AI Can Write Code—But Can It Write Code That Scales?
Christopher Stauffer is CEO of STAUFFER, a digital agency that bridges strategy, engineering and design to solve complex business problems.
It's never been easier to write code. Tools like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot can generate boilerplate code, suggest test scaffolding and really help get your early-stage ideas going. These tools are fast, smart and constantly improving. But I keep coming back to something I've said often to clients and colleagues: Writing code isn't hard anymore. Writing code that scales? That's still the hard part.
I don't say that as a warning. I say it as a reminder because we're entering a time when the differentiator in software isn't the one who can build something fast. It's who can build something that still works when your business grows, your customer behavior shifts or your platform expands.
We've Solved For Speed—Now What?
AI has dramatically reduced the time it takes to get from idea to prototype. That's a real gain. But with that gain comes a new risk: the illusion of completeness. Something that looks finished might just be the beginning. Something that functions in isolation might collapse the moment it's connected to real systems and real users.
Speed is great—if you know where you're going. But if you don't, you just get lost faster.
That's why I tell people to use AI the same way they use any other tool: to extend your reach, not to replace your judgment. Use it for things like boilerplate code, rapid iteration, documentation support and even experimentation. But always think about the next step: What happens when this scales? What assumptions are we baking in right now that we'll regret later?
What Scaling Actually Means
When we talk about scaling, people often imagine it's about handling more users or more data—and it is, partially. But scalability also means flexibility. It means being able to add new features without rewriting your foundation. It means avoiding the kind of brittle design that locks you into early decisions and makes future updates painful or expensive.
AI doesn't think about that for you. It doesn't know your roadmap, budget, integration points or compliance requirements. That's still your job. And if you don't ask the right questions up front, no amount of AI speed will save you from backtracking later.
The Leadership Blind Spot
I think one of the biggest shifts AI brings is this: It makes it easier for anyone—at any skill level—to generate something that looks like a finished product. That's exciting. But it's also risky, especially for non-technical stakeholders.
If you're a CMO or COO evaluating a new internal tool, it might look clean and responsive and 'done.' But how is it built? What happens if the user base triples? What breaks when you expand it to new markets or channels?
You don't need to read code to ask those questions. You just need to know they're important. And you need a team that values long-term thinking as much as short-term wins.
What Still Matters
AI is powerful, but it doesn't have instincts. It doesn't know what tradeoffs are worth making. It can't anticipate every ramification of a quick fix or a clever workaround. That's where experienced engineers and thoughtful leaders come in.
I've worked on projects where everything worked perfectly—until it didn't. Not because the code was bad, but because the system wasn't built to adapt. And I've seen the opposite: teams that slowed down to think ahead, make smart architectural choices and build something that could grow without constant rework.
Those are the teams that win. Not because they used AI or didn't, but because they knew what they were building toward.
The role of a good technologist is changing. It's not about memorizing syntax or writing thousands of lines of code by hand. AI can help with that. The real role—the one that can't be automated—is knowing what to build, why and how it needs to evolve over time.
