logo
L.A. lawyer and son-in-law of Tom Girardi pleads guilty to contempt of court

L.A. lawyer and son-in-law of Tom Girardi pleads guilty to contempt of court

Yahoo05-06-2025
Days after a judge sentenced legal titan Tom Girardi to seven years in prison for stealing from clients, his son-in-law — formerly a high-ranking attorney at his now-defunct firm — pleaded guilty to a federal charge in Illinois.
David Lira, 65, of Pasadena, admitted Thursday to one count of contempt of court for defying a Chicago judge's order concerning the distribution of settlement funds to clients whose relatives had perished in a 2018 Indonesian plane crash.
As part of broader litigation to hold Boeing accountable for defects in its 737-MAX jets, Lira and Girardi negotiated payouts totaling $7.5 million for a group of widows and orphans in 2020. But the clients, who lived in Indonesia, did not receive their full settlements.
Evidence would later emerge that Girardi was routinely using client money to underwrite a lavish lifestyle with his wife, 'Real Housewives of Beverly Hills' star Erika Jayne.
Read more: Tom Girardi – disgraced legal titan, former 'Real Housewives' husband – sentenced to 7 years in prison
Lira 'knew that Girardi did not pay the Lion Air Clients' settlement funds in full, in contravention of [U.S. District] Judge (Thomas) Durkin's orders, despite [the Indonesian clients'] inquiries about and demands for their Settlements,' according to a plea agreement filed Thursday.
Durkin referred the case for criminal investigation, and prosecutors in Chicago filed wire fraud and other charges against Lira and Girardi in 2021. Prosecutors dropped the Chicago-based case against Girardi, 86, last month. Girardi was separately convicted of wire fraud last year in Los Angeles, resulting in the seven-year prison sentence handed down this week.
Lira, who is married to Girardi's daughter Jacqueline, began working at his father-in-law's firm in 1999. He was sometimes called the firm's senior partner, though Girardi was the sole owner.
Lira resigned from Girardi Keese about six months before its 2020 collapse, after confronting his father-in-law about the Lion Air case and demanding that Girardi pay the victims. As he moved on to another firm, Lira did not alert the victims or authorities about Girardi's mishandling of the money.
Lira's defense attorney, Damon Cheronis, noted that 'the plea agreement did not assert any acts of fraud on the part of Mr. Lira.'
Read more: Vegas parties, celebrities and boozy lunches: How legal titan Tom Girardi seduced the State Bar
'Mr. Lira continually asked Mr. Girardi to pay these clients their rightful settlement money pursuant to the court order, however Girardi did not,' Cheronis said in a statement.
Lira is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 8. Prosecutors have not yet recommended a particular penalty, but they indicated in the plea agreement that under federal sentencing guidelines, Lira faces six to eight years in prison.
Girardi and Lira represented the victims in the Lion Air crash alongside Chicago-based lawyer Jay Edelson. It was ultimately Edelson who brought to the judge's attention that the Indonesian clients were not paid by Girardi.
'We're pleased that David Lira, after years of portraying himself as an innocent bystander, has finally admitted he is a criminal,' Edelson told The Times on Thursday. 'We remain hopeful that the other criminals who helped Girardi pull off the largest Ponzi scheme in the history of the plaintiff's bar will also face disbarment and long prison sentences.'
The widows and orphans ultimately received their settlement payments after Edelson's insurance provider agreed to foot the cost.
The State Bar is pursuing disciplinary action against Lira and two other attorneys who worked at Girardi Keese. Lira continues to practice for a Century City law firm, though restrictions imposed by a bar court judge prohibit him from handling client money.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in iconic soft drink
Trump says Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in iconic soft drink

UPI

time24 minutes ago

  • UPI

Trump says Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in iconic soft drink

President Donald Trump said Wednesday that Coca-Cola will use cane sugar in its iconic beverage. File Photo by Billie Jean Shaw/UPI July 17 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump has announced that Coca-Cola has agreed to use cane sugar in its iconic drink instead of high-fructose corn syrup, though the Atlanta-based conglomerate has yet to confirm the move. Trump, a known heavy consumer of Diet Coke, made the announcement on his Truth Social media platform on Wednesday. "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," he said. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them -- You'll see. It's just better!" High-fructose corn syrup is used as a sweetener in Coca-Cola in the United States. The move to cane sugar would align the U.S. product with Coca-Cola sold in other countries, including Mexico. Coca-Cola has not confirmed that it is adopting cane sugar for its U.S. drinks. In a statement, the company said: "We appreciate President Trump's enthusiasm for our iconic Coca-Cola brand. More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon."

