logo
Pentagon says US strikes stalled Iran's nuclear programme by two years, but satellite images tell another story

Pentagon says US strikes stalled Iran's nuclear programme by two years, but satellite images tell another story

Time of Indiaa day ago
The Pentagon declared on Wednesday that US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites might have delayed Tehran's ambitions by up to two years. Sean Parnell, the Pentagon's spokesperson, told reporters, 'We have degraded their programme by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department (of Defense) assess that.' He added the estimate was 'probably closer to two years' but gave no evidence for this claim.
US President Donald Trump had earlier said the same strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear plans. At the Pentagon briefing, Parnell echoed this view: 'All of the intelligence that we've seen (has) led us to believe that Iran's -- those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated.'
Massive bombs and cruise missiles unleashed
On 22 June, US bombers hit three Iranian nuclear sites with more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs and over two dozen Tomahawk cruise missiles. The strikes focused on Fordow and Natanz with bombs dropped by B-2 stealth bombers. A submarine launched the Tomahawks at Isfahan.
General Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, explained the tactic. He said most bombs at Fordow 'were tasked to enter the main shaft, move down into the complex at greater than 1,000 feet per second, and explode in the mission space.'
Tehran admits damage but moves ahead
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi admitted that Fordow suffered a big blow. Speaking to CBS News, Araqchi said, 'No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged.'
Live Events
But new satellite images show the story is not over. Photos from Maxar Technologies taken last Sunday reveal Iran is still working at Fordow. Maxar said the pictures 'reveal ongoing activity at and near the ventilation shafts and holes caused by last week's airstrikes on the Fordow fuel enrichment complex.'
The images show an excavator and workers next to the northern shaft above the underground plant. A crane stands at the shaft entrance. Several vehicles line the access path.
Inspectors spot repairs, not surrender
Former nuclear inspector David Albright, who heads the Institute for Science and International Security, said images from Fordow show Iran is 'actively working at the two MOP impact sites penetrating the ventilation shafts.' He believes this work 'may include backfilling the craters, as well as conducting engineering damage assessments and likely radiological sampling. The craters above the main shafts remain open.'
He added on X, 'We have observed that the Iranians have also rapidly repaired the bomb cratering damage on the main entrance road from only a few days prior. However, there are yet no indications of any efforts to reopen any of the tunnel entrances.'
UN watchdog: Iran could restart enrichment soon
While the Pentagon stands by its timeline, the UN's nuclear watchdog chief remains cautious. Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Iran could spin up new centrifuges within months. 'They can have in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium,' Grossi said.
Grossi also noted Iran's advanced nuclear know-how cannot be erased by bombs alone. His warning fits an early, lower-confidence Pentagon intelligence report that the strikes may have only slowed Iran by months.
Stockpiles may be hidden
Some experts think Iran may have shifted its near weapons-grade uranium before the raids. So far, no hard proof of this has come to light. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said last week he knew of no evidence Iran moved stockpiles to shield them from the attack.
An early Defence Intelligence Agency assessment pointed to a range of possible outcomes. One scenario sees Fordow restarting quickly with new kit. Another holds that Iran might even abandon the damaged site altogether.
The real measure of success now sits underground — and in intelligence files still under review. As satellite images catch fresh machinery at Fordow, officials and inspectors weigh new findings against bold claims.
For now, the Pentagon insists it hit Tehran's nuclear heart hard. Iran keeps digging. The world waits to see which side blinks first.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's Vietnam deal signals China tariffs unlikely to ease further
Trump's Vietnam deal signals China tariffs unlikely to ease further

Business Standard

time38 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Trump's Vietnam deal signals China tariffs unlikely to ease further

