BBC's Gaza documentary breached accuracy guideline, review finds
The investigation, however, found there were no other breaches of the BBC's editorial guidelines, including on impartiality, and no evidence that outside interests "inappropriately impacted on the programme".
The BBC removed "Gaza: How To Survive A War Zone" from its online platform in February, five days after it was broadcast, saying it had "serious flaws". The documentary was made by independent production company HOYO Films.
A review found the programme breached a guideline on accuracy that deals with misleading audiences.
The background on the narrator's father — a minister in the Hamas-run government in Gaza — was "critical information", which was not shared with the BBC before broadcast, the review found.
Gaza's health ministry says more than 58,000 people have been killed since the start of the war on Oct. 7 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza.
The BBC's coverage of the war has been heavily scrutinised throughout the conflict, with both supporters of Israel and its critics saying the broadcaster had failed to strike the right balance.
"Regardless of how the significance or otherwise of the Narrator's father's position was judged, the audience should have been informed about this," said the report by Peter Johnston, BBC Director of Editorial Complaints and Reviews.
BBC Director-General Tim Davie said the report identified a significant failing in relation to accuracy.
"We will now take action on two fronts – fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated," Davie said in a statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
OBR boss denies forecast drove welfare cut proposals
The Chancellor could have met her fiscal rules without proposing £5 billion worth of welfare cuts, the head of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has said. Richard Hughes rejected the suggestion that the OBR's forecast was now driving policy, saying it was up to chancellors to decide how much headroom they wanted against their targets. In March 2025, it was reported that Rachel Reeves had expanded planned cuts to welfare shortly before her spring statement after the OBR forecast the Government's previous proposals would not save as much money as thought. That enabled her to maintain the £9.9 billion of headroom against her debt target that she set out in her October 2024 budget. But it also prompted an outcry from Labour backbenchers, leading to the Government dropping most of the proposals in order to avoid its first Commons defeat. Appearing before the Commons Treasury Committee on Tuesday ahead of his proposed reappointment as the OBR's chairman, Mr Hughes denied that changes in the OBR forecast had driven the proposed welfare changes. He said: 'I don't really accept the characterisation that it was changes in our forecast that forced the Government to make any particular sort of policy decision. 'Back in March, the Government decided to make £5 billion worth of welfare savings. They had £10 billion worth of headroom against their fiscal rule. They could have settled for five.' Mr Hughes went on to characterise the decision on welfare, which has now been largely reversed, as 'an entirely political choice' and added Ms Reeves could also have decided to break or change her fiscal rules. Asked about a perception that the forecast was now driving policy, he said: 'Chancellors can make a point about how much headroom they want against their fiscal rules. Recently they have left themselves very little.' Mr Hughes also pushed back against criticism from the Prime Minister, who had complained to the Commons Liaison Committee in April that the OBR's forecast had not included the effect of the Government's welfare reforms on employment. He said the Government had failed to provide enough detail on the employment support programme for it to be included, saying: 'There were no specifics. 'They couldn't tell us who was going to benefit from this programme, which groups, what kind of support they were going to get. 'There was no policy for us to score in our forecast.' A series of U-turns on the Government's welfare proposals at the start of July have left the Chancellor looking for another £5 billion in savings or tax rises if she wishes to maintain the headroom against her debt target she had last year. Ms Reeves is also likely to face a further squeeze thanks to a weakening economy and a commitment to partially reverse cuts to the winter fuel allowance.
