US conducts successful test launch of Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile
The
United States Air Force
(USAF) on Wednesday conducted a successful test launch of the nuclear-capable Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) which can deliver a nuclear warhead to anywhere on Earth.
The missile was unarmed when launched at 12:01 am Pacific Time from California's Vandenberg Space Force Base, USAF said in a
statement
.
"This ICBM test launch underscores the strength of the nation's
nuclear deterrent
and the readiness of the ICBM leg of the triad. This is part of routine and periodic activities designed to demonstrate that the United States' nuclear deterrent remains safe, secure, reliable and effective in deterring 21st-century threats and reassuring our allies," the statement quoted USAF's General Thomas Bussiere as saying.
"With more than 300 similar tests conducted in the past, this test is part of the nation's ongoing commitment to maintaining a credible deterrent and is not a response to current world events," Bussiere added.
As per the statement, the missile travelled 15,000 miles per hour to the United States Army's Space and Missile Defense Command's Ronald Reagan Ballistic Missile Defense Test Site in the Marshall Islands 4,200 miles away. The Marshall Islands are a sprawling chain of volcanic islands in the central Pacific Ocean, between America's Hawaii province and the Philippines in Asia.
The Minuteman is a 1970-era program which the Air Force plans to replace with the LGM-35A Sentinel system. Minuteman III is to be used as a "viable deterrent" until LGM achieves full capability.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
4 days ago
- India.com
Which country has world's largest air force and how many fighter jets do they have? India, Pakistan rank will surprise you
Which country has world's largest air force and how many fighter jets do they have? India, Pakistan rank will surprise you The United States Air Force is the biggest and most powerful air force in the world. It has over 5,000 aircraft, including thousands of fighter jets. These include powerful 4th-generation jets like the F-15, F-16, and F-18. Along with these, the US. also has super-advanced 5th-generation stealth fighter jets such as the F-22 Raptor and F-35 Lightning II. These jets are not just large in number they are also highly advanced in technology. Russia, the second largest powerful air force Russia has the second-largest air force in the world based on the number of aircraft. It also owns thousands of planes, including strong fighter jets like the Sukhoi Su-27, Su-30, Su-35 and MiG-29, MiG-31. Russia is also working on improving its latest 5th-generation jet, the Su-57 'Felon', to make it even more advanced. China at same level as Russia China's air force is growing very fast and becoming more modern every year. It is now almost at the same level as Russia and some reports even say China may have already moved ahead. China has a large number of fighter jets like the J-10, J-11, and J-16, and it is also mass-producing its advanced 5th-generation stealth jet, the J-20 'Mighty Dragon'. India, top four largest air forces India has one of the world's top four largest air forces, and it is the most powerful in South Asia. The Indian Air Force (IAF) has a strong mix of fighter jets, including the Sukhoi Su-30MKI, Rafale, MiG-29, Mirage 2000, and the homegrown Tejas. India is steadily modernizing its fleet and is also working on developing its own 5th-generation fighter jets for the future. Where does Pakistan stand on the list Other powerful air forces Countries like South Korea, Japan, Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey also have powerful air forces with strong regional capabilities. Each of them has modern jets and continues to improve their air strength. What the future looks like on fighter jets In the future, air power will not depend only on fighter jets. The focus is now shifting to 5th-generation jets, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or drones), and new technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML).