Chinese goods face 55% tariffs, likely through August. Under the Vietnam deal, the US will impose 20% tariffs on Vietnamese exports and 40% on transshipped goods to curb Chinese tariff evasion Bloomberg President Donald Trump's new trade deal with Vietnam sends a clear signal about where US tariffs on Chinese goods might ultimately land, as talks between Washington and Beijing continue following their recent truce. Chinese goods currently face tariffs of around 55 per cent, a level expected to remain through August. But under the latest Vietnam agreement, the US will slap a 20 per cent tariff on Vietnamese exports to the US and a steeper 40 per cent levy on goods deemed to be transshipped — the latter targeting a well-worn backdoor used by Chinese exporters since the first China-US trade war to dodge American tariffs. By closing the loopholes, the Trump administration is signaling what any future deal with China might look like. The 40 per cent tariff on transshipped goods suggests that even if tariffs on China are eventually reduced, they're unlikely to fall significantly below that threshold. 'The 40 per cent figure in the Vietnam deal might reflect a broader conviction in the Trump administration about the appropriate tariff level on China, which would be similarly reflected in other bilateral deals,' said Gabriel Wildau, a managing director at Teneo focused on political risk analysis in China. 'However, I am skeptical that Trump has a specific red line for minimum tariffs on China.' Beijing and Washington reached a trade framework last month following talks in London, which remains in effect through mid-August. As part of the deal, China agreed to resume shipments of rare earths — key inputs for wind turbines, electric vehicles and military hardware. In return, the US offered to ease some export restrictions on ethane, chip-design software and jet engine components. US tariffs on Chinese goods have been cut back to around 55 per cent, down from as high as 145 per cent in early April. But 20 per cent tariffs tied to fentanyl remain in place. Beijing has since tightened controls on two precursor chemicals used to make the drug — one of the few obvious avenues it has to win further tariff relief. 'The 20 per cent is really the focal point where all the attention is centered right now,' said Christopher Beddor, deputy China research director at Gavekal Research. 'The thinking is that the Chinese government is very willing to do a deal on something related to fentanyl. They've been telegraphing that for months.'' Still, those efforts are unlikely to bring Chinese tariffs below the 40 per cent rate now applied to Vietnam. If China's duties were to fall to 35 per cent, for instance, it would restore a competitive edge to China and encourage firms to shift operations back, running counter to the Trump administration's broader objectives. 'If China ends up with a lower tariff level than Vietnam that would certainly shift the competitiveness calculations somewhat, but keep in mind that moving production facilities is not as easy as flipping a light switch on and off,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. 'From the perspective of Chinese companies, there is zero confidence that once Trump sets a tariff level that it will remain at that level.' For now, there are signs both sides are following through on the terms of the London agreement and displaying signs of goodwill. The Trump administration has lifted recent export license requirements for chip design software sales in China, and approved US ethane exports to China without additional approvals. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Chinese rare earth magnets are flowing, although they haven't yet bounced back to the levels seen before China imposed export curbs in early April. The US remains hopeful that China will further ease restrictions on those exports after their London deal, he said in an interview Tuesday on Fox News. Meanwhile, a senior Chinese official on Thursday delivered one of Beijing's most positive messages about his nation's ties with the US in weeks. Liu Jianchao, head of the Communist Party's International Department, said at the World Peace Forum that he was 'optimistic' about future relations. China is keenly aware of what it's gained from China-US cooperation,' Liu said 'Our cooperation is mutually beneficial. The act of putting up barriers will hurt the other and ourselves as well.' Other negotiations Apart from Vietnam, Beijing is growing increasingly cautious about US efforts to strike trade deals that could isolate China. With a July 9 deadline approaching, when Trump's higher 'reciprocal' tariffs are set to take effect, American officials are ramping up negotiations with key partners in Asia and Europe. What Bloomberg Economics says... 'The looming question now is how China will respond. Beijing has made clear that it would respond to deals that came at the expense of Chinese interests and the decision to agree to a higher tariff on goods deemed to be 'transshipped' through Vietnam may fall in that category. Given China's position as Vietnam's largest trading partner and key source of inputs for domestic production, any retaliatory steps could have an outsized impact on Vietnam's economy.' — Rana Sajedi and Adam Farrar. Click here to read the full report. Beijing on Thursday said it's taken note of the US-Vietnam trade deal and is currently assessing the situation. 'We're happy to see all parties resolve trade conflicts with the US through equal negotiations, but firmly oppose any party striking a deal at the expense of China's interests,' He Yongqian, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Commerce, said at a briefing. 'If such a situation arises, China will firmly strike back to protect its own legitimate rights and interests,' she added, repeating a familiar warning. Olson cautioned against relying too much on the US-Vietnam trade agreement as a blueprint for assessing Washington's approach to China. The stakes in US-China negotiations are significantly higher, shaped by strategic rivalry and a wider set of geopolitical considerations. There is also much less of a power discrepancy in the US-China discussions. 'One important takeaway for China from both the Vietnam deal and the previous deal with the UK is that the US intends to use these negotiations to apply pressure on China,' Olson said. 'This could lead China to a much more sober assessment of what it might be possible to achieve with the US in these negotiations.'

