
The key to Giorgia Meloni's resounding success
Her explanation is that she refused to play the victim, and found iron in her soul – even if, as she admits, she has never found happiness. It is an amazing story: how she transformed from an ugly duckling into the swan who is now a familiar figure on the largely male-dominated world stage, and whose humour, charm, friendliness and no-nonsense talk make her such a refreshing change.
When she became Prime Minister, aged just 45, most media commentators dubbed her the 'far right heir of Benito Mussolini'. Her aim, they said, was to dismantle democracy, since she and others in the Fratelli d'Italia (FdI) were once in Italy's long-dead post-fascist party. She has not done so, and the party she co-founded in 2012, and defines as conservative, is more popular now than when the right-wing coalition she leads won the general election. That is almost unheard of for a party in government in the West. It is even rarer in Italy, where, since the fall of fascism in 1945, there have been 69 governments.
Meloni's insistence that Italy should be close to America – very different to most European leaders' default position of resentment – led to a close rapport with Joe Biden, and continues now with Donald Trump. Biden saw her as a 'good friend' and Trump, who thinks her 'a fantastic woman', phones her when he wants to talk to Europe.
It helps that she speaks good English, which, she tells us, she taught herself as a teenager, listening to pop music on her Walkman during long bus trips to and from school (a favourite was Michael Jackson). She dreamed of being an interpreter, and did well at school, but could not afford university.
The title of the book is taken from an impassioned speech that Meloni gave in October 2019 at a right-wing coalition rally in Rome, when she bellowed:
They want to call us parent 1, parent 2, gender LGBT, citizen X, with code numbers. But we are not code numbers… and we'll defend our identity. I am Giorgia. I am a woman. I am a mother. I am Italian. I am Christian. You will not take that away from me!
The speech, which captures the essence of her politics, was so talked about it made her a social media star and caused support for the FdI to surge. It was even turned into a disco dance track designed to embarrass her, but which instead became a smash hit that made young people warm to her. At the May general election the year before, the party had received only 4 per cent of the vote; but at the 2022 general election it got 26 per cent – much more than any other party – and is now polling 30 per cent.
This book, first published in Italy before Meloni came to power, avoids virtually all mention of Mussolini and fascism – which I understand, but I think is a mistake. Meloni should have spelled out why she and her party, despite their roots, are conservative. She might have written more, too, on how she has been inspired by the late Roger Scruton – whom she calls 'the prince of British conservative thought'. And she could have outlined the key differences between conservatism and fascism, which are too often falsely lumped together, owing to the still dominant Marxist view of fascism as a bourgeois counter-revolution.
I would also have liked more on why Meloni and the Italian right in general since the 1970s are so besotted with J.R.R. Tolkien. Why do they identify with hobbits in the idyllic little world of the Shire, while outside the mustering forces of evil prepare to engulf them? As a youth member of the post-fascist party, Meloni and her companions would stage hobbit plays in the park, in which she invariably took the role of Sam Gamgee, her favourite Tolkien character. 'He's just a hobbit – a gardener by trade. Yet without him Frodo would never have competed his mission,' she writes.
Perhaps the key figure in Meloni's life is the father she barely knew, whose name – Francesco – she even refuses to write. He was an accountant and abandoned her mother Anna, her elder sister Arianna and herself when a baby. Francesco had wanted Anna to have an abortion (still illegal in Italy in 1976); but on her way to the backstreet clinic, Anna changed her mind. Meloni was born thanks only to her mother's decision to defy her father. He then sailed off in a yacht to the Canary Islands to open a restaurant. (It later emerged he received a nine-year jail sentence in 1995 for drug-running.) The two sisters would fly out to visit him in the summer holidays, but he showed them no love, and, aged 11, Meloni decided not to see him again.
