Nikkei ends five-day winning run as US-Japan trade talks weigh
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
Japan's Nikkei share average snapped a five-day winning streak to fall more than 1% on Tuesday, as investors sold stocks amid uncertainty over U.S.-Japan trade talks.The Nikkei fell 1.24% to 39,986.33, slipping from the highest level since mid-July, which it reached in the previous session.The broader Topix slipped 0.73% to 2,832.07."The market was overheated, but there were some factors that boosted demand last month," said Hiroyuki Ueno, chief strategist at Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Asset Management.Japanese equities mirrored a rally in U.S. stocks in the past several sessions, but demand was also supported by dividend payouts investors received after corporate shareholders' meetings in June, as well as corporate share buybacks , said Ueno.The Nikkei rose 6.6% in June, marking its biggest monthly gain since February 2024. In the last five sessions of June, the index gained 5.5%.The Relative Strength Index (RSI), a technical measure for investment momentum, dropped to 66.6 on Tuesday from the "overbought" condition of 74.5.Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump expressed frustration with U.S.-Japan trade negotiations on Monday, casting clouds over ongoing trade talks between the two countries.U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also warned that countries could be notified of sharply higher tariffs as a July 9 deadline approaches despite good-faith negotiations."Investors weighed trade factors, but if the outlook of the talks becomes clear, then the market gauges stocks with fundamentals and the Nikkei has the potential to rise further," said Ueno.Uniqlo-brand owner Fast Retailing fell 4.16% to drag the Nikkei the most. Chip-equipment maker Tokyo Electron slipped 2.2%.Bucking the trend, utility Tokyo Electric Power Holdings jumped 9.98% to become the biggest percentage gainer on the Nikkei.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
Can Donald Trump end America's $1.8 trillion student-debt nightmare?
In recent years, America's student-loan policy has come to resemble an alphabet soup. During the covid-19 pandemic, relief came from the CARES, ARPA and HEROES acts. Repayment plans ranged from the appropriately named (SAVE and PAYE) to the less so (PSLF and TEPSLF). Even seasoned bureaucrats at the FSA will have struggled to keep track. Owing to these various policies, some $189bn in student debt was forgiven, and more than $260bn of payments waived. Such relief may have been welcome at the time, but America is now waking up to reality. The last of the pandemic-era forbearance ended in September 2023; defaults began to appear on credit records in the first quarter of this year. And the picture that is emerging is not pretty. Delinquencies have spiked (see chart 1). According to TransUnion, a credit-reporting bureau, some 21% of federal student-loan borrowers are in default, the most ever, up from 12% in February 2020. More difficulties may lie ahead. On May 5th President Donald Trump instructed the Treasury to resume collections from borrowers in default; by the end of the year loan forgiveness, which often occurs automatically after two decades of repayments, will once again be taxed at a federal level. America's repayment woes are the culmination of a trend that has been building for decades. In the 20 years before the arrival of covid, student loans were among the fastest-growing forms of household borrowing, having swollen from 10% of non-mortgage debt in 2003 to 33% by 2020 (see chart 2). By 2010 they had overtaken credit cards and car loans as the largest single slice of household liabilities. By 2012 they led in delinquencies, too. When covid struck, student debt was an obvious—if controversial—option for federal relief. The Biden administration's acronym barrage stopped delinquencies from rising still further. Defaults on federal student loans fell to nearly zero, and monthly payments to the Treasury more than halved. At the same time, the debt burden continued its relentless upwards march. The federal student-loan portfolio has grown to $1.8trn; the average borrower balance sits at $40,000, according to the Education Data Initiative, a research group. If the picture appears bleak for America's graduates, it is bleaker still for Uncle Sam. Student lending was once profitable for the federal government. Now it loses 25 cents on every dollar lent. All told, officials expect their student-loan portfolio to cost around $450bn in the next nine years. Why the shortfall? Graduates are doing worse, and so are less likely to repay their loans. They are also more likely to have borrowed for postgraduate courses, a growing number of which seem to provide poor value for money. Yet perhaps the most important factor is an underappreciated one: a shift from fixed repayment schedules to income-driven plans (see chart 3). Although these take various forms, with different repayment schedules, payment periods and more, all set payments as a share of wages. First introduced in 2009, such plans have surged in popularity and now account for 56% of outstanding federal-student-loan balances. For borrowers, they offer the promise of payments that are less likely to become unmanageable. For taxpayers, though, they are a burden. According to the Congressional Budget Office, a watchdog, the government earns a return on most fixed-repayment loans, but loses money on every dollar lent via such flexible options (see chart 4). In part, this may reflect adverse selection: borrowers who expect low wages are more likely to opt into an income-based plan than those confident of high salaries. Australia and England avoid this dynamic by mandating a single repayment structure. However, America's income-driven borrowing plans are also expensive for the taxpayer by design. Balances are forgiven after 20 or 25 years, regardless of the repayment progress, compared with a 40-year write-off period in England. And the required payments, which can be as little as 5% of discretionary income, were lowered by the Biden administration in lieu of outright debt forgiveness. If there is a glimmer of hope, it may lie in—of all places—Mr Trump's free-spending 'Big Beautiful Bill', which is currently making its way through