Meta spending big on AI talent but will it pay off?
A few OpenAI employees have reportedly taken Meta up on the offer, joining Scale AI founder and former chief executive Alexandr Wang at the Menlo Park-based tech titan. — Reuters
NEW YORK: Mark Zuckerberg and Meta are spending billions of dollars for top talent to make up ground in the generative artificial intelligence race, sparking doubt about the wisdom of the spree.
OpenAI boss Sam Altman recently lamented that Meta has offered US$100mil (RM422mil) bonuses to engineers who jump to Zuckerberg's ship, where hefty salaries await.
A few OpenAI employees have reportedly taken Meta up on the offer, joining Scale AI founder and former chief executive Alexandr Wang at the Menlo Park-based tech titan.
Meta paid more than US$14bil (RM59bil) for a 49 percent stake in Scale AI in mid-June, bringing Wang on board as part of the deal.
Scale AI labels data to better train AI models for businesses, governments and labs.
"Meta has finalised our strategic partnership and investment in Scale AI," a Meta spokesperson told AFP.
"As part of this, we will deepen the work we do together producing data for AI models and Alexandr Wang will join Meta to work on our superintelligence efforts."
US media outlets have reported that Meta's recruitment effort has also targeted OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever; Google rival Perplexity AI, and hot AI video startup Runway.
Meta chief Zuckerberg is reported to have sounded the charge himself due to worries Meta is lagging rivals in the generative AI race.
The latest version of Meta AI model Llama finished behind its heavyweight rivals in code writing rankings at an LM Arena platform that lets users evaluate the technology.
Meta is integrating recruits into a new team dedicated to developing "superintelligence," or AI that outperforms people when it comes to thinking and understanding.
'Mercenary'
Tech blogger Zvi Moshowitz felt Zuckerberg had to do something about the situation, expecting Meta to succeed in attracting hot talent but questioning how well it will pay off.
"There are some extreme downsides to going pure mercenary... and being a company with products no one wants to work on," Moshowitz told AFP.
"I don't expect it to work, but I suppose Llama will suck less."
While Meta's share price is nearing a new high with the overall value of the company approaching US$2 trillion (RM8.4 trillion), some investors have started to worry.
Institutional investors are concerned about how well Meta is managing its cash flow and reserves, according to Baird strategist Ted Mortonson.
"Right now, there are no checks and balances" with Zuckerberg free to do as he wishes running Meta, Mortonson noted.
The potential for Meta to cash in by using AI to rev its lucrative online advertising machine has strong appeal but "people have a real big concern about spending," said Mortonson.
Meta executives have laid out a vision of using AI to streamline the ad process from easy creation to smarter targeting, bypassing creative agencies and providing a turnkey solution to brands.
AI talent hires are a long-term investment unlikely to impact Meta's profitability in the immediate future, according to CFRA analyst Angelo Zino.
"But still, you need those people on board now and to invest aggressively to be ready for that phase" of generative AI, Zino said.
According to The New York Times, Zuckerberg is considering shifting away from Meta's Llama, perhaps even using competing AI models instead.
Penn State University professor Mehmet Canayaz sees potential for Meta to succeed with AI agents tailored to specific tasks at its platform, not requiring the best large language model.