When he died 'a few years ago… I felt nothing', she writes. But it made her realise 'just how deep the black hole was I had buried my pain in – the pain of not being loved enough'. It was her father's emotional, not physical, abandonment that drove her rise to the top – because she would then spend her life 'competing with men (not with women), seeking their approval, friendship… all of it because of that wound'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
38 minutes ago
- The National
20 years on from the Gleneagles G8 summit protests
Weeks earlier chancellor Gordon Brown spearheaded an African debt relief programme, 'Make Poverty History'. Protesters travelled to Scotland and established a camp in Stirling. The anti-G8 movement had debuted in Genoa in 2001, ending in extreme violence from Italian police towards protesters sleeping at night. READ MORE: Craig Murray: I've been left questioning real purpose of Alba Party The stakes for participants were high, but as British activist Jay Jordan says: 'In Europe, there is confrontational policing. In the UK, policing is cleverer – the bosses have read their Foucault.' Protest at the time was divided into two main 'blocs', pink and black. The pink bloc used non-confrontational, artistic, musical, mocking and playful approaches to get their message across, while the black bloc would sometimes resort to confrontation, rioting and destruction of buildings. In 2005, I was part of the pink bloc, as a member of a samba band called Rhythms of Resistance based in London. I took my 11-year-old daughter, a drummer in the band, to Scotland. The anti-G8 organisers had hired a train from London to Edinburgh for protesters – 'for about £2000', according to one of the leaders, Amy Stansell. Rhythms of Resistance occupied a carriage. We practised drums while speeding through England. I'd brought a picnic, including a large trifle containing Malibu as well as wild strawberries from my garden. King's Cross station was crammed with police looking wary as excited protesters assembled to get on the train. On the platform, I spied Helen Steel, a defendant in the 'McLibel' court case against McDonald's, the longest running libel trial in British history, in which she was represented by Keir Starmer. As a well-known protester, she had been tricked into having a long-term relationship with an undercover 'spy cop'. Many of the interviewees for this piece are participants in the ongoing Mitting Inquiry into the spy cop scandal. All of them talked about the phenomenon of being infiltrated by undercover police. Mark Kennedy, one of the spy cops, was present in Gleneagles and organised most of the protesters' transport. One Scottish activist, whom I'll call Fraser, said: 'I knew Mark Kennedy quite well. I thought I had some sort of 'spy sense', but I didn't know. I was a bit humbled. All I knew was I didn't like him.' The anti-G8 protest at Gleneagles was well organised. Amy Stansell explains the preparation: 'We moved to Scotland six months before, sofa surfing and staying in communities such as Bilston Glen protest camp.' Amy and her partner Robin spent months trying to find a piece of land where they could set up a convergence camp, which, inspired by a No Borders camp in Schengen, was divided into small local 'barrios' each with a kitchen. The idea was to create a horizontal democracy: 'Providing space for people to meet, network, connect – a safe non-capitalist space, where people can be without having to spend money, where people can dream and have ideas. We wanted to change people's hearts by creating a miniature vision of the world we wanted to see.' Fraser recalls the difficulties that arose when they met with farmers: 'There were a number of sites where we had handshake agreements, we had a site and then … we didn't.' Amy explains: 'We had a big pot, around £5000, for renting some land. We were looking at land, assessing it on the basis of accessibility, of drainage, of water, the flatness. One person intimated that they had been basically pressured not to make a deal with us. 'We'd lost our first two choices due to what we termed at the time 'dark forces'. I remember ringing up the chief executive of Stirling Council at 8pm one night and saying, 'In a few weeks' time, you're gonna have 5000 activists descending on your town, and if there's not anywhere for them to go, they're just going to be around in the town, and it's just going to be really hectic'. READ MORE: Kate Forbes: Bigger-picture switch is proving key in tackling tourism issues 'The next morning, the people at the council who we were liaising with contacted us and said, 'We've got a bit of land for you'.' But the land was not ideal, Amy remembers, 'One of the things that we really worried about was that the site was completely surrounded by a brook. There was one road in and the rest of it was surrounded by a river. We felt a bit like, 'are we in a trap now?'.' Fraser agrees: 'It wasn't what we wanted. There was the danger of getting kettled and the danger of when we got kettled, people jumping in the river.' On July 2, 2005, some 2000 people and the samba band marched through Edinburgh in a carnival atmosphere. The weather was hot; the buildings tall, grand and grey. I played a surdo, a huge drum (in general, the smaller the woman, the bigger the drum) for miles, which was exhausting. Then the band made our way to the camp in Stirling, the nearest large town to Gleneagles. I'd already attended an anarchist anti-G8 camp in Evian in 2003, which was the political equivalent of the Glastonbury Festival. Organised along the barrio system, it had music, workshops, tents, food stalls, activities and meetings. I cooked meals for the camp using donated and waste food from dumpsters for the Manchester barrio kitchen. I blogged at the time: 'Have attended more meetings in a week than ever before in