Trump says he turned down invitation to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's island
Trump's remarks were his latest effort to distance himself from the political furore over his administration's handling of files related to Epstein's case and renewed questions over his past relationship with the disgraced financier, who died by suicide in a New York prison in 2019.
'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn it down,'
Trump told reporters during a trip to Scotland. 'In one of my very good moments, I turned it down.'
Epstein owned a private island in the US Virgin Islands where he entertained prominent people from politics, business and entertainment.
Prosecutors have alleged he used the compound to conceal the sex trafficking and abuse of underage victims.
Trump, who socialised with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, also offered new insight into why their relationship ended.
The president said he cut ties after Epstein attempted to recruit staff who worked for Trump.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump says Russia will face sanctions in 10 days if it does not move to end Ukraine war
US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he would start imposing tariffs and other measures on Russia '10 days from today' if Moscow did not make progress towards ending the war in Ukraine. Trump, who first announced on Monday that he was shortening his initial 50-day deadline for action from Moscow, said he had not heard a response from Russia. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Tuesday that Russia is determined to achieve its goals in Ukraine, though he said Moscow has 'taken note' of Trump's announcement and is committed to seeking a peaceful solution. Zelensky welcomed Trump's shortening of the deadline. 'Everyone needs peace – Ukraine, Europe, the United States and responsible leaders across the globe,' he wrote in a post on Telegram. 'Everyone except Russia.' Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump also said he was not worried about the potential impact of Russian sanctions on the oil market or prices, saying the US would boost domestic oil production to offset any impact. Russia's rouble fell further against the dollar and China's yuan on Tuesday, reacting to Trump's setting of the shorter deadline to end the war.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China, US finish Stockholm trade talks with divergence on timing of tariff pause extension
China and the United States have diverged on the timing for another pause on tariff increases, a hurdle that must be cleared before the world's two largest economies reach a trade deal ahead of an August 12 deadline. After their two days of talks in Stockholm, Sweden, Chinese negotiators declared a consensus for an extension of the pause on tariff increases, while the American side insisted that no deal would be final without US President Donald Trump's explicit approval. The Chinese side did not announce any breakthroughs or specify the duration of the extension after the discussions, which marked a third round of high-level trade negotiations between the two countries. 'According to the consensus between China and the US, both sides will continue to push for the continued extension of the pause on the 24 per cent part of the reciprocal tariffs on the US side as well as the countermeasures on the Chinese side,' Li Chenggang, China's vice-minister of commerce, said after the negotiations concluded on Tuesday. In a separate briefing held about an hour later, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the talks as 'constructive' and 'wide-ranging', but denied that any agreement had been completed. He said that nothing would be agreed upon until American negotiators spoke with Trump, now returning to the US from Scotland, where he had opened a new golf course at his Aberdeenshire resort. 'I notice … that the Chinese deputy minister did say that we had agreed on a pause,' Bessent said.
South China Morning Post
12 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Why Asian exporters can't afford a passive approach to US politics
For all the continued dizzying headlines about global tariffs and strategic pauses, one thing remains true: the United States is deploying trade policy not just as economic leverage but as a tool of diplomacy and power. The August 1 deadline for countries, including several in Asia, to negotiate a trade deal or face steep tariffs is no exception. Markets throughout Asia – a region home to some of the most export-reliant economies in the world – are in the crosshairs of US President Donald Trump's 'America first' doctrine. The topic was top of mind at the Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional forum in Kuala Lumpur earlier this month. During the first Trump administration, China faced tariffs that affected a broad range of industries. These continued through the subsequent Biden administration and became embedded in business processes, pricing and distribution. Things are different this time, and the stakes – and the tariffs – are much higher. Trump's constant policy changes related to tariffs offer little relief, and his administration continues to stoke great uncertainty and frustration in global markets and in company boardrooms. For nations whose prosperity depends on steady access to global markets – especially in automobiles, agriculture, manufacturing, textiles and fisheries – tariffs have made conducting business persistently unpredictable. Notably, Trump's new slate of tariffs continues to rock the imported automobiles market , with such global powerhouses as Toyota, Honda and Hyundai feeling the sting. The stakes are no longer confined to profit margins or trade balances; they touch on national reputations, political alliances and long-term viability on the global stage. Yet too often Asian nations respond as if it's still business as usual, which it is not. The geopolitical terrain has shifted and will continue to do so under the current administration. Washington is more than just a diplomatic capital; it's an economic power centre where deals are shaped in the White House, amplified by media echo chambers and driven by electoral calculus. In this environment, silence is a potential vulnerability rather than an expression of neutrality.