BBC News
6 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ukrainians unimpressed by Trump's 50-day ultimatum to Putin
Ukrainians are tired, run down by the emotional toll of the invasion and the physical toll of sleepless nights due to air raid sirens, explosions and the screeching sounds of attack drones. "It was a long night," is a common remark you will hear in US President Donald Trump's decision to give Russia 50 days to agree to a ceasefire or face "very severe tariffs… at about 100%" has not gone down of Ukraine's most prominent politicians, Kyiv Mayor Vitaly Klitschko, asked "why such a delay?" while speaking on German television. Russian attacks had become "more intense", he said, and more people could be killed in that 50-day Volodymyr Zelensky spoke to Trump after the president said "top-of-the-line weapons" would be sent from the US via Nato partners in Europe, and thanked him for his "willingness to support Ukraine". If implemented, the "secondary tariffs" would hit countries that buy Russia's oil exports. But Ukrainian MP Kira Rudik says Trump's announcement was "bitttersweet", as it gave Putin another 50 days to continue his deadly bombardment and maintain his offensive on the front line."It is very hard and very personal for us because we don't know if some of us will survive for these 50 days," she told the than 230 civilians were killed in Ukraine last month and many more wounded, according to UN human rights monitors - the biggest number for three years, as Russia unleashed record numbers of drone and missile attacks. Read More:Trump threatens Russia while unveiling Ukraine weapons planRosenberg: Russia more relieved than rattled by US tariff threatTrump weapons pledge a big step for Ukraine Among the weapons being sent to Ukraine are Patriot air defence batteries to help protect cities from attack."[There] hasn't been a single fact that would prove Russia wants to stop the war. Ukraine is ready for an unconditional ceasefire, we have done everything by the book," Rudik spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that Trump's announcement was "very serious" and warned such decisions were seen by Kyiv "not as a signal for peace but as a signal to continue the war".There was little faith in Trump's promises on the streets of Yuliia and Alisa said they both worried about his relationship with the Kremlin."I don't believe it is real help for Ukraine… it's all about his ego," Yuliia told the BBC. "I guess these four years [of Trump's presidency] are going to be very tough for Ukraine.""Everything that happened during the last six months just proved that nothing will change despite what Trump does or does not say," Alisa who also lives in Kyiv, was more optimistic that additional weapons sent by the US and paid for by Nato member states in Europe could "speed up the end of the war".It could have come to an end sooner if Russia had not have been helped by allies like North Korea and China, she whose father is serving in the Ukrainian army, was "hoping for the best"."People say a lot, let's see how it goes. I hope that everything will be the way we want. And we want peace, for the war in Ukraine to end, and for all the guys to return alive," he said. Walking around the wall encircling St Michael's monastery in Kyiv, photos of the fallen stare out at you - some were taken before the war, featuring men and women posing with family members and Trump talks of imposing new tariffs on Russia, the war continues - with these images a reminder of the soldiers who will never come home.
The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
King ‘riveted' by story of Royal Marine boxer who was stabbed
The King said he was 'riveted' to hear the story of a Royal Marine and boxer as he hosted actor Idris Elba, recipients of the King's Trust and campaigners at St James's Palace. Kyle Shaw-Tullin, a Royal Marine and Team GB boxer, who was stabbed in Oldham as a teenager, told a table discussion that getting back in the boxing ring after the attack helped keep him out of trouble. Charles said it was 'a good point' about 'being too exhausted to get into trouble'. Charles also invited the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who had come from chairing a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, with Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, in attendance too. He said he was 'enormously grateful' for the support of the attendees. The King said: 'The critical thing is how do we induce the action. 'So often I can't help feeling with problems how do you join up all the dots between different departments and different agencies and voluntary organisations? 'This is the key, how do we do that? 'Is there some one person who can help make sure all this happens?' The prime minister lauded Elba's 'brilliant' campaign against knife crime called Don't Stop Your Future and congratulated other activists for their work, calling them 'inspirational'. Meanwhile, the Luther star said there had been some 'milestones' in knife crime campaigning but added 'we can't take out foot off the pedal'. Elba said: 'We've seen some things happen, and that's great. 'There's also been a small rise in knife crime at the same time, OK? 'And compared to the year before that rising knife crime might be less than the year before, but it was still a rise. 'So we can't take our foot off the pedal. 'We have to stay focused.'