life.' Meetings used hand signals, eg waving hands for agreement (silent clapping). Much of the language started in 1960s protest movements and has since been used in civil rights, Reclaim the Streets, climate camps, anti-globalisation movements and Occupy. Protest hand signals were added to the basic samba vocabulary, as players cannot hear each other. This is also a good way to cross language barriers for international participants. Sister protest samba bands travelled from Belgium, Germany, Holland. The camp was multilingual. I was surprised by the efficiency and organisation of the Stirling convergence camp. There were toilets, food stores and a sophisticated ecological greywater system for wastewater. Kate Evans, a political cartoonist who was present, recalls: 'There was an impromptu Highland Games. I won the caber toss!' We even had a camp witch – an American called Starhawk who cast spells over the campsite to protect it from the police. On Wednesday, July 6, the main day of protest against the Gleneagles summit, many activists walked through the undergrowth overnight, hiding in the heathery hills, to reach Gleneagles. I wrote at the time: 'The call came through at about 5am that the M9 had been taken by us. Big cheer. This was the least likely blockade to succeed. 'By 7am, the A9 was blocked, and many B roads. I was standing next to the medics as they received news: 'Lancaster took the B2499, Nottingham have taken this other road' and so on. It was like the Wars of the Roses!' Starhawk had been doing invisibility spells for the walkers who blockaded the roads. 'I think magic doesn't work in theory, only in practice,' Jay says. I spent the rest of the day on the 'baby bloc', a children's protest convoy headed by a London double-decker red bus (maximum speed 30mph). Once we arrived at the police lines, near Auchterarder, close to the Gleneagles hotel, we set up a 'terrorist toddlers' picnic, which included a sound system, clowns, bubbles, rain, banners, colour and an enormous umbrella under which we played samba. Entertainment was provided also by the Geishas of Gaiety (white-faced, dressed in kimonos and waving fans) and the Radical Cheerleaders, as well as the award-winning poet Kae Tempest (at that time Kate Tempest). The police appeared nonplussed. Jay, who led the Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army (Circa), which used clowning, satire and absurdity to critique the establishment, remembers with amusement: 'Bored cops were convinced to play a game similar to paper scissors rock, called wizards, goblins, giants. At the end, they couldn't help but laugh and we hugged.' That night in the camp, we were on high alert, blockaded by police. From time to time, people would run about, screaming, 'we are going to be raided'. Others sneaked out slowly, avoiding police lines. On July 7, the morning after the confrontation at Gleneagles, we heard the news – terrorist bombings on public transport in the centre of London. We gathered for a large meeting. People were sombre and concerned. I was holding back tears. My sister lived in King's Cross and I was terrified she'd been caught up in it. Our protest and the Make Poverty History message were wiped off the front pages. As Amy explains: 'That took the attention from us, which is terrible to say but that was our experience. 'We'd put in months of our lives to do this, and no-one noticed, apart from a few delegates who couldn't get to a few meetings. We wanted it to be big news and it wasn't because of the bombing. READ MORE: Pat Kane: The powerful vision of Adam Curtis has an obvious blind spot So, do participants in the 2005 anti-G8 camp at Stirling think protest works? What did they learn? Giovanna Speciale, a music leader in the samba band, reflects: 'The change is us. Politicians are very rarely changed by protesters coming up and saying, 'You should change, you should change your attitude. You're really bad'. 'Protest rarely changes anyone's mind, but it does change what is politically feasible to talk about. 'Nothing changes someone more than having gone out, taken, done an action, got a placard, written on it saying what their attitude is, then showing that to everyone else. There is a massive problem with protest in that often we're othering ourselves, so we make ourselves look different, sound different. 'There is nothing less likely to change a politician's mind than a bunch of people who are clearly outsiders.' Amy says: 'That question actually makes me well up a little bit – that's quite an emotional question. I variously go through phases where I'm just like, 'there's no point', right? It does nothing. Years and years of doing massive protests like the Stop the War march in London and they just still invaded the next day. 'You do all of these massive events and then the only coverage we'd get would be the traffic news. I gave up the whole of my 20s, pretty much, to fight capitalism and be an activist.' Jay says: 'Stirling was the end of a cycle. It was a symbolic victory. Protesters were saying, 'This isn't normal. This isn't democracy.' But there is a burnout culture in activism. I teach regenerative activism now to combat it.' Fraser says of direct action: 'Obviously there is a sort of bravado – of youth or masculinity.' Giovanna adds: 'There were huge amounts of courage and, yes, sacrifice and creativity.' Amy says: 'I don't want to categorise my life in a hierarchy of excitingness, but they definitely were very exciting times. There was a sense of heroism, we're the ones who are standing up. Danger intertwined with righteousness – which is what makes heroism, isn't it?' It is often wondered whether there is really a point to protest, not least by activists themselves. There is little doubt, though, that the Stirling camp and anti-G8 protest at Gleneagles was a deeply meaningful experience for those involved.


Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
A year of Keir - Mirror experts cast their verdict on Labour's first 12 months
After 12 months in Government, the Mirror digs into Keir Starmer's performance in key areas from the NHS, the economy and education to defence, foreign affairs and policing In the early hours of July 5 2024, a beaming Keir Starmer told activists: "Change begins now." The man who would become Prime Minister had defied his critics and turned Labour into an election-winning machine. Labour stormed to power with 411 seats, wiping out the Tories, who won just 121 seats in the worst result in their party's history. Mr Starmer told an ecstatic crowd of Labour members that a "sunlight of hope" was shining that day, and Britain would "get its future back". But despite this emphatic endorsement from the country, governing it has proved to be a challenge. Rachel Reeves soon discovered the Tories had left a £22billion black hole in the public finances and made the disastrous decision to strip millions of pensioners of the winter fuel allowance. A summer marred by appalling riots in the wake of the Southport murders, Downing Street infighting and a row over freebies punctured the optimism further. The Chancellor splashed the cash in the Budget, with a £40billion tax raid to fund £70billion in public spending to rebuild Britain's public services after Tory austerity. Billions of pounds are being ploughed into recruiting more teachers, cutting NHS waiting lists, upgrading train lines and investing in jobs. But the Government faced a backlash from businesses and farmers over the tax hikes. NHS waiting lists started to fall and the Government set out a 10-year plan to overhaul the struggling health service. Labour endured a bruising set of local elections in May, with Reform UK seizing control of a number of English councils and winning a by-election in Runcorn and Helsby. Free breakfast clubs were rolled out in the first 750 primary schools, and another 500,000 children will become eligible for free school meals. At the Spending Review, the Chancellor set out a £300billion package to renew Britain, with £113billion for infrastructure projects, including £39billion for affordable homes over the next decade, £15.6billion for transport networks outside of London and £16.7billion for nuclear power. The Government partially U-turned on the winter fuel cut, ensuring 9 million pensioners will get the payment this winter. Mr Starmer's efforts to build a relationship with Donald Trump paid dividends, pulling off a US-UK trade deal that shielded British businesses from the worst of the US President's trade tariffs. He stepped in to smooth tensions after Mr Trump kicked President Volodymyr Zelensky out of the White House, and led talks to build support for peace in Ukraine. Ukraine and the Middle East continued to dominate the Prime Minister's attention as the US President kept the world on tenterhooks about what he would do next. Rising global threats prompted the Prime Minister to pledge to ramp up defence spending to 2.5% by 2027, funded by a raid on the foreign aid budget. In June, he joined NATO allies in committing to hike defence and security spending to 5% by 2035 to appease Mr Trump. But while he was away, Labour anger about plans to cut disability benefits boiled over, forcing the Government to gut the legislation to avoid a damaging Commons defeat. Ms Reeves was in tears during Prime Minister's Questions the next day, which led to borrowing costs surging and a fall in the value of the pound as speculation rose about her position. She said it was a personal issue and the PM and the Chancellor put on a united front the next day, with Mr Starmer saying he had "every faith in my Chancellor". It was a difficult end to a testing year. But the PM was clear he's getting on with the job and determined to deliver the change he promised. The Mirror team has dug into how the Government has performed on key issues it its first year. LEADER By Lizzy Buchan, Political Editor This year has been testing for Keir Starmer. He arrived in No10 with a thumping majority, rewarded by voters desperate for change after years of Tory chaos. But the Prime Minister learned quickly that the inheritance was far worse than expected and public patience was already stretched to breaking point. A year on, Mr Starmer is in the trenches. The last few weeks have been brutal, with U-turns on winter fuel and welfare, and Labour MPs in open revolt. Over the last year, I've travelled all over the world with the PM and he strikes me as a serious, thoughtful man, who understands the deep challenges facing Britain. He's motivated by public service and deeply frustrated by the injustices plaguing ordinary people. But he has struggled at times to convince voters he's on their side. The Starmer paradox is that a man who grew up in a working class family is viewed by some as an establishment figure. And his buttoned-up public persona doesn't match who he is in private. He can be utterly ruthless when he wants to be. But people close to him always say he's incredibly kind. I've seen this in private conversations I've had with him, where he can be warm, funny and thoughtful. He cares deeply about rebuilding Britain but he has struggled to spell out to the public what that looks like. He needs to fix this. He must hold his nerve on gripping difficult problems, from the NHS and immigration to driving up growth so people feel better off. But Mr Starmer must also be clear what he stands for and face down deep public mistrust with honesty and conviction. CRIME By Tom Pettifor, Crime Editor I had just been made the Daily Mirror's crime correspondent in 2013 when I saw first-hand the disgust police officers had for the Coalition Government. Tensions were running high in the hall at the Police Federation annual conference in Bournemouth as Home Secretary Theresa May took to the lectern. She had overseen savage cuts to forces but escaped without being booed as she had the year before though officers made clear their disgust for her government. May and Tory chancellor George Osborne took no notice and continued to set a wrecking ball to policing, smashing out local bobbies and gutting forces of experienced cops. It saw 21,732 offices lost by 2018 - a drop of 15% from 2010. During 14 years of Conservative rule police officers saw increased workloads and diminished pay and pensions. At the same time, I watched as courts crumbled and backlogs lengthened. Victims of crime were increasingly being failed. And I chatted to inmates as they left prison early because jails were so overcrowded. So officers should have been breathing a sigh of relief at last year's election results. