, the carting off to far away cages,' writes journalist Charles Blow. 'The context is different, obviously, but the terror is kindred.' And as Bernice A. King, daughter of Martin Luther King Jr. and CEO of the King Center writes: 'It would help tremendously not to refer to human beings as 'illegals.' Because language matters. Because labels often dehumanize. Because no person is an 'illegal.'' As much as we talk about 'illegal aliens' as problems, we rarely discuss possible solutions outside of arresting or jailing them. So I'm heartened by a recent Quinnipiac poll that finds support for a path to legalization for most undocumented immigrants has risen to 64%. Only 31% want most of them deported. That's a 14-point net swing for legalization since Trump took office in January. I'm also encouraged by seeing communities protest ICE—including in traditionally red states and counties. Trump baselessly claimed that these demonstrations were part of a 'foreign invasion.' No, it was Americans standing up for their neighbors—and for the values America represents. This Independence Day, I choose to celebrate progress toward these values. I choose to hope that undocumented immigrants will no longer be used as pawns in an endless political game. In fireworks, I see beacons of public embrace. In communities across our country, I see groups of Americans, from all backgrounds, giving proof that our flag is still there.
Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Child Tax Credit Warning: Millions of Children Could Be Ineligible
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Almost one in three children could be left out of the boosted Child Tax Credit (CTC) approved by Congress this week, researchers said. Why It Matters The CTC is a federal tax benefit aimed at helping families offset the cost of raising children. As of 2024, the credit provides up to $2,000 per qualifying child under the age of 17, with up to $1,600 of that amount refundable. This means eligible families can receive a portion of the credit as a refund even if they owe no federal income tax. Changes to the CTC are embedded in the Republican One Big Beautiful Bill Act. The sprawling megabill, the bedrock of President Donald Trump's fiscal agenda, passed its final vote in the House on Thursday. Beginning in the 2025 tax year, the CTC will rise from its current $2,000 to $2,200 until the legislation expires in 2028—providing a welcome, albeit temporary, boost for many American families once the president signs it into law. But low-income parents and their children are unlikely to benefit, researchers at Columbia University told Newsweek. A stock photo of children walking toward a school entrance. A stock photo of children walking toward a school entrance. GETTY What To Know Megan A. Curran, the policy director at the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University, told Newsweek that 28.3 percent, or 19.3 million children, would not see this increase and would "be left out" of the full $2,200 because "they are in families that do not earn enough to qualify for the new, higher minimum income threshold requirements." Under the new policy, a two-adult, two-child family would need to earn $41,500 to get the full $2,200 credit, Curran said. Under the current policy, a family of that size needs annual earnings of $36,000 to receive the full $2,000. "It will also ultimately be much worse for these children because not only do they see no gains from the CTC in this bill, but they are the same children who are now at high risk of losing their health care and food assistance," such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits and school meals, Curran said. While the expanded CTC approved in the bill is higher, Curran said that even families who receive the full temporary increase are "unlikely to feel it in reality because the CTC has lost value since it was established as $2,000 back at the end of 2017." "In order to keep up with inflation, the CTC would need to be about $2,500 today in order to maintain its real value from 2017/2018," she said. "Because it is only raised now to $2,200, this means that what is being passed is actually less generous than what was originally passed in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as it is smaller in real terms than the original $2,000 credit was then." What Happens Next The CTC boost is temporary and expires in 2028 unless lawmakers extend it. At that point, it would drop back down to $2,000 and be indexed to inflation for subsequent years.
