Germany finance regulator: banks strong but uncertainty high
FRANKFURT, May 7 (Reuters) - Mark Branson, the president of Germany's bank watchdog BaFin, said on Wednesday that the nation's financial firms were in a strong position but that uncertainty would remain extremely high.
"The possibility that problems in the non-banking sector have an impact on banks cannot be ruled out just because we have weathered the turbulence well so far," Branson said.
Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
Reporting by Tom Sims and Frank Siebelt, Editing by Rachel More
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab
Share X
Link
Purchase Licensing Rights
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Coin Geek
3 days ago
- Coin Geek
Sparkassen into 'crypto' trading; Kazakhstan sets up reserve
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready... Sparkassen-Finanzgruppe, a network of savings banks in Germany and Europe's largest financial services network, plans to offer digital asset trading services for its clients within the following year. Sparkassen will enable its over 50 million users in Germany and beyond to trade leading digital assets via its mobile app, Bloomberg reports. The new offering will be managed by DekaBank, a wholly-owned asset manager that handles over $470 billion worth of assets. Speaking to Bloomberg, a DekaBank spokesperson revealed that the group will develop the new product over the course of the next year and intends to launch it by summer 2026. DekaBank is not new to digital assets. In February, the Frankfurt-based bank introduced 'crypto' trading for its institutional clients, two years after it first announced the service. The lender received a digital asset custody license from BaFin and the European Central Bank (ECB). Last year, it issued a digital bond under the ECB's wholesale digital euro trial. Sparkassen is Germany's largest financial services institution and includes 376 local savings banks and six regional public banks. The network manages nearly $3 trillion in assets across banks, insurers, and building societies. According to the German Savings Banks and Giro Association (DSGV), which oversees the savings banks, the digital asset offering was driven by a rise in customer demand. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulatory framework, which took effect in December last year, has also allowed regulated institutions to venture into digital assets, DSGV added. The new service is a sharp pivot for Sparkassen, which has been anti-digital assets for years. A decade ago, it blocked all digital asset purchases for its customers and, despite industry uproar, stuck to its guns for years. Since then, its executives have advocated against digital assets, citing volatility and a lack of regulation as the biggest concerns. Even after announcing the upcoming 'crypto' service, the network still issued a warning to its customers who intend to dive into digital assets. 'Our position remains clear: cryptocurrencies are highly speculative assets,' the watchdog, DSGV, reiterated. It added that member banks under the Sparkassen network are prohibited from promoting digital asset products and that they must inform customers about the associated risks, 'including the possibility of a total loss.' While Sparkassen is gradually warming up to digital assets, other German banks are going all out. On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that Germany's largest lender, Deutsche Bank (NASDAQ: DB), intends to launch its digital asset custody service next year, partnering with Austrian exchange Bitpanda for its technology. Last September, Commerzbank (NASDAQ: CRZBY) launched a trading and custody service for its corporate clients, while regional bank LBBW announced a similar program earlier in the year. Kazakhstan to set up national digital asset reserve Elsewhere, Kazakhstan has announced plans to establish a national digital asset reserve that the central bank will manage. The new reserve will be initially funded with the digital assets that Kazakh authorities have seized over the years, reports local outlet Kazinform. Assets mined by national institutions will also be included in the reserve. Kazakhstan is home to one of the world's largest block reward mining industries, ranking third behind the United States and China for BTC hash rate. Appointing the National Bank of Kazakhstan (NBK) to oversee and manage the reserve is a strategic decision that protects national interests, said Timur Suleimenov, the chairman of the central bank, in a response to an inquiry by legislators. He added that the reserve would allow Kazakhstan to gain a foothold in the digital asset economy without the associated risks, which include capital flight. The NBK head called on legislators to formulate laws that would govern how the fund will be managed, who will have the decision-making authority, and when and how the assets can be liquidated. Beyond the fund, the central bank called on parliament to develop policies that will rein in 'crypto' influencers who have been misleading young Kazakhs into risky investments. It also wants a framework that guides the tokenization of traditional financial instruments like stocks and bonds. Watch: Richard Baker on engineering a smarter financial world with blockchain title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen="">
Reuters
4 days ago
- Reuters
Malaysia cuts green electricity tariff premium rates by up to 80% beginning July 1
KUALA LUMPUR, July 2 (Reuters) - Malaysia has cut its green electricity tariff premium rates by up to 80% beginning July 1 in an effort to diversify its green electricity supply access options for companies to meet their ESG commitments. The premium rates that were previously set based on user categories will now be combined into a single tier of pricing, the Energy Transition and Water Transformation Ministry said in a statement on Wednesday. All users will now pay 5 cents per kilowatt hour for one-year contracts, 4 cents per kWh for two-year agreements, and 3 cents per kWh for three-year commitments. The green electricity tariff (GET) programme was introduced in 2021, offering renewable power to customers of state-run utility firm Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) seeking to reduce their carbon footprint. The government previously set the 2025 GET programme quota of at least 6,600 gigawatt hours, with premium rates of 10 cents per kWh for domestic and non-domestic low voltage users and 20 cents per kWh for non-domestic medium and high voltage users. As these new provisions involve structural changes and cost implications, the Ministry said that users will have the option to terminate existing subscriptions without penalty until August 31. The Ministry added that in response to demand from data center operators as well as industrial and commercial users, they have also launched the GET GreenPath Programme to address the need for "tenant accounts" to receive formal recognition of their green electricity usage through Renewable Energy Certificates. This enhanced version of the existing GET programme will be implemented by TNB and opened for subscription on August 1.