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has promised 13,000 officers and community support officers working in neighbourhoods in England and Wales. However, the true intentions of Keir Starmer's government were revealed earlier this month when Rachel Reeves announced an extra £2.1 billion for policing over the next three years. Because of existing deficits, the funding will not be enough to keep officer numbers steady and make the 13,000 target impossible to achieve, the National Police Chiefs' Council has warned They say it will not allow forces to address Labour's priorities of halving violence against women and knife crime. UK policing undoubtedly needs radical reform from within. But if Labour continue to fail to provide adequate funding they will never achieve their goals. IMMIGRATION By Dave Burke, Political Correspondent When he came to power, Keir Starmer said there would be no quick fixes on migration. But the sight of people arriving in their droves onboard small boats, and thousands of asylum seekers living in hotels is turning into a big problem. The Government has asked for patience in its efforts to smash the gangs, but with Nigel Farage breathing down its neck, patience is in small supply. Home Office insiders believe better working with Europe will pay off, but it could take until next year for the results to show. Nearly 20,000 made the dangerous crossing in the first six months of the year - up 48% on 2024. Failure to drive this down will be catastrophic. But there are more tangible results on overall migration. Mr Starmer said he wants to drive down net migration, which hit a record level under the Tories. Latest figures show this fell to 431,000 in the year to December 2024 - down from 860,000 12 months earlier. A white paper bringing in a string of changes to immigration rules, including abolishing social care visas. In all, Labour's measures are expected to slash a further 100,000 from the net migration total. This, and more than 30,000 deportations since last July, show Mr Starmer wants to take the fight to Reform UK. ECONOMY By Graham Hiscott, Head of Business Labour went all-out to woo the business world ahead of the general election - and it worked. Industry had high hopes for Keir Starmer's government, and financial markets were reassured. But it's fair to say it's been a rocky ride since, with Chancellor Rachel Reeves' Budget raid on businesses - including a hike in employers' national insurance - leaving many firm smarting. The much longed-for economic growth has been feeble, while the government's borrowing costs have kept on soaring. But for all the gloom, business leaders are clinging on to the relative stability Labour offers compared with the shambles of the last Tory government. Tax hikes in this autumn Budget will go down like a cup of cold sick, but many firms I speak to aren't as fussed about changes in the Employment Rights Bill that some vocal critics would have you believe. It's fair to say the honeymoon period is over, but companies have praised Labour's investment heavy commitments, including the recent Industrial Strategy. Business confidence is shaky but the green shoots are there. HEALTH By Martin Bagot, Health Editor Keir Starmer's government has brought about the first sustained fall in the NHS waiting list in over a decade. The NHS waiting list hit a record high in September 2023 with 7.8 million treatments in England following a steady upward trajectory from 2.5 million in 2010 when the Tories came to power. The waiting list has since come down to £7.4 million - its lowest for two years - and a raft of other key NHS metrics show the service has turned a corner. The problem is that waits for GPs, A&E care and 999 response times had deteriorated so much that there is still a hell of a long way to go. Many patients will not yet have noticed that things have started to improve. The NHS still has deep rooted problems of low productivity, staff shortages and outdated tech and buildings. But Rome wasn't built in a day and Health Secretary Wes Streeting's plan for the NHS has the potential to future proof it for the next generation. But you generally get what you pay for and the success of this plan will depend on how well the Treasury funds the NHS in the years to come. EDUCATION By Sophie Huskisson, Political Correspondent From day one, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson made it her mission to ensure more kids across Britain have better opportunities. The politician genuinely believes in the transformative power of education, having grown up in a council house on a street in Sunderland, to studying at Oxford University and then later Parliament, thanks in part to her amazing teachers. Labour put education as a cornerstone of the election campaign, with the party's manifesto pledging to hire 6,500 more teachers, roll out free breakfast clubs in every primary school and bring in supervised toothbrushing for three to five year olds. Since then, Keir Starmer has also announced a significant expansion of free school meals to all kids in households who get Universal Credit, in a move that could save parents up to £500 a year. Labour's Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill - to improve safeguarding and welfare of kids has been a headline piece of legislation in its first year. The landmark bill aims to crack down on spiralling school absence in schools, save parents cash by helping with school uniform costs and strengthen support for children who are or have been in care, among a raft of other measures. Ministers stuck to their guns over their decision to end private school tax breaks, forcing them to pay VAT at the standard 20% rate from the start of the year. Right wing critics fiercely condemned the plan but Ms Phillipson stood by the decision to raise money for kids in state schools. The Labour government started on a good note with schools after teachers voted overwhelmingly to accept a 5.5% pay rise - after taking mass strike action under the Tories. But one year on, teachers in England are again threatening industrial action after a proposed 2.8% pay rise for