'Judge's consent needed for transfer'
The Supreme Court on Tuesday examined the procedure for transferring judges in India, noting that unlike the neighboring country, Pakistan's Constitution requires a high court judge's consent before they can be transferred to another high court.
A five-member constitutional bench (CB) led by Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar resumed hearing multiple petitions challenging the transfer of three judges from provincial high courts to the Islamabad High Court (IHC), as well as the subsequent change in the IHC judges' seniority list.
During the proceedings, Hamid Khan, representing the Lahore High Court Bar, continued his arguments, stating that several legal aspects of judges' transfers from high courts need thorough consideration.
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar remarked that in India, judges' consent is not required for transfers, and such decisions are made in consultation with the chief justice of the high court of that state. "In our system, however, obtaining a judge's consent for transfer is a constitutional requirement," he noted.
Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan observed that India follows a unified cadre system for high court judges, while Pakistan does not have a similar system for seniority. Justice Shakeel Ahmed added that in India, the seniority list for high court judges is uniform.
Hamid Khan argued that in India, consultation with the chief justice is mandatory prior to any transfer. He said consent is essential when transferring judges and that, under Section 3 of the Islamabad High Court Act, consultation is required before a transfer or new appointment.
"The selection of judges for transfer must be based on merit and that the executive branch should not hold the authority to nominate judges for transfer. This power should rest solely with the chief justice," he asserted.
Hamid Khan pointed out that instead of transferring judges to the IHC, new appointments are often made. "In a recent case, the IHC acting chief justice was consulted regarding the transfer of a judge from Balochistan, but the advice for transfers was not approved by the Cabinet," he added.
Idrees Ashraf Advocate, representing PTI founder Imran Khan also presented his arguments. He stated that the transfer notification did not mention the tenure of the transferred judges and claimed that such transfers could lead to discrimination among judges within the same high court.
Justice Mazhar asked the counsel if Article 25, which ensures equality before the law, should be considered in the process of judges' transfers. He also inquired whether the counsel would be satisfied if the transfer tenure was fixed at two years, noting that the core issue remains the matter of seniority.
The court later adjourned the hearing until 9:30 am today (Wednesday).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Election Commission faces troll post-reserved seats verdict
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Saturday rejected what it called "baseless propaganda" being circulated in certain media circles following the Supreme Court's constitutional bench's decision on reserved seats. The criticism arose after the Supreme Court's constitutional bench dismissed the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI)-turned Sunni Ittehad Council's (SIC) review petition regarding the allocation of reserved seats. The decision allowed the ruling coalition, led by the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), to emerge as the single largest party and to consolidate a two-thirds majority in the National Assembly. Amid shifting political dynamics, the ECP reiterated its constitutional role and defended the legality of its decisions, saying the claims were contrary to facts and intended to mislead the public. In a statement, a spokesperson for the ECP said that some circles in the media were engaged in baseless propaganda against the Commission following the recent decision of the top court. The spokesperson said that the Commission declares this propaganda to be contrary to facts and based on falsehoods. The statement said that such elements were unjustifiably targeting the commission with criticism. It added that historical facts and numerous decisions of the superior judiciary provide irrefutable evidence that the Commission has always performed its duties in light of the Constitution and law. "The Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the position of the Election Commission," it read. For example, in the Senate elections, the spokesperson said, the commission's stance regarding secret ballot and show of hands procedures, which was fully in accordance with Article 226 of the Constitution, was upheld by a Supreme Court bench headed by the then ex-CJP Justice Gulzar Ahmed. In the case of the disqualification election in Daska, the official added, the Commission's decision was not only declared valid by the Supreme Court bench, led by then Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial but also recognized as a constitutional action. The Supreme Court bench headed by then Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa had also endorsed the legal interpretation of the Commission concerning PTI's intra-party elections, the statement maintained. Furthermore, it said, in the case of the delisting of the All Pakistan Muslim League (APML), when the Commission delisted APML for failing to conduct intra-party elections, and this decision was challenged by APML in the Supreme Court, the Court upheld the Commission's decision. Following this, the spokesperson said, the Commission delisted several other parties that failed to comply with the law, keeping the Supreme Court's decision in mind. The Supreme Court also accepted the Commission's appeal regarding Punjab Election Tribunals, rejecting the Lahore High Court's decision and upholding the Commission's stance. Similarly, it was maintained, in the recent case concerning reserved seats of the Sunni Ittehad Council, first the Peshawar High Court and now the SC constitutional bench have upheld the Commission's position as constitutional and legal.
