
Neighbors mixed on proposed Evanston tower that would rival suburbs' tallest buildings
The proposed residential tower would have the same number of floors as suburban Chicago's tallest building, Oakbrook Terrace Tower in DuPage County, though that building rises 418 feet, according to information from Shawn Ursini of the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat.
The proposed highrise, which aligns with Mayor Daniel Biss' goal to increase housing density in Evanston, is also notable becuse it includes dramatically fewer parking spaces than is typical for the suburbs. There would be 80 on-site spaces for 445 apartments. The developer suggested using an estimated 120 parking spots in nearby city-owned garages, but so far that remains only a suggestion.
Representatives from Chicago based co-developers Vermilion Development and Campbell Coyle shared with neighbors proposals of their 605 Davis Street high rise, at the northwest corner of Davis Street and Chicago Avenue, at a ward meeting on April 29. The developers anticipate the development, on two currently vacant lots, will also help the city's goal of raising property tax revenue for the land parcels by millions of dollars.
The proposed building's height would put it under the suburbs' second-tallest building, Two Pierce Plaza in Itasca, at 395 feet, but much taller than Evanston's existing tallest buildings: Orrington Plaza at 277 feet, Sherman Plaza at 276 feet, Optima Views at 265 feet and One Rotary Center at 237 feet tall, per information from the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat.
The community meeting, hosted by Councilmembers Clare Kelly (1st) and Jonathan Nieuwsma (4th), was attended by about 50 residents at the main branch of the Evanston Public Library. The majority of residents offered a mix of reasons as to why the project should not move forward, including parking troubles, traffic troubles and a potential 'wind tunnel' effect that could strengthen winds, making downtown harder for pedestrians to walk.
The project had some support at the meeting from Evanston's commercial partners. 'We should be welcoming this type of development. We should be working with them,' said Andy Vick, the executive director of the Downtown Evanston Merchants Organization.
Evanston resident Tina Paden said the development will not benefit most Evanstonians, particularly Black families.
'Let's be real, that this building is for Northwestern students,' she said. 'I live down the street from (housing developments) E2 and The Link. I do not see Black families with three or four children walking out of the building. They are Northwestern students. You are coming here for opportunity to make big, giant dollars from Northwestern students. You do not care about Evanston residents.'
As proposed by developers, the building's 445 residential units will mostly be studio, one-bedroom and two-bedroom units, according to Dickson. The development is proposed to have 20%, or 89, of them marketed as affordable units, which is 5% more than the city's inclusionary housing ordinance requires.
Plans call for the development to have three storefronts. Luay Aboona, principal at traffic consulting firm KLOA, Inc., said the development is not likely to increase traffic in a significant way in the immediate area of the development.
Kerry Dickson, managing director of Vermilion Development, said the developers hope to negotiate a lease with city-owned parking lots on Church Street and Davis Street for residents to park their vehicles there. The city could net an additional $172,000 in renting out parking spaces needed by the development's residents, he said, estimating that an additional 120 vehicles will need parking.
Dickson said the site at 605-609 Davis Street now houses two vacant lots and is in blighted condition.
The Davis Street development isn't the only high rise project in the works in Evanston. Last September, two developers proposed a 27-story apartment building also in the downtown area at the current Church Street Plaza. That development is anticipated to have 358 units, and is also asking the city for variances in its zoning code to have a lower number of parking spaces.
Property tax breaks
Jonathan Perman of Jasculca Terman Strategic Communications, a spokesperson hired to represent the development, said that because the 605 Davis Street development offers 20% of its units to be rented at an affordable rate, a state statute makes discounts available in the developer's property tax bill.
Called Affordable Illinois when it was signed into law by Gov. JB Pritzker in 2021, the state law makes housing developments in certain areas of Cook County eligible for a significant property tax break, in the form of lowered assessments, available for 30 years, as long as they also provide 20% of their housing units to be rented at affordable rates, among other requirements.
For the first 12 years after the development is complete, the building owner will pay 60% or less of the building's assessed property tax value. For the 18 years after that, they will pay 80% of the assessed value. After that time period is over, the property tax bill must be paid in its entirety.
At the meeting, Councilmember Kelly said the 30 years of property tax discounts would essentially be a forfeiture from the city to the developer.
Perman took a different emphasis, characterizing the property tax bill the developers will be paying, stating that after 12 years, the city of Evanston would be reaping an estimated $2.7 million instead of the $21,450 it is getting now for the undeveloped property.
