logo
Bengaluru mom defends viral video of domestic worker's son eating on floor: ‘Doesn't need your pity'

Bengaluru mom defends viral video of domestic worker's son eating on floor: ‘Doesn't need your pity'

Hindustan Times16 hours ago

A Bengaluru nutritionist's video sharing parenting tips went viral after it showed her domestic worker's child eating while sitting on the floor, drawing sharp criticism online. Nutritionist Sonakshi Sharma shared the video to highlight how baby-led weaning (BLW) is not a Western concept, but something Indian mothers have practised for generations. In the video, Sonakshi Sharma explains how baby-led weaning has been used by Indian mothers for generations.(Instagram/fitnaari.india)
'Remember our moms being so busy with housework that they used to leave us with the food, and in that process we learnt to eat. BLW is just the same story wrapped in a seemingly exorbitant cover!,' Sharma says in the video.
The clip shows her sitting on a sofa while her baby eats from a high chair. However, in the next shot, her domestic worker's three-year-old son is shown sitting on the floor, eating kheer and roti. Take a look at the video here:
The contrast drew backlash from viewers who said it highlighted inequality, especially given the difference in how the two children were presented.
Sharma defended her video, clarifying that the clips were filmed on different days and that the child simply preferred to sit on the floor.
'I don't practice idiotic things like untouchability in 2025 for god's sake! We just valued this child's preference, that's it. I understand that those showing concern are good people, but this child doesn't really need your pity for such a trivial thing,' she said.
She also criticised the online response, claiming viewers were reading into it the wrong way.
'You're seeing a 'Househelp's child' sitting on the floor, while I'm seeing just a child who chose to sit on the floor—the same way my daughter would sometimes choose to do—the same floor where we regularly sit and eat,' she added.
The video drew mixed reactions online. While some users supported Sharma's explanation, others felt the comparison was not needed.
'Whatever your justification is for why your help's three-year-old is sitting on the floor, it still does give out wrong message. This comparison reel was unnecessary in the first place,' one user wrote.
Another countered, 'God! All the drama queens crying in the comments because kid is sitting on the floor. It's an Indian household, we all sit on the floor.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'You're not like other Indians': Woman opens up about subtle racism faced abroad, internet reacts
'You're not like other Indians': Woman opens up about subtle racism faced abroad, internet reacts

Mint

time6 minutes ago

  • Mint

'You're not like other Indians': Woman opens up about subtle racism faced abroad, internet reacts

A Reddit post by an Indian woman living abroad has struck a chord with many around the world, especially those who have faced the exhausting, often demeaning, experience of subtle or 'casual' racism. The anonymous user took to the subreddit r/nri to share her recent encounter at a spa that left her feeling stunned and unsure how to react. A white woman asked where she was from. When the poster replied 'India', the woman followed up with, 'Did you learn English after coming here? Your English is exactly like mine.' The Redditor responded calmly, saying she had spoken English all her life, but was met with an uncomfortable silence and a blank stare. 'It wasn't aggressive,' she wrote, 'but it was so ignorant… Stuff like this happens too often, and it's exhausting.' The post has triggered a wider conversation online about how Indians, and people of colour more broadly, are expected to tolerate microaggression, a term used to describe the subtle, often unintentional acts of racism or bias that chip away at one's identity and dignity. From getting ID-checked twice at concerts to being warned 'it's expensive' at salons, the woman listed incidents that many immigrants and non-white people will find painfully familiar. She also touched upon colourism, recounting how people often say, 'You're not like other Indians,' presumably because she is fair-skinned, a comment she rightly questioned: 'How is that even a compliment?' The post has since received hundreds of responses, with many Indian-origin users, as well as other people of colour, sharing their own stories and coping mechanisms. "It's expensive" is absolutely best upselling skill that sales folks have learned to make someone feel "less than" and hope they fall in the trap to buy more. It does get directed more towards immigrants. Another user wrote, "If you want to push them into the corner, just ask them very politely that you don't understand, 'I don't understand, could you please elaborate". And if they move forward, just enjoy them digging their own racist hole. Several users pointed out how such interactions often stem from a narrow or stereotypical view of India — that it's a poor, underdeveloped country where English isn't widely spoken. 'I get frustrated whenever I go in to eat alone and while I wait to get seated, I get asked "Doordash?". Has happened with me couple of times now. This flips me over. I wait to see if a white guy who walks up alone gets asked the same way. This definitely is racial profiling. May not be intentional but I tend to lose it whenever this happens," a user wrote.