Congress. The versions drawn up by the House of Representatives and Senate may differ, but they share the makings of sensible student-loan reform. Rather than maintaining the Biden administration's alphabet soup, the draft legislation proposes a streamlined system where students can choose between two options: fixed or income-driven. This would reduce administrative costs and limit carve-outs that are currently to the advantage of everyone from married couples to public-sector workers. There is bipartisan consensus on another front: the need to hold universities to account for how well their students do upon leaving campus. Both bills include penalties for colleges that produce graduates with low earnings relative to their debts. And both take steps—albeit cautious ones—towards curbing runaway balances for graduate students. Although such students represent just a fifth of borrowers, they account for half of outstanding debt. Much of that reflects pricey tuition at law and medical schools, where subsequent salaries often justify the cost. But a growing share stems from expensive, low-value courses that arguably should not qualify for federal lending. Both bills, to be sure, have room for improvement. For example, some of the accountability measures do not adequately target shorter courses that are often money-spinners for colleges; their loan limits for graduate students may be too stingy for those studying for professional qualifications. And even if the legislation rightly limits costs for the government, whatever emerges will be tougher for many borrowers. Yet streamlining repayment, limiting borrowing and cracking down on predatory courses could be a rare bipartisan achievement. After decades of drift, America's student loan system may at last be approaching a graduation of its own.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Deal Or No Deal: What Happens With Trump's July Tariff Deadline?
A week before US President Donald Trump reimposes steep tariffs on dozens of economies, including the EU and Japan, many are still scrambling to reach a deal that would protect them from the worst. The tariffs taking effect July 9 are part of a package Trump imposed in April citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trading ties. He slapped a 10 percent levy on most partners, with higher customized rates to kick in later in countries the United States has major trade deficits with. But these were halted until July to allow room for negotiations. Analysts expect countries will encounter one of three outcomes: They could reach a framework for an agreement; receive an extended pause on higher tariffs; or see levies surge. 'Framework' deals "There will be a group of deals that we will land before July 9," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last Friday on CNBC. Policymakers have not named countries in this group, although Bessent maintains that Washington has been focused on striking deals with about 18 key partners. "Vietnam, India and Taiwan remain promising candidates for a deal," Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) vice president Wendy Cutler told AFP. Without a deal, Vietnam's "reciprocal tariff" rises from the baseline of 10 percent to 46 percent, India's to 26 percent and Taiwan's to 32 percent. Josh Lipsky, international economics chair at the Atlantic Council, cited Indian negotiators' extension of their US trip recently in noting that it "seems like a frontrunner." "Japan was in that category, but things have set back a little," Lipsky said, referring to Trump's criticism Monday over what the president called Japan's reluctance to accept US rice exports. The deals, however, will unlikely be full-fledged trade pacts, analysts said, citing complexities in negotiating such agreements. Since April, Washington has only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties with China. Extended pause Bessent has also said that countries "negotiating in good faith" can have their tariffs remain at the 10 percent baseline. But extensions of the pause on higher rates would depend on Trump, he added. "With a new government, (South) Korea looks well positioned to secure an extension," Cutler of ASPI said. Lipsky expects many countries to fall into this bucket, receiving an extended halt on higher tariffs that could last until Labor Day, which falls on September 1. Bessent earlier said that Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by Labor Day, a signal that more agreements could be concluded but with talks likely to extend past July. Tariff reimposition For countries that the United States finds "recalcitrant," however, tariffs could spring back to the higher levels Trump previously announced, Bessent has warned. These range from 11 percent to 50 percent. Cutler warned that "Japan's refusal to open its rice market, coupled with the US resistance to lowering automotive tariffs, may lead to the reimposition of Japan's 24 percent reciprocal tariff." Trump himself said Tuesday that a trade deal was unlikely with Japan and the country could pay a tariff of "30 percent, 35 percent, or whatever the number is that we determine." Lipsky believes the European Union is at risk of having tariffs snap back to steeper levels too -- to the 20 percent unveiled in April or the 50 percent Trump more recently threatened. An area of tension could be Europe's approach to digital regulation. Trump recently said he would terminate trade talks with Canada -- which is not impacted by the July 9 deadline -- in retaliation for the country's digital services tax, which Ottawa eventually said it would rescind. This week, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic is in Washington in a push to seal a trade deal, with the EU commission having received early drafts of proposals that officials are working on.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Stock market update: Nifty Auto index advances 0.32%
(What's moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news, stock tips, Budget 2025, Share Market on Budget 2025 and expert advice, on ETMarkets. Also, is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds .) Subscribe to ET Prime and read the Economic Times ePaper Sensex Today. Top Trending Stocks: SBI Share Price, Axis Bank Share Price, HDFC Bank Share Price, Infosys Share Price, Wipro Share Price, NTPC Share Price
