Pottsville School Board adopts 2025-26 district budget with no tax hike
Property owners in the Pottsville Area School District will avoid a tax increase this upcoming budget year since the school board has approved a 2025-26 spending plan with no millage increase.
The board voted 9-0 during its meeting last week to approve the budget and keep the millage rate at 45.4025. The budget balances expenses and revenue at $51,842,309.
District officials have spoken about the dire fiscal situation the district was in as recently as 2019, when the Pennsylvania Auditor General's office said that Pottsville was at risk of being placed on financial watch by the state.
By contrast, the 2025-26 budget avoids a tax hike while adding important personnel, making much-needed improvements to buildings and infrastructure, increasing programming for students, and maintaining reserves despite rising expenses, officials said.
The approved millage rate means that a property assessed at the district's median rate of $27,030 next year will pay $1,227 in taxes.
Pottsville has now not raised taxes 12 of the last 19 years.
The assessed value of real estate within the district decreased by $813,770 to $295,279,815 since last year. Though there were net in assessed values in Norwegian Township, Palo Alto and Port Carbon totaling $712,045, there was a decrease in assessed values in the city of Pottsville of $1,525,815.
New staff approved for next year includes four additional teachers in the elementary school to continue to lower class sizes and a behavior interventionist to provide more support for special education students. Also added was a library media specialist for the middle and high schools and an additional physical education teacher at the high school.
The upcoming school year will also include new math curriculum in K-6th grades.
The high school will be receiving significant funding from the district's Crimson Tide Foundation to purchase approximately $100,000 in new technology including live-streaming equipment for the middle school, upgraded computers for the PAHS Publications program and resources for the high school's drone certification program.
Dr. Sarah Yoder, superintendent, said that the largest financial challenges in drawing up the new budget were increased costs, including those for facilities and employee healthcare. The district's restructuring of its healthcare plan, though, will provide savings long-term, she said. Improving and maintaining the facilities based on the district's five-year facilities plan will remain the biggest difficulty based on needs to upgrade aging schools and equipment, she said.
Grants that the district secured were important additions to the district's revenue, Yoder said.
The district obtained an Emergency Connectivity Fund grant of nearly $1 million that enabled it to buy new technology beginning last school year and save money this upcoming year. A PennDOT grant received by the district increased the state Department of Education funding Pottsville received for transportation reimbursement and increased the number of students who have access to school bus transportation. The Bipartisan Safer Communities Act state grant funds for 2024-2025 and 2025-2026 totaling almost $1 will continue to support the district in terms of staffing, professional development, dual enrollment, health and wellness and more.
By improving its credit score three levels in recent years the district will save money when it someday has to borrow funds since it will get a significantly lower interest rate, Yoder said.
School board president Linda Wytovich agreed that the district must continue to focus on its aging buildings and athletic facilities, though the cost of the work needed will be millions of dollars.
The top priorities are the high school, which was built in 1933, and Veterans Memorial Stadium, which opened a year earlier. The middle school and Martz Hall arena opened in 1970, and the elementary center in 1981.
'Each year we work towards balancing the needs of the students, staff, and facilities while keeping our taxpayers in mind as we build our annual budget and plans for the future,' Wytovich said.
'To date, we are moving in the right direction. I'm proud of the work the board and district's administrative staff has accomplished. I'm also thankful for the community's support and patience as we continue to build a better district.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thanks, Supreme Court! It's now my right to prevent my kid from learning about Trump.