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Noisy protest in Punjab PA budget session: Speaker bans entry of 26 opposition MPAs into house
LAHORE: The Punjab Assembly session began after a delay of three hours and 47 minutes under the chairmanship of Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan. No opposition members were present at the start of the session. A resolution was presented condemning the tragic incident at the Swat River, with calls for the resignation of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister. The Assembly also held Fateha and offered prayers for the victims, seeking forgiveness and elevation of their ranks. Speaker Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan ordered, stating that the House would not be allowed to be held hostage. While protest is a constitutional right, he stressed that it must adhere to the sanctity and rules of the Assembly. He condemned the recent budget session incidents involving vandalism, slogan-chanting, document tearing, and microphone destruction as unacceptable. Under Rules 210 and 223, action will be taken against members involved in unparliamentary and violent behavior. The Speaker warned that any member disrupting order would face consequences. Freedom of expression in the Assembly is conditional, bound by constitutional Article 19 and defined rules. Expressing regret, the Speaker noted that while the opposition was given ample freedom, it misused tolerance. Financial losses, estimated at Rs. 3 million, will be recovered from the responsible members. A violent protester threw the budget book at the Finance Minister, prompting the Speaker to highlight that countries like France and New Zealand also take strict action against such behavior. The dignity of the Assembly is paramount, and the Speaker announced firm measures against any future unconstitutional acts. The ruling applies equally to all members, regardless of political affiliation. Freedom of expression does not override other fundamental rights. Punjab PA budget session turns chaotic as treasury, opposition members trade barbs Referring to the Faizabad sit-in case and other judicial precedents, the Speaker stated that illegal protests are intolerable. No member can infringe upon another's right to speak, and maintaining order is essential. Upholding laws is the foundation of democracy, and turning the Assembly into a battleground betrays public trust. Speaker Malik Muhammad Khan stated that he has always strived to run the House in accordance with the Constitution and traditions. Unfortunately, opposition members violated his rulings, forcing him to take strict action. He imposed a ban on 26 opposition members from entering the Assembly. To ensure the democratic functioning of the House, all constitutional and legal measures will be taken. The opposition had torn copies of the agenda and chanted inappropriate slogans in the previous session. Among the suspended members under Rule 226 are Malik Fahad Masood, Syed Riffat Masood, Karimullah Khan, Zulfiqar Ali, Ahmad Mujtaba Chaudhry, Khayal Castro, Shahbaz Ahmad, Imtiaz Sheikh, Ijaz Shafi Muawang Zeb, Shoaib Amin, and others. The Speaker asserted that neither government members nor past precedents, such as those of Pervez Elahi, would dictate his actions. As a democratic leader, he follows democratic traditions. He warned that if protests occur in the Assembly, the armed sergeant would be summoned. Referencing past struggles, he noted that while leaders have faced imprisonment or even execution, such hardships do not justify disrupting the Assembly. Provincial Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Mujtaba Shujaur Rehman, while addressing the assembly, stated that this house has witnessed two tenures of a defensive government and two of a defensive opposition, but never an opposition like this. He remarked that the Speaker made sincere efforts to guide opposition members, but all attempts proved futile. Despite the chaos, the Chief Minister reaffirmed her commitment to Punjab's development in line with her vision. The pace of progress set by the Chief Minister indicates that work is now being done in the province. Rehman emphasized that if Nawaz Sharif's nine-year tenure is excluded, no major projects can be seen in Pakistan. During Nawaz Sharif's era, motorways were built, nuclear tests were conducted, and load-shedding was eliminated. Today, Nawaz Sharif's daughter serves as Punjab's Chief Minister, and his brother is Pakistan's Prime Minister, both serving the nation. He criticized the opposition leader for promising to elevate the dignity of the green passport but instead diminishing its value. Responding to allegations of Form 47, Rehman questioned how the 2018 elections were stolen, while the 2024 