Gaza officials say at least 27 killed in third aid site shooting in three days
Health officials in Gaza say Israeli forces again fired on people heading to an aid site in Rafah on Tuesday, killing at least 27 and wounding over 180, the third time this has happened in the last three days.
The Israeli army said it fired 'near a few individual suspects' who left the designated route and approached armed forces.
They say they are looking into reports of casualties and have denied firing on civilians. Mourners pray beside the body of Alfat Za'rab who was killed while heading to a Gaza aid hub / Credit: AP
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a joint US and Israeli backed aid distribution, is a new operation which Israel says is designed to circumvent Hamas.
The UN has rejected this, saying it doesn't address Gaza's mounting hunger crisis and allows Israel to use aid as a weapon.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which operates the sites, says there has been no violence in or around them.
On Tuesday, it acknowledged that the Israeli military was investigating whether civilians were wounded 'after moving beyond the designated safe corridor and into a closed military zone,' in an area that was 'well beyond our secure distribution site.' Palestinians pray during the funeral of a person killed heading to a Gaza aid hub. / Credit: AP
The latest incident occurred close to Gaza's southern city of Rafah which is now mostly uninhabited.
Hisham Mhanna, a spokesperson for the International Committee of the Red Cross, said its field hospital in Rafah received 184 wounded people, 19 of whom were declared dead on arrival and eight more who later died of their wounds. The 27 dead were transferred to Nasser Hospital in the city of Khan Younis.
At least two women who survived the shooting described finding no aid supplies at the site when they got there.
Neima al-Aaraj said: 'There were many martyrs and wounded.'
Adding: 'There was no aid there. After the martyrs and wounded, I won't return, either way we will die.' Still from a video released by Israel's military, which claims to show gunmen shooting into a crowd at a similar shooting three days ago. / Credit: IDF
Tuesday's shooting follows a similar incident on Sunday which killed at least 31 and was disputed by the IDF, ,as well as a second on Monday at the same site which left three dead.
Meanwhile the Israeli military said Tuesday that three of its soldiers were killed in the Gaza Strip, in what appeared to be the deadliest attack on Israel's forces since it ended a ceasefire with Hamas in March.
The military said the three soldiers, all in their early 20s, fell during combat in northern Gaza on Monday, without providing details. Israeli media reported that they were killed in an explosion in the Jabaliya area.
What we know about the shootings so far?
Early on Sunday, witnesses and Palestinian health authorities say Israeli forces opened fire on large crowds around one kilometre from an Israeli run aid distribution site, killing at least 31 and wounding over 170.
On Monday, authorities said Israeli forces fired at people in the same location, killing at least three and wounding dozens.
Now most recently on Tuesday, crowds were again fired on, killing at least 27 and injuring at least 184 according to the International Committee of the Red Cross. A spokesperson for the UN also confirmed these deaths.
What have the Israeli army said?
The Israeli army described the claims about Sunday's attack as false reports and said initial investigations showed 'the IDF did not fire at civilians while they were near or within the humanitarian aid distribution site and that reports to this effect are false.'
They later published drone footage which they claim shows masked Hamas gunmen opening fire on people queuing for aid.
On the Monday shooting which killed three, the IDF said they fired warning shots toward, 'several suspects who advanced toward the troops and posed a threat to them.' They say this took place at a time when the aid distribution centre was closed and denied preventing people from accessing the site.
They claimed the same about Tuesday's shooting and said that reports regarding casualties were 'being looked into,' adding: 'IDF troops are not preventing the arrival of Gazan civilians to the humanitarian aid distribution sites. The warning shots were fired approximately half a kilometer away from the humanitarian aid distribution site toward several suspects who advanced toward the troops in such a way that posed a threat to them.'
The US-Isareli backed, Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, which operates the aid sites, says there has been no violence in or around them. On Tuesday, it acknowledged that the Israeli military was investigating whether civilians were wounded 'after moving beyond the designated safe corridor and into a closed military zone,' in an area that was 'well beyond our secure distribution site.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Netanyahu at crossroads as Trump's Hamas ceasefire deal offers clear route to peace
Benjamin Netanyahu will fly into the White House tonight (6 Jul) ahead of pivotal talks with Donald Trump and pressure from all sides to bring about an end to the 21-month war on Gaza. Israel has already accepted a US -brokered framework on a 60-day truce. On Friday, Trump was equivocal on Hamas ' acceptance of the deal, which, sources have told The Independent, hinge on whether or not it will lead to further negotiations for a permanent cessation of hostilities. The Independent 's chief international correspondent Bel Trew looks at the main sticking points to the deal for both sides, and whether Netanyahu's third visit to Trump's White House in six months will finally mark the beginning of the end of the war.
