Anwar's constitutional reference appeal for case management tomorrow
PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has brought forward case management of Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's constitutional reference appeal to tomorrow, with a view to disposing of the case on an expedited basis.
Anwar is appealing against the High Court's refusal to refer eight legal questions – which he claims arise from a civil suit brought by former research assistant Yusoff Rawther – to the Federal Court for determination.
An e-mail sent out by senior assistant registrar Ahmad Izuddin Fajri Fakrullah, sighted by FMT, said the case management was being brought forward as the appeals court bench had indicated this morning that an early hearing should be held.
As such, Izuddin said case management, previously scheduled for Sept 2, has been brought forward to tomorrow.
Lawyer Rafique Rashid Ali, appearing for Yusoff, who filed his suit in 2021 against Anwar over an alleged assault, confirmed the matter.
'The case management will be held online,' he said when contacted.
Earlier today, a three-member bench chaired by Justice Ruzima Ghazali said the stay should be granted as Anwar had shown special circumstances.
Ruzima, who sat with Justices Wong Kian Kheong and Lim Hock Leng, however, said parties were at liberty to apply for an early hearing date.
On June 4, High Court Justice Roz Mawar Rozain dismissed Anwar's reference application and directed that the trial proceed on the seven days previously set between June 16 and June 25.
In her decision, Roz Mawar said none of the questions posed in the application had crossed the threshold set out in Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 to justify a referral to the apex court.
In a 21-page judgment, she said the application was misconceived as to the jurisdiction of the courts and based on speculative doctrines with no constitutional footing.
On June 10, the Court of Appeal granted Anwar an interim stay pending today's hearing of the prime minister's stay application.
The prime minister wants the apex court to determine whether Articles 5(1), 8(1), 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from the suit filed by Yusoff four years ago.
Yusoff's suit relates to events which allegedly took place before Anwar took office on Nov 22, 2022.
A grandson of the late Penang consumer advocate SM Mohamed Idris, Yusoff claims he was assaulted at Anwar's home in Segambut in October 2018.
He is seeking general, special, aggravated and exemplary damages, as well as interest, costs and other relief deemed fit by the court.
Anwar denies the claim and has filed a countersuit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
19 minutes ago
- The Star
Free rides on Penang ferries on Aug 31, Sept 15 and 16
GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Port Commission (SPPP) has announced free ferry services for Malaysians on Aug 31 as well as Sept 15 and 16 in conjunction with National Day and Malaysia Day. SPPP chairman Datuk Yeoh Soon Hin said the initiative supports the announcement by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, particularly the move to declare an extra public holiday on Sept 15 in conjunction with the Malaysia Day celebration, which will be held at the PICCA Convention Centre in Butterworth on Sept 16. "The free ferry service offered on these three important dates reflects SPPP's commitment as the Port Authority and Regulatory Body, along with Penang Port Sdn Bhd (PPSB) as the port operator, in encouraging Malaysians to use public transport when commemorating key national events. "In addition, this initiative will also help ease the burden on Malaysians," he said in a statement on Thursday (July 24). Yeoh also welcomed the government's strong commitment to introducing strategic measures that not only help ease the cost of living but also reflect a deep appreciation for and recognition of all Malaysians. – Bernama
Malay Mail
19 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
When integrity gets twisted into accusation — Mohd Said Bani CM Din
JULY 24 — It is both disappointing and ironic that, in a time when we should be celebrating the institutional strength of independent audit and accountability, the appointment of Auditor-General Wan Suraya Wan Radzi has come under fire from some politicians, not for failing in her duties, but for excelling at them while refusing to play political cheerleader. To suggest that her appointment is 'tainted' simply because she is a civil servant is both legally unfounded and ethically disingenuous. Article 105 of the Federal Constitution clearly provides for the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to appoint the Auditor-General on the advice of the Prime Minister — after consultation with the Conference of Rulers. This process was duly followed. The idea that a civil servant, by default, lacks independence is an insult not only to her professionalism but to the integrity of the Malaysian Civil Service as a whole. In fact, the suggestion that only retirees are 'independent' is laughable. Since