"Even firms without the most advanced LLMs, like Meta, can succeed as long as their models perform well within their specific market segment," Canayaz said. – AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
19 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Cadillac team have 'limitless ambition' and plenty of money
SILVERSTONE, England: Cadillac principal Graeme Lowdon says Formula One's newest team have limitless ambition, and plenty of funds, but every expectation of being last when they debut next season. The General Motors brand secured approval in March, after a 764-day entry process, to become the sport's 11th team and are racing against time to be ready. Testing starts in Barcelona on January 26, with free practice for the 2026 season-opener in Melbourne on March 6. No drivers are signed yet, despite regular reports of familiar names set to join and the usual suspects in the frame, but the focus is on more fundamental issues. A recent tour of the team's Silverstone facility revealed a quiet sense of purpose, and the deep pockets behind the operation. "You will not see this team over-promising in any way," Lowdon told reporters. "But we do want to convey the fact that the ambitions are really limitless, as they should be." The team are also backed by TWG Global, whose CEO Mark Walter has an estimated net worth of $12.5 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Walter's ownership interests include MLB's Los Angeles Dodgers, Premier League soccer side Chelsea and a soon to be acquired majority stake in the Los Angeles Lakers NBA basketball franchise. LONG ROAD Despite that, there is a long road ahead for a team that will start with Ferrari engines but plan to make their own eventually. Lowdon, whose US-owned rivals Haas are in their 10th season, said he presents the situation to shareholders with a question: "Can you imagine if you've owned a Formula One team for 10 years and then another team rocks up and beats you? You would be apoplectic. "You have to assume that any new team coming in is going to be last. Otherwise, what's gone wrong somewhere else? ... We're trying to be as competitive as we possibly can but We're realistic. We know how difficult it is. "We're happy with our progress, but we just don't know. Other than if we beat someone then someone's going to be angry." Cadillac reckon on having 600 people by next season, many recruited from rival teams, and say they are already two thirds of the way there and no longer even the smallest outfit. Although approval came only in March, preparations started long before. Wind tunnel work has been ongoing since the middle of last year and the first car floor was delivered in January. Roll hoop testing took place in May and a prototype steering wheel was also ready by then. "We've already issued somewhere in the region of 6,000 drawings. We've made 10,000 components already while we've been kind of quiet," said Lowdon. "If you just wait until you get the entry and then start doing everything that we've been doing, you time out. It becomes an impossible task." Cadillac have sites on two continents – a headquarters under construction in Indianapolis, manufacturing facilities in North Carolina and Michigan and a design and logistics base at Silverstone. Lowdon, a previous CEO of the defunct Virgin and Marussia teams, said a different management approach was needed and he had "leaned heavily" on the structure used by the U.S. space programme in the 1960s and 70s. "We need an engineer here (in Britain) talking to an engineer in Charlotte and another one in Warren, Michigan, or eventually in Fishers (Indiana). So we've looked to have a very, very flat management structure," he said.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
How do you teach computer science in the AI era?
Carnegie Mellon University has a well-earned reputation as one of the nation's top schools for computer science. Its graduates go on to work at big tech companies, startups and research labs worldwide. Still, for all its past success, the department's faculty is planning a retreat this summer to rethink what the school should be teaching to adapt to the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence. The technology has 'really shaken computer science education', said Thomas Cortina, a professor and an associate dean of the university's undergraduate programs. Computer science, more than any other field of study, is being challenged by generative AI. The AI technology behind chatbots such as ChatGPT, which can write essays and answer questions with humanlike fluency, is making inroads across academia. But AI is coming fastest and most forcefully to computer science, which emphasises writing code, the language of computers. Big tech companies and startups have introduced AI assistants that can generate code and are rapidly becoming more capable. And in January, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta's CEO, predicted that AI technology would effectively match the performance of a midlevel software engineer sometime this year. Computer science programs at universities across the country are now scrambling to understand the implications of the technological transformation, grappling with what to keep teaching in the AI era. Ideas range from less emphasis on mastering programming languages to focusing on hybrid courses designed to inject computing into every profession, as educators ponder what the tech jobs of the future will look like in an AI economy. 'We're seeing the tip of the AI tsunami,' said Jeannette Wing, a computer science professor and executive vice president of research at Columbia University. Heightening the sense of urgency is a tech job market that has tightened in recent years. Computer science graduates are finding that job offers, once plentiful, are often scarce. Tech companies are relying more on AI for some aspects of coding, eliminating some entry-level work. Some educators now believe the discipline could broaden to become more like a liberal arts degree, with a greater emphasis on critical thinking and communication skills. The National Science Foundation is funding a program, Level Up AI, to bring together university and community college educators and researchers to move toward a shared vision of the essentials of AI education. The 18-month project, run by the Computing Research Association, a research and education nonprofit, in partnership with New Mexico State University, is organising conferences and roundtables and producing white papers to share resources and best practices. The NSF-backed initiative was created because of 'a sense of urgency that we need a lot more computing students – and more people – who know about AI in the workforce,' said Mary Lou Maher, a computer scientist and a director of the Computing Research Association. The future of computer science education, Maher said, is likely to focus less on coding and more on computational thinking and AI literacy. Computational thinking involves breaking down problems into smaller tasks, developing step-by-step solutions and using data to reach evidence-based conclusions. AI literacy is an understanding – at varying depths for students at different levels – of how AI works, how to use it responsibly and how it is affecting society. Nurturing informed skepticism, she said, should be a goal. At Carnegie Mellon, as faculty members prepare for their gathering, Cortina said his view was that the coursework should include instruction in the traditional basics of computing and AI principles, followed by plenty of hands-on experience designing software using the new tools. 