'Why double standard?': Employee questions office dress code after boss bans slippers but allows crop tops
'Why double standard?': Employee questions office dress code after boss bans slippers but allows crop tops

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Why double standard?': Employee questions office dress code after boss bans slippers but allows crop tops

A Reddit post has sparked discussion around workplace attire and perceived double standards. In a post titled 'Dresscode double standards: crop tops ok, slippers not ok', a user named @peela_doodh12 shared an incident from his workplace—a digital news company that reportedly has no official dress code—where he was instructed by his boss not to wear slippers to the office. A Redditor questioned office dress code norms after being told not to wear slippers.(Representational image/Unsplash) (Also read: Employee details ordeal of manager 'shamelessly' asking for money despite repeated refusals) 'I work at a digital news website where there's no official dress code. Some women coworkers wear crop tops that expose the navel and I have no issue with that,' the post begins. 'But here's what bothers me: I was once told by my boss not to wear slippers. My role doesn't involve attending meetings or any situation that demands formal wear. So why the double standard? If others can dress comfortably, why can't I wear slippers as long as I'm doing my job well?' Check out the post here: Mixed reactions flood the comments The post quickly attracted comments from fellow Redditors, with users weighing in from both sides of the discussion. One user sarcastically suggested, 'Go with barefoot so your supervisor will request you to wear at least slippers.' Another offered a more technical explanation: 'Slippers are dangerous during evacuations as per Health and Safety ISO standards. Your company is ensuring your safety. This is followed in all MNCs.' Yet some responses reflected personal observations and biases. 'Most of the girls who wear crop tops to the office keep pulling the dress down to cover their tummy… wonder why they chose to wear crop tops,' one commenter wrote. Others took a more neutral or supportive stance. 'People can wear anything publicly decent that they want to if there's no dress code. There's nothing wrong in that. And of course, no one wears a dirty pair of slippers to office if that's what you're imagining,' said a user. (Also read: US company demands Indian employee keep camera on during work hours. His response) However, not everyone agreed. 'Who wears slippers at office? Doesn't matter what your role is, at least respect the decorum of the place,' one Redditor argued. In defence, the original poster responded, 'Read the post. There is no dress code. Can you tell me what exactly is wrong with slippers? How does that not maintain the decorum? If I'm doing job fine how does it matter what one wears.' Another commenter added, 'I used to wear bathroom slippers to my startup, no one cared.'

The barefoot Naga in Kargil's bloodiest night
The barefoot Naga in Kargil's bloodiest night