I have a deeply held religious conviction that, by divine precept, lying, bullying and paying $130,000 in hush money to an adult film star are all immoral acts. So it is with great thanks to the U.S. Supreme Court and its recent ruling allowing Maryland parents to opt their children out of any lessons that involve LGBTQ+ material that I announce the following: Attempts to teach my children anything about Donald Trump, including the unfortunate fact that he is president of the United States, place an unconstitutional burden on my First Amendment right to freely exercise my religion. In its June 27 ruling, the high court cited Wisconsin v. Yoder and noted, 'The Court recognized that parents have a right 'to direct the religious upbringing of their children' and that this right can be infringed by laws that pose 'a very real threat of undermining' the religious beliefs and practices that parents wish to instill in their children.' Well, I wish to instill in my children the belief that suggesting some Americans are 'radical left thugs that live like vermin' and describing a female vice president of the United States as 'mentally impaired' and 'a weak and foolish woman' are bad things unworthy of anyone, much less a commander in chief. So any attempt to teach my children that Trump exists and is president might suggest such behavior is acceptable, and that would infringe on my right to raise my children under the moral tenets of my faith. (My faith, in this case, has a relatively simple core belief that being a complete jerk virtually all the time is bad.) Opinion: I can't wait to get a Trump Mobile gold phone to pay respect to my MAGA king As Justice Samuel Alito wrote in his opinion regarding the use of LGBTQ+ books in schools, some 'Americans wish to present a different moral message to their children. And their ability to present that message is undermined when the exact opposite message is positively reinforced in the public school classroom at a very young age.' Exactly. I wish to present a moral message to my children that when a man is found liable for sexual abuse and has been heard saying things like 'I moved on her like a bitch' and 'she's now got the big phony tits and everything' and 'Grab 'em by the pussy,' that man is deemed loathsome by civil society and not voted into the office of the presidency. That wish is undermined by any book or teacher exposing my student to the fact that Trump is president. Alito cited several books that were at issue in Maryland schools, including one called 'Love Violet,' which 'follows a young girl named Violet who has a crush on her female classmate, Mira. Mira makes Violet's 'heart skip' and 'thunde[r] like a hundred galloping horses.' Although Violet is initially too afraid to interact with Mira, the two end up exchanging gifts on Valentine's Day. Afterwards, the two girls are seen holding hands and 'galloping over snowy drifts to see what they might find. Together.'' While my religion would define such a story as 'sweet' and 'loving,' Alito and his fellow conservatives on the Supreme Court find it 'hostile' to parents' religious beliefs. Tell us: Is America's billionaire boom good for government, democracy? | Opinion Forum As Alito wrote, 'Like many books targeted at young children, the books are unmistakably normative. They are clearly designed to present certain values and beliefs as things to be celebrated and certain contrary values and beliefs as things to be rejected.' OK. By that same logic, any class discussion or history lesson involving Trump and his status as president has the potential to teach my children that it's normal to have a president who lies incessantly, demeans transgender people and routinely demonizes migrants. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Any in-class acknowledgement of Trump as president would, in Alito's words, be "clearly designed to present certain values and beliefs as things to be celebrated and certain contrary values and beliefs as things to be rejected.' I simply will not stand idly by while a taxpayer-funded school indoctrinates my children into believing a fundamentally dishonest and unkind person like Trump has the moral character to be president of the United States. My faith has led me to teach them otherwise, and any suggestion that Trump's behavior is acceptable would undermine that faith. Opinion: As a teacher, Supreme Court siding with parents' religious freedom concerns me Elly Brinkley, a staff attorney for U.S. Free Expression Programs at the free-speech advocacy group PEN America, said in a statement following the Supreme Court ruling in the Maryland case: 'The decision will allow any parents to object to any subject, with the potential to sow chaos in schools, and impact students, parents, educators, authors, and publishers.' Amen to that. I object to the subject of Donald Trump. Let the chaos ensue. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court just saved kids from reading about Trump | Opinion
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Premier to give Manitoba wildfire update Monday