this year, which could spell trouble for Ms Phillipson going forward. DEFENCE By Chris Hughes, Defence and Security Editor The government's political defence team led by Defence Secretary John Healey has made steady methodical progress in boosting protection of the UK and trying to make weapons procurement more efficient. One of the few areas in which the Tory disaster project celebrated successes was in supporting Ukraine, with the backing of the opposition and Labour has continued with that. Billions have been pledged to Kyiv's defences, not just because it is the right thing to do but because the UK is mindful of protecting the eastern European flank. Boosting defence spending to 5% by 2035 and incremental increases in the meantime is promising but many feel not soon enough, given the Russia threat, along with increasingly cosy allies Iranian, North Korean and perhaps China. The tenet of this government, however, appears to be straining for meaningful change that can be pulled off and that is where the 2035 pledge comes in. Investment in F35A nuclear weapons carrying and conventional warfare jets makes sense- perhaps along with savings as they replace 12 of the planned carrier friendly F35Bs. It will add to the UK's submarine nuclear capability and enhance nuclear protection with European allies, mirroring the French submarine and air nuclear weapons programme. This is about maintaining relative peace for the UK by projecting strength and linking up with the rest of NATO, whilst trying to avoid war and the nuclear deterrent will in the coming years be doing the heavy lifting. Forces veteran Labour MP Fred Thomas, serving on the defence committee, asked forcefully this week of Healey what the UK has if it needs to deploy against Russia if Putin pushes further into Eastern Europe, perhaps into allied territory. The answer was awkward and the silence that followed it even more so, in my view - we have 1,000 troops in Estonia and erm… The surge for defence substance and not bluster is sincere but Healey knows it's going to cost us in the coming years. The hope is that the defence dividend, boosting the UK defence industry and creating thousands of jobs will pay off. Time will tell but this is now a race against that and the clock is ticking. By Mikey Smith, Deputy Political Editor Keir Starmer has built a reputation as Europe's Trump whisperer. He came closer than anyone else to calming the US President down over Ukraine. And he managed to secure a trade deal which, even if it's worse than what we had under Joe Biden, is still better than the alternative. And he's done that by being overwhelmingly nice to him. Gushing about the special relationship, inviting him for tea with the King, making small talk about families and football and essentially telling him how great he is. But two problems loom for Mr Starmer with this approach. First, Donald Trump is incredibly unpopular in this country - with Labour supporters, MPs and the public at large. And that leads to his second problem - at some point, Donald Trump is going to do something manifestly unacceptable to the international community. And at that point, Mr Starmer is going to have to decide whether he'll risk losing support from the British people by continuing the softly softly approach to try and talk him round, or whether it's finally time to channel Hugh Grant in Love Actually and say: "Donald, since bullies only respond to strength, from now onward, I will be prepared to be much stronger." ENVIRONMENT By Nada Farhoud, Environment Editor Within days of being in power, Labour committed to doubling onshore wind farms, boosted budgets for renewables and stepped back from the last government's attempts to open a new coal mine. It has also shown it is willing to be tough with water companies that continue to pollute our rivers and seas by threatening their bosses with jail time. But more must be done to stop this scandal for good. It also needs to get tougher on other serial polluters - fossil fuel companies that have run up record profits, while the climate crisis rages. Taxing would provide money to support communities that have already suffered from floods, wildfires or coastal erosion. It also must do more to correct the false claims by the Conservatives and Reform that achieving the UK's net zero target is impossible - explaining how it will lower energy bills and mean cleaner air for us all. The Labour government was elected on a mandate to deliver the 'biggest boost to animal welfare in a generation.' But so far it has also not delivered on a variety of manifesto commitments including phasing out animal testing, ending the use of snares, fur imports, trail hunting and banning trophy hunting imports. The strengthening of these laws is long overdue. WELFARE By Ashley Cowburn, Deputy Political Editor Welfare has perhaps been the most messy and unpopular area for Keir Starmer during his first 12 months in office. Within weeks of winning the election the Chancellor Rachel Reeves scrapped winter fuel payments for all but the very poorest pensioners. After a bruising set of local elections in May - with voters raising the issue on the doorstep - the policy was largely junked by the Prime Minister. But the shambolic scenes in the Commons this week over the welfare bill was a low point. For months dozens of Labour MPs and pretty much every disability charity in the country had warned the government to drop plans to cut Personal Independence Payment (PIP). Ministers finally listened as they reckoned with a Commons defeat on Tuesday. After a series of messy U-turns large parts of the welfare bill were ditched - leaving the Chancellor with a massive blackhole in her spending plans. There have been some positive steps, such as overhauling Jobcentres and a youth guarantee scheme designed to tackle the number of 18-21-year-olds not in work, education or training. In the autumn, ministers will also publish a (delayed) child poverty strategy. Charities and Labour MPs will judge that work on whether the Tory-era two-child benefit limit - a policy blamed for trapping kids in poverty - is scrapped. It is estimated to impact over 100 extra children every day. Downing Street will face another explosive row if the policy remains. TRANSPORT By Dave Burke, Political Correspondent If Labour is going to drive up growth, tackling problems on Britain's transport networks will be integral. Under the Tories HS2 became