'We think that's where it's going,' he said. 'But do we need a more profound change in the curriculum?' Currently, individual computer science professors choose whether to allow students to use AI. Last year, Carnegie Mellon endorsed using AI for introductory courses. Initially, Cortina said, many students regarded AI as a 'magic bullet' to quickly complete homework assignments that involved writing programs. 'But they didn't understand half of what the code was,' he said, leading many to realize the value of knowing how to write and debug code themselves. 'The students are resetting.' That's true for many computer science students embracing the new AI tools, with some reservations. They say they use AI for building initial prototype programs, for checking for errors in code and as a digital tutor to answer questions. But they are reluctant to rely on it too much, fearing it dulls their computing acumen. Many students say they send out 100 to 200 applications for summer internships and first jobs. Connor Drake, who will be a senior next fall at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, counts himself lucky, having scored an interview after submitting only 30 applications. He was offered a job as a cybersecurity intern this summer for Duke Energy, a large utility company, in Charlotte. 'A computer science degree used to be a golden ticket to the promised land of jobs,' Drake, 22, said. 'That's no longer the case.' Drake's personal AI-defense strategy is to expand his skill set. In addition to his computer science major, he has minored in political science with a specialty in security and intelligence studies – a field where his expertise in cybersecurity could well be applied. He is president of a university cybersecurity club and has served in student government. Drake, like other computer science students, has been forced to adjust to an increasingly tough tech job market. Several factors, labor experts say, are at work. Big tech companies, in particular, have curbed their hiring for the past few years, a sharp pullback from the pandemic-era boom years. The exception is the hectic recruiting of a relatively small number of the most coveted AI experts, who are being offered lucrative pay packages. But most technology workers do not work for tech companies. Overall employment for workers in tech occupations had generally held up until recently – down 6% since February, according to government statistics. Employers have sent a sharper signal with a significant pullback in tech job listings. In the past three years, there has been a 65% drop from companies seeking workers with two years of experience or less, according to an analysis by CompTIA, a technology research and education organization. The decline in listings for tech workers with all levels of experience is down 58%. 'We're mainly seeing a postpandemic unwinding of hiring and the impact of the current economic uncertainty,' said Tim Herbert, chief research officer at CompTIA. 'We don't really have a clear AI effect yet.' While the road ahead for computer science education may be uncertain, the market for AI-assisted software is poised for growth, experts say. AI is a productivity tool, and every new wave of computing – the personal computer, the internet, the smartphone – has increased the demand for software and for programmers. This time, they say, the result may be a burst of technology democratization as chatbot-style tools are used by people in fields from medicine to marketing to create their own programs, tailored for their industry, fed by industry-specific data sets. 'The growth in software engineering jobs may decline, but the total number of people involved in programming will increase,' said Alex Aiken, a professor of computer science at Stanford University. – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Japan says it won't sacrifice farm sector after Trump complains about rice
This photo taken on June 4, 2025 shows a farmer preparing a transplanter vehicle before planting rice seedlings at a farm in the town of Sanjo, Niigata prefecture in northern Japan. Japan has been grappling with a doubling in rice prices due partly to a weather-driven poor-quality harvest in 2023 that caused a shortage last year. - AFP TOKYO: Japan will not sacrifice the agricultural sector as part of its tariff negotiations with the United States, its top government spokesperson said on Tuesday (July 1), after President Donald Trump complained that its ally was not importing American rice. Trump wrote in a social media post that Japan's reluctance to import American-grown rice was a sign that countries have become "spoiled with respect to the United States of America." "I have great respect for Japan, they won't take our RICE, and yet they have a massive rice shortage," he wrote on Truth Social. Japan has been grappling with a doubling in rice prices due partly to a weather-driven poor-quality harvest in 2023 that caused a shortage last year. The government has released almost its entire stock of emergency rice since March in an effort to bring prices down. "We are not thinking about doing anything that would sacrifice the farm sector," Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi told a press conference. He, as well as farm minister Shinjiro Koizumi, declined to comment directly on Trump's post. Koizumi told a separate press conference that his ministry would continue to work with various ministries towards maximising Japan's national interests. Under a "minimum access" agreement within the World Trade Organisation, Japan has an 770,000-tonne tariff-free import quota for rice, of which up to 100,000 tonnes is for staple rice. Beyond this, rice imports are subject to a levy of 341 yen (US$2.37) per kilogramme. To continue in its efforts to lower domestic prices, the government had brought forward a tender for the first 30,000 tonnes of tariff-free staple rice imports earmarked for this year earlier than the usual auction in September. Results of that tender, held on June 27, showed applications for 81,853 tonnes, or nearly three times as much as was auctioned. Of the total tendered, 25,541 tonnes was from the US, followed by 1,500 tonnes from Australia and 708 tonnes from Thailand. - Reuters
