
Left-leaning actress Natasha Lyonne leading efforts to lobby Trump admin on AI regulation
"My primary interest is that people get paid for their life's work," Lyonne said in a report in the Wall Street Journal.
The story detailed Lyonne's efforts to lobby Hollywood heavyweights to sign onto her letter to the Trump administration in March, urging against the loosening of regulations around AI, which they deem a potential threat to their intellectual property without proper protections in place.
The WSJ noted the White House's pending AI action plan "could influence how U.S. copyright rules are applied to training large language models," with tech companies like Google and OpenAI saying they need such models to keep theirs up to date and compete globally with rivals like China.
The Hollywood letter said the companies "are arguing for a special government exemption so they can freely exploit America's creative and knowledge industries, despite their substantial revenues and available funds. There is no reason to weaken or eliminate the copyright protections that have helped America flourish."
Lyonne and more than 400 others, including such figures as Paul McCartney, Ron Howard and Ben Stiller, signed the letter.
Lyonne, known for her roles in the series "Poker Face" and "Russian Doll," is a partner in a new studio called Asteria, which describes itself as "an artist-led generative AI film and animation studio powered by the first clean and ethical AI model."
Like many figures in Hollywood, Lyonne is not a fan of the president, endorsing Kamala Harris in 2024 and posting in a now-deleted X post in 2020 about turning Texas blue to defeat Trump.
Earlier this year, she told The Hollywood Reporter she was concerned for marginalized communities, saying of Trump, "It's very weird to have like a showbiz guy in charge, is surreal. I'm actually pretty horrified by how strategic and effective this whole thing has been."
She added she was concerned that 12-year-olds wouldn't be able to get abortions, later clarifying that she was referring to young victims of rape or incest who may be forced to give birth.
The WSJ reported that Trump officials were unsure whether they'd take any action on the AI front, due to the complexities involved and having to take one side over another.
There have been mixed rulings on the subject as well, with fair use arguments favoring companies like Meta and Anthropic in two cases last month because the copyrighted material used to train their AI models was sufficiently transformed, the Wall Street Journal reported. But others have favored copyright holders, depending on the context.
OpenAI and Google put forth their own submissions earlier this year to the White House Office of Science and Technology asking their respective companies to be able to train their models on copyrighted material.
"The federal government can both secure Americans' freedom to learn from AI and avoid forfeiting our AI lead to the PRC [People's Republic of China] by preserving American AI models' ability to learn from copyrighted material," OpenAI's letter states.
Google's letter states, "Balanced copyright rules, such as fair use and text-and-data mining exceptions, have been critical to enabling AI systems to learn from prior knowledge and publicly available data, unlocking scientific and social advances. These exceptions allow for the use of copyrighted, publicly available material for AI training without significantly impacting rightsholders and avoid often highly unpredictable, imbalanced, and lengthy negotiations with data holders during model development or scientific experimentation."
This week, a deal that had been reached between Sens. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, over how states can regulate artificial intelligence was pulled from President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" bill.
The collapsed agreement would have required states seeking to access hundreds of millions of dollars in AI infrastructure funding in the "big, beautiful" bill to refrain from adopting new regulations on the technology for five years, a compromise down from the original 10 years.
The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. Fox News Digital also reached out to Lyonne's representatives, as well as Google and OpenAI, for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NORAD intercepts plane in Trump's Bedminster no-fly zone: 'No excuses'
A fighter jet scrambled by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) intercepted a civilian aircraft Saturday afternoon after it entered restricted airspace over Bedminster, New Jersey, where President Donald Trump is spending the holiday weekend. The pilot flew into a temporary flight restriction (TFR) zone just before 2:40 p.m. ET, according to a NORAD statement. The aircraft was safely escorted out of the area after a standard "headbutt" maneuver was used to get the pilot's attention. Air Force F-16 Struck By Drone During Training Flight Over Arizona In 2023 This was the fourth restricted airspace violation of the day and not the last. NORAD says another incursion happened later, making for five unauthorized entries in a single day over presidential airspace. Read On The Fox News App NORAD responded swiftly, using its layered defense system of radar, satellites and fighter aircraft designed to protect U.S. and Canadian skies. The airspace over Bedminster is locked down any time Trump is in town. Second Navy Fighter Jet Goes Overboard From Truman Aircraft Carrier, Pilots Ejected Officials are warning private pilots to do their homework before article source: NORAD intercepts plane in Trump's Bedminster no-fly zone: 'No excuses'
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin expands efforts to strip naturalized Americans of citizenship