Belfast Telegraph
an hour ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Kneecap not the sole Vylans of the piece at Glastonbury festival
Although they were gazumped in their bid for notoriety at Glastonbury by two dreadlocked deadheads, Kneecap still managed to attract more publicity for themselves than the supposed stars of the festival. The sad reality was they got more headlines and TV coverage — and had more people talking about them — than the ongoing slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza and the almost forgotten plight of Hamas' Israeli hostages.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Could Hebron join the Abraham Accords?
You've heard of the two-state solution (or delusion, as I call it). But have you heard of the eight-state solution? Or the Palestinian Emirates plan? This is the idea of Professor Mordechai Kedar, who I spoke to in February 2024, just four months into the war started by the Palestinians on 7 October, 2023. If his vision once seemed outlandish or unrealistic to many, it now seems considerably less so in light of the fascinating developments emerging from Hebron. A Wall Street Journal report explains that a coalition of Hebron's most powerful clan leaders, led by Sheikh Wadee' al-Jaabari, has issued a public declaration of intent to break away from the Palestinian Authority (PA), establish an autonomous Emirate of Hebron, and seek membership of the Abraham Accords. In doing so, they recognised Israel as the Jewish nation-state (something the PA has never done) and rejected decades of Palestinian rejectionism. Their letter, addressed to Israeli economy minister Nir Barkat, marks an unprecedented rupture with the Palestinian national project as defined by the PLO, and is therefore a welcome shift towards a realistic vision of potential coexistence. And at the heart of this development is Professor Kedar himself. As the Wall Street Journal reported, it was Kedar who introduced Sheikh Jaabari to Barkat and who has, for years, quietly cultivated ties with traditional clan leaders across the West Bank. His blueprint, long dismissed by western diplomats, may now be finding traction precisely because the alternatives have collapsed in blood and failure. Kedar is an expert in Arab culture and a fluent Arabic speaker; a controversial and outspoken academic, he became internet famous in 2008 for schooling an Al Jazeera anchor on the Qu'ran in fluent Arabic. The core of Kedar's argument is sociological. In our 2024 conversation, he laid it out with characteristic clarity: the Arab world is divided into two categories of states. The failing states – Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Yemen – are all patchworks of sectarian, tribal and ethnic groups forced into artificial unity by post-colonial fiat. The successful ones – the Gulf monarchies, particularly the United Arab Emirates – are coherent clan-based structures where legitimacy flows from traditional authority, not abstract ideology. Kedar argues that Palestinian society fits the former mould: deeply clannish, inherently fragmented, and resistant to imposed national identities. The PLO and later the Palestinian Authority attempted to overwrite these loyalties with a centralised nationalist bureaucracy. The result? Corruption, repression, and dysfunction. As Kedar put it, 'the PA is illegitimate… just like Assad in Syria or Gaddafi in Libya.' In contrast, the eight-state or 'emirates' solution proposes a federation of autonomous city-states, each run by its dominant local clan (Hebron, Jericho, Nablus, Ramallah and so on) with rural areas remaining under Israeli sovereignty and offering Israeli citizenship to those who desire it. The model is explicitly drawn from the UAE, where seven emirates function under a federal structure, each rooted in a strong tribal base. Kedar is unapologetic about the cultural foundations of his model. Democracy, he argues, is not merely an institutional framework but a cultural ecosystem, one that is fundamentally alien to much of the Arab world. 'What we treat as sacred cornerstones of democracy,' he told me, 'are totally unacceptable in Islamic societies.' October 7th did not just end the credibility of the Palestinian Authority; it ended the credibility of the two-state paradigm itself. The horror of that day, the slaughter of 1,200 Israelis by Palestinian terrorists, was not an aberration but the culmination of decades of indoctrination, incitement and international indulgence. To continue proposing a sovereign Palestinian state governed by the same ideological and institutional forces that birthed that massacre is not diplomacy, it is moral and strategic derangement. None of this is guaranteed to deliver peace. The sheikhs of Hebron may not succeed. Their vision may be undercut by Israeli inertia, international opposition, or internal division. But their initiative represents something that has been absent from this conflict for too long: strategic imagination rooted in social reality. If Palestinians are to have a future beyond war, indoctrination and kleptocracy, the starting point is to abandon the delusions of the past and begin building with the materials at hand: a commitment to non-violence, recognition of Israel as Jewish state, local leadership, economic pragmatism and a willingness to coexist. The Hebron initiative is not merely a proposal, it is a mirror held up to decades of failed policy. And for those willing to look, it might just be the beginning of a new path.