Hindustan Times
22-07-2025
- Hindustan Times
Underground with America's nuclear-missile crews
THERE ARE no big red buttons in the underground bunkers, or 'capsules', that control America's nuclear missiles. Instead, launching an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) involves decrypting and verifying orders, receiving the appropriate codes and then many hands turning many keys and levers at the same time: two per officer or 'missileer', two missileers per capsule and at least two separate capsules must act in unison. The redundancies ensure that no rogue missileer or crew can fire a weapon—or block a launch. Your correspondent went through the procedures in a simulator at the F.E. Warren air-force base in Cheyenne, Wyoming, home to the 90th Missile Wing. Even in a make-believe setting the dread was real enough. After turning the levers, there is no going back. Little squares on a grid on the console, each representing an ICBM silo, change colour, from red (ready) to yellow (launch confirmed). And then you wait. If you still have missiles, you stand ready to fire more. If you are out of weapons, you relay messages to other launch facilities. Above all, you wait for the enemy's nukes, which are almost certainly coming your way. You might strap yourself into your chair, put on a hard hat and pray that you avoid a direct hit. You hope that the survival features—60 feet of earth above; blast doors; springs and shock absorbers all around; and supplies, backup power and air scrubbers within—will keep you alive. And if you eventually make it back to the surface, what would you find? The mind-bending logic of mutual assured destruction, which holds that being ready to unleash a nuclear apocalypse serves to prevent it, faded from public attention after the cold war. Yet the terrifying questions of nuclear war are returning in a new age of big-power rivalry. The last treaty limiting American and Russian nuclear weapons, New START, will expire in February, with no replacement in sight. Russia has repeatedly threatened to use nuclear weapons. China is fast building up its arsenal. It will have perhaps 1,000 warheads by the end of the decade, according to the Pentagon (fewer than the 5,000-odd that America and Russia each possesses). In turn America is modernising all parts of its 'triad' of land-, sea- and air-launched nuclear weapons, parts of which are half a century old. Minuteman III ICBMs will be replaced with Sentinel ones; B-2 bombers with the B-21s; and the Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarines (SSBNs) with the Columbia-class subs. The government is also debating whether it needs more nuclear warheads. The most contentious element is the Sentinel programme, whose cost has exceeded its budget, raising questions: why has the air force botched its estimates, does America really need ICBMs and would arms control be the better answer? America's ICBM infrastructure is vast, with 400 missiles deployed in 450 silos scattered across the great plains. A spider's web of cables connect them to 45 'missile-alert facilities' (MAFs), each consisting of a peanut-shaped capsule below and a support building 'topside' above. Maintenance teams tour the unmanned silos and, when necessary, pull ICBMs apart 'like Lego pieces', as one put it, to be worked on back at base. Armed teams in Humvees and helicopters keep the sites secure. In 2024 the estimated costs of Sentinel jumped to $141bn, more than 80% higher than the previous projection. For critics such as Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association, a campaign group, the overrun amounts to rank incompetence. Having originally ruled out extending the life of the Minuteman III as uneconomical, the air force is having to do just that because of the delays to Sentinel, which was supposed to begin entering service in 2030 but may not do so until 2038. General Andrew Gebara, the air force's point-man on nuclear policy, says development of the Sentinel missile itself is progressing well. The problem is that the infrastructure to support it dates to the 1960s and 1970s, and is in worse shape than expected. The original plan had envisioned reusing existing facilities after a light refurbishing, but such are the problems with weakening cement and water infiltration that it would be 'cheaper and faster to just dig a new silo'. Similarly, other officers note, replacing old copper cables with fibre-optic ones would allow more data to flow and reduce the number of MAFs (from 45 to 24). Replacing the current facilities sooner rather than later brings other advantages, the air force adds. New silos will more easily fit Sentinel, which is expected to be larger than the Minuteman III. And separate systems would make it easier to operate both old and new missiles as Sentinel is phased in. A new control centre and warhead-handling facility are under construction at Warren. To save money and minimise disruption the air force will try to dig new facilities within existing sites, or on land it already owns. Does America need ground-based ICBMs at all? Mr Kimball argues that they are destabilising. Instead America should rely on a 'dyad' of missiles launched from air and sea. The location of ICBM silos is no secret, he notes, and they would be a priority target, giving a president a few minutes to decide whether to use the missiles or risk losing them. 