a symbol of failure, with the government vowing never to repeat it. Legislation to nationalise rail firms was put forward in the first few days after the general election. And there's been a huge injection of infrastructure funding this year. Last month, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced £15billion for transport projects. These include £2.5billion to expand the tram system in Greater Manchester and £2.4billion to improve the network around Birmingham. The Government has also boosted bus passengers by announcing a £3 fare cap will be in place until 2027. Mr Starmer raised this from the £2 limit brought in by the Tories, but kept it in place amid fears it could be scrapped altogether. HOUSING By Ashley Cowburn, Deputy Political Editor Angela Rayner has been frank about the scale of the housing crisis. She came into office as Housing Secretary 12 months ago with high ambitions - most notably Labour's mission to build 1.5million million new homes by the end of the decade. There have been important first steps by restoring housing targets for local authorities. But there have been suggestions the party is not on track to meet the target. Crucial data to judge progress is expected to be published later this year. Clear progress has been made on renters' reform. In 2019 the Tories first vowed to reform the sector by abolishing no-fault evictions - a promise that was never delivered on. Within 12 months of Labour being in power the legislation to stop landlords evicting tenants on a whim and without reason is finally making its way through the Lords. But tenants still face sky-high bills for a roof over their head and some would like to see more radical action, such as rent controls. Labour has also promised to deliver 300,000 social and affordable homes after years of neglect. Charities have warned the government needs to create an additional 90,000 new social homes each year over the next decade to clear massive backlogs. Article continues below Data published in February showed around 1.3million households on waiting lists. And over 160,000 children are currently living in temporary accommodation, including bedsits, hotels and B&Bs. Important strides have been made but the housing crisis remains very much a reality. READ MORE: Join our Mirror politics WhatsApp group to get the latest updates from Westminster


JAMnews
5 hours ago
- JAMnews
Former Armenian defense minister may face criminal charges
Criminal prosecution against Seyran Ohanyan The Armenian parliament spent several hours debating whether to lift the parliamentary immunity of opposition 'Hayastan' bloc deputies Seyran Ohanyan and Artsvik Minasyan. The motion was submitted by prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan. No decision was reached, and the discussion will continue on July 7. Lawmakers will vote by secret ballot. If the parliament agrees to lift their immunity, criminal prosecution will begin against both deputies. Both lawmakers previously held ministerial positions under the former government. Seyran Ohanyan is a former defense minister, and Artsvik Minasyan is a former minister of environment. The cases against them are interconnected. Prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan stated that Ohanyan abused his official position by illegally building a private home in a specially protected natural area. Furthermore, he allegedly concealed this property—valued at around 125 million drams (approximately $325,000)—from his annual asset declarations. Artsvik Minasyan, according to the prosecutor general, was aware of the illegal construction. As chair of a ministry commission, he presented the private property as an investment project of the environment ministry, effectively providing legal cover for the unauthorized construction. Here's a media-style English translation of your sentence: Thus, legal grounds were created for the unauthorized construction. 'The investment project served as a legal disguise for an already committed illegal act, which they attempted to present as legitimate,' Vardapetyan said. Following the tender process, the lease and construction rights for the land plot were transferred for 25 years to a relative of Seyran Ohanyan's driver. However, the house does not officially exist in property records. Minasyan maintains that the tender process was not formal and that the ministry of environment had no authority to investigate personal connections between the bidders. The prosecutor general stressed that these are serious crimes, with the statute of limitations still valid. The court will determine the punishment, which could include imprisonment. Opposition factions 'Hayastan' and 'I have honor' boycotted the discussion on Ohanyan's immunity, arguing that it is unlawful to proceed in his absence. Under parliamentary rules, such proceedings can take place only if a deputy's absence is deemed unjustified. The parliamentary speaker stated that Ohanyan's absence could not be considered justified, as he had not submitted any medical documents regarding his health condition. Regarding Artsvik Minasyan, opposition deputies described the process as 'political persecution.' Deputy Taguhi Tovmasyan said Minasyan is being accused of actions that were beyond his legal powers—specifically, whether to demolish or legalize the construction. All sides' perspectives on the case will continue to unfold. Former defense minister built mansion in protected area The case concerns land belonging to the state-run 'Sevan National Park.' According to Armenian law, private ownership is prohibited in this and other specially protected areas. The law also bans major construction projects in such locations. 'Only temporary infrastructure related to sports, recreation, or entertainment is allowed in areas with this status. In other words, projects must serve the public good and benefit everyone. Building a private, fenced residence is strictly prohibited,' prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan explained. She stated that the value of the illegal construction on the seized land is estimated at around 125 million drams (approximately $328,000). Construction took place between 2010 and 2015 without proper permits. Initially, two applicants submitted bids for the project tender—both reportedly affiliated with Seyran Ohanyan. The repair and reconstruction of the property's swimming pool and sauna were carried out by Sitta Group LLC, a company selected through a defense ministry tender. According to the prosecutor, the son of the company's owner, Grigor Barseghyan, worked at the ministry of defense at the time. He headed the production and technical department of the defense ministry's construction and housing division. Law enforcement authorities found that the defense ministry ultimately did not pay the company for the work. 