It is not my job to dictate what you can create, says Swinney on eve of festival
Mr Swinney told the audience on Thursday he would be a protector of freedom of speech in his time in the top job.
'I also know that freedom of expressing is under greater and greater attack, both at home and abroad,' he said.
'I want to ensure that Scotland, the birthplace of the Enlightenment, remains a country of robust debate and inquiry.
'I firmly believe that art and culture must be able to challenge us, to ask us tough questions, and to force us to look at things from different perspectives.
'And, yes, it must, at times, be allowed to shock and offend us, but it can also heal us.
'Let me be absolutely clear – as First Minister, I will always protect freedom of speech in our country.
'It's not the First Minister's job to tell you what to create, nor would I ever seek to do so.'
Mr Swinney added that his and his Government's role is to assist artists in any way they can.
The First Minister went on to make a plea to the crowd and to wider society – with a particular nod to tech firms – to look at how the arts can be better supported financially as the Government looks to boost funding to £100 million annually in the coming years.
'I'm asking that from crowdfunding to patronage, to philanthropy to local authority support and much more, we all ask ourselves how can we do more to support the arts from the grassroots up?' he said.
'How can we better support emerging artists that don't necessarily fit the current mould?
'And how, in particular, can Scotland's emerging businesses in new sectors become the new generation of patrons of the arts and culture in Scotland?
'How do we incentivise a new guard of custodians and investors in Scotland's creative economy?'
Speaking to journalists after his speech, Mr Swinney said he is open to discussions about new legislation to support the cultural sector.
He said there is a sense that local authorities 'might not have a particularly explicit statutory duty to support artistic and cultural activity', suggesting this area 'might need to be strengthened'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If you come to Britain and can't support yourself, you must leave
For the 25 years up to 1997, according to the Centre for Policy Studies, net migration was 68,000. In the 25 years that followed, however, that figure shot up to nearly 6 million. Our immigration system is out of control. It isn't just about the number of people who've come here, unsustainable though that is. Our migration system has also been highly un-selective. The vast majority of those who've arrived in the last few years haven't come to work, and didn't need to be earning a particular salary – or often anything at all – to get their visa. Even those who did come here to work are often employed in low-paid jobs, and won't be paying enough in tax to account for the pressure that they put on public services, or the costs that they'll incur later in life. According to the researcher Karl Williams, 72 per cent of those who came as 'skilled workers' in 2022-23 earned below the UK average salary, with 54 percent likely earning less than half of that average. But after just five years here, most of these people will qualify for Indefinite Leave to Remain, or ILR. With ILR, migrants can access welfare, social housing, and free healthcare, as well as stay permanently in the UK and apply for citizenship. On average, the Government spends £34,000 looking after somebody in the last year of their life. Only a small minority of recent migrants will pay enough in tax to cover those costs over the entire time that they're here – let alone to cover the cost of the benefits and services that they and their family will use over their lifetimes. It's going to cost us hundreds of billions of pounds. We simply can't afford it. But it can be fixed. Earlier this year, the Conservatives proposed a plan to reform our immigration system, including by introducing a hard cap on visas and stopping ILR from entitling people to state support. We also proposed extending the qualifying period from five years to ten. This wouldn't just mean that it takes longer for migrants to be eligible for ILR status. It would also give us an opportunity to review the visas of those who are already here. Those who come to Britain from abroad must be able to support themselves, and must be earning enough to contribute more in tax than they will cost over their lifetime. If they can't, their visa must not be renewed, and they must leave. The Government voted against that plan, but they've committed to a consultation on ILR in the autumn. We must use that opportunity to push them not just to extend the qualifying period for ILR, including for those who are already here, but also to refuse to reissue visas to those who won't end up contributing enough. The era of mass migration has been a disaster. People can see it in their rising rents, in the pressure on their public services, and in their increasingly divided communities. Most disgracefully of all, the British people have voted to avert that disaster, time and time again. Government after government has failed to heed their warning. It's a complete scandal, and it's probably the single biggest reason why trust in our political system is in such short supply. Rebuilding that trust means building a migration system that's limited and selective – but it also means undoing the harm that has already been done. We can still avert the coming disaster around ILR, and we must.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Thousands to rally in Bangladesh one year after Sheikh Hasina's fall