elections were orchestrated by remnants of General Faiz. He welcomed yesterday's Supreme Court decision and questioned how reserved seats could be allocated to a party that did not even contest elections. He praised the current Speaker for ending the negative traditions of Pervez Elahi and Sibtain Khan, adding that opposition members in standing committees were provided vehicles and other facilities. Rehman stated that even opposition members have mothers and sisters at home, but they crossed all limits. Government member Ahsan Raza remarked that the ruckus during the Chief Minister's speech was unprecedented, adding that there is a limit to tolerance. He argued that opposition members involved in misconduct should not just be suspended but disqualified, calling the Speaker's decision correct and stating that the opposition is unfit to sit in the assembly. Punjab Information Minister Azma Bokhari, addressing the assembly, highlighted the tragic incident in Swat where people called for rescue for two hours but received no help. She noted that tourists from across Pakistan visit the Swat River, yet no safety measures are in place. She condemned the opposition leader for refusing to denounce the incident or question Ali Amin Gandapur. Bokhari praised local youth Muhammad Hilal for his rescue efforts, noting that while rescue teams were present, they lacked resources. The Tiger Force was deployed, but locals protested when rescuers admitted they could not swim. She demanded accountability for the deaths of 10 innocent people, calling it a matter of humanity, not politics. She criticized the opposition leader for ignoring the province's progress, stating there is no benefit in engaging with him. She accused the opposition of corruption, referencing those who embezzled 190 million pounds in Adiala Jail, warning that disrespect will be met with disrespect. She condemned the opposition's vulgar language against the Prime Minister and Punjab Chief Minister, stating that she had to resort to unparliamentary slogans to make them understand. Respect, she said, must come from both sides. The Speaker, while discussing the Swat River tragedy, noted that those trapped in the river could not be rescued for 150 minutes. He expressed confusion over reports that the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister claimed he would have gone with a tembo (inflatable tube). PPP Parliamentary Leader Syed Ali Haider Gilani supported the Speaker's ruling, hoping it would restore order in the house. He noted the opposition's absence, suggesting they were ashamed to attend. He pointed out that the Chief Minister repeatedly mentioned South Punjab, indicating its priority in development plans. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Dissolve CDA, transfer powers to MCI, IHC tells govt
ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Saturday directed federal government to dissolve Capital Development Authority (CDA) and transfer all of its assets, powers and duties to Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad (MCI). The High Court also declared the CDA's move to impose right-of-way charges in return for providing direct access to petrol pumps and CNG stations from major highways as illegal. Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani issued a written judgment. CDA, MCI directed to address issues facing street vendors/stallholders The court declared the CDA's SRO on right-of-way and access charges null and void and said that the federal government should initiate and complete the process of dissolving CDA. All powers and assets should be transferred to MCI. The written decision states that all the steps of the CDA under the SRO are declared illegal, if the CDA has received any money from anyone under the SRO, it should be returned. The Islamabad High Court said that the CDA Ordinance was enacted for the development works, the practical usefulness of the CDA Ordinance has been lost with the new laws and governance. The court said that it should be ensured that after the transfer of powers, the Islamabad administration is transparent and accountable, the protection of the rights of the citizens of Islamabad should be ensured under the law, and all administrative, regulatory and municipal framework of Islamabad works under the Local Government Act. The written decision states that the Islamabad Local Government Act is a special law for governance through elected representatives. According to the law, taxes cannot be imposed without the approval of the local government. The CDA has no legal authority to impose taxes. It should be noted that the CDA had imposed a right of access tax on petrol pumps and CNG stations. In addition, a direct access tax was imposed on housing societies from the main highway.
