logo
It's not just about vouchers and school funding. Here are the other Texas public education bills you should track.

It's not just about vouchers and school funding. Here are the other Texas public education bills you should track.

Yahoo13-05-2025
Private school vouchers, public school finance and teacher pay have been the focus of heated debates during this year's legislative session over how to direct taxpayer dollars to support Texas children's education. But those haven't been the only education-related issues up for discussion.
Many other bills aim to reshape public education in Texas. Some offer additional resources, while others introduce new restrictions. Proposed legislation would boost funding for campus safety, support students who are falling behind in math and reading, and prohibit the use of cellphones during school hours.
Other measures have drawn more controversy. These include bills that would extend the state's higher ed ban on diversity, equity and inclusion programs to K-12 schools, require the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms, and expand teachers' authority to discipline students. Supporters say these changes will improve classroom environments, while critics warn they could harm the state's most vulnerable children.
Here's a look at some of the most significant education bills under consideration and where they stand in the legislative process.
In March, the Texas Senate approved a bill that would expand the state's DEI ban on its public colleges and universities to K-12 public schools. The measure, Senate Bill 12, is now under consideration in the Texas House.
SB 12, filed by Sen. Brandon Creighton, the Conroe Republican who chairs the Senate's K-16 education committee, would prevent school districts from taking race, ethnicity, gender identity or sexual orientation into account in employment decisions. It would also outlaw trainings, programs and activities that reference those characteristics, unless required by federal or state law.
In addition, the bill would bar student groups centered on sexual orientation or gender identity from public schools. It would also give parents the right to file complaints about any perceived violations of the DEI ban, prompting formal investigations.
Supporters say that DEI initiatives waste instructional time and taxpayer funds, and push political ideologies onto students. During a hearing earlier this year, Creighton said DEI programs are 'using millions of taxpayer dollars meant for the classroom to fund political activism and political agendas.'
Opponents warn that eliminating DEI support could worsen inequities; increase bullying, harassment and discrimination; exacerbate mental health problems; make some students feel ashamed of their identities; limit how topics like race are discussed in classrooms; and allow racism to grow in schools.
Meanwhile, Senate Bill 13, by Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney, would give school boards and parents more control over what books can be put in school libraries, as well as ban books that have 'indecent content or profane content.' Anti-censorship advocates say it could lead to the removal of books featuring gender and sexuality content from school libraries. The bill was passed by the Senate in March and is awaiting consideration in the House.
Earlier this year, the Texas Senate approved a pair of bills that would require the Ten Commandments to be displayed in classrooms and set aside time during the school day for prayer.
The measures are priorities for Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, the leader of the Texas Senate, which approved them in March. They are now awaiting consideration in the House.
Supporters say the bills are an acknowledgement of the country's religious roots and would help restore traditional values. Sen. Mayes Middleton, the Republican who authored Senate Bill 11, the prayer-in-school bill, defended the legislation by saying, 'Our schools are not God-free zones.' He added, 'We are a state and nation built on 'In God We Trust.''
Senate Bill 10, the Ten Commandments bill, was met with sharp criticism from some Democratic lawmakers. Sen. Sarah Eckhardt, D-Austin, has argued the measure goes too far in promoting a specific faith. 'Most Texans are religious,' she said during floor debate in March, 'but I would venture that Texans do not want religion crammed down their throat by their government.'
Sen. Nathan Johnson, D-Dallas, also raised concerns during the debate. He read aloud a letter signed by 166 religious leaders from across the state, including Jewish, Muslim, Christian, Sikh and Buddhist representatives, who urged lawmakers to oppose the Ten Commandments bill. The letter warned against turning public schools into places of worship, arguing that such moves risk alienating students from diverse backgrounds.
As Texas struggles with a severe teacher shortage, school districts, especially in rural areas, have increasingly turned to hiring uncertified educators to fill classroom vacancies. Last year, 56% of newly hired teachers across the state were not certified, raising concerns about the quality of education students are receiving.
Senate Bill 2253, would require schools to have only certified teachers in core subjects by the 2029-30 school year. To help teachers, it would include a one-time $1,000 stipend for some untrained educators who were recently hired and get certified by the end of the next school year. The bill is awaiting a vote in the Senate.
Amid rising concerns about classroom violence, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic, Texas lawmakers are pushing legislation that would expand school districts' authority to discipline students.
House Bill 6 passed the House and is now being reviewed by the Senate K-16 Education Committee. It seeks to give schools more flexibility in handling disruptive behavior. The bill would allow administrators to suspend students for 'repeated and significant' classroom disruptions or for actions that endanger the safety of others, requiring those students to remain out of school during the suspension period.
