Australians are voting earlier than in previous elections. Some parties have taken advantage
So far, a record 2.6 million people have applied for a ballot paper via the post.
But far more have attended early voting centres across the country.
The figures point to change in voting patterns with Australians choosing to vote early in record numbers this election.
With just days to go, let's break down the numbers.
How many people have voted so far?
Pre-poll numbers show that more than 4.03 million people have already voted — a considerable jump since the 2022 election.
That's more than 22 per cent of enrolment.
At the same point in the 2022 campaign, 3.2 million voters had cast their ballots early, according to Australian Electoral Commission data.
The latest figures represent a 125 per cent increase on the previous campaign.
But why are more people voting early?
Political experts say it's not just about avoiding the long queues on May 3 but could be an emerging trend.
Professor of Australian Politics at the University of Sydney, Rodney Smith, said more people could be voting earlier to fit in with their work schedules and lifestyle.
"The greater availability of early voting centres, more knowledge among voters that they can vote early, and that it is often more convenient to do so," he said.
"[Early voting] is certainly about convenience but that is not necessarily a bad thing.
He said if early voting wasn't allowed, pre-poll voting would be "much more cumbersome".
But early voting is not new, and doesn't seem to be going anywhere, according to La Trobe University's Phoebe Hayman, whose research focuses on political participation.
"It's really escalated at this election, but it has been a trend that we've been seeing pop up in a number of elections now," she said.
Has early voting changed election campaigns?
Ms Hayman said political parties had changed their campaign trails to target early voters.
"[The early voting trend] is one that parties have been taking into account and adapting to," she said.
Ms Hayman said many parties had now moved to the "permanent campaign" model to target more voters.
"Parties now just need to start campaigning a lot earlier, and to release major policies and their big selling items pretty early on in the piece,"
she said.
Photo shows
Five people on a beach are shown from behind running into the water as the sun rises.
A coal industry-funded group campaigning against progressive candidates in the federal election has deleted two months of social media posts after being pulled up by the Australian Electoral Commission over unauthorised content.
But Professor Smith said while the major parties launched their campaigns earlier this time around, other parties have not yet caught on.
"[Other parties] needed to get their early voting centre teams organised for a 10 to 12-day period to target early voters," he said.
"Rather than just mobilising their forces on polling day …[parties] need to get more of their policies out earlier."
Ms Hayman said smaller parties, like the Greens, had focused on community-based campaigning this time around.
"We're also seeing with the independents and in campaigns … with The Greens, that ongoing shift to community-based campaigning and on-the-ground efforts, which start months, if not years, in advance of the election," Ms Hayman said.
Postal voting hits record
While many get in early, others have opted to vote via post for many reasons.
A record 2.6 million people have applied for a postal vote for the 2025 federal election so far, according to the AEC.
But that does not necessarily mean all those who have applied will vote via post — people may change their mind and vote on the day or during pre-poll.
More than 100,000 votes have also been cast with mobile voting teams, largely in regional areas.
Electoral Commissioner Jeff Pope said it was extraordinarily difficult to service some people who applied for postal voting at the last minute, depending on their circumstances.
"If you can vote in-person, that's what you should do,"
Mr Pope said.
Stay updated:
Catch the latest interviews and in-depth coverage on
"Postal vote applications have been open for a month now and we've been consistent in encouraging people to apply as early as possible if they need a postal vote.
"Clearly most people have listened to our messages, and we thank them for that.