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
15 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Student loan debt may be tougher to pay off and expand the wealth divide after passage of Trump's big bill
'I'm at an age when people are advancing in their careers, starting families, buying houses,' she said. '[The debt] takes a huge emotional and financial toll. I'm very pro-active, I create budgets. On every spreadsheet, I have to budget for this dark cloud.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up German Roman is one of the Advertisement Recent efforts by the Trump administration and Republican-led Congress to restrict access to federal student loans may further deepen these disparities. By limiting funds historically under-represented communities have relied on, students of color and women may be pushed toward private lending, or skip higher education altogether. As part of the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' signed by President Trump on July 4, federal loans for medical and law students will be capped at $200,000, below Advertisement The bill also limits repayment options, with fewer flexibilities, restricted pathways to debt forgiveness, and faster repayment requirements. According to the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy and research group, all students, regardless of income or whether they've completed their degree, will face higher monthly payments as a result of these changes. Outside of the legislation, the Trump administration The Student Debt Crisis Center, a separate advocacy group, estimates these fees will amount to about $300 a month. Already 5 million Americans have defaulted on their student loans, with another 2 million projected to default this month. Natalie Abrams, president and founder of the debt crisis center, now expects these numbers to grow. Advertisement 'This is a bad bill for borrowers,' she said. Advocates who have been raising alarm bells for years about rising student debt are now stuck in a strange position: Advocating for federal loans to continue, while also calling for major changes to the system through debt cancellation and lowered tuition. On its face, the Republican-led changes seem to acknowledge concerns about the country's But critics counter that in the face of federal loan caps, borrowers will rely on higher-priced, more risky private loans, or skip school altogether. Borrowers of color, who have less family wealth to tap into and are therefore more reliant on student loans, will be hurt the most. Student debt diminishes the ability of historically under-represented communities to build generational wealth, diverting money that could go toward savings, retirement, or investing in big-ticket items that traditionally fuel family wealth, such as homes. Advertisement 'Generations of systemic racism have forced Black and brown folks — especially Black women — to borrow at higher rates than our white peers and bear an enormous financial burden, denying us the opportunity to succeed and build generational wealth,' Representative Ayanna Pressley told the Globe in an emailed statement. Changes by the Trump administration, while reducing a reliance on federal student loans, could actually worsen the divide. Lending limits 'means fewer people who are not already rich will be able to go to college, and the people who still need to get education and training that are not already rich are going to be targeted for predatory private loan projects,' said Eileen Connor, executive director of the Project on Predatory Student Lending, a legal and policy organization focused on predatory for-profit colleges and lenders that started at Harvard Law School. 'There's been a fair amount of talk about Trump policies leading to resegregation,' Persis Yu, deputy executive director and managing council at the Student Borrower Protection Center, an advocacy group that aims to improve the student loan system, said. 'And I think this is part of that project.' Amina Khamsi will be starting her third year at Boston University School of Medicine this fall. Originally from El Paso, Texas, Khamsi, who is a first-generation immigrant with Moroccan and Colombian roots, has already taken out nearly $120,000 in federal student debt, which has accrued nearly $10,000 in interest. She's already considering whether she can afford to stay in Boston for residency, and worries doctors will have to reconsider whether they can work in underserved communities, where positions pay less, if they have to take on more private debt. Advertisement 'You are forcing people to make decisions not based on ethical practices or how they want to practice medicine, but 'how am I going to cope with this.' I fear in the long run we're going to have less doctors who look like me, who look like a lot of patients across America, and that could have detrimental effects to health care.' Private lenders seem primed for the potential influx. In the weeks leading up to the legislation's passage, Sallie Mae calling for caps on federal student lending. The CEO of Navient, a major private student lender, As students consider their now whittled-down options, German Roman encourages them to be informed. She doesn't regret going to college, but she does regret taking on debt, even as she feels she should consider herself lucky, since the $20,000 she owes is half tuition-free college. 'No one is arguing for the status quo,' said Yu. 'But until there is a real investment in higher education, both on the federal and state level,' millions of students and their families will continue to rely on federal debt, with now-tightened conditions. 'These proposals,' Yu said, 'are going to make the crisis worse, not better.' Advertisement This story was produced by the Globe's team, which covers the racial wealth gap in Greater Boston. You can sign up for the newsletter . Mara Kardas-Nelson can be reached at
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
The best Amazon deals this weekend: Apple AirPods are within $1 of their all-time low
Get this: There's a restaurant in China that's put baby lion cuddles on their menu. And it creates a dilemma, right? You're thinking, Hmmm ... that feels at least vaguely exploitive of those precious little cubs. But you're also thinking, Awww, the babies! Can I have two orders ...with extra cuteness? It's a bit like the predicament of post-Prime Day shoppers: You're thinking, I kinda made a killing last week — do I really need to be shopping now? But you're also thinking, Oh, man, the best Amazon deals of this weekend are just too good to resist!Allergy sufferers: This $40-off deal on a highly rated air purifier is sure nothing to sneeze at. And as long as you've got de-dusting on the agenda, how about a 40% markdown on a Black & Decker hand vacuum? (It's the one I rely on at home, and it's down to a record-low price.) Ready to have your mind blown? Behold: A 24" Fire TV for a mere 60 bucks! This is our kind of weekend bargain blowout. Killer discounts ... and no dilemmas! Best Amazon deals: Rare sales Best Amazon deals: All-time low prices Best Amazon deals: Our best-tested products Best Amazon tech deals Best Amazon deals: Style Best Amazon deals: Home Best Amazon deals: Beauty Best Amazon deals: Kitchen If you have Amazon Prime, you'll get free shipping, of course. Not yet a member? No problem. You can sign up for your free 30-day trial here. (And by the way, those without Prime still get free shipping on orders of $35 or more.)


