logo
One Nation styles itself as a party of unity — but defection remains a problem

One Nation styles itself as a party of unity — but defection remains a problem

The origin of the notion of "one-nation conservatism" is often traced back to Benjamin Disraeli, the British prime minister who was among the 19th century's most prominent and dominant political figures.
But according to Tory grandee Douglas Hurd, it was in fact a later British conservative leader who — taking inspiration from Disraeli — expressly formulated the concept.
Hurd and co-author Edward Young's biography of Disraeli cites a 1924 speech in which then-prime minister Stanley Baldwin appealed to the British people to set aside their class differences.
In this context, the words "one nation" were intended to evoke the image not of a classless society, but of a society that, while class-based, was composed of individuals prepared to look beyond socio-economic antagonisms in the interests of national unity.
It is one of the ironies of the Australian political party named One Nation that, while it often projects such an image for the country, it does not always reflect such an image in its inner workings.
Since its inception, One Nation has seemed, at times, unusually bedevilled by internal disputes, departures and defections.
The latest occurred over the weekend in South Australia, where state upper house MP Sarah Game announced she was quitting the party.
"I think they're grieving the fact that I've made this decision," Ms Game conceded on ABC Radio Adelaide on Monday.
On that point, at least, Ms Game and her former colleagues were of one mind.
In ventilating his feelings of frustration, One Nation's SA president Carlos Quaremba resorted to a parochial, sporting metaphor.
"Can you imagine if [Adelaide Crows forward] Tex Walker came out at half-time and said, 'Look, I'm changing my guernsey mid-way through the game because I'm not happy with how things are running'?," Mr Quaremba conjectured, indignantly, on ABC Radio.
"What would the supporters do? What would the coach do?
In response, Ms Game insisted she had been "true to the party" and had "wanted to remain loyal" to it.
But she added that there had been "too many moments" in which opportunities had been missed "for advocacy about causes that are very important to me" — an outcome she blamed on the party's reputation.
"I don't actually agree with some of that stereotyping about the party at all," she said.
"But ultimately my belief that I could change that stigma and change that stereotype to the level where I could be of maximum use — I lost hope in that."
At the time of her surprise victory at the 2022 state election, Ms Game was regarded as something of a mystery figure and an unlikely One Nation candidate.
Her public profile was modest and her online presence was minimal, and One Nation knocked back requests for interviews with her until her win was beyond doubt.
"Until we actually get confirmation of her winning that seat, I'm going to respect her privacy. I'm not going to discuss her," One Nation leader Pauline Hanson said at the time.
Three years on, the party remains adamant that Ms Game's win was almost exclusively the work of One Nation.
"She did no campaigning," Mr Quaremba said.
But it did not take long for Ms Game to embrace politics — even if she at times sounded like someone who did not entirely fit the One Nation mould.
In her maiden speech, she spoke strongly in favour of immigration and multiculturalism, and proudly of her own Lithuanian, German and Jewish heritage.
"I believe in people's right to maintain their culture and belief practices in Australia in a way that fosters a unified Australia, good relationships and respect between everybody," she said.
"I hold the belief that there are obstacles that the government needs to remove to allow people an equitable opportunity in life.
"I am grateful to have been born in Australia … and in my life have had the opportunity to obtain an education, a privilege that is not afforded to many around the world."
Reflecting on that privilege, Ms Game said her strong academic performance at school and university, and her work as a vet, had been made possible by her upbringing as the daughter of a "single working mother".
"My mother went to university and she obtained a science degree when it was a path largely followed by men," she said.
"She comes from a line of women who believe in the importance of education and the right for women to be independent financially."
Ms Game's mother Jennifer was herself a Senate candidate for One Nation — but on Monday her daughter confirmed she had also left the party.
According to One Nation, it was a falling-out with Jennifer Game over the party's ticket at the next state election that led to Sarah Game's defection.
"This is another instance of where a politician is being brought down by a babysitter, which was her mother," Mr Quaremba said.
"This has simply got to do with the fact that her mother said that if she wasn't number one on the ticket, she'd be leaving the party.
"This has got nothing to do with party politics or the way the party's perceived, as she's making out."
Those claims were rejected by Ms Game, who retorted that Mr Quaremba was "certainly not my closest confidant".
Nevertheless, she conceded there was "truth" in the explanation to the extent that "the dream to be in politics was originally my mother's, and I ended up here somewhat unexpectedly".
"When that relationship between her and the party ended — which was before my own relationship [with it ended] — I just ended up on the phone to her and realised, through talking it through, I needed to make these next steps," Ms Game said.
But regardless of whether family politics or party politics were the final straw for Ms Game, One Nation's South Australian predicament is hardly unique.
"This is not the first time this has happened to political parties," Mr Quaremba pointed out.
"You've only got to look at the Liberals, the Greens."
At federal level, both those parties were forced to choose new leaders in the aftermath of this month's election.
Indeed, the national poll seems to have coincided with — or perhaps even triggered — something of a reset moment in Australian politics.
There has been much talk of soul-searching, and the Nationals have also been left licking wounds.
At state level, the South Australian Greens have found themselves in an unedifying spat with upper house MP Tammy Franks, whose resignation from the party prompted acrimonious public exchanges.
In isolation, each of these developments might be regarded as of little consequence — but to anyone inclined to take a broad view of the country's current political landscape, they could amount to signs of seismic shifts.
For the time being, at least, Australia will likely remain one nation where the tectonic plates of politics continue to send out shocks.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Talking sense': Hanson forces Coalition to show ‘true colours' on net zero
‘Talking sense': Hanson forces Coalition to show ‘true colours' on net zero