So, yes, AI can write code. And that's a good thing. But if you're thinking about the future of your business, platform or product—don't just ask if it works. Ask if it lasts. That's where the real value still lives.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Your Work Culture Deserves Tender Loving Care
. Pixabay Culture, it's been said, is how employees' hearts and stomachs feel about Monday morning on Sunday night. If you're a leader in your workplace, organizational culture is arguably the only sustainable competitive advantage that's completely within your control. Is that a big deal? As Peter Drucker famously said, 'Culture eats strategy for breakfast.' Organizational psychologist Laura Hamill has invested her career in studying culture. She was director of People Research at Microsoft and co-founded Limeade, an employee experience software company. Dr. Hamill brings both scientific rigor and practical insight to the topic of culture. Her book is The Power of Culture: Bringing Values to Life at Work . Hamill talks about what she calls the concept of cultural betrayal. 'When a company's aspirational culture differs significantly from the reality that people experience, leaders and organizations quickly lose credibility,' she says. 'People are acutely aware when leaders aren't walking the talk, and a sense of cultural betrayal can take root. Employees understandably feel resentful when what they were 'sold' about an organization is not what they receive—and this can have a significant impact on employees, especially in mission-driven companies.' Hamill says the impact of perceived cultural betrayal can run deep, generating negative feelings about the company, withdrawal behaviors (such as not participating in company meetings and events), and increased employee attrition. 'By contrast,' she says, 'when the aspirational culture is clearly articulated and consistent with what employees experience, intentional culture is alive and well. Unfortunately, many organizations tend to stop their culture work after they have posted their values on their website, not realizing that they are only at the beginning of the journey.' Laura Hamill . She also talks about power and culture. 'The value placed on power within an organization influences the extent to which power shapes its culture,' she says. 'Shared power and its distribution among leaders, managers, and employees also play a significant role in reinforcing specific aspects of culture.' Hamill says leaders are crucial in shaping organizational culture, serving as role models and culture architects. 'They must be aware of their power and intentional about their actions and communications,' she says. 'However, leaders often lack awareness of their power and how their actions, even small ones, can be misinterpreted as cues about what's valued in the organization. As 'culture megaphones,' leaders' explicit and implicit messages significantly impact the organization's values and priorities. So, to understand culture, you must also understand power.' Hamill uses the term 'intentional culture' to emphasize the importance of deliberate focus on the mindsets and behaviors that produce desired outcomes. 'Most organizations are not intentional about their culture and don't work to have an explicit connection between what they are trying to achieve and the culture they have,' she says. 'If you aren't intentional about your culture, it's unlikely that it's working to your advantage.' 'Toxic culture' seems to be a popular term these days. Is that just a new term for an old problem, or are there actually more cultures that are problematic? 'I think toxic cultures have always been around, but maybe we have more awareness about them and—thank goodness—less tolerance for them now,' Hamill says. 'Also, I think now we are articulating and sharing the impact toxic culture is having on people and organizations.' What are the tell-tale signs that an organization's culture has become toxic? There are several key indicators to watch for, Hamill says. 'One of the most obvious signs is a high turnover rate, particularly among those who have the ability to find employment elsewhere. They are often the first to leave, seeking better opportunities and a more positive work environment. However, even before employees make the decision to depart, there are early warning signs that can signal a toxic culture. You may notice withdrawal behaviors, such as a decline in participation and engagement. Employees may start to skip company meetings or events, finding reasons to avoid participating. When they do attend, they may be hesitant to speak up, ask questions, or contribute to discussions. This silence can be a red flag, suggesting that employees feel uncomfortable or unheard.' . . Hamill says another concerning indicator is a growing sense of apathy among the workforce. 'When employees lose enthusiasm for their work and seem to be merely going through the motions, it can be a sign that they have become disengaged and disconnected from the company,' she says. 'This apathy can be contagious, spreading throughout the organization and eroding morale. I look for signs in the language like using 'they' instead of 'we' when talking about the company and saying things like 'That's beyond my pay grade' or 'Not on my job description.' While these signs can be disheartening to witness, recognizing them early is crucial for addressing the underlying issues and taking steps to improve the workplace culture.' For maximum positive impact, how should an organization's culture be aligned with its operational strategy? 'Explicitly,' Hamill says. 'Effective leaders recognize the critical link between culture and business strategy. They understand that a strong, positive culture can be a powerful driver of organizational success, while a dysfunctional culture can hinder progress and performance. By aligning cultural work with the overall business strategy, leaders can ensure that the changes they implement support the company's mission, values, and goals.' Hamill says this strategic alignment helps create a culture that not only engages and empowers employees but also contributes to the organization's competitive advantage and long-term success.
Washington Post
26 minutes ago
- Washington Post
What's in the latest version of Trump's big bill now before the Senate
WASHINGTON — At some 940-pages, the legislation is a sprawling collection of tax breaks , spending cuts and other Republican priorities, including new money for national defense and deportations . Now it's up to Congress to decide whether President Donald Trump's signature's domestic policy package will become law.
Bloomberg
28 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Meta Taps Four OpenAI Researchers for Superintelligence Team
Meta Platforms Inc. has hired four notable artificial intelligence researchers from OpenAI, ramping up a hiring spree for its Superintelligence group. The company on Friday signed on Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi, Shengjia Zhao and Hongyu Ren, according to people with knowledge of the matter, who declined to be named discussing unannounced hires. They join several other AI industry leaders, including Daniel Gross and Nat Friedman, heading to Alexandr Wang's new team at the social networking giant.