Spectator
5 days ago
- Spectator
Why corporations won't let Pride die
Pride month has finally come to an end. Did you notice? There has definitely been a reduction in the number of parades, banners, and flags this year. As Gareth Roberts wrote here, Pride has been damaged by its internal contradictions and the Supreme Court's common-sense ruling on what a woman is. Still, hopeful as all this is, it seems that for some corporations, Pride still refuses to die. Whilst shopping I recently saw a jar of Marmite. Its label urged me to 'Stand with Pride.' The flag accompanying the statement included the transgender stripes, naturally. Meanwhile, Marks and Spencer's social media profile pictures were changed to the alphabet flag, not forgetting the intersex circle. Throughout Pride month, M&S matched customer donations to the homeless charity 'akt'. We can argue the merits of corporate philanthropy, and few would object to helping the homeless. But akt doesn't appear to support all homeless individuals, only those who happen to not be heterosexual. It's preferential charitable giving based on sexuality. Other brands go further. Shake Shack, the popular milkshake shop, has launched their 'Pride Shake'. Don't panic if you missed it: it is available until 7 July. For every milkshake sold, they will donate £1 to LGBTQ+ charities. Such charities include Not A Phase, whose mission is 'uplifting and improving the lives of trans+ adults.' Their attempts to achieve this mission have involved 'growing the UK trans+ economy', and condemning those who want to protect males from competing in female sports. Why are brands still throwing money at charities promoting an ideology that the public rejects but which they are ultimately being forced to pay for? The answer is ESG: Environmental, Social, and Governance, a set of standards supposedly measuring the ethical impact of businesses, but which usually just serves to keep the money flowing to questionable yet fashionable causes. This is what is keeping Pride month alive. Whilst the 'E' does much damage to returns as companies are coerced into spending money on unprofitable windmills and solar farms, the 'S' gives us rainbow logos and compulsory trans donations. Increasingly, to access investment, companies must prioritise ESG. This is because most institutional investors in Britain have launched ESG funds and increasingly invest savers' money into these funds by default. They claim this is because of the good that ESG achieves. A cynic might suggest it is because of the higher management fees that ESG justifies. Therefore, to access investment, companies prostrate themselves in front of the ESG ratings agencies, who have largely unchecked power. To receive top points from these agencies, companies must excel in the 'social' category. Obviously social factors are subjective and not easily quantifiable. As such, it is not enough to simply be a thoughtful employer who pays equal work equally. Rather, firms must brandish their commitment publicly, ensuring that when the ratings agencies seek proof of companies' social commitment, it is easy to find. It is no coincidence that the firms which top Stonewall's equality index tend to receive top points in the ESG rankings. The ESG and DEI reports of big brands make this plain. Unilever, the parent company of Marmite, have an entire section of their DEI report dedicated to explaining, 'how our brands are confronting bias and discrimination' – as if Vaseline is the next Martin Luther King. Unilever are also recipients of Stonewall's gold status award for being a leading LGBTQ+ employer and have an AA sustainability rating, one of the highest scores available from ratings agency MSCI. Shake Shack's donation to a transgenderism charity, meanwhile, is not a humble humanitarian mission which they modestly pursue. In their ESG reports they boast that their Pride Shake is part of 'a strong history of supporting the LGBTQ+ community and rolling out national Pride'. This has clearly had the desired effect as they have received the Equality 100 award in LGBTQ+ workplace equality. There are a number of criteria for receiving this award. One which stands out is the requirement for 'Philanthropic support of at least one LGBTQ+ organisation.' Are the executives of these companies true believers in Pride? Some surely are and would fly the flag regardless. Many, however, play along simply because otherwise they would lose access to vital capital. But companies should not be manipulated into pushing an agenda that is increasingly rejected by the public and underlying shareholders. The shifting public mood and consistent financial underperformance means that ESG will not remain viable for long. In the meantime, individuals who are pleased to see the decline of Pride Month should ensure their money is kept away from funds engaged in ESG.