Sky News AU

timean hour ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Talking sense': Hanson forces Coalition to show ‘true colours' on net zero

Verve Communications' Prue MacSween discusses One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson moving an urgency motion in the Senate, calling on the Albanese government to dump net zero. 'She's talking sense,' Ms MacSween told Sky News host Rita Panahi. 'This is the point of difference, if Sussan Ley doesn't adopt the abandonment of net-zero, then she's lost a lot of people. 'Thanks to Pauline Hanson, who's making them show their true colours, and it's about time.'

Victoria says $776 million treaty negotiations claim ‘cherry-picked', but $308 million spent since 2020
Victoria says $776 million treaty negotiations claim ‘cherry-picked', but $308 million spent since 2020

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Victoria says $776 million treaty negotiations claim ‘cherry-picked', but $308 million spent since 2020

The Victorian government has hit back at 'cherry-picked analysis' that claimed it has spent more than $776 million on treaty negotiations since 2016. The Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), a conservative think tank, on Sunday published analysis of spending items in Victorian government budget documents relating to treaty or 'self-determination' initiatives. The report claimed Victoria had spent $776.2 million on programs related to the development of a state treaty since 2016, with $100.6 million committed in the 2026 financial year alone and $220 million in the first two full financial years following the defeat of the Voice referendum. 'This is cherry-picked analysis from a Liberal Party-aligned think tank,' a Victorian government spokesperson said. 'If you listen to the people directly affected by policies, you get better outcomes — that's common sense. Treaty is about making a better and fairer state for all Victorians — negotiations are underway and we look forward to bringing Treaty to the Parliament.' The government would not confirm the IPA's figures, but noted $308 million had been invested into the Treaty since the 2020-21 budget, according to publicly available annual reports. Analysis of annual reports and budget papers by the Herald Sun put the figure at $382.4 million over the past 10 years. Some of that funding has gone into setting up the Treaty Authority, an 'independent umpire' created by the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria and the State of Victoria to oversee the process. The Herald Sun reported in 2023 that members of the Treaty Authority panel could be paid a salary of up to $380,000 per year plus expenses if they worked full-time. The Victorian government first committed to advancing a treaty with Indigenous Victorians in 2016. Negotiations formally began in November 2024, and Victoria plans to finalise a treaty by the end of the 2026 financial year. Victoria would be the first Australian jurisdiction to negotiate a formal treaty with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. But the IPA said Victorians remained largely in the dark about what a treaty would entail, despite the hundreds of millions of dollars spent and hundreds of meetings held since 2017 in preparation for negotiations. 'Despite the Victorian government spending in excess of $776 million on secret treaty negotiations, mainstream Victorians are none the wiser as to what special rights and reparations it will grant to some Victorians based solely on race,' IPA research fellow Margaret Chambers said in a statement. The report noted that between July 2016 and June 2025, 727 meetings had been held by the Victorian government in relation to the development of a treaty — but just four public statements had been issued and the 'substance of these negotiations remains largely undisclosed'.That number included meetings between First Peoples' negotiating parties and the state of Victoria to negotiate or prepare for Treaty agreements, and meetings with departments to support whole of Victorian government co-ordination and engagement in Treaty negotiations. 'The Victorian government is not being honest and upfront with Victorians about its plan to divide the community by race,' Ms Chambers said. 'With a treaty scheduled to be finalised in the next 12 months, and despite the volume of secret meetings over the past decade, very little is known about what this treaty will entail. 'Any treaty will fundamentally change Victoria's legal structure and will likely require already financially stretched Victorian taxpayers to pay billions of dollars to activists aligned to the Allan government. 'Yet, for a government which operates one of the most sophisticated and well-funded spin machines ever seen, just four statements, totalling 1588 words, have been released on the Allan government's plan to divide Victorians by race.' Recent IPA analysis claimed the monetary compensation, tax relief and litigation which would flow from a treaty in Victoria based on the landmark Yoorrook report would be in excess of $48 billion annually. 'Victorians voted against racial division at the Voice referendum,' Ms Chambers said. 'Jacinta Allan is demonstrating complete and utter contempt for the Victorian people, and our democracy, by pursuing this treaty that will divide and cripple Victoria. 'With all the problems that Victoria faces, the last thing the community needs is a two-tiered legal system where some have special rights and get special government payments. Every Victorian should be treated equally under the law.'