[Source] The Justice Department has issued new guidelines directing attorneys to aggressively pursue stripping citizenship from naturalized Americans who concealed crimes or posed national security threats during their naturalization process, a policy that could affect the nearly 25 million people. What you need to know: A June 11 memo from Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate establishes multiple priority categories for citizenship revocation and instructs the Civil Division to 'prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.' The policy focuses on individuals who 'pose a potential danger to national security, including those with a nexus to terrorism' and those who 'committed felonies that were not disclosed during the naturalization process.' The memo permits attorneys to target those facing 'pending criminal charges' that have not yet secured a conviction. Shumate outlined that the benefits include 'the government's ability to revoke the citizenship of individuals who engaged in the commission of war crimes, extrajudicial killings or other serious human rights abuses.' Pros and cons: Hans von Spakovsky of conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation defended the initiative, telling NPR, 'I do not understand how anyone could possibly be opposed to the Justice Department taking such action to protect the nation from obvious predators, criminals and terrorists.' Others, however, have expressed alarm over constitutional issues. Law professor and former U.S. attorney Joyce Vance cautioned that 'the provision is so vague that it would permit the Division to denaturalize for just about anything,' potentially targeting 'troublesome journalists who are naturalized citizens' or 'students.' The administration's approach has drawn political attention, with President Donald Trump recently saying he will 'take a look' at potentially deporting Elon Musk — who has been critical of his recent 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — remarking that 'we might have to put DOGE on Elon.' Broader implications: The policy marks a substantial escalation from earlier initiatives, including Operation Janus launched under the Obama administration, which identified hundreds of immigrants who had been ordered deported but became U.S. citizens under another identity. The administration has already succeeded in one case against Elliott Duke, a British-born Army veteran convicted of distributing child sexual abuse material, who now lacks citizenship in any country. Trending on NextShark: This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices. Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community. Trending on NextShark: Subscribe here now! Download the NextShark App: Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Albo slammed for tariff ‘white flag'
Anthony Albanese's admission that he does not expect a US tariff carve out ahead of the upcoming deal deadline is 'waving a white flag' to Washington, according to the opposition. The 90-day freeze on Donald Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs is set to expire on Wednesday. Australian goods are subject to universal 10 per cent duties, with steel and aluminium slugged with imposts of up to 50 per cent. The Prime Minister told a News Corp summit this week he did not expect that to change. Opposition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sunday he did not know why the Prime Minister had been so quick to pre-empt the US decision. 'We have seen carve outs for some countries,' Mr Hogan told Sky News. 'We know the UK have had a bit of a carve out on the steel and aluminium tariffs – remember, steel and aluminium tariffs have gone up to 50 per cent, they're not at 10 per cent. 'Countries have got carve outs to that … Mexico get a few carve outs, Canada have got a few carve outs from what tariffs they initially had as well. 'So there are countries dealing and talking to the US President but not ours.' Only the UK and Vietnam have so far reached trade deals in the 90-day pause, but neither have had tariffs removed altogether. EU officials this week said trade talks had fallen through and that they were shifting their efforts to maintaining the status quo to get more time to negotiate. India has also failed to lock in a deal. Mr Hogan put the lack of an Australian exemption down to Mr Albanese's failure to meet the US President, even though plenty of world leaders had met Mr Trump and still faced far worse tariffs. 'It is embarrassing that our Prime Minister has not been able to secure a physical meeting,' Mr Hogan said. 'I think initially it wasn't a priority of his – now he seems to be struggling to get one. 'Given the importance of that country, not just on the economic relationship we have, but the national security relationship … the fact our two leaders haven't had a chat and Albanese hasn't been able to secure that is absolutely embarrassing.' Mr Albanese has had several phone calls with Mr Trump, including after Labor's landslide win at the federal election. In his comments to the News Corp summit on Friday, Mr Albanese repeated his government's line that the US tariffs were 'an act of economic self-harm' and that he would continue to make the case for an Australian exemption 'We continue to be engaged with our American friends, but they have a different position on tariffs,' he said. 'If you look at what the impact has been so far, our beef exports are up. 'Our exports in a range of other products are up as well. 'Lamb's down a little bit, steel and aluminium have been impacted, but not hugely. 'We are in a position where on 9 July, that won't really have an impact on us because that's about other countries who have higher rates overnight.' Mr Trump included Australia in sweeping tariffs after telling Mr Albanese a Canberra carve out was 'under consideration'. Pressed on that interaction with Mr Trump, Mr Albanese said they 'did have a constructive discussion' but that 'President Trump … made a decision that's consistent with his public comments'. 'He did say that, but he has also said that there's no more beautiful word in the English language than 'tariff',' he said. 'Now we have a different view. That wouldn't even be … in my, to quote top 10 lists … that wouldn't be in my top million of words.'