logo
Coalition says it will allow gas producers to access $4bn net zero fund for critical minerals

Coalition says it will allow gas producers to access $4bn net zero fund for critical minerals

The Guardian02-04-2025
The Coalition has told a gas industry conference in Sydney it would give gas the same status as a critical mineral, to allow the industry to access a $4bn export finance fund set up to support the transition to net zero.
Queensland senator Susan McDonald told the conference on Wednesday morning the policy would ensure that gas – which is methane, a fossil fuel – 'remains a critical part of the Australian economy for decades'.
'I can announce today that to boost investment, a Coalition government will elevate gas to the same status as a critical mineral,' she said.
'This will ensure gas projects are able to apply for funding from the $4bn critical minerals facility.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
'This will ensure gas projects, so critical to our national and international security, are able to access specialised teams within the department of resources to support their projects.'
The facility is a fund managed by Export Finance Australia. It was established to support projects that are in line with the goals of the federal government's critical minerals strategy, which aims to boost the critical minerals sector as energy markets transition to clean energy.
The announcement follows Peter Dutton's budget reply last week, where the opposition leader vowed to establish an east coast gas reservation scheme to reduce domestic prices.
Dutton said he would require east coast gas exporters to add 10% to 20% to available gas supply for Australian homes and businesses, and that it could lead to wholesale gas prices falling from $14 to $10 a gigajoule before the end of the year. The Coalition had not yet explained how the policy would work, but promised to release modelling to back up the claims.
Samantha McCulloch, the chief executive of the peak industry body Australian Energy Producers, told the conference the announcement was 'further welcome news and further welcome recognition of the critical role of gas in our economy'.
Anti-gas group the Lock the Gate Alliance expressed alarm about 'the very large amounts of taxpayers' money being offered to the gas industry by the Coalition', noting Wednesday's announcement came on top of another promise in Dutton's budget reply, of $1bn for gas pipelines and storage facilities.
'This is a huge pot of public money being opened up during a cost of living crisis to big gas companies that are already making large profits, pay little to no royalties to the federal government, and absolutely don't need a taxpayers' leg up,' national coordinator Carmel Flint said.
Josh Runciman, from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, said because the vast majority of Australia's gas was exported, any benefits from the additional financial support could flow overseas.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'Government financial support often plays a key role in supporting emerging Australian industries. Australia's critical minerals industry, still in its infancy, is one such industry likely to require government support,' he said.
'Conversely, Australia's gas industry is well established, rather than emerging, with hundreds of billions invested in recent decades without government support.'
In a pre-recorded speech to the conference, the resources minister, Madeleine King, said the opposition leader's overall gas plan was 'not much of a plan' and 'reckless' in its lack of detail.
She noted that in the recent parliament, the opposition had voted against government legislation designed to bring gas prices down for Australian consumers, such as a temporary $12 a gigajoule price cap.
'There is a distinct lack of detail [in the Coalition's policy], and there is certainly nothing new in it, and nothing the government hasn't already done,' King said.
'All Peter Dutton's gas reservation scheme has to offer is a slogan.'
McCulloch was also critical of the gas reservation plan, telling the conference it 'risks undermining the case for investment in the long term secure gas supply that we need'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sheep farmer's ex-wife LOSES battle over £80MILLION ‘gift' he gave her for kids… after she divorced him & kept cash
Sheep farmer's ex-wife LOSES battle over £80MILLION ‘gift' he gave her for kids… after she divorced him & kept cash

Scottish Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Sheep farmer's ex-wife LOSES battle over £80MILLION ‘gift' he gave her for kids… after she divorced him & kept cash

