Now, India says in UNSC Gaza ceasefire must be put in place
Indian ambassador P Harish reiterated that the pathway to enduring peace is rooted in a two-State solution - one that establishes a sovereign, viable and independent State of Palestine within recognised and mutually agreed borders, living side by side with Israel in peace.
"The way ahead is clear, and India has been consistent in this regard. The ongoing human suffering must not be allowed to continue. Humanitarian assistance needs to be facilitated in a safe, sustained and timely manner.
There is no substitute to peace. A ceasefire must be put in place. All hostages must be released," said Harish, adding that dialogue and diplomacy remain the only viable paths to achieving these objectives and that there are no other fixes or solutions.
India had earlier this year abstained from voting on a UNGA resolution for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, even though it had underlined the significance of truce in its remarks.
"India shares historic and strong ties with our Palestinian brothers and sisters. We have always stood by them and our commitment towards the Palestinian cause is unwavering," said Harish.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
24 minutes ago
- Mint
Demographic changes in Assam, Bengal 'ticking time bomb', need to find solutions: TN Guv RN Ravi
Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi has expressed concern over 'demographic changes' in some parts of the country, including Assam and West Bengal. He said the demographic changes were a 'ticking time bomb', as he urged stakeholders to find solutions to the changes in parts of the country. Addressing students and faculty at Rashtriya Raksha University (RRU) in Gandhinagar, RN Ravi remarked that harbouring bitterness over language is not in India's character or culture. "This country always managed to fight external aggression. But when it comes to internal matters, what happened in the past? In 1947, India was Partitioned because of internal implosion. People following an ideology announced they don't want to live with the rest of us. This ideology broke our nation," emphasised Ravi. "Is anyone concerned about the changes in demography which took place in Assam, West Bengal and Purvanchal (parts of UP and Bihar) during the last 30-40 years? Can anyone predict today that in the coming 50 years, work for partitioning the nation will not happen in these areas?" he asked. "We should conduct a study on the sensitive demography growing in some regions and what will be its future. This issue is like a ticking time bomb. We have to think about how we will deal with this issue in the future and start finding solutions from today itself," he said. Speaking of the language rows in Maharashtra and Karnataka, RN Ravi said, 'After independence, we started fighting with each other. One of the reasons was language. They [those advocating states based on linguistic identity] called it linguistic nationalism.' He said the Central government has consistently emphasised that all languages deserve same respect. "Union Home Minister Amit Shah has said on numerous occasions that all Indian languages are our national languages and we respect each one of them. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has also said that at least primary education should be imparted in local languages in each state," said Ravi.
Deccan Herald
26 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
PM Modi can't say 'Trump is lying' over ceasefire as US President will lay bare truth: Rahul Gandhi
Gandhi said Trump is making the remarks to put pressure on the Indian government for the trade deal.