'That vastly increases the risk of miscalculation,' says Mr Kimball; better to rely on submarine-launched nukes, which are nigh impossible to find and provide an assured second-strike capability. Eric Edelman, a former Pentagon official, retorts that, on the contrary, ICBMs are stabilising. Without them an enemy might be tempted to try to decapitate America's deterrent by striking the handful of nuclear-bomber and submarine bases, and command-and-control nodes. Moreover, new hypersonic missiles are harder to spot. With ICBMs in silos, an enemy must fire hundreds of missiles at the American heartland, which would undoubtedly be detected and invite massive retaliation. 'Why would you want to simplify your adversary's targeting problem?' asks Mr Edelman. China, which has built hundreds of silos in recent years, seems to accept such logic. Some argue that America should complicate the targeting even further by making at least some ICBMs mobile, as China and Russia do. A congressionally appointed bipartisan commission in 2023 recommended examining the possibility. This would revive cold-war programmes such as the Midgetman, a small ICBM carried on a road-mobile launcher, and the Peacekeeper railway garrison, a large missile carried on special railway carriages. Both missiles forces were intended to be dispersed across America's transport network in times of crisis, but the idea was abandoned with the end of the cold war. General Gebara says it was studied anew and rejected because it would be both expensive and unpopular. Beyond the cost and mix of nuclear weapons, a broader question looms. With the expiry of New START, America and Russia will no longer be bound by the ceiling of 1,550 'strategic' (long-range) warheads each. Some experts say the two sides should continue to abide by the limit informally, pending new arms-control negotiations. President Donald Trump has spoken about his desire for 'denuclearisation', and for talks with China and Russia to halve defence spending. But neither power seems interested. James Acton of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a think-tank, reckons nuclear policy is anyhow likely to be decided by the bureaucracy. 'Among the majority of the Republican national-security establishment that thinks about these issues there's a pretty clear view that we need more nukes,' he notes. As wonks debate, ominous responsibility rests on the shoulders of young officers on alert in the capsules, usually lieutenants and captains in their 20s. They typically work 24-hour shifts every three days, locked away in pairs, taking turns to sleep and work. In quiet moments they stream television and send text messages via a computer topside (no personal electronic devices are allowed). Many use the long hours to study for postgraduate degrees. On the day your correspondent visited the Foxtrot-01 capsule near Kimball, the two women on duty spoke of the hours of camaraderie underground, watching episodes of 'Friends', and their pride in keeping America safe. On a wall someone had drawn a whale with a spout in the shape of a mushroom cloud—a reference to the 'Moby Dick' squadron of second-world-war bombers to which their unit, the 320th missile squadron, traces its origins. Next to it were words that summed up a mission they hope never to carry out: 'Death from Below'.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25-06-2025
- First Post
Catnaps, a chemical toilet and more: Inside America's 37-hour B-2 bomber mission into Iran and back
Flying a 37-hour bombing mission to Iran, B-2 pilots faced extreme physical and mental stress. They prepared with sleep simulations, strict nutritional plans and chemical assistance — using sleeping pills pre-mission and amphetamines during flight. Inside a cramped cockpit, rest came in shifts, with only cots, 'piddle packs' and personal grit for support read more Seven B-2 Spirit stealth bombers from the United States Air Force embarked on a 37-hour round-trip journey from Missouri's Whiteman Air Force Base to Iranian territory and back. The mission, targeting three fortified nuclear-related facilities in Iran, marked not just a display of military precision but also of extreme endurance. The mission's scale was enormous. Over 125 aircraft were mobilised, including multiple bombers, surveillance platforms, fighter escorts and aerial refuelling tankers. Of the seven B-2s involved in the strike, each aircraft carried two crew members, executing coordinated bomb runs within a tight 30-minute window over their targets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Although officials have not publicly confirmed specific mission details, parallels can be drawn with earlier long-range bomber operations such as the 44-hour sortie flown by now-retired US Colonel Melvin G Deaile in 2001 during the early days of Operation Enduring Freedom. Describing the Iran raid as 'an incredible feat,' CNN quoted Deaile who highlighted the uniqueness of seven B-2s operating over target areas simultaneously and executing independent bombing trajectories. What goes into a 37-hour B-2 mission Operating a B-2 Spirit over such long distances involves meticulous pre-flight conditioning for pilots. Crews assigned to missions of this length typically undergo days, sometimes weeks, of physical and mental preparation. These include regulated sleep cycles, nutritional planning, and simulator training. Pilots are also trained to manage digestion and hydration — factors that directly affect alertness and comfort in a cockpit with minimal amenities. 'The flight doc did have what we call 'go pills' authorised for use — amphetamines,' Deaile recalled of his own Afghanistan mission, though he acknowledged policy may have changed since then. He also described taking 'sleeping pills to help them rest in the days leading up to the bombings.' Retired Lieutenant General Steve Basham, a former B-2 pilot who flew combat sorties during the 1999 Kosovo conflict, confirmed that the physical strain is more than incidental. 