The ruling has been upheld by the Supreme Court BAAH HUMBUG Sheep farmer's ex-wife LOSES battle over £80MILLION 'gift' he gave her for kids… after she divorced him & kept cash Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A SHEEP farmer's ex-wife has lost a five-year legal battle to keep half of a £80million sum he gave her as part of a tax avoidance scheme. Clive Standish, 72, transferred the multi-million pound gift to his former partner Anna in 2017, with the intention of eventually placing the money in an offshore trust for their children. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 5 Clive Standish will keep the majority of an £80million gift he gave his wife Credit: Central News 5 It was initially decided by the High Court that Anna should receive half of the funds Credit: Champion News Clive, a former chief financial officer at UBS, made the decision to move the funds over to his Australian wife to exploit her non-dom status and avoid a crippling 40% inheritance-tax rate. The former banker believed he would face a bill of about £32 million if he died with the money in his name. But the pair's 15 year marriage later hit the rocks and divorce proceedings began in 2020 with the assets still in her name. It was initially decided by the High Court in 2023 that Anna, 57, should receive half of the funds in the settlement. Read more News CHEEKY BURGERS Uber Eats kitchen cooking burgers set up in asylum hotel is SHUT DOWN But last year, the Court of Appeal ruled that her share should be reduced from half to £25million. The amount was judged to fairly represent her contribution to raising the children and looking after their home. And despite Anna's recent attempts to overturn the decision, the ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court yesterday. Five judges argued that the sum was not a marital asset because it had not been shared by the couple and Mr Standish had intended it for their children. The ruling said: 'Tax planning schemes to save tax, involving transfers of assets from one spouse to another, are commonplace. 'The problem for the wife is that there is nothing to show that, over time, the parties were treating the 2017 assets as shared between them. 'Rather, the transfer was in pursuance of a scheme to negate inheritance tax and it was for the benefit exclusively of the children. 'The parties' intention was that the £80 million should not be retained by the wife.' Fresh twist in Eamonn Holmes & Ruth Langsford's divorce as celeb pair battle over £3.6m home His wife never established two offshore trusts as he had expected, so Clive was judged to be the sole owner of those assets when divorce proceedings began. Lord Faulks, representing Anna, tried to argue that the money had become shared property after the initial transfer, adding that she had contributed by accepting the gift. Mr Standish moved to Australia in 1976 and married Anna in December 2005, before the pair moved to the UK five years later. The couple lived together at Moundsmere Manor, an 18-bedroom mansion near Preston Candover, Hampshire. Clive's laywer, Tim Bishop KC, explained that in June 2004 his client was worth £57.3 million, while Anna had 'no significant pre-marital wealth'. The marital assets at the time of the split amounted to £132million, almost all of which had come from Clive's initial fortune. Mr Bishop added: "The husband made the transfers in March 2017, but the wife failed to transfer the assets into trust by the time the marriage ran into problems in 2019 and then broke down finally in 2020". Delivering the Supreme Court ruling, Lord Burrows and Lord Stephens agreed with the Court of Appeal's verdict. 5 The pair lived together at Moundsmere Manor in Hampshire Credit: Champion News Service 5 Clive moved the funds over to his Australian wife to avoid inheritance-tax Credit: Champion News Service Ltd They said: "There was no matrimonialisation of the 2017 assets because the transfer was to save tax and it was for the benefit of the children not the wife. "The 2017 assets were not, therefore, being treated by the husband and wife for any period of time as an asset that was shared between them. "Transfers of capital assets with the intention of saving tax do not, without some further compelling evidence, establish that the parties are treating the capital asset as shared between them. "The 2017 assets comprise the husband's pre-marital assets and earnings that the husband made in the years 2004-2007, to which the wife contributed by being the home-maker and child carer during those years. "In relation to a scheme designed to save tax, under which one spouse transfers an asset to the other spouse, the parties' dealings with the asset do not normally show that the asset is being treated as shared between them. "Rather, the intention is simply to save tax."