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

The barefoot Naga in Kargil's bloodiest night

Chandigarh: It was the bloodiest night of the Kargil War . As dawn broke on June 29, 1999, a beleaguered Commanding Officer of the 2 Rajputana Rifles (2 Raj Rif), Col M B Ravindranath, Vir Chakra, was taking stock of the blood that had seeped into the forbidding, lifeless alpine rocks. Three of his officers and 10 other ranks had made the supreme sacrifice, 51 were wounded, including 36 critically. None more heroic of those against-all-odds actions than that of the Naga officer, Capt N Kenguruse. As the attack stalled that night, Kenguruse had barefoot launched a suicidal assault up the vertical cliff face of Lone Hill on the Drass LoC. The slippery slopes of Lone Hill had not afforded traction to his Army-regulation snow boots, so he just dumped them. But the odds were so stacked against the daredevil action that Kenguruse never got to the top. All that the Pakistani soldiers of the 6 Northern Light Infantry (SIKKIS) had to do was to push boulders off the top and onto Kenguruse and Hav. Sharman Singh, both of whom were clinging to a precipice under angled fire from the top. They plunged off the cliff, 200 feet to their deaths. Kenguruse, forever frozen in immortality at age 25, was awarded the Maha Vir Chakra (MVC) while Singh the Sena Medal (Gallantry). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like local network access control Esseps Learn More Undo Kenguruse's fatal initiative epitomised the raw courage displayed by the Indian Infantry in the unique alpine battles of Kargil where it attacked the waiting enemy in frontal assaults and up heights ranging in excess of 19,000 feet. These were heights, terrain and such tempestuous weather, that other nations would dare send only mountaineering expeditions. But here Indian soldiers fought with blood, guts and 'jugaad' resulting in 545 deaths. The Indian soldiers had etched with their blood a saga unparalleled in the annals of super-high altitude warfare. That fateful night, Kenguruse, the indomitable Naga from Nerhema village, Kohima, was leading the battalion's Ghatak platoon (commandos) tasked by the CO to act as a protective patrol to Delta Company's infiltrating column under the command of Maj. Mohit Saxena, Vir Chakra. D Company''s assault got held up due to the steep and forbidding approach up a vertical cliff face of Lone Hill. Kenguruse seized the initiative, took off his boots, socks and clambered up the cliff. His daring assault picked a route to the enemy's position from a flank but up a vertical mountain wall. On top of Lone Hill was the enemy in section strength, entrenched in bunkers fashioned from boulders (sangers), and supported by a universal machine gun (UMG). As Kenguruse climbed to the top, he took a hit. "As the commando team scaled the cliff face, it came under intense fire, which caused heavy casualties. The officer sustained a splinter injury in his abdomen. Bleeding profusely yet undeterred, he urged his men to carry on with the displayed conspicuous gallantry, indomitable resolve, grit and determination beyond the call of duty and made the supreme sacrifice in the face of the enemy, in true traditions of the Indian Army," said the official citation for Kenguruse's MVC. A detailed account of Kenguruse's last moments supported by photographs of Lone Hill has been penned by the late Ravindranath in his memoir, 'Kargil War: The Turning Point'. The memoir is supported by first-hand accounts from (later Brigadier) Saxena, the D Company commander under whose command during the night of June 28-29, 1999, were placed Kenguruse's Ghataks. "Kenguruse's daredevil assault: Failing to find a way to Lone Hill, Kenguruse led his troops through a rock face, climbing it with bare feet and hands, and had gained a route to the top, and together, they had fought their way to the top. It was then that the enemy in desperation had pushed the stones down on this team. The rolling stones had swept this team down the precipice at the edge of which Kenguruse's team had gathered to launch a final push to the top. It was a merciless tumble for the team, resulting in the death of Kenguruse and Sharman, whose hands still held the grenade he had intended to throw," wrote Ravindranath. As Kenguruse and Singh plunged off the cliff, Delta Company's reserve platoon under Sub. Sayar Singh was still 500 metres behind. The first light of dawn June 29, 1999, was just an hour away and threatening to rob the assaulting Indian troops of the cover of darkness. It was a critical situation, as assessed by the CO, who had staged well forward into the battle. "Overall, in my assessment, Delta Company had expended itself, and despite the heroic efforts, we had yet to capture Lone Hill or succeed in capturing a tactical foothold," wrote Ravindranath. Ultimately, with the Bofors fire coming in and the 18 Garhwal Rifles launching simultaneous flanking assaults on Point 4700, the enemy panicked and vacated its battlements on Lone Hill, Three Pimples and Knoll, which were the three main objectives of 2 Raj Rif that night. Victory had come, but laced heavily with the taste of salty blood in the mouth.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store