'We go through sleep studies, we actually go through nutritional education to be able to teach each one of us: one, what wakes us up and then what helps us go to sleep,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Basham's preferred inflight meal was as unassuming as the mission was demanding: 'turkey sandwiches on wheat bread, no cheese,' to minimise digestion issues. The compact design of the B-2 limits crew mobility. Each cockpit includes a makeshift cot tucked behind the seats where one pilot can rest while the other remains alert. Pilots are required to be in their seats during takeoff, midair refuelling, time over hostile territory and landing — leaving little opportunity for extended rest. Even bodily functions require creative solutions. The cockpit includes a chemical toilet without partitions, leading Deaile to explain, 'Privacy is the guy looks the other way.' To manage hydration needs, pilots drink around a bottle of water per hour and use 'piddle packs,' absorbent bags designed to contain urine. Deaile and his fellow pilot once amused themselves by calculating the cumulative weight of their used packs midflight — one of the few ways to pass time on a multi-day sortie. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How the B-2 was able to stay in the air for 37 hours Despite the B-2's design capability to fly more than 6,000 nautical miles without refuelling, most long-duration missions necessitate multiple midair refuellings. This involves delicate manoeuvring at high altitude and in close formation with a tanker aircraft, whose refuelling boom must be blindly aligned with the bomber from behind. Pilots can't see the boom; instead, they rely on illuminated reference markers and practiced routines. 'Refuelling is done blind,' Basham explained. 'At night, especially on moonless flights, the task becomes what Basham called 'inherently dangerous.'' Fatigue exacerbates the difficulty of these manoeuvres, particularly on the return leg of such an extended operation. The pilots' concentration must remain razor-sharp despite dwindling energy levels and erratic sleep. 'The adrenaline goes away,' Basham said. 'You try to get a little bit of rest and you still got that one last refuelling.' Nevertheless, the prospect of returning to US airspace after hours over hostile terrain offers motivation. 'The one thing that's going to lift them up is they're going to enter the coast of the United States again and they're going to get that 'welcome home' from a US controller,' Basham added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The first combat use of US' most powerful bomb Saturday's operation marked a significant moment in US military history with the first-ever combat deployment of the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP). Weighing 30,000 pounds, the bomb is designed to destroy hardened underground facilities, such as the fortified installations reportedly targeted in Iran. Only the B-2 is capable of carrying these weapons due to their size and weight. Each of the seven B-2s in the raid is believed to have carried two of these munitions, totalling over a dozen MOPs dropped in the operation. Basham, reflecting on this unprecedented payload, remarked, 'It'll be interesting to hear from the pilots,' referencing the unusual shift in aircraft weight that occurs after releasing such enormous bombs. Despite the increased firepower and operational intensity, Pentagon officials reported no direct engagement from Iranian defence systems. Unlike earlier combat zones where B-2s flew amidst anti-aircraft fire or visible missile trails, this operation proceeded without a single shot being fired at either the bombers or their F-35 escorts. The human touch behind a $2 billion aircraft Despite its cutting-edge technology — including stealth capabilities that reduce detection by radar, heat, and sound — the success of any B-2 mission ultimately rests on its crew. The aircraft's two-person team assumes responsibilities once distributed across larger crews on older platforms like the B-1B or B-52. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The B-2's fly-by-wire control system, once lag-prone in its earlier iterations, has seen software improvements over the decades. These enhancements have made precision flight and refueling operations more responsive, but the human element remains irreplaceable. 'Our pilots make it look easy, but it's far from easy,' Basham noted. The complexity of a mission like this one extends beyond the cockpit. Hundreds of personnel on the ground worldwide are involved in mission planning, logistics, and maintenance. From simulator operators and intelligence analysts to aircraft technicians and mission briefers, a globe-spanning support infrastructure undergirds every moment in the air. What will replace the B-2 Spirit bombers Though the B-2 Spirit remains an elite symbol of US airpower, its era is winding down. The US Air Force plans to replace the B-2 and B-1 fleets with at least 100 B-21 Raiders over the coming decades. Still, with a per-hour operating cost of $65,000, the B-2 continues to deliver what other platforms cannot — deep-penetration stealth capability over great distances. The 37-hour Iran mission demonstrated the extraordinary resilience of its pilots. As Deaile reflected from his own record-setting flight decades ago: 'We just knew that if the president made the call, we were going to fly.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