Critics of Trump's presidential library fundraising say "there are no rules"
Critics of Trump's presidential library fundraising say "there are no rules"

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Critics of Trump's presidential library fundraising say "there are no rules"

President Trump's efforts to direct millions of dollars to his future presidential library has drawn fresh attention to a lack of visibility into the identities or potential interests of the donors who are funding it, a longstanding Washington concern facing past presidents from both parties. Two prominent Senate Democrats say they are preparing to introduce a bill Wednesday that would regulate fundraising for presidential libraries, according to documents shared with CBS News. "Donald Trump is using his presidential library as a tool for bribery while he is still in office," said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, of Massachusetts, who is introducing the legislation with Sen. Richard Blumenthal, of Connecticut. "Many of the donations to Trump's future library are coming straight from companies and special interests that need a favor from Trump," Warren said. "Right now there are no rules." The effort was spurred by a series of announcements about gifts to the Trump library, including an opulently appointed Boeing 747 given to the U.S. Air Force by the Qatari royal family for the president's use, after which it would be donated to the library for Mr. Trump's post-presidency. The proceeds of four large legal settlements with the president are also reportedly bound for his library fund. The multimillion-dollar settlements stem from Mr. Trump's lawsuits against Meta, ABC News, X (formerly Twitter) and Paramount. Paramount is the parent company of CBS News. The funds from the four settlements alone could total up to $63 million, according to a CBS News review of news reports and court documents. Sens. Warren and Blumenthal, along with three House members, Reps. Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), are proposing several measures to restrict fundraising for presidential libraries. Among them is a contribution cap of $10,000 per person while the president is still serving in office. The legislation also proposes quarterly disclosures for all donations of $200 or more, and imposes a two-year "cooling off" period after the end of their term during which a president cannot accept donations from foreign nationals, federal government contractors or individuals seeking presidential pardons. Finally, the bill also explicitly bars the use of library donations for personal expenses. "Right now, there are basically no rules," said Warren. "The settlements show everyone who has business pending in front of the federal government, that if they've got enough money and can funnel it to Donald Trump through his future presidential library, they might receive better treatment from the US government." The White House did not respond to CBS News' request for comment. Funding is largely opaque and unregulated The total amount raised for the Trump library to date is likely far greater than the amounts visible through the president's publicly announced legal settlements. For instance, funds leftover from the $239 million raised by the Trump-Vance inaugural committee — including millions from tech companies and CEOs such as Amazon, OpenAI, Apple and Uber — were expected to be redirected to the library, according to multiple news reports. It's unclear how much of those funds have already been transferred. Donations to inaugural funds are required to be reported publicly, whereas presidential libraries are under no such obligation. The $400 million jet the Trump administration accepted from Qatar in May is also slated to be transferred to the Trump library shortly before he leaves office. Other than those instances, the funding for the private foundations that support presidential libraries is largely opaque and unregulated, experts said. "No one outside the organization knows who contributes to presidential library funds," said Brett Kappel, a campaign finance lawyer who advises tax exempt organizations. "That information is provided to the IRS, but is not made public." While campaign funds have historically been tightly regulated under a series of laws passed after the Watergate scandal, there are no restrictions on donations to presidential libraries, Kappel said. While in office, presidents can solicit unlimited library donations from anyone — including foreign nationals, individuals seeking presidential pardons and corporations with federal contracts. "The lack of transparency could raise the appearance of impropriety," said Kappel. "No one will know who is making donations to the presidential library while the president is still in office and making government policy." Trustees of the two Trump library organizations and the Trump Organization did not respond to CBS News' request for comment. The Obama Presidential Foundation, which oversees the development of former President Barack Obama's library in Chicago, was founded in January 2014, a year after Obama's second term began. The foundation said it would disclose all donors and donations over $200 on a quarterly basis on their website in an effort to increase transparency. It was estimated in June 2021 that the center will cost roughly $700 million to construct. President George W. Bush's library foundation began fundraising efforts in the spring of 2009, after he left office. The foundation did not publicly disclose its donors. The cost of that effort clocked in at $250 million. The George W. Bush Presidential Center, on the campus of Southern Methodist University in Dallas, opened in 2013. The first presidential library was established by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1938. Since then, presidential libraries are built and maintained with a mix of private and federal funds. Typically the library itself is constructed with private donations, and occasionally with support from local government or university partners. The library is then transferred to the federal government and maintained by the National Archives and Records Administration, or NARA, which oversees the preservation of presidential documents and has a congressionally appropriated budget for maintaining the library structures. Two nonprofits behind the Trump library In the last year, the Trump family and associates have established two funds for presidential library donations, according to incorporation records reviewed by CBS News. Both are incorporated as nonprofits in Florida. The first, the Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Fund Inc., was created in December 2024, before President Trump was sworn in, and shortly after ABC announced it would donate $15 million to the future Trump library to settle a defamation claim the president brought against the network. According to incorporation documents, the fund was established by Jacob Roth, a Florida-based attorney who also filed the paperwork for both the Trump Vance Inauguration Committee Inc. and the Trump Vance Inaugural Committee Inc. in November. According to incorporation documents for the organization, the purpose of the fund is to "to preserve and steward the legacy of President Donald J. Trump and his presidency." A few months later, in May, a second nonprofit was incorporated under the name Donald J. Trump Presidential Library Foundation. There are three listed trustees: Eric Trump; Tiffany Trump's husband, Michael Boulos; and James Kiley, a New York attorney who represented Mr. Trump between 2020 and 2022 during one of his legal battles against his niece, Mary Trump. This foundation was created to "steward, preserve, and celebrate the legacy and historical record of President Donald J. Trump and his presidency," according to filings. There may not be rules for what money can go into a presidential library fund, but there are strict rules for how nonprofit funds can be spent. As nonprofit 501(c)(3)s, tax laws prohibit the use of funds from a presidential library for personal benefit. The IRS is in charge of enforcing all conflict-of-interest laws for nonprofits, although experts are skeptical about the agency's political will to enforce those provisions. "501(c)(3)s are supposed to be used for charitable purposes. To the extent funds are being used beyond that, and outside the scope of a presidential library, that's something the IRS would have to look into," said Viriginia Canter, who served as senior ethics counsel for the Treasury Department under both Republican and Democratic administrations. There is no indication that Mr. Trump or his family are using funds for the libraries for personal expenses. Past library controversies The Trump family is not the first to face criticism over donations to a library fund while in office. President Bill Clinton faced significant pushback after he pardoned billionaire businessman Marc Rich, who'd fled to Switzerland after he was indicted in 1983 on more than 50 counts of wire fraud, racketeering, trading with Iran during an embargo and evading more than $48 million in U.S. income taxes. Clinton's pardon — which was issued just hours before he left office in January 2001 — faced scrutiny even from some of his closest allies, who said Rich's pardon appeared to have been bought. They pointed to the $450,000 donation Rich's ex-wife, Denise Rich, bestowed to the Clinton library foundation and the additional $100,000 she donated to Hillary Clinton's 2000 Senate campaign. And in 2008, a GOP lobbyist with ties to the Bush administration was caught on video allegedly soliciting a donation for his presidential library in exchange for setting up a meeting with top White House officials. (It was a sting operation set up by a newspaper; no money changed hands.) Congress has tried, and largely failed for almost two decades, to pass legislation that would require organizations raising funds for presidential libraries to disclose donations. Since 2007, the House has passed five bills regarding presidential library funding transparency — the most recent being in 2019 — but they have all been stalled in the Senate. Son of man who was violently detained by ICE reacts after release Mike Johnson breaks from Trump, calls on DOJ to release Epstein files 7.3 magnitude earthquake hits southern Alaska