Provincial officials will give an update on the state of Manitoba wildfires early this afternoon. Premier Wab Kinew and Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Lisa Naylor are holding a news conference at 12:45 p.m. CT about wildfires burning across Manitoba. CBC News will livestream the update here. Kristin Hayward, assistant deputy minister of the Conservation Officer Service and the Manitoba Wildfire Service, and Christine Stevens, assistant deputy minister of the Manitoba Emergency Management Organization, will join the minister and premier for the update at the Manitoba Legislature. Manitoba declared a 30-day state of emergency May 28 under the Emergency Measures Act, as out-of-control wildfires threatening communities across the province spurred 22,000 people to leave their homes. Wildfires have burned an estimated 902,000 hectares of the province so far. Evacuees from some rural and remote regions have begun to return to their communities as the situation has improved around some of the fires burning in the province. All evacuees staying in Winnipeg had been moved into hotels as of early last week, after the initial crush of evacuees created a shortage of spaces. Winnipeg Mayor Scott Gillingham told CBC News late last week that two of four arenas and soccer complexes that have been devoted to helping and housing evacuees are in the process of being decommissioned as shelters, since they're no longer needed. Recent rain and firefighting efforts have helped quell concerns in some parts of the province, but not all. Some of the 5,100 Flin Flon residents expecting to be allowed to head home this Wednesday are nervous about seeing the extent of damage to the northern community. A fire in the area was about 370,780 hectares in size as of the provincial fire bulletin released on Friday. Tataskweyak Cree Nation residents were given the green light to return about a week ago, only for chief and council of the northern community to reverse course hours later due to concerning levels of aluminum found in local water sources. Meanwhile, business owners, cottagers and residents in the south of Nopiming Provincial Park in eastern Manitoba got the go-ahead to return midweek last week. The Manitoba Lodges and Outfitters Association is calling on the province to provide owners with financial supports to help them shoulder losses due to a season cut short by the fires. There have been at least 124 fires this spring alone. The average for the past two decades is 118 for the time of year, Kristin Hayward, assistant deputy minister of the Conservation Officer Service and the Manitoba Wildfire Service, said last week. Almost 300 firefighters from out of province — including from Newfoundland and Labrador, Parks Canada and U.S. federal and state agencies — were still in Manitoba as of Friday to help with ongoing efforts. Find the latest wildfire information: Are you an evacuee who needs assistance? Contact Manitoba 211 by calling 211 from anywhere in Manitoba or email 211mb@
Yahoo
18-06-2025
- Yahoo
'We have to dismantle a 40-year-old supply chain': Toy company appeals to the Supreme Court over Trump's tariffs
Two toy companies are asking the Supreme Court to hear their tariff lawsuit before lower courts do. Two courts have ruled the tariffs illegal in separate cases on different grounds. The CEO of a plaintiff company says his company is facing an emergency and "time is of the essence." President Donald Trump's tariffs may face their final fate at the Supreme Court soon. Two Illinois-based educational toy companies filed an emergency request Tuesday asking the Supreme Court to take up their case as soon as possible, rather than letting it continue to play out in lower courts since "it will inevitably fall to this Court to resolve it definitively." Toy companies Learning Resources and hand2mind filed an initial suit on April 22, challenging Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs without going through Congress. "For months, we've had dozens of people working full-time or part-time on addressing all aspects of the tariffs — you can hardly imagine anything more disruptive," Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, told Business Insider. "This is an emergency, and so time is of the essence." The IEEPA tariffs have thus far been ruled unlawful by both the US District Court in the District of Columbia and the Court of International Trade on different grounds in separate lawsuits, including Woldenberg's case filed in Washington, DC. But in both instances, the Court of Appeals has stayed the injunction on the tariffs. "In light of the tariffs' massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims, challenges to the IEEPA tariffs cannot await the normal appellate process," wrote Pratik A. Shah, the lawyer for the case, in the petition to the Supreme Court. Learning Resources and hand2mind are not the only businesses to have sued over Trump's tariffs. At least two similar lawsuits, one from a small women-owned business in Florida and the other from five owner-run businesses across various states, are facing similar court proceedings. Neither has thus far appealed to the Supreme Court, as their cases are also stayed by federal appeals courts. The lawsuits share the common argument that Trump has overstepped his authority by imposing tariffs under IEEPA, a law they said does not give the president unilateral power to impose trade duties. The toy companies are specifically suing over Trump's 10% baseline tariff on most imports and an additional 20% tariff on Chinese goods, which the president said were responses to national security concerns and drug trafficking. "There are no rules, we don't know what our costs are, and we are generally given 36 hours of advance notice to change how we operate our business," Woldenberg said. "We have to dismantle a 40-year-old supply chain. There are tremendous amounts of costs associated with that which are not recoverable in any way, shape, or form." It is uncommon for the Supreme Court to intervene before a lower court rules, and the Court's next term starts in October. Data show businesses and consumers are feeling the impacts of the tariffs. In the month of May, retail and food services sales faced a larger drop than economists had expected, down 0.9% compared to April. The National Association of Home Builders Housing Market Index also shows worse sentiment for June than Bloomberg experts had expected, at just 32 points. A score above 50 is generally considered a favorable outlook on home sales. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comments. Read the original article on Business Insider