In recent years, Texas law has limited such discipline. Students in pre-K through second grade have generally been protected from suspension unless they committed serious crimes. Similar protections have applied to homeless students, who could only be suspended in cases involving violence, weapons, drugs or alcohol. HB 6 would roll back those restrictions, giving schools broader discretion to suspend these students.
Though the bill has received strong Republican support in the House, some lawmakers say it needs more clarity. In March, Rep. Gina Hinojosa, D-Austin, urged representatives to tighten the bill's language, warning, 'we're not sending kindergarteners home to an empty apartment.'
Another bill, Senate Bill 1872, which has passed by the Senate and is under review by the House Public Education Committee, would require the expulsion of any student who assaults a teacher or a school volunteer, even if the incident happened off campus. Expelled students would be placed in the Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program, which serves students who have been removed from their original schools.
Another bill would expedite the process of referring students to truancy court when they miss out on school. Senate Bill 1925, which still hasn't received a vote in the Senate K-16 Education Committee, would no longer require schools to intervene before referring students to court. It also requires schools to notify parents if their children have three truancies in four weeks.
Meanwhile, Senate Bill 1871 would make it easier for students to get mental health help through the telehealth platforms and for those required to go to an alternative education program to participate virtually. The measure has passed the Senate and was referred to the House Education Committee.
Lawmakers are also considering increasing funding for school safety.
​​In 2023, a year after the Uvalde elementary school shooting, the state passed House Bill 3, mandating armed officers at every school. The law also increased schools' annual safety allotment to $10 per student, gave districts $15,000 per school for safety upgrades, and created a $1.1 billion grant program to help school districts pay for additional school safety requirements, like silent panic alerts.
Many school leaders said the measure wasn't enough to pay for those new jobs or otherwise implement the law effectively. Law enforcement shortages have also made it hard for schools to hire new officers.
One key proposal this session is Senate Bill 260, authored by Sen. Joan Huffman, R-Houston, which would give schools an additional $28 per student and $30,000 per campus each year to pay for safety upgrades. The bill has been passed in both chambers. Lawmakers will now meet behind closed doors to resolve the differences between their two versions.
Another bill, Senate Bill 598, introduced by Sen. Royce West, D-Dallas, offers a more generous funding model, proposing to give schools $100 per student and $60,000 per campus each year for school safety. The bill is currently under review by the Senate K-16 Education Committee.
Earlier this month, the Texas House approved House Bill 123, which aims to provide struggling students extra learning support as early as kindergarten, before learning gaps compound. Last month, the Senate passed a similar bill, Senate Bill 2252. Members from both chambers are now expected to reconcile differences in their proposals in a closed-door conference committee.
More than half of third graders in the state are not at grade level in reading or math, meaning they lack the key foundational skills they need to thrive as learners. Students who are behind in third grade rarely catch up, which can lead to serious consequences later in life. Research shows students who struggle to read by third grade are more likely to drop out of high school. Math proficiency is tied to economic mobility as an adult.
The legislation would require districts to use literacy and numeracy screeners to identify students who are struggling early on. The screeners would assess students three times a year between pre-K and 3rd grade on skills like phonics, vocabulary and spelling. Those who are furthest behind would get extra tutoring in small group settings.
The legislation would also expand educators' access to math and reading instructional materials. Teachers often work unpaid hours to complete training known as math and reading academies, which give them the tools to help build students' skills in those subjects. HB 123 would give districts funding to pay teachers who take those courses after their regular workday.
After several states across the country introduced strict limits on cellphone use in public schools, Texas lawmakers are considering a similar approach.
House Bill 1481, introduced by Rep. Caroline Fairly of Amarillo, the only Gen Z member of the Texas House, aims to significantly restrict the use of "personal communication devices" in public schools. This includes cellphones, tablets, smartwatches and similar electronics. Fairly said she hopes the measure will improve students' mental health and academic performance. Supporters of the bill say it could help reduce cyberbullying.
The bill would give school districts some flexibility in how to implement the restrictions. They would be able to ban the devices entirely, provide designated storage areas, or extend the ban to extracurricular activities.
However, not all lawmakers support the proposal. During a hearing earlier this year, Rep. Alma Allen, D-Houston, expressed concerns that the policy might prevent students from reaching emergency services or contacting their parents when needed.
First round of TribFest speakers announced! Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Maureen Dowd; U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-San Antonio; Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker; U.S. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-California; and U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas are taking the stage Nov. 13–15 in Austin. Get your tickets today!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents
Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents

Boston Globe

time8 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents

'I mean, some of those kids are -- that's real starvation stuff,' Trump said in Scotland on Monday. 'I see it, and you can't fake it. So we're going to be even more involved.' It was unclear what Trump meant by getting 'more involved.' Days earlier, he had withdrawn his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, from talks between Israel and Hamas in pursuit of a ceasefire to end the war in Gaza. Advertisement But Witkoff will now travel to Israel on Thursday to discuss Gaza, and Israeli news outlets reported that he might even visit a food distribution center in the territory. Witkoff's change of plans comes as aid groups say hunger in Gaza is reaching crisis levels. One United Nations-affiliated group said in a report this week that a 'worst-case' famine scenario is unfolding, and Gaza health officials say that dozens of Palestinians, including children, have died of starvation in recent weeks. Those grim facts have been driven home by gut-wrenching images of skeletal toddlers and people fighting for food. Advertisement Israeli officials reject responsibility for food shortages in Gaza, which they say are exaggerated and caused by Hamas. 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Hamas 'robs, steals this humanitarian aid and then accuses Israel of not supplying it,' he added. But Hamas denies that, and Israeli military officials privately say they have found no evidence that Hamas systematically steals aid. Such protests have not defused global anger. France announced this week that it would recognize an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations in September, and Britain said it would follow suit if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas. And in Washington this week, one of Trump's fiercest Republican allies in Congress, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, condemned Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide.' Trump has few good options. The United States supplies Israel, its close partner, with billions in annual military aid. Even if Hamas is the main obstacle to aid delivery, Trump lacks influence over the militant group. His only real hope is to insist that Israel, which controls Gaza's borders, does more to clear roads and protect aid convoys. And a long-term solution may require leveraging American aid to force Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire on terms short of his longtime demands. Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow in the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the quandary is a familiar one for U.S. presidents. 'President Trump's excuse-making over Gaza resonates with a long line of presidents who were pressured to address humanitarian catastrophes,' Wertheim said. Advertisement That pressure comes from a sense of moral duty in the country's DNA, dating as far back as John Winthrop's 1630 'City on a Hill' sermon, in which he told Puritan Massachusetts colonists that 'the eyes of all people are upon us.' As the United States grew in power and wealth, so did its sense of obligation to people in need everywhere. When President Herbert Hoover, a free-market Republican, ordered aid to famine-stricken Soviet Russia in 1921, he declared: 'Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!' Cold War competition for global influence with the Soviet Union reinforced the instinct, on strategic grounds. Many conservatives argue that America is not a charity, and should help people abroad only when it advances the national interest. Trump has made that argument explicit in his 'America first' foreign policy, his deep cuts to foreign aid spending and his dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development. Stephen Pomper, the chief of policy at the International Crisis Group, noted that a president who preaches an 'America first' foreign policy has undermined an international system built over decades to prevent foreign atrocities. The United States, he said, 'looks increasingly like it rejects or is indifferent to the founding principles of the order that it helped create.' Still, the crisis in Gaza has echoes of past humanitarian crises that left presidents wringing their hands over how to respond. President Bill Clinton took office in 1993 as a champion of human rights and international institutions. But when machete-wielding Hutu militias started to slaughter ethnic Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994, he rejected calls for U.S. action. Scarred by the deaths of 18 American soldiers on a peacekeeping mission in Somalia, Clinton feared that even modest steps could escalate dangerously. Unchecked, Hutu killers carried out the genocide of an estimated 800,000 Tutsi. Clinton later said he regretted not doing more to stop it. Advertisement Clinton also hesitated as Serbian forces slaughtered civilians in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the mid-1990s, rebuffing direct pleas from the likes of Elie Wiesel by saying the problem did not warrant risking American lives. The 1995 massacre of 8,000 men and boys at a U.N.-declared 'safe area' in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica finally moved Clinton to act. A U.S.-led bombing campaign against Serbian forces led to a peace deal credited with stabilizing the region. Stopping mass killings in the Darfur region of Sudan in the early 2000s became a campaign for activists and celebrities, including Angelina Jolie and George Clooney. But even after the State Department formally declared the atrocities there a 'genocide' in 2004, President George W. Bush refused calls to deploy U.S. troops to stop it. He cited, among other things, concern about intervening 'in another Muslim country' at the time of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the time Barack Obama became president, activists and scholars -- fueled by the American failure in Rwanda -- had developed new legal theories to support cross-border intervention to protect victims of atrocities. Among them was Samantha Power, an influential national security aide to Obama, who helped engineer a 2011 presidential directive on the subject. 'Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,' it declared. Obama put that idea into practice in 2011, when he ordered airstrikes in Libya against government forces preparing to crush a rebellion in the city of Benghazi. Obama said he acted to avert 'a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.' Advertisement But that supposedly limited intervention expanded into a monthslong NATO bombing campaign, and Libya collapsed into violent anarchy, leaving Obama regretting the experience. So when he was pressured again to intervene in Syria's civil war against the country's brutal regime, he rejected pleas for airstrikes from top officials, including Secretary of State John Kerry. Obama did, however, order limited airstrikes in Syria in 2014 against Islamic State group fighters, in part to save thousands of Yazidi people trapped on a mountain in Iraq and at risk of genocidal massacre. 'Earlier this week, one Iraqi cried that there is no one coming to help,' Obama said in an address to the nation. 'Well, today America is coming to help.' Gaza presents Trump with an especially difficult case, as it did for President Joe Biden. Biden faced withering questions about his support for Israel's military campaign, and was shouted down at public events by protesters accusing him of complicity in 'genocide.' But while Biden often harangued Netanyahu to allow more aid into Gaza -- usually with limited and temporary results -- he never risked a full break with the prime minister over the matter. One reason, Biden officials say, was intelligence showing that Hamas responded to signs of a potential split between the United States and Israel by hardening its negotiation position in ceasefire talks. Biden felt enough of a responsibility -- and also perhaps political vulnerability -- that he resorted to dramatic displays of support for hungry Palestinians, sending military planes to airdrop supplies and ordering the construction of a $230 million pier to allow aid delivery by sea. Critics dismissed both measures as made-for-TV substitutes for putting decisive pressure on Netanyahu. Advertisement Ultimately, Wertheim said, America's real problem in Gaza is itself. 'It's not that other parties are engaged in atrocities and the question is whether the United States will use its righteous power to stop,' he said. 'In this case, the issue is that the United States is complicit in Israel's conduct.' This article originally appeared in