The Print
26 minutes ago
- The Print
China is enjoying the strain in India-US ties and Trump cosying up to Pakistan
For years, India and the US appeared united in their efforts to counterbalance China. Today, that unity seems more transactional than strategic, according to Chinese analysts . They point to Donald Trump's renewed interest in mediating India-Pakistan tensions, high-level US engagements with Pakistan's military leadership, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio's outreach to Islamabad as signs of a shift . As one Chinese commentator put it, 'Trump's erratic policies have not hurt China; they have hurt India.' Chinese media are rife with headlines such as 'US pursues 'mineral diplomacy' with Pakistan while sidelining India' and 'By backing Pakistan, the US has effectively joined China in cornering India.' Once hailed as a counterbalance to Chinese influence in Asia, the India-US partnership is now showing signs of strain. As the Trump administration renews and deepens its ties with Pakistan, Beijing is pushing the narrative that Washington is gradually sidelining New Delhi. India sidelined, Pakistan revived Chinese commentators underscore Washington's abrupt pivot. Barely a month after imposing tariffs on Pakistan, the US was discussing an $8 trillion mineral venture in Balochistan. For Beijing, this is a clear signal of Pakistan's strategic value being restored, while India's diplomatic space continues to shrink. According to Chinese discourse, India misread US signals and launched a military operation against Pakistan, a move that allegedly backfired. With Pakistan's defence bolstered by Chinese arms, India suffered substantial losses. Meanwhile, delivery of US weapons to India is delayed. From Beijing's vantage point, the US treated India not as an equal partner, but as a regional actor to be mediated. The result, Chinese commentators argue, was military embarrassment, diplomatic isolation, and a weakened regional posture. One Weibo post declared: 'Modi's lies are exposed, and Trump's comments are a slap in the face as he openly sides with Pakistan.' Another user wrote: 'The United States is trying to balance both sides to protect its regional interests.' For Beijing, this underscores a core message that Washington prioritises its own interests over siding firmly with India. The result is a strategic dilemma, where Indian expectations diverge from US strategic calculations. India's diplomatic challenges in Beijing's narrative Chinese analysts consistently characterise India's diplomacy as brittle and ineffective. Despite New Delhi's longstanding labelling of Pakistan as a terrorist state, they argue India has failed to secure unequivocal backing from Washington. Instead, US engagement with and praise for Pakistan have further complicated India's regional standing and credibility. 'The deterioration in US–India relations is two-sided and visible,' read a widely circulated Weibo post. Guancha editor Yang Rong noted that while the Biden administration once promoted India as a regional alternative to China, Trump-era policy has become more cautious, unwilling to fully integrate security and trade interests. Analyst Liu Chenghui warns that any US–China détente would also leave India further exposed. Beijing's narrative casts India as squeezed between assertive Chinese pressure and American ambivalence. Pakistan, by contrast, is depicted as deftly maintaining good relations with both powers. The US tilt towards Pakistan, in this context, signals that India's much-vaunted strategic autonomy is reactive and vulnerable in an evolving world order. Shen Yi, assistant dean at Fudan University's School of International Relations and Public Affairs, argues that the US is not a genuine strategic partner for India. Instead, it is a power willing to undermine New Delhi's standing to maintain regional fluidity, fuelling instability and hastening the collapse of the so-called 'second island chain' strategy. In this telling, India's strategic posture is increasingly precarious. Surrounded by adversarial neighbours and lacking dependable partners, Chinese commentators suggest India must focus on stabilising ties at home and with key regional players, particularly Pakistan and China, before it can project broader influence. China is a clear winner The US offers of mediation, including military and economic aid to Pakistan, sparked outrage in India, where Kashmir remains deeply sensitive. Chinese commentators argue that Washington continues to underestimate South Asian nationalist sentiments. India's rejection of these overtures, in their view, reflects not just diminished trust but growing strategic insecurity. 'The more India caters to Washington, the more it 'cuts its own flesh',' said Liu Zongyi, senior research fellow at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies, a government think tank. Once touted as a cornerstone of Indo-Pacific strategy, the India-US relationship now appears weakened following Washington's engagement with Pakistan and its perceived failure to support India in times of need. From Beijing's perspective, this indifference by Washington is driving India closer to China. In Chinese discourse, the US is framed as a power driven by expediency, quick to pivot, slow to commit, and increasingly withdrawing support for India. India, in turn, is portrayed as playing both sides, indecisive, and lacking strategic coherence, a 'fence-sitter' unable to secure the confidence of either Washington or Beijing. It further declares India as overestimating its strategic value to Washington while underestimating the risks of aligning too closely with the US and drifting away from China. In contrast, China's self-image is one of strategic constancy, a steady hand in a volatile region, comfortable with long-term positioning. It presents itself as the only consistent beneficiary of the evolving regional realignment. With Pakistan firmly within its orbit and the US rekindling ties with Islamabad, the regional dynamics is, in Beijing's telling, tilting decisively in China's favour while India scrambles to recalibrate. Sana Hashmi is a fellow at the Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. She tweets @sanahashmi1. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