when did age or retirement status become the gold standard for objectivity? Is independence defined by being out of service — or by having the strength to serve without fear or favour? Wan Suraya brings with her 29 years of administrative service, deep knowledge of government operations, and a track record unmarred by scandal. If anything, this positions her to understand — and scrutinise — government mechanisms with greater precision than someone parachuted in from outside with no institutional insight. Auditor-General Wan Suraya Wan Radzi at a recent official function. Her appointment has sparked political debate, despite constitutional backing and a track record of public service spanning nearly three decades. — Bernama pic As a communications professional, I must also highlight that this debate reflects a larger challenge — the erosion of ethics and integrity in public discourse. True communication isn't just about broadcasting opinions; it is about educating the public with context, accuracy, and respect for institutions. When we distort narratives for political mileage, we not only mislead the public but undermine trust in democratic processes. Ethical communication, especially in public service, must be upheld — not attacked — if we are to strengthen national confidence and civic understanding. And let's talk about this so-called 'cheerleading' for Madani. If public servants attending a national event or sharing an official Facebook post constitutes propaganda, then we might as well shut down every government event since Merdeka. By that logic, any participation in public discourse becomes a conflict of interest. Perhaps next we'll be told that liking a post on workplace safety makes you unfit to investigate construction sites. Let us be clear: auditors are not monks, nor are they mute. Their duty is not to hide in a cave until summoned — it is to engage with governance, communicate transparently, and uphold public trust. Selective outrage over a social media post, or over a conflict of interest exemption that is both legitimate and previously exercised under certain contexts, reeks more of political theatre than constitutional concern. Instead of applauding the fact that the National Audit Department continues to produce thorough, timely reports, certain quarters would rather question the messenger — simply because the message is inconvenient. To the critics: if your goal is to discredit institutional integrity, do so with facts — not conjecture laced with sarcasm and double standards. And please, let's not pretend this is about transparency when it is clearly about politics. Malaysia doesn't need a silent Auditor-General. It needs a courageous, competent, and constitutionally appointed one. And, fortunately, it has one. *Prof. Mohd Said Bani CM Din is president of the Public Relations and Communications Association (PRCA) Malaysia. **This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Free Malaysia Today
31 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
What happened to electoral reform proposals, asks MP
Indera Mahkota MP Saifuddin Abdullah said a fair and credible election process is a fundamental civil and political right. KUALA LUMPUR : An opposition MP has urged the government to clarify the status of recommendations to improve the electoral process proposed by the Electoral Reform Committee (ERC). Saifuddin Abdullah (PN-Indera Mahkota) said the ERC, chaired by former Election Commission (EC) chairman Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman, was established in August 2018 in response to growing public distrust in the country's electoral system. He said the committee was given two years to review the system, compare it with practices in advanced democracies, consult experts, conduct engagement sessions and research, and propose legislative reforms. 'I understand the committee submitted its final report to the government upon completing its mandate. 'So, what is the status of that report? How many recommendations were made and what actions were taken by the government?' he asked during the debate on the 2023 Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) report in the Dewan Rakyat. In August 2020, the ERC submitted 49 recommendations to improve the electoral system to the then government led by Muhyiddin Yassin. According to the ERC, the implementation of its proposed reforms would take between three and 10 years, if accepted. Key recommendations included strengthening the EC's powers as an independent regulator of political parties, the establishment of an electoral boundary commission, and setting fixed dates for the dissolution of Parliament and state assemblies – six months ahead of their actual expiry. Saifuddin, who is also a member of Bersatu's Supreme Council, said a fair and credible election process is a fundamental civil and political right. 'Elections are the most crucial component of a functioning democracy, one that ultimately serves the people. 'Such a democracy must uphold five key principles of elections – freedom, transparency, integrity, efficiency and fairness.'