Thousands of people are expected to attend rallies, concerts, and prayer sessions in Bangladesh 's capital of Dhaka on Tuesday for the first anniversary of the deadly protests that ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. The events will culminate in a declaration touted as a roadmap for democratic reform in the political journey from an uprising sparked by economic woes and repression to rule by an interim government led by Nobel peace laureate Muhammad Yunus. "Together, we will build a Bangladesh where tyranny will never rise again," Mr Yunus said in a message to the nation a year after protests forced Ms Hasina to flee to neighbouring India, as he paid tribute to those who sacrificed their lives. A peaceful, fair, and transparent election could be held early next year, Mr Yunus said. He pledged a return to full democratic rule at a time of mounting pressure for a swifter transition amid growing labour unrest. "Fallen autocrats and their self-serving allies remain active," however, he added, urging unity to protect the gains of the uprising while his government holds reform talks with political parties and civil society. His interim government had launched sweeping reforms, he added, while trials for those responsible for the "July killings" were progressing swiftly. Police were on high alert throughout the capital, with armoured vehicles patrolling the streets to deter any attempt by Ms Hasina's banned Awami League to disrupt the day's events. "Let this anniversary not be a day of retrospection, but a rallying cry for a brighter tomorrow," Ms Hasina said in an open letter to the people of Bangladesh, adding that she had never resigned from her duties as prime minister. "Bangladesh has overcome adversity before, and we will rise again, stronger, more united, and more determined to build a democracy that truly serves its people." The July Declaration, to be announced later in the day by Mr Yunus, will formally recognise the 2024 student-led uprising and the shift away from authoritarian rule to democratic renewal. Despite some opposition, it is backed by major political groups, including the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by former premier Khaleda Zia. Supporters see the charter as a foundation for institutional reform, but critics have warned that its impact could be largely symbolic in the absence of a legal framework or parliamentary consensus.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Emissions from gas-fired power plant to be stored underground in UK first
A gas-fired power plant will have its carbon emissions captured and piped underground in a first for Britain, as part of Ed Miliband's net zero plans. The Government announced on Tuesday that a new power station at Connah's Quay in North Wales will be fitted with carbon capture technology. Emissions from the plant, which will generate enough electricity for 900,000 homes, will be transported by pipeline to a storage facility underneath Liverpool Bay. The power station is one of two projects now confirmed to be in talks about joining the HyNet pipeline network, which will transport emissions from heavy industry for storage under the Irish Sea. The other business looking at joining the network is a biomass plant in Ellesmere Port that will also use carbon capture. Both schemes are expected to contribute towards Mr Miliband's plan for a clean electricity system by 2030. They will deliver what is known as 'low-carbon dispatchable power' – steady, reliable energy, unlike intermittent wind and sun generation, with minimal emissions. Mr Miliband's clean power action plan states that these plants will be vital to managing 'dunkelflaute' weather periods in the winter, when gloomy and low-wind conditions depress the output of wind and solar farms. The Government has set a target of having up to 7 gigawatts (GW) of low-carbon dispatchable power available by 2030. The energy secretary's plan also relies on keeping around 35GWs of 'unabated' gas-fired plants in reserve, meaning generators where the carbon is simply emitted into the atmosphere. The 1.4GW Connah's Quay project, which will be delivered in two phases by German power company Uniper, would be the first gas plant fitted with carbon capture to come online in the country. It would replace the existing 1.4GW gas plant currently at the site, which is reaching the end of its lifespan. Together with Evero Energy's biomass plant in Ellesmere Port, the Government said the scheme would help to create 800 local jobs. They are part of the broader HyNet network in the North West, which was one of three carbon capture schemes to secure funding from a £22bn pot announced by Mr Miliband and Sir Keir Starmer in October. HyNet is expected to enter service in 2028. Net Zero Teesside, a similar project in the North East, has also been promised funding. Mr Miliband has said these networks are 'essential if we are to decarbonise without de-industrialising'. On Tuesday, Sarah Jones, the Industry Minister, said: 'We are securing the jobs of the future, the power for our homes and the protection of our planet by becoming world leaders on carbon capture and storage. 'These new projects will bring industrial renewal, unlock growth and secure an additional 800 good, skilled jobs for local people across North Wales and the North West – taking the total supported by HyNet to 2,800 – all part of our Plan for Change.' Mike Lockett, boss of Uniper UK, said: 'Government's support for the development of carbon capture and storage infrastructure is vital for moving towards clean power 2030 and at the same time maintaining a secure electricity supply.' Under Labour's green energy plans, carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies will be relied on to strip up to 30m tonnes of CO2 from UK emissions each year by 2030 and more than 100m tonnes by 2050. Carbon capture systems take emissions from factories or other sites that burn fossil fuels or wood and pass them through a process that strips out waste CO2. This is then compressed into a liquid and pumped deep underground for permanent storage, eventually reacting with and becoming part of the surrounding rocks. Scientists have warned the technology still needs a great deal of research and engineering to succeed. A report on carbon capture produced by The Royal Society, Britain's leading scientific institution, said: 'An enormous and continued investment is needed each year to 2050 to build the injection wells, transport networks, monitoring technologies, and a skilled workforce, and to install hundreds of new wells each year.' Earlier this year MPs also raised concerns that the Government was committing billions of pounds to what was essentially 'unproven' technology.