Boston Globe
37 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
From Christopher Columbus to Alex Trebek, Trump is spending millions on statues of ‘American heroes' while slashing arts funding
It's a typically grandiose plan from a former real estate mogul who has Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The statues must be 'lifelike or abstract or modernist' representations of 'historically significant Americans," according to Advertisement They will be displayed in a yet-to-be-named 'site of natural beauty' with a stated deadline ofJuly 4, 2026. It was a highly ambitious timetable given the deadline to submit Advertisement Artists can receive as much as $200,000 per statue, which can be in marble, granite, bronze, copper, or brass. The project already had $34 million from the National Endowment for the Humanities and the National Endowment for the Arts, and received another $40 million in Trump's massive domestic policy bill approved on Thursday. The funneling of so much money into the statue garden while other arts projects have lost support has 'outraged' Representative Chellie Pingree, a Maine Democrat and leading congressional advocate for the arts. 'I think this is illegal for the president to transfer funds that were already granted to arts agencies all over the country to use for a project of his own making and his own purpose that wasn't approved by any broader authority,' she told the Globe. 'It's just his big idea of what he wants to do.' Urbanity Dance, a Boston non-profit contemporary dance company, was told in early May that a $15,000 grant from the NEA was being canceled, even though they had already completed the performance the grant was meant to support. The message said the NEA would now 'prioritize' other projects, including those that 'celebrate the 250th anniversary of American independence.' 'It was something we had come to rely upon over the years in order to produce community-based dance, which is really our focus,' Urbanity founder and director Betsi Graves said. The money was meant to help fund a March 28 dance performance with high school students from Boston Arts Academy that Graves described as 'all about standing up for others, especially in the face of cruelty and bully behavior.' Advertisement 'We received the offer, we put on the show that we said we were going to do, and then we had the rug pulled out from they don't even know what city they're going to be bringing [the sculpture garden] to yet?' Graves said. 'To hurt neighborhood community arts organizations to be able to fulfill a request from one person, or those closest to him, feels incredibly ego-fulfilling and selfish.' Trump unveiled the statute garden during 'Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities,' Trump said, standing in front of the mountain's carved faces of presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Theodore Roosevelt. He described the statute garden as 'a new monument to the giants of our past...a vast outdoor park that will feature the statues of the greatest Americans to ever live.' In addition to an The order specifically named an eclectic group of 31 —among them Washington, Lincoln, abolitionist Frederick Douglas, World War II hero Audie Murphy, and the Wright Brothers, with the task force adding to it. Advertisement It also said that non-Americans such as Christopher Columbus (who never set foot in what is now the United States) were eligible if they 'made substantive contributions to America's public life or otherwise had a substantive effect on America's history.' That opened the door to the Canadian-born Trebek, Swedish actress Ingrid Bergman, and French general Marquis de Lafayette, who all made the final list. The goal was 250 statues for America's 250th birthday, but the NEH is working off list has not been updated publicly since. Some choices are controversial. They include Columbus, whose explorations helped launch colonization in the Americas; President Andrew Jackson, who forced Native Americans to march hundreds of miles from their land to open it up for US settlers; and automotive pioneer Henry Ford, who publicly espoused antisemitic views. 'There are lots of people on this list who would refuse to be in the same room with one another,' said Kirk Savage, a University of Pittsburgh art history professor who studies American monuments. 'But they're being, in a sense, conscripted into this project because of somebody else's idea of what America is supposed to look like in 2026.' He also foresaw logistical problems, including the 'unbelievably quick' July 4, 2026, timetable, the 'low ball" maximum $200,000 price per statue, and the undetermined location and installation process. 'As an art historian, I was kind of shocked at the lack of detail in the call for proposals,' he said. 'The artists are designing statues without knowing where they're going to be located.' Advertisement The governor of The project moves forward as the NEA has 'They've broken all these contracts at the NEA and the NEH that were going to legitimate small groups in every single state that really benefit each of our communities,' Pingree said. 'It's just repurposing the funds because he thinks it's a good idea.' This spring, Lee Blake, president of the New Bedford Historical Society, was about to notify people who had been accepted into the society's program funded by a $180,000 NEH grant when she learned it had been cancelled. The money would have underwritten an educational program for 80 teachers, mostly from waterfront communities, about the maritime underground railroad that ran through New Bedford. The historical society first received NEH funding for the program 15 years ago, Blake said. Now that money could go to a garden in a single location instead of a history course that reaches innumerable communities. 'You're going to have this hero park. How are people going to get there?' she said. 'It's not like it's democratic and spread throughout the country. It's going to become a tourist place where only a few people are going to be able to afford to go.' Advertisement Jim Puzzanghera can be reached at