Elon Musk's xAI Is in Talks to Lease Data Center Space in Saudi Arabia
Elon Musk's xAI Is in Talks to Lease Data Center Space in Saudi Arabia

Business Insider

timean hour ago

  • Business Insider

Elon Musk's xAI Is in Talks to Lease Data Center Space in Saudi Arabia

Elon Musk's AI startup, xAI, is in early talks to lease data center space in Saudi Arabia. The goal is to expand the company's infrastructure into areas with low energy costs and strong political support. According to people familiar with the matter, xAI is speaking with two possible partners. One is Humain, a Saudi-backed AI company offering several gigawatts of capacity in the future. The other is a company currently building a 200-megawatt facility that could be ready much sooner. In both cases, xAI wouldn't own the facilities. Instead, it would lease space to power its AI models. Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Although Humain's proposal offers massive long-term potential, its facilities haven't been built yet. This makes the 200-megawatt facility a more realistic option in the near term. For reference, a facility with one gigawatt of power could use as much energy as 900,000 homes per year, according to Carbon Collective. Interestingly, former U.S. Energy Department official Kathryn Huff explained that as demand for power increases, companies will need to carefully balance energy costs with performance, which could possibly lead them to turn to countries with new nuclear infrastructure. Separately, xAI is also exploring deals in the UAE with Abu Dhabi-based AI firm G42, as well as in African countries where energy and labor costs are lower. Still, Saudi Arabia is the top candidate thanks to its wealth and access to specialized AI chips. The company has also recently raised $10 billion in funding and is preparing to raise more funds at a $200 billion valuation, as it continues to build its infrastructure, which includes a supercomputing hub called Colossus in Memphis. What Is the Prediction for Tesla Stock? When it comes to Elon Musk's companies, most of them are privately held. However, retail investors can invest in his most popular company, Tesla (TSLA). Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Hold consensus rating on TSLA stock based on 13 Buys, 13 Holds, and eight Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average TSLA price target of $298.97 per share implies 7.1% downside risk.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store