Search for answers after Texas' deadly floods brings lawmakers to devastated Hill Country

time2 hours ago

Search for answers after Texas' deadly floods brings lawmakers to devastated Hill Country

KERRVILLE, Texas -- Texas lawmakers will take their search for answers following the deadly July 4 floods to the heart of the devastation in Kerr County, where local officials were expected to face questions over their response to the disaster that swept away homes and campers along the Guadalupe River. The hearing Thursday is the first time a panel of lawmakers is visiting the hard-hit Texas Hill Country since the floods, which killed at least 136 people. Most were in Kerr County, including 27 young campers and counselors at Camp Mystic, an all-girls summer camp. Among those invited to testify were local leaders who have defended their preparations and response to the fast-rising waters. Residents will also be given the chance to address lawmakers. The hearing comes as authorities have begun publicly releasing records and audio — including 911 calls — that have provided new glimpses into the escalating danger and chaos in the early hours of the July Fourth holiday. They include panicked and confused messages from residents caught in trees as well as families fleeing with children from homes with water creeping up to the knees. 'People are dying,' one woman tells a 911 operator in call logs released by nearby Kendall County. She says she had a young relative at a church camp in Kerr County who was stranded along with his classmates because of the high waters. 'I don't want them to get stuck in a low-water crossing. And what are they going to do? They have like 30 kids," the woman says. Kerr County officials have denied several Texas Public of Information requests filed by The Associated Press for 911 calls and body-camera footage related to the floods. Lawmakers have had to address flood relief amid a busy 30-day legislative special session that has included a highly-partisan sprint by Republicans to redraw the state's maps to pick up five more seats in the U.S. House. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott added flood relief and disaster preparedness to the agenda items shortly after calling a special session in June. He also included redrawing the state's maps after receiving pressure from President Donald Trump, who has said he wants Texas Republicans to squeeze five additional seats. House Democrats have launched a series of protests that have involved fleeing the state to meet with Democratic governors to try and stop Republican redistricting. As the minority party in both chambers, the caucus has few options and lawmakers face up to $500 a day for walking out after they broke a quorum in 2021. Party leaders have said they will not engage in other legislative business until the legislature addresses flood relief. Lawmakers have filed bills to provide funding for early warning systems, improve emergency communications and strengthen flood infrastructure in flood-prone areas. Residents along the Guadalupe River have said they were caught off guard and had no warning when rainfall struck. Kerr County does not have a warning system along the river after several missed opportunities by state and local agencies to finance one. Abbott and Texas Republicans have signaled no appetite for assigning blame for the disaster or second-guessing decisions by local officials, who have described the scale of the disaster as one that no one could have saw coming. At the first hearing by Texas lawmakers this month, Texas' chief emergency management official called for better accreditation for county response officials. Democrats, meanwhile, have questioned if officials had done enough to provide sufficient infrastructure for flood-prone areas in rural counties.

Most Democrats vote for failed resolutions to block arms sales to Israel
Most Democrats vote for failed resolutions to block arms sales to Israel

Washington Post

time3 hours ago

  • Washington Post

Most Democrats vote for failed resolutions to block arms sales to Israel

More than half of Senate Democrats voted for two resolutions Wednesday night to block weapons sales to Israel, highlighting the party's growing frustration with Israel's handling of the war in Gaza nearly two years after Hamas's attack on Israel. The Senate rejected both resolutions introduced by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont). The first, which would block the sale of tens of thousands of assault rifles, failed 70-27. The second, which would block the sale of $675.7 million of bombs and other materiel to Israel, failed 73-24.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store