'The actual owner of Sitta Group LLC, Levon Barseghyan, realizing his company's dependence on Seyran Ohanyan and Ashot Grigoryan [head of the ministry's construction department], and aware that his son worked under Grigoryan's supervision, did not demand the 58 million dram [$152,000] payment, hoping for illegal advantages in future procurement processes,' stated the prosecution's report submitted to parliament. In addition, from 2011 to 2016, the military police provided security for the property, with their salaries—amounting to at least 13.12 million drams (around $34,000)—paid from the defense ministry budget. The prosecutor general said this also constitutes abuse of power. Moreover, the mansion was not included in official records of illegal property subject to confiscation, as it 'does not exist' in official documentation. 'The mansion exists in reality. But in the documents and in the cadastral registry, it does not. Only the land plot is registered, and its listed value is dozens of times lower—just 3 million drams (less than $8,000),' Vardapetyan noted. It is confirmed that the owner of this property is Ohanyan According to the prosecutor general, ownership of the property is confirmed by witness testimonies and search records. She noted that the electricity and gas utility accounts for the house are registered under the name of Seyran Ohanyan's mother-in-law. Ohanyan himself has not denied links to the property. 'Ohanyan admits using the property but has not explained how he financed its construction. He claims it was built using his own funds and savings,' Vardapetyan said. Another former minister accused of abusing power According to prosecutor general Anna Vardapetyan, former minister of environment Artsvik Minasyan admitted during his testimony that he was aware the land plot in question was not vacant. 'The chair of the environmental tender commission, fully aware that an unauthorized structure existed on the site, tells the government that there is no such structure and proposes launching an investment project,' she said. The prosecutor concluded that, in doing so, Minasyan abused his official position. 'The abuse lies in the fact that a private property was presented as an investment project. As a result, the state budget received no revenue. At most, property tax could have been collected—but only if the illegal construction had been legalized. And anyone with basic legal knowledge won't legalize an unauthorized structure in a specially protected area. That's why it was presented as an investment project for a 25-year period,' Vardapetyan explained. Minasyan: 'I acted in the public interest' Unlike Seyran Ohanyan, Artsvik Minasyan attended the parliamentary discussions. After the prosecutor general's remarks, he stated that either Vardapetyan had not been properly briefed or she had not reviewed the case thoroughly. 'They are accusing me of actions that, from a legal perspective, cannot be attributed to me,' he said. The lawmaker argued that claims suggesting the tender was merely a formality were false. He stressed that the body he headed was not required to verify ties between tender participants. 'I not only didn't know who had built the structure, I also didn't know whether Mr. Ohanyan was connected to it. I simply stated that, according to the information provided to me, Ohanyan was using the property,' Minasyan explained. He insisted that he had not exceeded his authority and acted in the public interest. He rejected the accusations and claimed that the process was aimed at discrediting him. 'This wasn't about group interests or personal gain. If there had been such an interest, I would admit it. There was none. I acted in the interest of the public and environmental protection,' Minasyan declared. Ohanyan: 'The goal is to distract the public from real threats' According to PM Seyran Ohanyan, the motion was submitted to parliament during his excused absence due to health issues. He claims that Article 108, Clause 3 of the National Assembly's Rules of Procedure was violated. According to this clause, the matter can be discussed without the deputy only if their absence from the session is considered unexcused. 'On July 1, I sent a letter to the Speaker of the National Assembly stating that I would be unable to attend the extraordinary session, as I have been undergoing rehabilitation treatment since June 27. The treatment is ongoing. The letter was accompanied by a medical certificate,' Ohanyan said. The former defense minister believes that a 'show' is being orchestrated around him and his colleagues, serving two purposes: 'to distract public attention from the severe threats to our state created by their own actions, in coordination with Azerbaijani authorities, to systematically neutralize all political, public, military figures, philanthropists, and clergy who stand for Artsakh, Armenia, the survival of the Armenian people, and its spiritual values.' 'These people are aiming their weapons at the nation' — deputy speaker 'You cannot have a strong army when its leadership is busy building private mansions, saunas, and swimming pools at the expense of the army, national parks, and the people,' said deputy speaker of parliament Hakob Arshakyan. He reminded that the defense ministry's construction department is responsible for building military barracks, trenches, and infrastructure for soldiers—not for constructing private estates for ministers. 'This is exactly what systemic corruption looked like—the kind from which the Armenian people were freed by the 2018 revolution. Now, society wants, can, and has the will to build an Armenia where citizens live under a fair system, feel happy, and are masters of their own country. That is why these people—the former authorities—are now trying to turn their weapons against the people and the legitimate government. We won't allow it,' he said, referring to the recently uncovered coup plot. Follow us – Twitter | Facebook | Instagram Criminal prosecution against Seyran Ohanyan