Rubio delays Japan, S Korea visits to focus on Israel-Hamas ceasefire ahead of Netanyahu's White House visit
Rubio delays Japan, S Korea visits to focus on Israel-Hamas ceasefire ahead of Netanyahu's White House visit

First Post

time42 minutes ago

  • First Post

Rubio delays Japan, S Korea visits to focus on Israel-Hamas ceasefire ahead of Netanyahu's White House visit

Instead of his planned trip to the Asian nations, Rubio will now attend a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, slated for Monday, as pressure mounts on Israel and Hamas to reach a ceasefire in Gaza read more US Secretary of State Marco Rubio attends a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on US President Donald Trump's State Department budget request for the Department of State, on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday. Reuters file US State Secretary Marco Rubio has postponed his upcoming visits to Japan and South Korea to focus on the Israel-Hamas war as Washington draws up plans for a ceasefire in Gaza. According to a report by Nikkei, Rubio, who was supposed to kick-start his Asia tour from next week by travelling to Japan, has informed the governments in Tokyo and Seoul that his trips will be pushed back. During his visit to Japan, Rubio was scheduled to meet with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya. Discussions were expected to cover US tariff policies, developments in West Asia, and regional issues involving China, Russia, and North Korea. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The development comes after the US cast doubt on reaching a trade deal with Japan and South Korea ahead of the expiration of a pause on retaliatory tariffs. Why has the tour been pushed back? Instead of his planned trip to the Asian nations, Rubio will now attend a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, slated for Monday, as pressure mounts on Israel and Hamas to reach a ceasefire in Gaza. Sources told Nikkei that top State Department officials decided to cancel the meeting during a discussion held on Wednesday. Meanwhile, efforts toward securing a temporary ceasefire in Gaza appear to be gaining traction, with the potential for Hamas to release 10 living hostages and the remains of 18 others over a 60-day period. While two State Department officials have confirmed the cancellation of Rubio's trip to Japan and South Korea, he is still expected to visit Malaysia for the ASEAN Foreign Ministers' Meeting on July 10 and July 11. Is Asia not a priority for Trump? Derek Grossman, a professor of international relations at the University of Southern California, said, 'The Trump administration is leaving key US allies, Japan and South Korea, hanging out to dry when some shoring up of ties is needed, especially with ongoing trade tariffs and whispers that Washington plans to withdraw troops from bases in these allied nations.' Trump's foreign policy had been shifting towards transactional diplomacy, economic deals, and recalibrating alliances away from costly military entanglements in West Asia, looking to Gulf states for security and economic partnerships instead of traditional commitments to Israel. The administration's new focus on West Asian crises undermines its ability to prioritise Asia, particularly efforts to deter China and reinforce alliances in the Indo-Pacific. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

‘Biggest bill ever': Trump hails massive bill, defends tariffs, and shares Putin call details
‘Biggest bill ever': Trump hails massive bill, defends tariffs, and shares Putin call details

Time of India

time43 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘Biggest bill ever': Trump hails massive bill, defends tariffs, and shares Putin call details

US President Donald Trump addressed a wide range of questions after signing what he called the 'biggest bill of its kind,' touting major tax cuts, border security, and economic growth. He spoke on his call with Putin, Iran, Ukraine, and upcoming tariffs. Trump dismissed any 'deals' made for Republican support and hinted at new tariffs via letters to countries. He praised GOP leaders, teased future Iran talks, and emphasized safety in Gaza and Washington, DC. Show more Show less

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store