Cosmopolitan
a day ago
- Cosmopolitan
Ami Colé is closing: It's time to wake up before another Black-owned beauty brand disappears
I'm exhausted. Tired in a bone-deep, soul-sapped, can't-believe-we're-here-again kind of way. I almost didn't write this letter because it feels like déjà vu wrapped in heartbreak. The news that Ami Colé, one of the most beloved Black-owned beauty brands, is shuttering after a wildly successful four-year run is as devastating as it is familiar. We know the stats. They're damning. Less than 0.1 percent of venture capital funding goes to Black women entrepreneurs. That's not just a missed opportunity — it's an intentional failure of imagination, investment, and equity. I've dedicated my career to celebrating, uplifting, and advocating for diversity and inclusion in beauty. And yet, most days, it feels like I'm preaching to the choir or screaming into the void. I've used every platform I've been blessed to hold — my voice, my bylines, my seat at the proverbial (and sometimes literal) table — to spotlight the undeniable brilliance of Black-owned brands. And still, I watch them disappear one by one. So now, I'm talking to you: the billion-dollar conglomerates and investors with deep pockets. The legacy houses and corporate giants with the power and purse strings to change the narrative. Yes, I'm talking to you, L'Oréal Groupe, Estée Lauder Companies Inc., Unilever Global, Proctor & Gamble, Coty Inc., Shiseido Company, e.l.f. Beauty Inc., and all the rest. You with the billion-dollar budgets who know how to write the checks that shift culture and make us all feel oh-so-beautiful. You who made room for rhode, Drunk Elephant, OUAI, and Hourglass Cosmetics, to name a few (and no shade — those were solid plays). So, let's not pretend the bank accounts are suddenly empty when it comes to funding Black-owned brilliance. There is money. There is infrastructure. There is a proven formula. So, where's the disconnect when it comes to investing in brands that speak deeply, authentically, and powerfully to communities of colour? Ami Colé did that—and then some. This wasn't an underdog story waiting to be fixed. This was a brand that had already done the damn thing. Over $3 million raised. On shelves in 600+ Sephora stores. Media acclaim. Award-winning products. Loved by the likes of Oprah and Martha Stewart. A founder (Diarrha N'Diaye-Mbaye) who formally worked at L'Oreal and in product development at Glossier. Viral moments. Cult-status glosses. A community that showed up, showed out, and bought in. The consumers did their part. So, why wasn't that enough? I'm devastated not just for the brand but for what this signals to Black founders everywhere: That even when you build something with intention, revenue, and community, survival is not guaranteed, at least not without deep-pocketed allies who understand both the moral imperative and the market opportunity in protecting this space. Let me say this louder: Black-owned beauty brands aren't just for Black folks. And even when melanin-rich skin or textured hair is centred, there is still undeniable magic. The potential to scale is not a liability—it's an untapped goldmine. I'm not just calling for charitable donations or feel-good optics. I'm calling for strategic investments. And maybe even for seats on your boards for people like me—those of us who've built careers testing your products (and all your competitors), telling your stories, and turning casual browsers into lifelong consumers. We may not have actual MBAs, but we have MBAs in beauty. We are your brand whisperers, your trend forecasters, your cultural compasses. The question is, will you listen? I fully understand there are countless layers and valid nuances that make my DEI dreams harder than ever to realise. But right now, I'm writing to you as a devoted beauty storyteller whose professional purpose — and passion — is to help move this industry in the right direction. So, I will continue to dream of a world where I have the capital to be the one writing ginormous checks. But since I don't (yet), I will continue to use my voice to push those who do. Because Black and brown beauty deserves more than a moment. It deserves momentum— real and everlasting. This isn't about calling you out — I'm lovingly calling you in. Let this not be another eulogy. Let this be a turning point. With urgency, hope, and light, Julee Wilson Julee Wilson is Beauty Editor at Large at Cosmopolitan. Previously, Julee was Beauty Director at Cosmo and Global Beauty Director at Essence and has held various editorial positions at Huffington Post and Real Simple. She counts herself lucky AF that she gets to play with beauty products for a living and tell dope stories. And if you're as obsessed with beauty as she is, make sure to follow her on Instagram for plenty of product recs, natural hair inspo, skincare testing, and Black girl magic shenanigans.