North Sydney Council to introduce ticketed access to New Year's Eve observation spot
North Sydney Council to introduce ticketed access to New Year's Eve observation spot

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

North Sydney Council to introduce ticketed access to New Year's Eve observation spot

Revellers taking in Sydney's legendary New Year's Eve fireworks will soon have to shell out $50 to access a prime viewing spot in a major shake-up to how tourists and locals experience the beloved event. North Sydney councillors on Monday night decided to implement 'ticketed access' to Blues Point, a popular vantage point that fronts Sydney Harbour and the Harbour Bridge. It was a decision that councillors say was made 'with a heavy heart', Mayor Zoe Baker said, citing already high New Year's Eve expenditure and a poor budget position as decisive factors in the decision. 'I share your principle on this and have and every year that I've been on this council, I've always voted to keep public open space free and access free,' Ms Baker told the council meeting. 'But unfortunately, we as a council and a governing body have inherited a really precarious financial position that has not been relieved … And so it is with an exceptionally heavy heart that I find myself supporting the motion for one year only.' 
 'Councillors every year that I've been on the council (17), have written to state governments of varying political persuasions to the same response, which is no. 'I'm hopeful that this Labor state government, who are committed to public access to the foreshore for the fireworks, may be persuaded to provide us, even if it were with the amount that we're seeking to recover, so that we don't have to proceed with the closing of Blue's Point Reserve.' Ms Baker pointed out the ticketed area was one location in a local government area 'blessed with foreshore access and vantage points'. 'So if you cannot afford a ticket for Blues Point, then I'd urge you to go to Bradfield Park to Mary Booth Lookout to Kurraba Point, to Crem Point, to Waverton, to Carradeh Park, and every other vantage point … to see the fireworks on public land for free.' The council area boasts three renowned vantage points for the show, namely Bradfield Park, Lavender Bay and Blues Point, with thousands of punters descending on the spots on December 31 to take in the party. The council is looking to sell 8000 tickets for $50 each. Councillor Nicole Antonini said the cost to the council of hosting New Year's Eve celebrations was already over a million dollars and the implementation of the paid zone would reduce the cost to council by around $300,000 alone. 'Unfortunately … we're in a difficult position. This is not ideal, it's certainly not the preference of most of this council, but in our current financial situation, we have little choice, and for this year only, I support the recommendation of ticketing for this one site.' The report to North Sydney Council outlined three options for the 2025-26 event. Option 1 involved ticketing across all three spots to achieve 'full cost recovery'. Option 2 involved 'partial cost recovery', with ticketing limited to Blues Point, and Option 3 involved continuing with 'free managed access'. The motion to endorse option 2 was carried. Local resident Davie MacDonald said he 'heartily opposed' the idea but if it had to happen, wanted to see an amendment allowing local residents continued access to the area. 'The cost imposed onto young families of being able to go and enjoy the fireworks, especially because there is special fireworks on before 9 o'clock, and I think that impulse against young families, and even for local residents is something that I think you need to take a careful consideration,' Mr MacDonald said. 'I especially look to the progressive people in this chamber, my Labor friends here, and my green friend there, Councillor Hoy, that you must consider very carefully how this impacts on working people. 
 'Let me tell you, I'm here begging for this, and I never go to a New Year's Eve fireworks display, I actually think it's a waste of money and a terrible waste in that respect, but I ask you to at least, if you're going to accept having a fee there, that there's some kind of modification (for locals).' Previously access to all three sites was free.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store