African Democratic Congress: Nigeria's Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi form new  party to challenge Bola Tinubu
African Democratic Congress: Nigeria's Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi form new  party to challenge Bola Tinubu

BBC News

time5 hours ago

  • BBC News

African Democratic Congress: Nigeria's Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi form new party to challenge Bola Tinubu

Nigeria's two main opposition leaders have joined a new political party to challenge President BolaTinubu and his ruling party in the next Abubakar and Peter Obi have chosen the African Democratic Congress (ADC) as their new political home after breaking away from their respective parties - the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and the Labour Party (LP). This is one of the biggest shake-ups in Nigerian politics since the end of military rule in political heavyweights from Tinubu's All Progressives Congress (APC) party have also thrown their weight behind the new political movement. Why have they formed a coalition? The announcement of the ADC is the culmination of a series of talks between the leaders to put up a united front in the 2027 election, rather than splitting their vote. Tinubu won the 2023 election with just 37% of the vote after opposition supporters were divided between Abubakar who got 29%, and Obi with 25%.Obi had broken away from the PDP after the party chose Abubakar as its presidential candidate. At the unveiling of the ADC, interim chairman David Mark said it was an attempt to save the country's democracy and to stop Nigeria from becoming a one-party the PDP and LP are also battling internal crises which some believe were instigated by external Shehu Iliyasu said Abubakar and Obi are learning the lessons of the last election."Both Atiku [Abubakar] and Obi felt they came so close in 2023 and would have maybe won on a joint ticket so they want to amend their mistake by working together this time around," he told the BBC. Who are the main characters in the ADC? Tinubu's biggest challengers in the last elections, Atiku Abubakar and Peter Obi are the face of the there's a long way to go before candidates are officially announced, political commentators are predicting that Abubakar will have another shot at the presidency - it would be his fifth attempt - with former Anambra governor Obi as his vice-presidential political heavyweights in the coalition include former Senate President David Mark, who like Atiku is leaving the PDP, former Tinubu ally turned foe Nasir El-Rufai and powerful minister in the last dispensation Rotimi Amaechi. What are their chances in 2027? Analyst Ben Kenneth say he believes the coalition has a better chance of defeating Tinubu than last time."If you look at what Atiku and Obi got in the last election, it's clear to see that they would've won assuming they worked together, so it's a good thing they have realised they need each other,' he noted. However, another analyst Sani Hamisu feels Tinubu has a better chance now than in 2023."In Nigeria and Africa, when a leader is in office seeking a second term, he hardly loses, it is very rare and that's why I feel Tinubu has a better chance now than when he wasn't in office in 2019," he said. Is the ruling party worried? The ruling party says it is not bothered in the least by the coalition which it does not see as a real chairman Ali Bukar Dalori told BBC Hausa the coalition would have no impact on the APC."Nobody is talking about a coalition except in Abuja. Even in Abuja, they are in a hotel, and when they are defeated in elections, they will leave the country," he said. What are the main political parties saying? The country's biggest opposition party, the PDP had since ruled out joining the coalition, preferring to face the APC on its Labour Party also called on its supporters to remain focused and resolute behind the party, denying any plans to join a coalition. More BBC stories on Nigeria: Nigeria's major tax overhaul explainedWhat is behind the wave of killings in central Nigeria?Culture and colour come out in praise of a Nigerian king Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

4 Palestine Action members charged over RAF break-in
4 Palestine Action members charged over RAF break-in

The National

time5 hours ago

  • The National

4 Palestine Action members charged over RAF break-in

Members of Palestine Action have been charged by counter-terrorism police for causing £7 million worth of damage to military planes at RAF Brize Norton. It comes after MPs voted 385 to 26 last night to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation, despite widespread criticism of the move. READ MORE: MPs vote in favour of proscribing Palestine Action The four suspects, aged 22-29, are due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court later on Thursday. Counter Terrorism Policing South East said they had been charged with conspiracy to commit criminal damage, and conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the UK. A 41-year-old woman previously arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender was released on bail until 19 September, while another man was released without charge. In a statement released by the BBC, police said the Crown Prosecution service will argue in court that the alleged offences had a "terrorist connection". In the vote last night, the SNP and LibDems chose to abstain, whilst 275 Labour MPs and 87 Tory MPs voted in favour of the move. READ MORE: The 26 MPs who voted against proscribing Palestine Action Four Green MPs voted against the proscription, alongside six Independents and nine Labour MPs. The Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025 is now expected to be debated and voted on by the House of Lords on Thursday before it becomes law. If it passes, membership and/or support of the group could carry a jail sentence of up to 14 years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store