"While we appreciate that for some people in-person voting isn't an option for their circumstances, Australia does have some of the best in-person voting options in the world with thousands of venues available," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
A $200 billion boost to the economy – but it may mean losing your job
A combination of artificial intelligence and better use of our personal information could deliver a $200 billion boost to the economy over the next decade, the Productivity Commission has found, while warning it may cost some Australians their jobs. As the nation's second-largest company slammed a proposal from the commission that would increase its annual tax bill, the agency urged Anthony Albanese to reject calls from within his government to impose binding regulation on AI, saying it could leave everyone worse off. In its third report before this month's economic roundtable, at which 23 hand-picked experts, business and union leaders will map out ways to lift the country's productivity growth rate, the commission said data and digital technologies were the modern engines of economic growth. Likening the possible gains from AI to the way steam engines helped begin the industrial revolution, the commission said the emerging technology could underpin a surge of productivity over coming years. Loading It said productivity by workers could grow by 4.3 per cent, which, based on the current size of the jobs market and working hours, could lift economic output by $116 billion over the next decade. Benefits from allowing businesses and individuals to access and share data that relates to them, such as making better spending decisions, could potentially add another $10 billion a year through higher productivity. Commissioner Stephen King said new technology had driven productivity growth since the 1960s, which had improved living standards threefold since. 'With the right policy approach, AI technology and innovations in data could help Australia get back on the path to growth,' he said.

The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
A $200 billion boost to the economy – but it may mean losing your job
A combination of artificial intelligence and better use of our personal information could deliver a $200 billion boost to the economy over the next decade, the Productivity Commission has found, while warning it may cost some Australians their jobs. As the nation's second-largest company slammed a proposal from the commission that would increase its annual tax bill, the agency urged Anthony Albanese to reject calls from within his government to impose binding regulation on AI, saying it could leave everyone worse off. In its third report before this month's economic roundtable, at which 23 hand-picked experts, business and union leaders will map out ways to lift the country's productivity growth rate, the commission said data and digital technologies were the modern engines of economic growth. Likening the possible gains from AI to the way steam engines helped begin the industrial revolution, the commission said the emerging technology could underpin a surge of productivity over coming years. Loading It said productivity by workers could grow by 4.3 per cent, which, based on the current size of the jobs market and working hours, could lift economic output by $116 billion over the next decade. Benefits from allowing businesses and individuals to access and share data that relates to them, such as making better spending decisions, could potentially add another $10 billion a year through higher productivity. Commissioner Stephen King said new technology had driven productivity growth since the 1960s, which had improved living standards threefold since. 'With the right policy approach, AI technology and innovations in data could help Australia get back on the path to growth,' he said.


Perth Now
5 hours ago
- Perth Now
Pauline Hanson's wild ceremony claims
One Nation senator Pauline Hanson believes teaching children to acknowledge country in school will condition people not to feel like they are part of Australia, and leave the nation defenceless in the face of war. Speaking on 10 News+, Senator Hanson said she wouldn't defend the country if she felt like the land belonged to one race of people. The One Nation leader defended her decision to reject Welcome to Country ceremonies in the Senate when she was questioned why her party's senators were present during ceremonies when they did not have to be there. Pauline Hanson has defended her decision to reject Welcome to Country ceremonies in an interview on 10 News+. Supplied / Channel 10 Credit: Channel 10 One Nation senators were called out by their Labor and Greens counterparts over 'childish stunts' and 'hurtful' behaviour when they turned their backs during proceedings. Senator Hanson said they had a right to be there and the new senators wanted to experience the opening of the Senate. 'But it's also to be a voice for the Australian people that have had a gut full of it and don't want to hear Welcome to Country anymore,' she said. 'It is showing leadership, that you don't have to go along with this. 'When our kids have been taught in school to put their hand on the ground and say, you know, acknowledge the land is Aboriginal, we're not making people feel part of this country. Senator Pauline Hanson said she would not defend Australia if she thought the land belonged to another race of people. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'And I'll ask the question, if we ever have war that touches our shores here and we've conditioned the people think this is not our land, it belongs to another race of people, how many Australians are going to get up and fight to defend it? 'I won't.' The Queensland senator hopes her legacy will be that people thought she did her best to stand up for a fair go for all Australians, without fear or favour, and promised to run again in three years time. 'I think that's important, people want that from their politicians,' she said. 'But I'm a conviction politician and I've had so much thrown at me – I've have been to prison, had everything bar the kitchen sink thrown at me. 'Guess what, I'm still standing, the problem is people have underestimated me.'